<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | Cosmology Clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/tags/cosmology/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/tags/cosmology/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Ancient Hebrew Cosmology</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E72B0351-4DE0-40AA-A382-3380777D9822/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/risatalogo/"&gt;risatalogo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Ancient Hebrew cosmology as illustrated by Michæl.Paukner:&lt;br/&gt;  &lt;br/&gt;The preceding description of the world doesn't share the same scientific view that we have, in which the Earth is one planet around one sun in a universe full of suns and planets. The ancient picture of the universe portrays a world in which the Earth is a disc surrounded by water not only on the sides, but underneath and above as well. A firm bowl (the firmament) keeps the upper waters back but has gates to let the rain and snow through. The Sun, Moon, and stars move in fixed tracks along the underside of this bowl. From below the disc, the waters break through as wells, rivers and the ocean, but the Earth stands firm on pillars sunk into the waters like the pillings of a pier. Deep below the Earth is Sheol, the abode of the dead, which can be entered only through the grave.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As portrayed in the illustration, the biblical cosmos consisted of three basic regions: the heavens, the land, and the underworld. In conclusion &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelpaukner/4077736695/" title="http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelpaukner/4077736695/"&gt;www.flickr.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/risatalogo/512/A683DACE-4428-4EDA-8C32-811450D70A97.jpg" alt="Ancient Hebrew Cosmology by Michæl.Paukner." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hebrew+cosmology/" rel="tag"&gt;hebrew cosmology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelpaukner/4077736695/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:57:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The life of Albert Einstein - </title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/851A260C-569E-4870-8AB2-43668AEB757D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/murieleileen/"&gt;murieleileen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  He is best known for his theory of relativity and specifically mass-energy equivalence, E = mc2. Einstein received the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfDzLzMYs0w" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfDzLzMYs0w"&gt;www.youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The life of Albert Einstein - part 1&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Einstein's many contributions to physics include his special theory of relativity, which reconciled mechanics with electromagnetism, and his general theory of relativity, which extended the principle of relativity to non-uniform motion, creating a new theory of gravitation. His other contributions include relativistic cosmology, capillary action, critical opalescence, classical problems of statistical mechanics and their application to quantum theory, an explanation of the Brownian movement of molecules, atomic transition probabilities, the quantum theory of a monatomic gas, thermal properties of light with low radiation density (which laid the foundation for the photon theory), a theory of radiation including stimulated emission, the conception of a unified field theory, and the geometrization of physics.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOVCxO43bpk&amp;feature=related" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOVCxO43bpk&amp;feature=related"&gt;www.youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The life of Albert Einstein - part 2&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4natV9IlXac&amp;feature=related" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4natV9IlXac&amp;feature=related"&gt;www.youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The life of Albert Einstein - part 3&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgCRXSVXayw&amp;feature=related" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgCRXSVXayw&amp;feature=related"&gt;www.youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The life of Albert Einstein - part 4&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRPpuI5VIGI&amp;feature=related" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRPpuI5VIGI&amp;feature=related"&gt;www.youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The life of Albert Einstein - part 5&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/albert+einstein+.+physics/" rel="tag"&gt;albert einstein . physics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfDzLzMYs0w</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:40:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Universie Today - The Stats are In: No Global Cooling</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/21A40767-FE84-4D5E-AE05-84EEAB05C7DB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/heartlandinstitute/"&gt;heartlandinstitute&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/10/26/the-stats-are-in-no-global-cooling/" title="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/10/26/the-stats-are-in-no-global-cooling/"&gt;www.universetoday.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;A title="The Stats Are In:  No Global Cooling" href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/10/26/the-stats-are-in-no-global-cooling/"&gt;The Stats Are In:  No Global Cooling&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yet, as we see in the news there are those who want alternatives to Darwinian theory (solidly established in its basic form) as well as cosmology.  Global warming does not impact the theology of a deity, but it does impact the theology of the dollar.  So there is a lot of investment in creating noise and confusion on the matter.  This is not too different from the tobacco industry's "Tobacco Institute," meant to make counter claims against cancer links and to generate noise and a smoke screen to protect profits from the industry.  We have been seeing similar trends, with the Heartland Institute and others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/heartland+institute/" rel="tag"&gt;heartland institute&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/environment/" rel="tag"&gt;environment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/10/26/the-stats-are-in-no-global-cooling/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:09:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stephen Hawking steps down as Lucasian professor at Cambridge</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/398FE4F7-FA14-4771-B54A-F2656C43DB7B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/infidel70/"&gt;infidel70&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090930/science/science_eu_britain_hawking" title="http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090930/science/science_eu_britain_hawking"&gt;ca.news.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;EM class="timedate"&gt;Wed Sep 30, 12:41 PM&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
LONDON - Physicist Stephen Hawking stepped down Wednesday as Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge University after 30 years in the post.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The roughly 350-year-old position has been held by such luminaries as Isaac Newton and Charles Babbage, one of the fathers of modern computing. It is customary for professors to retire from the post the year they turn 67.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Hawking, who reached that age in January, will continue to work at the university as director of research at a department dealing with applied mathematics and theoretical physics.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
"This is an exciting time in cosmology with new observational results coming in thick and fast and large-scale terrestrial and satellite experiments underway," Hawking said in a statement. "I want to make sure this progress is matched by the development of theories of the universe which are both mathematically consistent and observationally testable."
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090930/science/science_eu_britain_hawking</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:48:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Olber's Paradox</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/89AD056E-F4FA-4440-AC52-91AB7296C44E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/willhelm/"&gt;willhelm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Olbers%27_paradox&amp;oldid=314668775" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Olbers%27_paradox&amp;oldid=314668775"&gt;en.wikipedia.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In &lt;A title="Astrophysics" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysics"&gt;astrophysics&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A title="Physical cosmology" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_cosmology"&gt;&lt;YOONO-HIGHLIGHT class="yoono-link-hover" keywords="physical cosmology"&gt;physical cosmology&lt;/YOONO-HIGHLIGHT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;B&gt;Olbers' paradox&lt;/B&gt;, is the argument that the darkness of the &lt;YOONO-HIGHLIGHT class="yoono-link-hover yoono-link-active-link" keywords="night sky"&gt;night sky&lt;/YOONO-HIGHLIGHT&gt; conflicts with the assumption of an infinite and eternal &lt;A title="Static universe" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_universe"&gt;static universe&lt;/A&gt;. It is one of the pieces of evidence for a non-static universe such as the current &lt;A title="Lambda-CDM model" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model"&gt;Big Bang model&lt;/A&gt;. The argument is also referred to as the "&lt;B&gt;&lt;YOONO-HIGHLIGHT class="yoono-link-hover yoono-link-active-link" keywords="dark night"&gt;dark night&lt;/YOONO-HIGHLIGHT&gt; sky paradox&lt;/B&gt;" The paradox states that at any angle from the earth the sight line will end at the surface of a star. To understand this we compare it to standing in a forest of white trees. If at any point the vision of the observer ended at the surface of a tree, wouldnt the observer only see white? This contradicts the darkness of the night sky and leads many to wonder why we do not see only light from stars &lt;YOONO-HIGHLIGHT class="yoono-link-hover yoono-link-active-link" keywords="in the night"&gt;in the night&lt;/YOONO-HIGHLIGHT&gt; sky.(see &lt;A title="Physical paradox" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_paradox"&gt;physical paradox&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Olbers%27_paradox&amp;oldid=314668775</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:06:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Redshift</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/85ACBCD9-6CBC-4DD2-B878-88C8E661706D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/robm47/"&gt;robm47&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This could change your notion that the redshift of stars equals velocity. In fact, it challenges the notion of the Big Band theory itself!  The redder the object, the younger it is. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm" title="http://www.electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm"&gt;www.electric-cosmos.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;FONT size="3" face="Arial, Helvetica" color="yellow"&gt;Halton Arp&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/image_cache/robm47/512/28D87345-3BE7-40D5-9E8E-0DB03CDBC8EB.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica"&gt;Because of Arp's photos, the assumption that high red shift objects have
	to be very far away - on which the "Big Bang" theory and all of "accepted cosmology" is based
	- is proven to be wrong!  The Big Bang theory is therefore falsified.&lt;/FONT&gt;
	&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica"&gt;The final irrefutable 
	falsification of the "Redshift equals distance"
	assumption is the following image of galaxy NGC 7319 (Redshift = 0.0225). The small object indicated by the arrow
	is a quasar (Redshift z = 2.11) This observation of a quasar &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/image_cache/robm47/512/90AF3904-F508-49DB-B472-675526B8FD6F.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica"&gt;In fact, a higher magnification image of the quasar (below) shows a "jet"
	of matter extending out from the center of NGC 7319 toward the quasar.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/image_cache/robm47/512/6597B432-262E-41CE-9D26-64ED871E5D5F.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
	&lt;FONT size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica"&gt;So, Arp is correct in his contention 
	that redshift is caused mainly by an object's being young, and only 
	secondarily because of its velocity.  Therefore, quasars are not the 
	brightest, most distant and rapidly moving things in the observed universe - 
	but they are among the youngest.   &lt;/FONT&gt;
	&lt;FONT size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica" color="yellow"&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:45:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A new cosmology</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0B94869B-F52F-41C7-8780-11BB96EDCABC/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/robm47/"&gt;robm47&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The Electric Universe states that the Big Bang never happened, that the universe is predominately electric in nature and that black holes, dark matter and pixie dust aren't real. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=wxse6f8q" title="http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=wxse6f8q"&gt;www.holoscience.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Unlike big bang cosmology, plasma cosmology 
											is subject to experimental tests in the laboratory and follows 
											the Lichtenberg experimental tradition. Any 'bangs' it creates are 
											real and noisy. Plasma cosmology can demonstrate with simple physical 
											principles the electrical formation and behavior of spiral galaxies 
											and stars without recourse to hypothetical dark matter and black holes.
											&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The plasma cosmologist Eric Lerner, author of &lt;EM&gt;The Big Bang never 
											Happened&lt;/EM&gt;, says:
											&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
												&lt;EM&gt;... one of the most 
												destructive features of the methodology of the big bang is that it conveys 
												the idea that only people versed in extremely complicated mathematics can 
												understand the universe… This is, of course, the argument of the emperor's 
												new clothes. If you can't see the emperor's new clothes you must be either 
												stupid or incompetent.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Engineers are neither stupid nor incompetent.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;And it 
											is engineers who tend to prefer the real-world simplicity of the Electric 
											Universe to the metaphysics of the big bang and black holes.
										&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=wxse6f8q</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A theory of dark matter</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D0C08D08-AB25-49EA-B5B0-B9F52B0515C4/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/splendidus/"&gt;splendidus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  via @Spaceweaver &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.physorg.com/news171640779.html" title="http://www.physorg.com/news171640779.html"&gt;www.physorg.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/splendidus/512/D28A1A73-E8AF-454C-B1B1-72F2AE57C269.jpg" alt="A Theory of Dark Matter" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Dark matter is unseen matter -- unseen in the sense that it emits no detected &lt;A class="textTag" rel="tag" href="http://www.physorg.com/tags/electromagnetic+radiation/"&gt;electromagnetic radiation&lt;/A&gt; (light, &lt;A class="textTag" rel="tag" href="http://www.physorg.com/tags/radio+waves/"&gt;radio waves&lt;/A&gt;, etc) -- but it has been definitively spotted nonetheless because its &lt;A class="textTag" rel="tag" href="http://www.physorg.com/tags/gravity/"&gt;gravity&lt;/A&gt; has measurable effects on stars, things that we can see.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;CfA scientist Douglas Finkbeiner, together with three of his colleagues, has published a new paper&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;There are only four known forces in the world: the familiar gravitational and electromagnetic forces&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the so-called strong and weak forces&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;So far as we know, these are the only forces there are, and scientists have generally supposed that these four will ultimately explain the dark sector as well&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In working out their self-consistent theory of &lt;A class="textTag" rel="tag" href="http://www.physorg.com/tags/dark+matter/"&gt;dark matter&lt;/A&gt;, the scientists find that a new, fifth force of nature is implied.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;they argue that it is in fact a relatively straightforward solution&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;appears to solve a number of independent problem&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;subsequent research can now either contradict ... or confirm&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cosmology/" rel="tag"&gt;cosmology&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dark+matter/" rel="tag"&gt;dark matter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/universe/" rel="tag"&gt;universe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.physorg.com/news171640779.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:39:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>inverse gambler's fallacy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/271DEE17-0373-4A31-9C2F-892B5F1EBE04/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/skwirlinator/"&gt;skwirlinator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inverse_gambler%27s_fallacy&amp;oldid=294159502" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inverse_gambler%27s_fallacy&amp;oldid=294159502"&gt;en.wikipedia.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The &lt;B&gt;inverse gambler's fallacy&lt;/B&gt; is a term coined by philosopher &lt;A title="Ian Hacking" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Hacking" linkindex="3"&gt;Ian Hacking&lt;/A&gt; to refer to a &lt;A title="Formal fallacy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy" linkindex="4"&gt;formal fallacy&lt;/A&gt; of &lt;A title="Bayesian inference" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_inference" linkindex="5"&gt;Bayesian inference&lt;/A&gt; which is similar to the better known &lt;A title="Gambler's fallacy" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacy" linkindex="6"&gt;gambler's fallacy&lt;/A&gt;. It is the fallacy of concluding, on the basis of an unlikely outcome of a &lt;A class="mw-redirect" title="Random" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random" linkindex="7"&gt;random&lt;/A&gt; process, that the process is likely to have occurred many times before. For example, if one observes a pair of fair &lt;A title="Dice" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice" linkindex="8"&gt;dice&lt;/A&gt; being rolled and turning up double sixes, it is wrong to suppose that this lends any support to the hypothesis that the dice have been rolled before. We can see this from the Bayesian update rule: letting &lt;I&gt;U&lt;/I&gt; denote the unlikely outcome of the random process and &lt;I&gt;M&lt;/I&gt; the proposition that the process has occurred before, we have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/image_cache/skwirlinator/512/5E8D1563-6CE4-4AB4-8013-EE0C8D96921B.png" alt="P(M|U) = P(M) \frac{P(U|M)}{P(U)}" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;and since &lt;I&gt;P&lt;/I&gt;(&lt;I&gt;U&lt;/I&gt;|&lt;I&gt;M&lt;/I&gt;) = &lt;I&gt;P&lt;/I&gt;(&lt;I&gt;U&lt;/I&gt;) (the outcome of the process is unaffected by previous occurrences), it follows that &lt;I&gt;P&lt;/I&gt;(&lt;I&gt;M&lt;/I&gt;|&lt;I&gt;U&lt;/I&gt;) = &lt;I&gt;P&lt;/I&gt;(&lt;I&gt;M&lt;/I&gt;); that is, our confidence in &lt;I&gt;M&lt;/I&gt; should be unchanged when we learn &lt;I&gt;U&lt;/I&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;I&gt;No Inverse Gambler's Fallacy in Cosmology.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/inverse+gambler's+fallacy/" rel="tag"&gt;inverse gambler's fallacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/random/" rel="tag"&gt;random&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/process/" rel="tag"&gt;process&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/repeat/" rel="tag"&gt;repeat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inverse_gambler%27s_fallacy&amp;oldid=294159502</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:31:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>anthropic principle</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7874C391-DF48-4375-8D5E-7B07554AA970/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/skwirlinator/"&gt;skwirlinator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthropic_principle&amp;oldid=312030784" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthropic_principle&amp;oldid=312030784"&gt;en.wikipedia.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In &lt;A title="Physics" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics" linkindex="5"&gt;physics&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A title="Cosmology" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology" linkindex="6"&gt;cosmology&lt;/A&gt;, the &lt;B&gt;anthropic principle&lt;/B&gt; is the collective name for several ways of asserting that physical and &lt;A title="Chemistry" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry" linkindex="7"&gt;chemical&lt;/A&gt; theories, especially &lt;A title="Astrophysics" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysics" linkindex="8"&gt;astrophysics&lt;/A&gt; and cosmology, need to take into account that there is life on Earth, and that one form of that life, &lt;I&gt;&lt;A class="mw-redirect" title="Homo sapiens" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens" linkindex="9"&gt;Homo sapiens&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;, has attained rationality. The only kind of universe humans can occupy is one that is similar to the current one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The anthropic principle has given rise to some confusion and controversy, partly because the phrase has been applied to several distinct ideas. All versions of the principle have been accused of undermining the search for a deeper physical understanding of the universe. Those who invoke the anthropic principle often invoke multiple universes or an &lt;A title="Intelligent designer" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_designer" linkindex="24"&gt;intelligent designer&lt;/A&gt;, both controversial and criticised for being &lt;A title="Falsifiability" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability" linkindex="25"&gt;untestable&lt;/A&gt; and therefore outside the purview of accepted science.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Weak anthropic principle (WAP)&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Strong anthropic principle (SAP)&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Strong self-sampling assumption (SSSA)&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/anthropic+principle/" rel="tag"&gt;anthropic principle&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/unique/" rel="tag"&gt;unique&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/life/" rel="tag"&gt;life&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cosmos/" rel="tag"&gt;cosmos&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthropic_principle&amp;oldid=312030784</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:21:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Suicidal planet seems on death spiral into star</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F57C98BD-7EC1-48AE-8AF1-4A1E902C9000/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/skwirlinator/"&gt;skwirlinator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://apnews.myway.com//article/20090826/D9AAMKG81.html" title="http://apnews.myway.com//article/20090826/D9AAMKG81.html"&gt;apnews.myway.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Suicidal planet seems on death spiral into star&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The odd, fiery planet is so close to its star and so large that it is triggering tremendous plasma tides on the star. Those powerful tides are in turn warping the planet's zippy less-than-a-day orbit around its star.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The result: an ever-closer tango of death, with the planet eventually spiraling into the star.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The star is called WASP-18 and the planet is WASP-18b because of the Wide Angle Search for Planets team that found them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The planet is 1.9 million miles from its star, 1/50th of the distance between Earth and the sun, our star. And because of that the temperature is about 3,800 degrees.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Its size - 10 times bigger than Jupiter - and its proximity to its star make it likely to die, Hellier said.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
WASP group: &lt;A href="http://www.superwasp.org/" linkindex="30"&gt;http://www.superwasp.org/&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Nature: &lt;A href="http://www.nature.com/nature" linkindex="29"&gt;http://www.nature.com/nature&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The answer will become apparent in less than a decade if the planet seems to be further in a death spiral, he said.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/suicidal+planet+seems+on+death+spiral+into+star/" rel="tag"&gt;suicidal planet seems on death spiral into star&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cosmology/" rel="tag"&gt;cosmology&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/planets/" rel="tag"&gt;planets&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://apnews.myway.com//article/20090826/D9AAMKG81.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:38:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Atheist Turns To God</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5379E973-C873-4FC1-8E42-3595821A7DB2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/ideacreamanuela/"&gt;ideacreamanuela&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  g05 12/8 p. 28 Watching the World  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://jwitness-nonofficialwebsiteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/08/beware-atheists-can-be-reformed.html" title="http://jwitness-nonofficialwebsiteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/08/beware-atheists-can-be-reformed.html"&gt;jwitness-nonofficialwebsiteblogger.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;A British philosophy professor who has been called “the world’s most influential 
atheist” now says that he believes in God. In an online preview of an interview 
scheduled to be published in the journal Philosophia Christi, 81-year-old Dr. 
Antony Flew said that he “had to go where the evidence leads.” According to 
Flew, this evidence includes recent scientific discoveries in the fields of 
cosmology and physics. Additionally, “the findings of more than fifty years of 
DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormously powerful argument 
to design,” he explained. Even the “biblical account [of Genesis chapter one] 
might be scientifically accurate,” he states. So, is he ready to become a 
practicing Christian? “It’s very unlikely,” he says. However, “if I wanted any 
sort of future life I should become a Jehovah’s Witness.”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheist/" rel="tag"&gt;atheist&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/professor/" rel="tag"&gt;professor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/jehovah's+witness/" rel="tag"&gt;jehovah's witness&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bible/" rel="tag"&gt;bible&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://jwitness-nonofficialwebsiteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/08/beware-atheists-can-be-reformed.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:26:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Little Physics, A Little Song and Dance</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/CE43D585-E876-48FD-81E6-3E96FE6E1259/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mcsmithblack/"&gt;mcsmithblack&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  On my good days, I "get" around 33% of what Rob B. talks about, but that's OK. I just love being in it over my head! It keeps the wonder in my life. Hope you like.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2009/08/expanding-4d-sphere.html" title="http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2009/08/expanding-4d-sphere.html"&gt;imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="header" class="header section"&gt;&lt;DIV id="Header1" class="widget Header"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="header-inner"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="titlewrapper"&gt;
&lt;H1 class="title"&gt;
&lt;A href="http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/"&gt;Imagining the Tenth Dimension&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/H1&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="descriptionwrapper"&gt;
&lt;P class="description"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a new way of thinking about time and space ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ by Rob Bryanton
 --author and research scientist David Jay Brown says: "one of the most brilliantly-conceived and mind-stretching books that I've ever encountered".
 --science fiction author Greg Bear says: "a fascinating excursion into the multiverse - clear, elegant, personal and provocative"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;it has been said that the observable universe is many orders of magnitude smaller than the greater universe that lies beyond the limits of our perception.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Imagine that the entire cosmological horizon is modeled by a sphere that is the diameter of a quarter (24.26 mm in diameter). If Alan Guth's inflationary model of early era cosmology is correct, the universe that lies beyond this “quarter-sized” horizon would conservatively be a sphere as large as the Earth globe itself.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2 class="title"&gt;Many of the great physicists have said that "time is an illusion". In the same sense, does that mean the big bang is an illusion?&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2009/08/expanding-4d-sphere.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:25:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Chaos</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/76C54085-1624-40F1-95DF-5B5A92C42FF1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/DazuPrime/"&gt;DazuPrime&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaos_(mythology)&amp;oldid=306714631" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaos_(mythology)&amp;oldid=306714631"&gt;en.wikipedia.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Later on Chaos was described as an original state of existence from which the first gods appeared. In other words, the dark void of space.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In &lt;A title="Greek language" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_language"&gt;Greek&lt;/A&gt; it is &lt;I&gt;Χάος,&lt;/I&gt; which in ancient Greek was pronounced &lt;SPAN class="IPA" title="Pronunciation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)"&gt;&lt;A title="Wikipedia:IPA" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IPA"&gt;[ˈkʰa.os]&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;. It means "gaping void", from the verb χαίνω "gape, be wide open, etc", &lt;A title="Proto-Indo-European language" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language"&gt;Proto-Indo-European&lt;/A&gt; *"ghen-", *"ghn-"; compare English "chasm" and "yawn", &lt;A class="mw-redirect" title="Old English language" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_English_language"&gt;Old English&lt;/A&gt; &lt;I&gt;geanian&lt;/I&gt; = "to gape".&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Ancient Greek &lt;A title="Cosmology" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology"&gt;cosmology&lt;/A&gt;, Chaos was the first couple of things to exist and the womb from which everything emerged. For &lt;A title="Hesiod" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesiod"&gt;Hesiod&lt;/A&gt; and the Olympian &lt;A title="Mythos" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythos"&gt;mythos&lt;/A&gt;, Chaos was the 'vast and dark' void from which the possible first deity, &lt;A title="Gaia (mythology)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_(mythology)"&gt;Gaia&lt;/A&gt;, emerged. In the &lt;A title="Pelasgians" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelasgians"&gt;Pelasgian&lt;/A&gt; creation myth, &lt;A title="Eurynome" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurynome"&gt;Eurynome&lt;/A&gt; ('goddess of everything') emerged from this Chaos and created the Cosmos from it&lt;SUP title="This claim needs references to reliable sources from February 2007" class="noprint Template-Fact"&gt;[&lt;I&gt;&lt;A title="Wikipedia:Citation needed" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed"&gt;citation needed&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;]&lt;/SUP&gt;. For &lt;A title="Orphism" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orphism"&gt;Orphics&lt;/A&gt;, it was called the 'Womb of Darkness' from which the &lt;I&gt;&lt;A title="World egg" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_egg"&gt;Cosmic Egg&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt; that contained the Universe emerged. It is sometimes conflated with 'Black Winged Night'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaos_(mythology)&amp;oldid=306714631</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:25:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The End of Everything</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/1273D2C0-D5DC-44C5-93CC-F7EB8D3F7334/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/thisnamecantbetaken/"&gt;thisnamecantbetaken&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  End of Cosmology – 3 trillion years from now.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;End of Stars – 100 trillion years from now.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The End of Regular Matter – 10 to the power of 30 years from now.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;End of Black Holes – 10 to the power of 100 years from now.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The End of Everything – 10 to the power of 100 years and beyond.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Perhaps there will be another Big Bang someday. Perhaps the Universe is cyclical and the whole process will start up again.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Perhaps it won't, and this bleak future of a cold, dead Universe is all that awaits us. It's not happy, but it's awe inspiring to consider the long future ahead, and helps us appreciate the vibrant age we live in today. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.universetoday.com/2007/07/25/the-end-of-everything/" title="http://www.universetoday.com/2007/07/25/the-end-of-everything/"&gt;www.universetoday.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;A title="The End of Everything" href="http://www.universetoday.com/2007/07/25/the-end-of-everything/"&gt;The End of Everything&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Let's really think big, stare forward in time, and think about what the future holds for &lt;A rel="external" title="" class="alinks_links" href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/the-universe/"&gt;the Universe&lt;/A&gt;. Look forward millions, trillions, and even 10&lt;SUP&gt;100&lt;/SUP&gt; years into the future. Let's consider the end of everything.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/image_cache/thisnamecantbetaken/512/5C9591FA-E519-446D-A5AA-7F73342C1708.jpg" alt="The Dark Ages, not a single star shines anywhere in the Universe." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;End of Humanity&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The vast majority of every species that has ever lived on &lt;A rel="external" title="" class="alinks_links" href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/earth/"&gt;Earth&lt;/A&gt; is now extinct. To think that humans can avoid the fate of every other creature is arrogant. Like all life on Earth, our time is limited. How long will we last? &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;There's no way to know, but there's a calculation that can help. It's called the Doomsday Argument&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;10,000 years&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; there's a 95% chance that humanity will have ended by the year 11,000.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;End of Life – 500 million years – 5 billion years&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;That's because the Sun is slowly heating up. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Over the course of the next few billion years, evolution will seem to go reverse. The largest organisms and least heat tolerant animals will die out, leaving hardy insects and bacteria. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;End of the Earth – 7.5 billion years&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/image_cache/thisnamecantbetaken/512/474728A3-4DF8-493C-B6E3-C2818BAA32D5.jpg" alt="Red giant Betelgeuse. Image credit: Hubble Space Telescope" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;End of the Sun – 7.5 billion&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/thisnamecantbetaken/512/6A9CBB0D-BA01-4837-976F-CD3C4D27ABE6.jpg" alt="Ring Nebula. A vision of our Sun" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/image_cache/thisnamecantbetaken/512/60DAEC05-D46A-4F2D-A677-5A21A82E71A9.jpg" alt="Artist impression of a disk of material around a white dwarf star. Image credit: Gemini Observatory" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.universetoday.com/2007/07/25/the-end-of-everything/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:16:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>