<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | Democrats Clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>USA Running out of Money to build roads/bridges</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2D4EDE84-E497-4DE1-9126-2B87052808C0/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/citizenbfk/"&gt;citizenbfk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I realize economic issues don't have the drama of war but the way Wall Street &amp;amp; Congress has recently transferred TRILLIONS of dollars of debt to the government is astounding.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Wall St. &amp;amp; Congress have risked as much taxpayers money that could have paid for 16 years of *@#$%-over Iraq.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now we can't pay to build or repair our own roads and bridges.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Be sure to notice the clear statement: "Until Friday the White House has been hostile to it." (i.e. hostile to the approval of money for roads and bridges,) --- because already Bush is trying to blame it on the Democrats.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For God's sake, could there be anything more basic to provide for a nation?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Bridges are collapsing. New Orleans is still not rebuilt three years later. Joblessness hits a 5-year high. Wall St. transfers trillions of dollars of bad debt to the government, we're guilty of torture and other war crimes, we've murdered maybe half-a-million Iraqi who had nothing to do with 9/11 or WMD's. bin Laden is still alive an &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/06/us/06highway.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/06/us/06highway.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;NYT_HEADLINE type=" " version="1.0"&gt;
Federal Highway Fund Running Out of Money
&lt;/NYT_HEADLINE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;WASHINGTON  —  An important account in the federal Highway Trust Fund will run out of money this month, which could hamper completion of road and bridge construction projects across the country, Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters said on Friday.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In July, the House passed a bill that would use $8 billion of general federal revenue — from income and other taxes, not the dedicated motor fuel tax  — to finance highway projects. The measure has not gained much traction in the Senate, and until Friday the White House had been hostile to it. But Ms. Peters said on Friday that the administration now endorses the measure, because “immediate action” is required to ensure that the states do not suffer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bridges/" rel="tag"&gt;bridges&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/wall_st./" rel="tag"&gt;wall_st.&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/06/us/06highway.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:54:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Resentment Strategy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/65704615-EA36-4ACE-98D6-DB54A4AC533A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/debbyski/"&gt;debbyski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "What the G.O.P. is selling, in other words, is the pure politics of resentment; you’re supposed to vote Republican to stick it to an elite that thinks it’s better than you.&lt;br/&gt;And when Mr. Bush turned out not to be that smart after all, and his presidency crashed and burned, the angry right — the raging rajas of resentment? — became, if anything, even angrier. Humiliation will do that.&lt;br/&gt;That said, the experience of the years since 2000 — the memory of what happened to working Americans when faux-populist Republicans controlled the government — is still fairly fresh in voters’ minds. Furthermore, while Democrats’ supposed contempt for ordinary people is mainly a figment of Republican imagination, the G.O.P. really is the Gramm Old Party — it really does believe that the economy is just fine, and the fact that most Americans disagree just shows that we’re a nation of whiners.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But the Democrats can’t afford to be complacent. Resentment, no matter how contrived, is a powerful force. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/opinion/05krugman.html?em" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/opinion/05krugman.html?em"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can the super-rich former governor of Massachusetts  —  the son of a Fortune 500 C.E.O. who made a vast fortune in the leveraged-buyout business  —  really keep a straight face while denouncing “Eastern elites”?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can the former mayor of New York City, a man who, as USA Today put it, “marched in gay pride parades, dressed up in drag and lived temporarily with a gay couple and their Shih Tzu”  —  that was between his second and third marriages  —  really get away with saying that Barack Obama doesn’t think small towns are sufficiently “cosmopolitan”?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, they can.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; But don’t be fooled either by Mr. McCain’s long-ago reputation as a maverick or by Ms. Palin’s appealing persona: the Republican Party, now more than ever, is firmly in the hands of the angry right, which has always been much bigger, much more influential and much angrier than its counterpart on the other side.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;What’s the source of all that anger?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/opinion/05krugman.html?em</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:19:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Everyone does better with Dems in the White House</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/43A01084-DF74-43E4-A9D6-AAC416E16795/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Over the last six decades, whether rich or poor, everyone has done better with Democrats in the White House. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.alternet.org/workplace/97645/why_mccain_and_the_gop_are_so_afraid_of_discussing_the_economy/" title="http://www.alternet.org/workplace/97645/why_mccain_and_the_gop_are_so_afraid_of_discussing_the_economy/"&gt;www.alternet.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="storyheadline"&gt;Why McCain and the GOP Are So Afraid of Discussing the Economy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Over the last six decades, whether rich or poor, everyone has done better with Democrats in the White House. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;From 1948 to 2007, the average annual growth of real gross national product was 1.64 percent per capita under Republican presidents versus 2.78 percent under Democrats. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Blinder notes that this 1.14-point difference over eight years would yield 9.33 percent more income per person&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alan S. Blinder, in the &lt;I&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/31/business/31view.html"&gt;New York Times&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;, drew recently from &lt;A href="http://www.powells.com/partner/32513/biblio/9780691136639"&gt;&lt;I&gt;Unequal Democracy&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/A&gt;, a new book by Princeton political science professor Larry M. Bartels. His takeaway could be a game-changer: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;real per capita GNP grew 69.5 percent faster under the Democrats&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Families at the 20th percentile (the poorest) did significantly better under Democrats t&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The best-off families &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;fared almost as well under Republican &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Income inequality&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;trended substantially upward under Republican presidents but slightly downward under Democrats&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/economy/" rel="tag"&gt;economy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republican/" rel="tag"&gt;republican&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrat/" rel="tag"&gt;democrat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.alternet.org/workplace/97645/why_mccain_and_the_gop_are_so_afraid_of_discussing_the_economy/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:06:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Leftists Devote Website to Ridiculing Trig Palin</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2EEB7FC7-E6BB-42CF-A6FF-1DD20F05AC8B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Smoke+TNT/"&gt;Smoke TNT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://moonbattery.com/" title="http://moonbattery.com/"&gt;moonbattery.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daily Kos and Democratic Underground make it difficult for the liberal Nutroots to reach new lows. Yet they always manage. Their latest proud accomplishment is &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://downspalin.blogspot.com/"&gt;I Miss My Mommy&lt;/A&gt;, a website devoted to ridiculing Sarah Palin's son Trig for having Down syndrome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The site makes repeated use of this graphic, evidently meant to represent Trig:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/Smoke TNT/512/75BB64E6-AC55-429D-B5F7-FB4C218E5EF3.jpg" alt="i-miss-my-mommy.jpg" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;A sample of the writing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;How dare you, Camel Brown [i.e., CNN anchor Campbell Brown], asking those bad questions 'bout Mommy and forn polcy. You have no right caus you are media leet. But joke on you, bitch! Wite wing behind Mommy now! Wite wing glavanized!&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Mommy, sorry I say word bitch. I know it bad word, but I hear it from Grampa 'Cain. Yes, he have firey temper but it ok. Everything he do ok. He pee oh dubyou. &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Liberals despise Sarah Palin for not having put Trig to death, so they're unlikely to see any harm in some ridicule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liberals/" rel="tag"&gt;liberals&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pieces+of+shit/" rel="tag"&gt;pieces of shit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://moonbattery.com/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:59:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Marxists/Socialists/Communists for Obama</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/41DD7E96-74CE-457A-A4AE-A2EB1CBA1BE6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Smoke+TNT/"&gt;Smoke TNT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I've noticed that communists are rarely good at 'spalling'. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/group/MarxistsSocialistsCommunistsforObama" title="http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/group/MarxistsSocialistsCommunistsforObama"&gt;my.barackobama.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="journaldescription"&gt;This group is for self-proclaimed Marxists/Communists/Socialists for the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency.  By no means is he a true Marxist, but under Karl Marx's writings we are to support the party with the best interests of the mobilization of the proletariat.  Though the Democratic Socialists of America or the Communist Patty of America may have more Socialististic values, it is pointless to vote for these candidates due to the fact that there is virutally no chance they will be elected on a National level.  The members of this group are not Leninists, Stalinists, etc. and do not support or condone the actions of North Korea, China, Cuba or any other self-procalimed "Marxist States."  They do not in anyway represent the Marxist philosophy nor do they represent Socialism/ Communsim.  We support Barack Obama because he knows what is best for the people!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/communism/" rel="tag"&gt;communism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/socialism/" rel="tag"&gt;socialism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liberals/" rel="tag"&gt;liberals&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/group/MarxistsSocialistsCommunistsforObama</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:52:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Moonbats' #1 Reason to Vote for Obama</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0FC87F99-72F1-40AA-B8C8-C479BA81BC4B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Smoke+TNT/"&gt;Smoke TNT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://moonbattery.com/" title="http://moonbattery.com/"&gt;moonbattery.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might be wondering how anyone could possibly plan to vote for Barack Obama, an arrogant but utterly unqualified, inexperienced extremist who has spent his entire life surrounded by unsavory fanatics who hate America. For Gary Kamiya, the answer is simple, as he explained earlier this year in &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2008/02/26/obama/"&gt;Salon.com&lt;/A&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;I admit it: I'm voting for Barack Obama because he's black. […] I believe that most of Obama's supporters are voting for him for the same reason. Like me, they're drawn to his idealism, his youthful energy, his progressive politics. But it's his blackness that seals the deal.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;And that's OK. In fact, it's wonderful. […]&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Obama's blackness is his indispensable asset. Without it, he would not have a snowball's chance in hell of being elected president.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;That last sentence is certainly true.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liberals/" rel="tag"&gt;liberals&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/race/" rel="tag"&gt;race&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://moonbattery.com/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:46:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Memo to President Obama 2010</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/24F368A0-2185-43AD-A395-2954AA4E7088/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/ColoradoRight/"&gt;ColoradoRight&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Politically, we have not seen the benefits of a filibuster proof majority in the Senate. It seems that every Democratic Senator has decided that if you could become President they could too. Considering that they are all more qualified than you, all of them are now also running for President - with the exception of Senator Schumer, who seems to be running for the position of God. He believes that is his appropriate pay grade, since no one else has it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=2279" title="http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=2279"&gt;www.thepeoplescube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/ColoradoRight/512/4805BD5A-1F53-42EB-BB7A-DFA4BAE8EF77.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;31 OCTOBER, 2010 &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;Mr. President: &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;First the good news: your approval ratings have jumped dramatically in the last two weeks. You are now at 15% approval which is your highest in the last eighteen months. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; The restoration of the Fairness Doctrine has enabled us better to manage the information coming out about the various problems of the Administration. The New York Times is continuing to work with us on getting your message out to their 86 subscribers, who are behind you 100% of the time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Jamming continues against Rush Limbaugh's pirate ships that are broadcasting from offshore and Mexico, but your directives to use only alternative energy reduce their ability to jam his signals to just a few yards from the antennae.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Internationally, our emissaries continue to seek out anyone from the former terrorist group Al Qaeda to apologize for putting Boston in the path of their nuclear weapon.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/barack+obama/" rel="tag"&gt;barack obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/president/" rel="tag"&gt;president&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=2279</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:43:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Word cloud of Democrats and Repulicans</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AB35CC50-339A-4F4A-A82B-C6A2F7556357/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/magicaldroplets/"&gt;magicaldroplets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/09/04/us/politics/20080905_WORDS_GRAPHIC.html" title="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/09/04/us/politics/20080905_WORDS_GRAPHIC.html"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/magicaldroplets/512/DDA9880E-97E4-42DE-8C00-CACB15E27D0D.gif" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The words that speakers used at the two political conventions show the themes that the parties have highlighted. Republican speakers have talked about reform and character far more frequently than the Democrats.  
And Republicans were more likely to talk about businesses and taxes, while Democrats were more likely to mention jobs or the economy. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/09/04/us/politics/20080905_WORDS_GRAPHIC.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:59:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Scott Ritter Rips Obama and McCain on War Policy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DC69B6E8-71DA-4A19-8F34-9D6E35530F9E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Powerful refutation of McCain and Obama's assessment of Iran and the "war on terrorism" in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the way it is being portrayed to the public.  Democrats in particular should see that Obama and McCain's policies (now) are very close, and not based upon credible threats, much like Iraq.  (Ritter is a republican and former Marine and the former UN weapons inspector in Iraq.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you listen on REAL video or audio his &lt;b&gt;interview begins at the 42:10 mark.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This same podcast also includes excerpts from Ron Paul's counter-convention. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/3/fmr_un_weapons_inspector_scott_ritter" title="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/3/fmr_un_weapons_inspector_scott_ritter"&gt;www.democracynow.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2 class="segment"&gt;Fmr. UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter on the RNC, Joe Biden and the Possibility of an Attack on Iran&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In these last few months of the Bush administration, as we continue to discuss the war in Iraq and the possibility of an attack on Iran, we turn to a man who was a UN weapons inspector inside Iraq in the 1990s: Scott Ritter. We speak with Ritter about Iran, Joe Biden’s role in the lead-up to the Iraq invasion and much more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;table background="undefined" bgcolor=""&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
  &lt;TD class="labels"&gt;
    &lt;H4&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/3/stream"&gt;LISTEN&lt;BR /&gt;WATCH&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H4&gt;
  &lt;/TD&gt;
  &lt;TD valign="top"&gt;
    &lt;DIV class="formats"&gt;
      &lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="real_video" href="http://play.rbn.com/?url=demnow/demnow/demand/2008/sept/video/dnB20080903a.rm&amp;proto=rtsp"&gt;Real Video Stream&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
      &lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="real_audio" href="http://play.rbn.com/?url=demnow/demnow/demand/2008/sept/audio/dn20080903.ra&amp;proto=rtsp" interclue-click-count="1"&gt;Real Audio Stream&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
      &lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="mp3_download" href="http://media.switchpod.com/users/democracynow/ftp/dn2008-0903-1.mp3"&gt;MP3 Download&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
      &lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="plus" href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/3/stream"&gt;More…&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
    &lt;/DIV&gt;
  &lt;/TD&gt;
  &lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mccain/" rel="tag"&gt;mccain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/iran/" rel="tag"&gt;iran&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war+on+terrorism/" rel="tag"&gt;war on terrorism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/scott+ritter/" rel="tag"&gt;scott ritter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/un+weapons+inspector/" rel="tag"&gt;un weapons inspector&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/3/fmr_un_weapons_inspector_scott_ritter</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:51:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Palin's weaknesses may be irrelevant</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4A3C95EF-8FC5-421C-9550-BAF58F7FA029/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  And why Democrats (including me!) miss the point when they campaign against them. Thought-provoking!  This clip just grazes the surface of a very important article. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://files.tikkun.org/current/article.php?story=20080904070242463" title="http://files.tikkun.org/current/article.php?story=20080904070242463"&gt;files.tikkun.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the Palin nomination is not basically about external realities and what Democrats call "issues,"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The Republicans can't win on realities. Her job is to speak the language of conservatism, activate the conservative view of the world&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Our national political dialogue is fundamentally metaphorical, with family values at the center&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Conservative family values are strict and apply via metaphorical thought to the nation: good vs. evil, authority, the use of force, toughness and discipline, individual (versus social) responsibility, and tough love&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Palin is the mom in the strict father family&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Yes, the McCain-Palin ticket is weak on the major realities. But it is strong on the symbolic dimension of politics that Republicans are so good at marketing&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;But such truths may nonetheless be largely irrelevant to this campaign. That is the lesson Democrats must learn&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;initial Democratic response to Palin&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;based on realities alone&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;indicates that many Democrats have not learned the lessons of the Reagan and Bush years&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://files.tikkun.org/current/article.php?story=20080904070242463</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:41:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Juglar cycle, long wave, and Democrats</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/66245B38-EB04-4C65-A4A4-729932ACEE7E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/deb2012/"&gt;deb2012&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/kondratyev/message/30482" title="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/kondratyev/message/30482"&gt;tech.groups.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I have a theory about why markets do so well when Democrats are in&lt;BR&gt;power, 
besides the obvious influences of Juglar cycles and the long&lt;BR&gt;wave, which work 
regardless of politics. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Democrats tend to put more money in the hands of more people. They do&lt;BR&gt;this by 
raising taxes on the wealthy while cutting them for lower wage&lt;BR&gt;earners, as 
well as raising minimum wages, etc. Let's look at Obama's&lt;BR&gt;proposal - let the 
Bush tax cuts expire and cut taxes for families&lt;BR&gt;earning $250,000 or less per 
year. Now you have two groups. Millions&lt;BR&gt;of lower wage earners who have more 
money and thousands of higher&lt;BR&gt;earners who have less. Which group is likelier 
to spend the extra&lt;BR&gt;money, thus boosting the economy, and which group would be 
likelier to&lt;BR&gt;hide extra wealth in some offshore account? My theory is that 
even&lt;BR&gt;the wealthy who are subject to higher taxation would more than 
offset&lt;BR&gt;the increase in taxes by investing in the growing economy supported 
by&lt;BR&gt;those with new found money.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Why are there rich liberals?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/investing/" rel="tag"&gt;investing&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/stock+market+cycles/" rel="tag"&gt;stock market cycles&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/taxes/" rel="tag"&gt;taxes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/kondratyev/message/30482</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:28:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RNC Picks Up $1 Million After Palin Speech, Obama picks up $8 million!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F38BC349-AB5C-4A33-B886-404D314CDC29/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/ratilfar/"&gt;ratilfar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I like that ratio 8:1, and from grassroots net donors. Nice! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/09/04/donations-pour-in-to-rnc-after-palin-speech/" title="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/09/04/donations-pour-in-to-rnc-after-palin-speech/"&gt;blogs.wsj.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Sarah Palin&lt;/STRONG&gt;’s speech to the convention Wednesday night energized conservatives, allayed concerns of some nervous party insiders – and inspired excited Republicans to donate a cool $1 million to the Republican National Committee’s effort to elect &lt;STRONG&gt;John McCain&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;UPDATE:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Bloomberg &lt;A target="blank" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/afxhgfvhhbtc&amp;printer=1;_ylt=AvEjfK3XtvNUREJ1RlG6oZ2pg9IF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;reported&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt; that Palin’s speech was even better for Democrats–&lt;STRONG&gt;Barack Obama &lt;/STRONG&gt;has raised $8 million since Wednesday’s speech. “Sarah Palin’s attacks have rallied our supporters in ways we never expected,” Obama campaign spokesman &lt;STRONG&gt;Bill Burton &lt;/STRONG&gt;said. “And we fully expect John McCain’s attacks tonight to help us make our grassroots organization even stronger.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mccain/" rel="tag"&gt;mccain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/contributions/" rel="tag"&gt;contributions&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/donations/" rel="tag"&gt;donations&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/money/" rel="tag"&gt;money&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/oops/" rel="tag"&gt;oops&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/09/04/donations-pour-in-to-rnc-after-palin-speech/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:49:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>It's Back</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B2C7B002-33D2-4EF7-AF69-EBA58ACE47D5/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/pecksnif/"&gt;pecksnif&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Democrats pushing for Obama's ouster from ticket over his birth status.  USA!   I'm dying here boss. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.com/" title="http://curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.com/"&gt;curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;&lt;BIG&gt;&lt;BIG&gt;&lt;BIG&gt;IT'S BACK!&lt;/BIG&gt;&lt;/BIG&gt;&lt;/BIG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;table background="undefined" bgcolor=""&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The COLB&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/pecksnif/512/7D97AACF-14B8-4A37-88C3-E815B0837E5E.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I'm
dying here boss.  Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Philadelphia
Democrat who filed a lawsuit in federal court, claiming  .. well
Hell, you know.   His website, &lt;A href="http://obamacrimes.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://obamacrimes.com/&lt;/A&gt;, offers a full menu of fun facts, accusations, and screed.  The &lt;SPAN&gt;New York Times &lt;/SPAN&gt;owned &lt;SPAN&gt;Times Herald&lt;/SPAN&gt; is currently running &lt;A href="http://www.timesherald.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20089295&amp;BRD=1672&amp;PAG=461&amp;dept_id=33380&amp;rfi=6" target="_blank"&gt;Born in the USA?&lt;/A&gt;.  So, the question for some democrats isn't "&lt;A href="http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?referrerid=&amp;t=299915" target="_blank"&gt;Should Obama replace Biden&lt;/A&gt;?," but "Should we replace Obama?"&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/colb/" rel="tag"&gt;colb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.com/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:05:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Westmoreland calls Obama ‘uppity'</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0B50880A-6832-4BE1-80D1-764D462F3796/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/tabsey/"&gt;tabsey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Absolutely amazing. To speak in such a snobbish/old money way, would not be tolerated at this level by Australians. A part of the culture that should be changed. And to further show ignorance, L W is shepherded into a world of name calling. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/" title="http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/"&gt;www.michaelmoore.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Georgia Republican Rep. Lynn Westmoreland used the racially-tinged term "uppity" to describe Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama Thursday.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Westmoreland was discussing vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin's speech with reporters outside the House chamber and was asked to compare her with Michelle Obama.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
"Just from what little I’ve seen of her and Mr. Obama, Sen. Obama, they're a member of an elitist-class individual that thinks that they're uppity," Westmoreland said.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Asked to clarify that he used the word “uppity,” Westmoreland said, “Uppity, yeah.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Other Democrats have charged that the Republican campaign to paint the Illinois senator as an “elitist” is racially charged, and accused them of using code words for “uppity” without using the word itself.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
In August, Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.) told reporters, “When I hear the word ‘elitist’ linked with Barack Obama, to me, that is a code word for 'uppity.' I find it extremely offensive and John McCain should know better.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:52:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>McCain is he talking to US or warning his 2nd wife ?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/41AFD509-2A74-48E4-B4BA-2222CC7F3F3B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jt3600/"&gt;jt3600&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Everyone riding the Palin speech, I found nothing in it ,as a matter of fact it was like watching a bad porn , waiting for the "money shot" that never happened ,apparently her daughter got that ,oh but we're not suppose to talk about that after all it not like her last name is "SPEARS"! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1928744420080904?feedType=nl&amp;feedName=usmorningdigest" title="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1928744420080904?feedType=nl&amp;feedName=usmorningdigest"&gt;www.reuters.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;McCain to take stage at Republican convention&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/jt3600/512/0C8567EA-765E-4625-9CD5-5B2FD71DC148.jpg" alt="Photo" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;ST. PAUL (Reuters) - Republican &lt;A title="Full Election 2008 coverage of John McCain's campaign" href="http://www.reuters.com/news/globalcoverage/johnmccain"&gt;John McCain&lt;/A&gt; promised Americans on Thursday that "change is coming" to Washington if he is elected president on November 4 and he pledged to overcome partisan rancor by working with Democrats.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/jt3600/512/F6F67EC2-B360-4CBC-A347-15735F221577.jpg" alt="Video Thumbnail" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a year in which Americans are thirsting for change, McCain sought to co-opt the message of change offered by his Democratic opponent, Illinois Sen. &lt;A title="More on Barack Obama's campaign for the 2008 Election" href="http://www.reuters.com/news/globalcoverage/barackobama"&gt;Barack Obama&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;McCain's campaign released excerpts of his speech accepting his party's nomination for president. He was to deliver the speech at about 10:30 p.m. EDT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1928744420080904?feedType=nl&amp;feedName=usmorningdigest</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:55:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>