<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | Impeachment Clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/tags/impeachment/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/tags/impeachment/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Berlin i Paryż szukają haka na prezydenta Klausa</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7F3C68CA-6D71-4707-884B-5AC3EB5D5A4C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/darciatko/"&gt;darciatko&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://polskatimes.pl/stronaglowna/172395,berlin-i-paryz-szukaja-haka-na-prezydenta-klausa,id,t.html" title="http://polskatimes.pl/stronaglowna/172395,berlin-i-paryz-szukaja-haka-na-prezydenta-klausa,id,t.html"&gt;polskatimes.pl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Berlin i Paryż szukają haka na prezydenta Klausa&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Francuscy i niemieccy dyplomaci w rozmowach z czeskimi kolegami zaproponowali dwa wyjścia: impeachment lub zmienienie czeskiej konstytucji tak, by odebrać Klausowi prawo weta. - Jeśli prezydent jest przeszkodą w procesie demokratycznym i sprzeciwia się decyzji nie tylko parlamentu, ale także własnych obywateli, łamie prawo i będzie musiał ponieść konsekwencje - powiedział pewien niemiecki dyplomata w rozmowie z "The Sunday Times"
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://polskatimes.pl/stronaglowna/172395,berlin-i-paryz-szukaja-haka-na-prezydenta-klausa,id,t.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:10:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Paul Krugman: The politics of spite</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/85F8041B-23E1-49B7-801E-6559B3B6ADB3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Lexica/"&gt;Lexica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  More:&lt;blockquote&gt;How did one of our great political parties become so ruthless, so willing to embrace scorched-earth tactics even if so doing undermines the ability of any future administration to govern?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The key point is that ever since the Reagan years, the Republican Party has been dominated by radicals — ideologues and/or apparatchiks who, at a fundamental level, do not accept anyone else’s right to govern.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyone surprised by the venomous, over-the-top opposition to Mr. Obama must have forgotten the Clinton years. Remember when Rush Limbaugh suggested that Hillary Clinton was a party to murder? When Newt Gingrich shut down the federal government in an attempt to bully Bill Clinton into accepting those Medicare cuts? And let’s not even talk about the impeachment saga.…&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It’s an ugly picture. But it’s the truth. And it’s a truth anyone trying to find solutions to America’s real problems has to understand.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?hp#" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?hp#"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;There was what President Obama likes to call a teachable moment last week, when the International Olympic Committee rejected Chicago’s bid to be host of the 2016 Summer Games. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“Cheers erupted” at the headquarters of the conservative Weekly Standard, according to a blog post by a member of the magazine’s staff, with the headline “Obama loses! Obama loses!” Rush Limbaugh declared himself “gleeful.” “World Rejects Obama,” gloated the Drudge Report. And so on.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what did we learn from this moment? For one thing, we learned that the modern conservative movement, which dominates the modern Republican Party, has the emotional maturity of a bratty 13-year-old. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;But more important, the episode illustrated an essential truth about the state of American politics: at this point, the guiding principle of one of our nation’s two great political parties is spite pure and simple. If Republicans think something might be good for the president, they’re against it  —  whether or not it’s good for America.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/malice/" rel="tag"&gt;malice&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/spite/" rel="tag"&gt;spite&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/conservatives/" rel="tag"&gt;conservatives&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?hp#</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:47:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Tell Me Lies</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7B36E123-2D2F-46D5-96D5-AF8C216E8B10/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/zizzy/"&gt;zizzy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2229120/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2229120/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2186951/"&gt;The Liberation of Lying&lt;/A&gt;: What Tobias Wolff gets and the frauds don't,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2162409/"&gt;When Congress Makes Your Swear&lt;/A&gt;: Does it matter if Karl Rove and Harriet Miers testify under oath?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2161390/"&gt;How Many Ways Can You Say "Lie"?&lt;/A&gt;: The difference between perjury, false statements, and obstruction of justice,"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2184338/"&gt;Doris Goodwin on Obama's Borrowings&lt;/A&gt;: One of these two people has committed plagiarism, and it isn't Obama,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2131566/"&gt;Secrets and Lies&lt;/A&gt;: The DoD's disgraceful plot to plant rosy stories in the Iraqi press&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2126413/"&gt;To Tell the Truth&lt;/A&gt;: How can you end a relationship with a chronic liar?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2112734/"&gt;Can I Beat a Lie Detector?&lt;/A&gt;: I always tell the truth. But not today&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2087591/"&gt;Liar, Liar&lt;/A&gt;: Liberal writers steal a rhetorical trick from the conservatives&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2083852/"&gt;Meme Watch: A Unified Theory of Bush Lies?&lt;/A&gt;: Why did Bush's tax cut exclude so many low-income families?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/1004809/"&gt;BJU Mystery Solved, Shifty Evangelicals Exposed&lt;/A&gt;,"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/12436/"&gt;Lies, Damned Lies, and Impeachment&lt;/A&gt;: Fine. Now let's go back and impeach Reagan and Bush&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/1002007/"&gt;What Is Clinton's Perjury Defense?&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/lies/" rel="tag"&gt;lies&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fibs/" rel="tag"&gt;fibs&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/deception/" rel="tag"&gt;deception&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/equivocation/" rel="tag"&gt;equivocation&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/truth/" rel="tag"&gt;truth&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/relationships/" rel="tag"&gt;relationships&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/everyone/" rel="tag"&gt;everyone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2229120/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:29:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama Policy Causes Death of American Soldiers</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/117DF11E-7555-4FD3-913A-DC3BF30B4522/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Eaglewings/"&gt;Eaglewings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Once again the Obama administration has shown whose side he is on in our fight against terrorism around the world. No it is not the side of America or the American soldier but rather the side of those who wish us harm. Current Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan have hampered our efforts to rout out Taliban insurgents bent on killing American soldiers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The sooner we rid our country of Islamic sympathizers the better off we will be in the end. Is it too soon to call for IMPEACHMENT of this present administration? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://townhall.com/columnists/DianaWest/2009/09/11/new_strategy_in_afghanistan_protect_everyone_but_americans?page=full" title="http://townhall.com/columnists/DianaWest/2009/09/11/new_strategy_in_afghanistan_protect_everyone_but_americans?page=full"&gt;townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the deaths of four U.S. Marines seemingly by the new rules of engagement (ROE) in Afghanistan. They took place on Tuesday in an ambush against Afghan forces and their U.S. trainers around the village of Ganjgal. There, journalist Jonathan S. Landay of McClatchey Newspapers lived through the deadly firefight to write the following:
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"U.S. commanders, citing new rules to avoid civilian casualties, rejected repeated calls to unleash artillery rounds at attackers dug into the slopes and tree lines -- despite being told repeatedly that they weren't near the village."&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've come a long way -- too long -- from George S. Patton's attributed words as spoken by George C. Scott in the movie "Patton": "I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country."
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/afghanistan/" rel="tag"&gt;afghanistan&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/rules+of+engagement/" rel="tag"&gt;rules of engagement&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://townhall.com/columnists/DianaWest/2009/09/11/new_strategy_in_afghanistan_protect_everyone_but_americans?page=full</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:50:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Obama’s “Czar System” Grounds For Impeachment?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B5B5B3C3-8FED-4CA6-A551-7D109D17578F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/merrie/"&gt;merrie&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Was this what the Framers intended when they created the three branches of our government with all the checks and balances?   &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; I am no lawyer, and obviously not a Constitutional one, but it strikes me there is a problem here. And it could be very embarrassing to Mr. Obama. No doubt this is why, as Byron York points out, the mainstream media has been so reluctant to cover this story, only the WaPo and CBS chiming in at this point, although they were late to the party and relatively perfunctory.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Had Bush appointed thirty-one czars outside the normal Congressional approval system the MSM would have been all over it like the proverbial wet suit, declaring a coup d’etat in the making. But, as of now, the MSM has imposed omerta.  It is Labor Day weekend. We shall see what happens next week.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;UPDATE:  Now that Van Jones has stepped, not surprisingly the NYT has commented " but without any acknowledgment that they had ignored the story. But what is interesting is that . . . .  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2009/09/05/is-obamas-czar-system-grounds-for-impeachment/" title="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2009/09/05/is-obamas-czar-system-grounds-for-impeachment/"&gt;pajamasmedia.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I was completely opposed to impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Reason: the percentage of men who have lied about sex, many of them under oath, is astronomical.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It was basically a private matter.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Barack Obama’s Czar System – which has recently come under scrutiny for some repellent, even paranoid, statements by his “Green Czar” Van Jones, a onetime “9-11 truther” who calls Republicans “assholes” on television – is an entirely different matter.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; According to an article recently published at Examiner.com by &lt;A href="http://www.examiner.com/x-13348-Jacksonville-Republican-Examiner~y2009m9d5-President-Obamas-czars-a-look-at-them-in-light-of-the-Van-Jones-controversy"&gt;Patrick McMahon&lt;/A&gt;, there are now thirty-one of these czars&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Congress has not vetted a single one of them, as far as I know.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Are others as extreme as Mr. Jones?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;All we know is that they are there and that Obama (or someone) approved them.  We don’t know exactly what their authority is and what they are supposed to do ultimately.  They are a completely new part of our Executive Branch, invented by the President and/or his advisors.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitutional+lawyer%3f/" rel="tag"&gt;constitutional lawyer?&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/czars+impeachable+violation+of+constitution%3f/" rel="tag"&gt;czars impeachable violation of constitution?&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/does+0bama+have+a+law+degree/" rel="tag"&gt;does 0bama have a law degree&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/racist+loony+troofer+van+jones/" rel="tag"&gt;racist loony troofer van jones&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2009/09/05/is-obamas-czar-system-grounds-for-impeachment/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:47:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Can Honduras Be Saved From Communism?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/FB9E36E6-3669-4E96-863E-B14E576903C7/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/merrie/"&gt;merrie&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  in order to defend their friend Zelaya. Unfortunately, some authorities in the U.S. have fallen for that version, without really          knowing what went on.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Why is Obama siding with Chavez and Castro on this matter?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I believe that, on the one hand, Obama is beginning to show his socialist          tendencies, which were denounced during the American presidential campaign. On the other hand, Obama is letting himself be influenced by several presidents of Latin America, particularly Lula of Brazil, who is the real power behind  the São Paulo Forum.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Can Honduras be saved from Chavez?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think it can, but it requires the participation of all citizens, not only of Latin America, but of the U.S. as well. Honduras is facing tremendous pressures, and will not be able to bear them without the help of the world         public opinion. Every article, every interview, in favor of the Honduran democracy helps to defend their institutions against Chavez’s assault. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff332.htm" title="http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff332.htm"&gt;www.newswithviews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;UnoAmerica 
        recognized the new Honduran government. Who and what does UnoAmerica represent?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
        UnoAmerica is an Alliance of Latin-American Non Governmental Organizations 
        (NGOs), created to defend democracy and freedom, both currently in danger 
        in our continent. We decided to recognize the new Honduran government 
        because the ousting of President Manuel Zelaya was actually an impeachment. 
        Zelaya wanted to change the Constitution, without the approval of the 
        Supreme Court and the Congress, in order to stay illegally in power. As 
        in all democratic governments, there are three branches of power in Honduras. 
        In this case, the Executive wanted to stage a coup against the Constitution, 
        and the other two powers (Legislative and Judiciary) did not let that 
        happen. It is very simple.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Why is the world allied against the new government?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In part, because of disinformation, and in part, because Hugo Chavez and 
        his allies have been conducting a black propaganda operation against the 
        new government,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/0bama/" rel="tag"&gt;0bama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/communist+leftist+parties+and+terrorist/" rel="tag"&gt;communist leftist parties and terrorist&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/manuel+zelaya+actually+impeached/" rel="tag"&gt;manuel zelaya actually impeached&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pe%26ntilde%3ba+esclusa+critic+of+chavez/" rel="tag"&gt;pe&amp;ntilde;a esclusa critic of chavez&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/sao+paulo+forum/" rel="tag"&gt;sao paulo forum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff332.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:53:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>SC GOP reps to discuss impeaching philandering governor</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/BFD240FF-D73C-46DF-B900-E3FCFD47A766/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jatfla/"&gt;jatfla&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  He needs to be impeached since he has refused to resign.  It's sad that his fellow Party members have to do this.  Now if only those in Washington would impeach those of more serious *crimes* such as fraud, tax evasion, conspiring with our enemies, unlawful use of taxpayers money, etc.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ACEHM00&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=1" title="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ACEHM00&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=1"&gt;www.breitbart.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;SC GOP reps to discuss impeaching philandering gov&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;South Carolina House Republicans are expected to consider Gov. Mark Sanford's fate at their annual gathering this weekend. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; Majority Leader Kenny Bingham says the House Majority Caucus will likely discuss impeachment for Sanford when members meet Saturday in Myrtle Beach. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; Bingham says lawmakers who want Sanford to leave office think he's become a distraction and believe the Legislature needs to focus on economic issues. Any impeachment proceeding likely wouldn't happen until lawmakers return in January. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9ACEHM00&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=1</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:11:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What does single-payer mean?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5A5511D3-8FBB-49C1-9B36-A5F026DE30E6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wes50/"&gt;wes50&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I think this is an explanation of the issues that will appeal to conservatives and liberals alike. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://healthspectator.com/2009/08/24/what-does-single-payer-mean/" title="http://healthspectator.com/2009/08/24/what-does-single-payer-mean/"&gt;healthspectator.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is one of history’s greatest ironies that had Richard Nixon not run afoul of the Watergate scandal, Americans might long ago have obtained universal health care. But thanks to Watergate, Nixon found himself on the path to impeachment and resigned his office. His “sweeping new program” for “comprehsive health insurance” lay dead on the table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
It is another of history’s ironies that Nixon’s successor, President Jimmy Carter, did not have the clout to push through a similar program. I recall sitting with a friend in a bar in New Jersey the same night that John Lennon was shot. A German was expounding on an issue I had never considered before.  “The thing you have to understand about American presidents,” he intoned in his Teutonic accent, “is that they always do the opposite of what you expect them to do. It was Nixon who opened the door to China, and Kennedy and Johnson who got us into the Vietnam war.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Should we deny any veteran&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the very best health care?  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/healthcare/" rel="tag"&gt;healthcare&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/health+care/" rel="tag"&gt;health care&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/single-payer/" rel="tag"&gt;single-payer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/health+insurance/" rel="tag"&gt;health insurance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://healthspectator.com/2009/08/24/what-does-single-payer-mean/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:20:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Senator Ensign: My affair wasn’t ‘legally wrong’</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/85BDA853-B05F-49B7-B150-C2FE40A43C7D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/disenchantedcitizen/"&gt;disenchantedcitizen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Oh, it was just a distraction.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now we see the error in our thinking. You really are a standup guy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32487192/ns/politics-capitol_hill/" title="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32487192/ns/politics-capitol_hill/"&gt;www.msnbc.msn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/disenchantedcitizen/512/AAE2FF7E-4B61-4B03-8E7C-960588A6AED7.jpg" alt="Image: John Ensign" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Sen. John Ensign told The &lt;A class="iAs" classname="iAs" href="#" target="_blank" itxtdid="11726934"&gt;Associated &lt;NOBR id="itxt_nobr_0_0"&gt;Press&lt;IMG src="http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2.gif" name="itxt-icon-77" /&gt;&lt;/NOBR&gt;&lt;/A&gt; on Wednesday that his affair with a friend's wife was different from former President Bill Clinton's relationship with a White House intern because he didn't lie about it under oath.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;"I haven't done anything legally wrong," the Nevada Republican said.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;"President Clinton stood right before the American people and he lied to the American people," Ensign said. "You remember that famous day he lied to the American people, plus the fact I thought he suborned perjury. That's why I voted for the articles of impeachment."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dumbass/" rel="tag"&gt;dumbass&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32487192/ns/politics-capitol_hill/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:13:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Continued Lying by Banks...and BarryO looks the other way</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/485B5827-E804-4447-A4C6-2E0AD3767B09/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/leevardi/"&gt;leevardi&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://market-ticker.org/" title="http://market-ticker.org/"&gt;market-ticker.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H4 class="serendipity_title"&gt;&lt;A href="http://market-ticker.org/archives/1341-Continued-Lying-Requires-TALF-Extension.html"&gt;Continued Lying Requires TALF Extension&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H4&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the news today &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20090817a.htm"&gt;The Federal Reserve announced&lt;/A&gt; that due to the continued lying by banks about asset valuations, a practice that has resulted in ABS and CMBS markets remaining locked up, they are continuing to sponsor and support accounting and control fraud, acts that should be treated as felonies and result in prison sentences:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nonetheless, the markets for asset-backed securities (ABS) backed by consumer and business loans and for commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) are still impaired and seem likely to remain so for some time. To promote the flow of credit to businesses and households and to facilitate the financing of commercial properties, the Federal Reserve and Treasury approved extending TALF loans against newly issued ABS and legacy CMBS through March 31, 2010.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;That Congress and The Obama Administration continue permit this lying is an outrage worthy of impeachment, not continued monetary support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://market-ticker.org/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:40:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Does Obama Know More About the Communist Manifesto or the Constitution?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/619F96B5-9101-4091-A9ED-177FEF0077D8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/The+Infowarrior/"&gt;The Infowarrior&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  His actions speak for themselves. His words are nothing but lies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://westernfrontamerica.com/2009/03/30/obama-communist-manifesto-constitution/" title="http://westernfrontamerica.com/2009/03/30/obama-communist-manifesto-constitution/"&gt;westernfrontamerica.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/image_cache/The Infowarrior/512/E39C7FCC-F49B-4676-B1F5-8FFAE2555319.jpg" alt="obama-socialist" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The President of the  United States forced a CEO out of his position, and nowhere in the Constitution  did the forefathers provide such power.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Obama took an oath just over two months ago to protect and defend the  Constitution of the United States. He is personally destroying it. It’s time to  take this country back through whatever means to insure freedom and liberty for  the children and grandchildren of this country. If it means, impeachment based  on Obama’s hostile takeover of GM, then so be it. Obama’s power is out of  control, and well beyond what is allotted to him. If it means organizing tea  parties to form the second American Revolution, the let’s do it. I refuse to  live under a sickle and hammer because some demagogue was elected President by  lying to the good people of this country about his philosophies and beliefs.  Obama is a communist. This take over of GM is a page out of the Communist  Manifesto. How much longer are we going to let him destroy our country?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/socialism/" rel="tag"&gt;socialism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/communism/" rel="tag"&gt;communism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hostile+takeover/" rel="tag"&gt;hostile takeover&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/general+motors/" rel="tag"&gt;general motors&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/tyranny/" rel="tag"&gt;tyranny&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/corruption/" rel="tag"&gt;corruption&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://westernfrontamerica.com/2009/03/30/obama-communist-manifesto-constitution/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:22:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>US government: the Executive Branch</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/475B0D60-0227-45A5-9044-35D18C7B5E75/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Lexica/"&gt;Lexica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/our_government/executive_branch/" title="http://www.whitehouse.gov/our_government/executive_branch/"&gt;www.whitehouse.gov&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The President is both the head of state and head of government of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The President has the power either to sign legislation into law or to veto bills enacted by Congress, although Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds vote of both houses. The Executive Branch conducts diplomacy with other nations, and the President has the power to negotiate and sign treaties, which also must be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. The President can issue executive orders, which direct executive officers or clarify and further existing laws. The President also has unlimited power to extend pardons and clemencies for federal crimes, except in cases of impeachment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/image_cache/Lexica/512/476E11C3-A791-43BD-AED4-05FF34198AF0.jpg" alt="The White House" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/us-government/" rel="tag"&gt;us-government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.whitehouse.gov/our_government/executive_branch/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:45:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>US government: the Legislative Branch</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0AABE2F2-9D7D-4671-AA95-8C40D3EF7BCE/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Lexica/"&gt;Lexica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/our_government/legislative_branch/" title="http://www.whitehouse.gov/our_government/legislative_branch/"&gt;www.whitehouse.gov&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress. The Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to enact legislation and declare war, the right to confirm or reject many Presidential appointments, and substantial investigative powers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The House has several powers assigned exclusively to it, including the power to initiate revenue bills, impeach federal officials, and elect the President in the case of an electoral college tie.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Senate has the sole power to confirm those of the President's appointments that require consent, and to ratify treaties. There are, however, two exceptions to this rule: the House must also approve appointments to the Vice Presidency and any treaty that involves foreign trade. The Senate also tries impeachment cases for federal officials referred to it by the House.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/image_cache/Lexica/512/45A800EA-2E88-46B8-BCD5-9F915DE1548E.jpg" alt="The Capitol" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/us-government/" rel="tag"&gt;us-government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.whitehouse.gov/our_government/legislative_branch/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:43:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>impeachment of Bill Clinton</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F2EF894E-B45D-423B-B202-2400C4F1863F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/doodleicious/"&gt;doodleicious&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  my bad- how the heck did i zone this one out- thanks for helping me learn something today...lordy- must have just round filed the impeachment thing- due to him being acquitted I guess- I am now un-askew my own darn self-&lt;br/&gt;lol...... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton&amp;oldid=300434994" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton&amp;oldid=300434994"&gt;en.wikipedia.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="firstHeading" id="firstHeading"&gt;Impeachment of Bill Clinton&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="Bill Clinton" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton"&gt;Bill Clinton&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A title="President of the United States" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States"&gt;President of the United States&lt;/A&gt;, was &lt;A title="Impeachment in the United States" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_States"&gt;impeached&lt;/A&gt; by the &lt;A title="United States House of Representatives" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives"&gt;House of Representatives&lt;/A&gt; on December 19, 1998, and acquitted by the &lt;A title="United States Senate" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate"&gt;Senate&lt;/A&gt; on February 12, 1999. The charges, &lt;A title="Perjury" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury"&gt;perjury&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A title="Obstruction of justice" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice"&gt;obstruction of justice&lt;/A&gt;, and &lt;A class="mw-redirect" title="Abuse of power" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_power"&gt;abuse of power&lt;/A&gt; arose from the &lt;A title="Lewinsky scandal" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewinsky_scandal"&gt;Monica Lewinsky scandal&lt;/A&gt; and the &lt;A title="Paula Jones" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones"&gt;Paula Jones&lt;/A&gt; lawsuit. The trial proceedings were largely party-line, with no &lt;A title="Democratic Party (United States)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)"&gt;Democratic&lt;/A&gt; Senators voting for conviction and only five Democratic Representatives voting to impeach. In all, 55 senators voted not guilty, and 45 voted guilty on the perjury charge. The &lt;A title="United States Senate" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate"&gt;Senate&lt;/A&gt; also acquitted on the charge of obstruction, with 50 votes cast as not guilty, and 50 votes as guilty.&lt;SUP class="reference" id="cite_ref-0"&gt;&lt;A href="#cite_note-0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[&lt;/SPAN&gt;1&lt;SPAN&gt;]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SUP&gt; It was only the second impeachment of a President in American history, following the &lt;A title="Impeachment of Andrew Johnson" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Andrew_Johnson"&gt;impeachment of Andrew Johnson&lt;/A&gt; in 1868.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton&amp;oldid=300434994</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:03:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Honduras crisis</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DE12213F-F311-4174-A555-F125409232AD/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/chetler/"&gt;chetler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Complicated Honduran politics &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2222241/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2222241/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the Honduran Constitution does not include an impeachment procedure—Congress is entitled to name a new president only in the absence of the current one. So, rather than bringing Zelaya before a judge to be tried for his criminal misbehavior, the army rousted him out of bed and flew him off to Costa Rica in his pajamas.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2222241/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:57:13 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>