<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | wildcat's 'evolution' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/search/evolution/sort/latest-pops/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/search/evolution/sort/latest-pops/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Kluge: The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/02308E5E-A55B-4C5C-A2A2-523F23D27D56/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;br/&gt;Trial-and-error evolution&lt;br/&gt;According to Gary Marcus's Kluge our brains are an engineering nightmare, says Steven Rose&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/may/31/scienceandnature" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/may/31/scienceandnature"&gt;www.guardian.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fallibility of the human mind is a source of continual frustration to philosophers, artificial intelligencers and evolutionary psychologists. Our memories are weak, we are credulous and easily led to believe improbable or impossible things, our language is not optimally constructed. We have problems with probabilities, and are logically inconsistent. We make choices that are apparently irrational and not in our own best long-term interests, and certainly not in those of our genes. Thus - according to Marcus - we prefer instant gratification to the chance of greater, longer-term benefits. We get drunk, embark on non-procreative sex for mere pleasure, and may even sacrifice our lives for some perceived cause that has nothing to do with increasing our inclusive (genetic) fitness.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;His chapter on language as a kluge, full of grammatical and linguistic incongruities, is particularly strong, although his basic argument is almost drowned in a flood of examples&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/kluge/" rel="tag"&gt;kluge&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/human+mind/" rel="tag"&gt;human mind&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/book+review/" rel="tag"&gt;book review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/may/31/scienceandnature</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:57:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Animal Intelligence and the Evolution of the Human Mind</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C2DD9A5E-07C9-4340-8E6E-9496F73A96F8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Subtle refinements in brain architecture, rather than large-scale alterations, make us smarter than other animals &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=intelligence-evolved&amp;sc=WR_20080902" title="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=intelligence-evolved&amp;sc=WR_20080902"&gt;www.sciam.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/EE24A6F9-45AF-4433-9052-464B5000ED3B.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The human brain lacks conspicuous characteristics—such as relative or absolute size—that might account for humans’ superior intellect.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Researchers have found some clues to humanity’s aptitude on a smaller scale, such as more neurons in our brain’s outermost layer.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Human intelligence may be best likened to an upgrade of the cognitive capacities of nonhuman primates rather than an exceptionally advanced form of cognition.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as we know, no dog can compose music, no dolphin can speak in rhymes, and no parrot can solve equations with two unknowns. Only humans can perform such intellectual feats, presumably because we are smarter than all other animal species—at least by our own definition of intelligence.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of course, intelligence must emerge from the workings of the three-pound mass of wetware packed inside our skulls&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Thus, researchers have tried to identify unique features of the human brain that could account for our superior intellectual abilities&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/brain/" rel="tag"&gt;brain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mind/" rel="tag"&gt;mind&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/intelligence/" rel="tag"&gt;intelligence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=intelligence-evolved&amp;sc=WR_20080902</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:50:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Zombification Of Philosophy (Of Mind)</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4D8907C0-DE91-46FB-8DC0-5D2DFE6C8F90/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Massimo Pigliucci is Professor in the Departments of Ecology &amp;amp; Evolution and of Philosophy at Stony Brook University, NY. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;an interesting view , go read it &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.scientificblogging.com/rationally_speaking/the_zombification_of_philosophy_of_mind" title="http://www.scientificblogging.com/rationally_speaking/the_zombification_of_philosophy_of_mind"&gt;www.scientificblogging.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Apple-style-span"&gt;David Chalmers is a famous philosopher of mind. His fame rests in great part on his 1996 book, &lt;A href="http://www.amazon.com/Conscious-Mind-Search-Fundamental-Philosophy/dp/0195117891/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1217366980&amp;sr=8-1" linkindex="167" set="yes"&gt;The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory.&lt;/A&gt; It’s too bad that the crucial idea behind the book, dualism, is hopelessly flawed, and -- more surprising yet -- that Chalmers got away with one of the most idiotic thought experiments ever, which a lot of people inexplicably seem to think is oh-so-very clever. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Let us start by recalling what dualism is: in philosophy the idea traces back at least to Descartes (though some would consider Plato a dualist), and his contention that while everything else in humans and animals is “mechanical” (i.e., made of matter), the mind is an exception, since it’s made of some kind of distinct mind stuff (he was pretty vague about exactly what this mind stuff might be, and so is Chalmers, incidentally&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; I think a lot of scientists do a disservice to themselves and to the public by not taking philosophy seriously&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/calmers/" rel="tag"&gt;calmers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/zombies/" rel="tag"&gt;zombies&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/philosophy/" rel="tag"&gt;philosophy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/consciousness/" rel="tag"&gt;consciousness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.scientificblogging.com/rationally_speaking/the_zombification_of_philosophy_of_mind</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:06:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Where Is Human Evolution Heading?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/15608FE7-42D0-41E3-8A38-2CFFF8A1370D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The race's DNA is changing faster than ever; what it means for our descendants &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/science/2008/07/24/where-is-human-evolution-heading.html" title="http://www.usnews.com/articles/science/2008/07/24/where-is-human-evolution-heading.html"&gt;www.usnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you judge the progress of humanity by Homer Simpson, Paris Hilton, and &lt;EM&gt;Girls Gone Wild&lt;/EM&gt; videos, you might conclude that our evolution has stalled—or even shifted into reverse. Not so, scientists say. Humans are evolving faster than ever before, picking up new genetic traits and talents that may help us survive a turbulent future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/20BCD8E4-2AE1-4E8A-89A0-5FD2EEB0024D.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Much remodeling has gone on since the dawn of agriculture about 10 millenniums ago. "People who lived 10,000 years ago were much more like Neanderthals than we are like those people," says John Hawks, a professor of anthropology at the University of Wisconsin. "We've changed."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Hawks is among a growing number of scientists who are using whole-genome sequencing and other modern technologies to zero in on just how we've changed. Their research is helping illuminate not only how humans became what we are but also where we might be headed&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Humans will continue to change to cope with new diseases, if history is any guide&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dna/" rel="tag"&gt;dna&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mutations/" rel="tag"&gt;mutations&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.usnews.com/articles/science/2008/07/24/where-is-human-evolution-heading.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:21:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Evolutionary Game Theory And The Mathematics Of Altruism</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6F85D474-860A-4D58-9EF2-EC3972B03F29/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  A fascinating example of cooperation we have right here at CM &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.scientificblogging.com/amorca/evolutionary_game_theory_and_the_mathematics_of_altruism" title="http://www.scientificblogging.com/amorca/evolutionary_game_theory_and_the_mathematics_of_altruism"&gt;www.scientificblogging.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why do humans cooperate in things as diverse as environment conservation or the creation of fairer societies, even when they don’t receive anything in exchange or, worst, they might even be penalized? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a question that has puzzled academics Why do humans cooperate in things as diverse as environment conservation or the creation of fairer societies, even when they don’t receive anything in exchange or, worst, they might even be penalized? This is a question that has puzzled academics for centuries, especially since in evolution the basis for the “survival of the fittest” is, after all, selfishness. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;But in an article just published in the journal Nature, three Portuguese theoretical physicists developed a mathematical model capable of providing a way out from this conundrum through the introduction of social diversity&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the act of cooperation may depend on one’s social context/ranking&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;when social diversity was taken into account&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the numbers of those cooperating increased&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolutionary/" rel="tag"&gt;evolutionary&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/game+theory/" rel="tag"&gt;game theory&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mathematics/" rel="tag"&gt;mathematics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/altruism/" rel="tag"&gt;altruism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.scientificblogging.com/amorca/evolutionary_game_theory_and_the_mathematics_of_altruism</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:02:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Death of HAL –the Evolving Digital Ecosystem</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EFB6157C-DC19-4062-9AB0-24D5FD0870B8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/the-death-of-ha.html" title="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/the-death-of-ha.html"&gt;www.dailygalaxy.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/AFA53E65-B57C-4083-BFE7-7A346934FA82.jpg" alt="Artificialintelligence_2_2" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the greatest fears of many is the underlying knowledge that, all the wonderful advances of technology, the internet and robotics is simply bringing us closer to being subservient to our robotic overlords. It is essentially a historical imperative, and we can see it coming a mile away. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;However British Computer Society President and ECS Professor of Artificial Intelligence Nigel Shadbolt, believes differently. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Instead of intelligence that is a “brain in a box”, we are seeing
intelligence that is assistive, adaptive and flexible. They are helping
us “drive our cars, diagnose disease and provide opponents in computer
games.”&lt;BR /&gt;In other words, instead of an intelligence that is
“…agonizing about their existence or whether we are about to switch
them off” we are seeing the growth of intelligence that, in years to
come, will immerse us and center around humans, rather than feel the
need to enslave humans. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“What is emerging now is a digital ecosystem,’&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/ai/" rel="tag"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/digital+ecosystem/" rel="tag"&gt;digital ecosystem&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/the+net/" rel="tag"&gt;the net&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/the+grid/" rel="tag"&gt;the grid&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/the-death-of-ha.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:07:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Future Human: The Evolution of Immediate Emotion </title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8AD96446-6CE5-4491-AB4A-1E99719A1F43/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Humans, apparently, are still in the early stages of evolving extended response mechanisms. But it seems likely that by the time we portion more of our brain to long-term dangers, there will be few grizzly bears around to worry about, and a whole lotta global warming. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-05/future-human-evolution-immediate-emotion" title="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-05/future-human-evolution-immediate-emotion"&gt;www.popsci.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="dek"&gt;
       Why a grizzly gets you shivering—but not global warming    &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/36D126D5-A38D-4793-843D-E4E9B0185417.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my Science Confirms the Obvious &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-05/science-confirms-obvious-sometimes-we-act-without-thinking" linkindex="37"&gt;post today&lt;/A&gt;, I discussed the first psychological proof (so say the authors) that humans can indeed experience emotions without immediately knowing why. We do this, they say, because we evolved that way. True, scientists love that explanation, but here it’s quite intriguing. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; “After all, you are likely to live longer if you immediately stop moving at the sight of a growling grizzly bear,”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“and do not need full awareness for such a response to be instigated.” Given the flood of unexpected stimuli we face moment to moment, quick reactions make sense for survival.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;You, that bear, and other animals experience emotions such as fear, anger, or disgust. But only a few species are aware of their emotions. This ability helps humans judge and respond to the behavior of others in order to navigate social situations and, ultimately, grease the wheels of complex society.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/future/" rel="tag"&gt;future&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/human/" rel="tag"&gt;human&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/immediate+emotion/" rel="tag"&gt;immediate emotion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-05/future-human-evolution-immediate-emotion</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:23:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Life's Increasing Complexity Spurred Evolution of Human Brain</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/3B6F3642-F317-40FD-AFE7-821BFEB5687B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/lifes-increasin.html" title="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/lifes-increasin.html"&gt;www.dailygalaxy.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/112749C3-C6F6-45E2-BA5A-A6CADF20FDDD.jpg" alt="Watergirl_2" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whether it be a week ago, or a couple of thousand years ago, humans have always needed split second thinking to avoid life threatening situations. Whether it would be a sudden and cataclysmic encounter with a semi-truck, or a similar encounter with a disgruntled lion, quick thinking has always been necessary.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;But we don’t always need split second thinking; sometimes we just need to take in all the information, and process it. Slowly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
According to new research from the University of Bristol, lead by Pete
Trimmer, and published Tuesday in the Proceedings of the Royal Society
B., those two types of thinking are completed by two separate areas of
our brains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
For a long time scientists have believed that mammals have two decision
making systems in their brains, each one operating at different speeds
depending on the situation around them. Trimmer’s research shows that
the older, more instinctual and thus less accurate thinking may have
helped shape the more recent, methodical thinking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/brain/" rel="tag"&gt;brain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/thought/" rel="tag"&gt;thought&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/lifes-increasin.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:47:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CULTURAL EVOLUTION</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/15924B10-4988-4E46-AAB9-5BA20DAAE0D8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  We are finally starting to understand the patterns of culture change and the role of natural selection in shaping them. And since everything from weapons of mass destruction to global heating are the results of changes in human culture over time, acquiring a fundamental understanding of cultural evolution just might be the key to saving civilization from itself. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/06/cultural_evolution.php" title="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/06/cultural_evolution.php"&gt;www.seedmagazine.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="deck"&gt;Does human culture evolve via natural selection, as our genes do?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/51CE5A6F-D0BE-431D-A8BD-52FFE54E732F.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Biologists have a pretty good idea of both how flies become resistant to DDT and how humans and primates have diverged over time. That's because the mechanism underlying these processes is the same. Using evolution we can understand how organisms generally change their stores of genetic information (DNA and RNA), alter their observable characteristics, and diversify. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;We do not understand how cultures evolve nearly so well. The majority of human evolution &lt;I&gt;does not&lt;/I&gt; involve changes in our DNA, but rather alterations in the gigantic library of nongenetic information, the culture, that our species possesses. This library is orders of magnitude larger than that of our genetic information, and the elements on its diverse shelves usually have meaning only in connection with other elements. Indeed, there has been a long, bitter debate about whether it is sensible even to use the term &lt;I&gt;evolution&lt;/I&gt; to describe changes in culture&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/culture/" rel="tag"&gt;culture&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/06/cultural_evolution.php</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:35:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mechanism and function of humor identified by new evolutionary theory</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/9B10D8B3-5A06-487E-B79B-60F9869A0422/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.physorg.com/news133783972.html" title="http://www.physorg.com/news133783972.html"&gt;www.physorg.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="Preview"&gt; 
A new publication answers centuries' old questions regarding the mechanism and function of humour, identifying the reason humour is common to all human societies, its fundamental role in the evolution of homo sapiens and its continuing importance in the cognitive development of infants.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; 
Alastair Clarke explains: "The theory is an evolutionary and cognitive explanation of how and why any individual finds anything funny. Effectively it explains that humour occurs when the brain recognizes a pattern that surprises it, and that recognition of this sort is rewarded with the experience of the humorous response, an element of which is broadcast as laughter.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"By removing stipulations of content we have been forced to study the structures underlying any instance of humour, and it has become clear that it is not the content of the stimulus but the patterns underlying it that provide the potential for sources of humour.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/humor/" rel="tag"&gt;humor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/human+society/" rel="tag"&gt;human society&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.physorg.com/news133783972.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:11:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Expansion of Consciousness</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F8C0D5AF-D053-4C97-823F-96C87C5DA18B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://brainmeta.com/index.php?p=expandconsciousness" title="http://brainmeta.com/index.php?p=expandconsciousness"&gt;brainmeta.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;&lt;A href="http://brainmeta.com/index.php?p=philosophy"&gt;&lt;I&gt;We are the Universe conscious of Itself&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Introduction&lt;/B&gt;

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The evolution and expansion of consciousness is inevitable.  With the expansion of consciousness comes new ways of seeing reality.  Everything changes.  You see things that you never could of conceived of before.  Old philosophies and religions suddenly appear naive and give way to a far more profound understanding.  Most religions and philosophies will not last long, simply because it is inevitable that a profound transformation in our consciousness, in our way of understanding and interacting with reality, is going to soon take place.  It is inevitable because that is the direction that consciousness is headed. 



&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;A few of us have chosen to make consciousness our 'game', in all of its forms and degrees of intensity, as well as its neural basis, modification, manipulation, and expansion&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/consciousness/" rel="tag"&gt;consciousness&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://brainmeta.com/index.php?p=expandconsciousness</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:33:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>“What is Life?” Evolution of Robots is Causing Scientists to Question</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/1755B27E-8EA5-4D89-8290-3ADC1F6E5095/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  “Robots are not human, but humans aren’t the only things that have emotions,” she said. “The question for robots is not, Will they ever have human emotions? Dogs don’t have human emotions, either, but we all agree they have genuine emotions. The question is, what are the emotions that are genuine for the robot?” &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/what-is-life-ev.html" title="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/what-is-life-ev.html"&gt;www.dailygalaxy.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/9FC0A95B-3D19-424F-8615-B15E417AD9A4.jpg" alt="Robot2_2" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is ongoing debate about what constitutes life.
Synthetic bacteria for example, are created by man and yet also alive.
Some go so far as to say that robot “emotions” may already have
occurred—that current robots have not only displayed emotions, but in
some ways have experienced them.

&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;“We’re all machines,” says Rodney Brooks author of “Flesh and
Machines,” and former director of M.I.T.’s Computer Science and
Artificial Intelligence Laboratory,  “Robots are made of different
sorts of components than we are — we are made of biomaterials; they are
silicon and steel — but in principle, even human emotions are
mechanistic.” A robot’s level of a feeling like sadness could be set as
a number in computer code, he said. But isn’t a human’s level of
sadness basically a number, too, just a number of the amounts of
various neurochemicals circulating in the brain? Why should a robot’s
numbers be any less authentic than a human’s?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/robotics/" rel="tag"&gt;robotics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/intelligence/" rel="tag"&gt;intelligence&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/life/" rel="tag"&gt;life&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/07/what-is-life-ev.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:04:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Novelty drives choice behavior in humans</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7238E3F2-F15B-46CD-8ABF-4C53E564D738/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.physorg.com/news133617911.html" title="http://www.physorg.com/news133617911.html"&gt;www.physorg.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="Preview"&gt; 
New research suggests that novelty drives choice behavior , even when the degree of familiarity with an option is completely unrelated to choice outcome. The research, published by Cell Press in the June 26th issue of the journal &lt;I&gt;Neuron&lt;/I&gt;, reveals fascinating insights into the brain mechanisms that underlie the tendency to explore, and even value, unfamiliar options.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; 
Novelty seeking can be strongly adaptive because unfamiliarity tends to be associated with uncertainty and the potential for valuable outcomes. "It can be advantageous for an animal to explore new parts of its environment because it might find valuable sources of food there," says study author Dr. Bianca C. Wittmann from University College London. In humans, this tendency is often exploited by manufacturers of everyday goods when they remarket identical products with novel packaging or advertising,
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/novelty/" rel="tag"&gt;novelty&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/behavior/" rel="tag"&gt;behavior&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/adaptaton/" rel="tag"&gt;adaptaton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.physorg.com/news133617911.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:14:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Neural implant learns with the brain</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6B4945A9-7491-40CF-AF09-F2F2F4ACC9F7/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/06/researchers-develop-neural-implant-that.html" title="http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/06/researchers-develop-neural-implant-that.html"&gt;nextbigfuture.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/786ABA13-4CF6-4727-A2E9-5E9E46578801.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A target="blank" href="http://www.news.health.ufl.edu/news/story.aspx?ID=5103" linkindex="6"&gt;University of Florida researchers have taken the concept of brain machine interfaces a step further, devising a way for computerized devices not only to translate brain signals into movement but also to evolve with the brain as it learns.&lt;/A&gt; This is a huge step forward to transhuman and technological singularity goals. The computer and the user co-evolve to learn to work together more effectively.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Until now, brain-machine interfaces have been designed as one-way conversations between the brain and a computer, with the brain doing all the talking and the computer following commands. The system UF engineers created actually allows the computer to have a say in that conversation, too, according to findings published this month online in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers journal IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"In the grand scheme of brain-machine interfaces, this is a complete paradigm change,"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/brain/" rel="tag"&gt;brain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/neaural+implant/" rel="tag"&gt;neaural implant&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/06/researchers-develop-neural-implant-that.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:22:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The One Machine</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/BC997515-5541-40B6-A25B-79DAA3EA53B1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Tap Into the 12-Million-Teraflop Handheld Megacomputer &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.wired.com/special_multimedia/2008/st_infoporn_1607" title="http://www.wired.com/special_multimedia/2008/st_infoporn_1607"&gt;www.wired.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Never mind Web 3.0:&lt;/STRONG&gt; The next stage in technological evolution is a single worldwide computer. Collectively, we are already assembling this megacomputer from our billions of Net-connected PCs, cell phones, PDAs, and the like. As an increasing number and variety of devices are lashed to one another via the Internet and other communication systems, they form the components of what we might call the One Machine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its circuit board encompasses the million copper wires and radio connections linking all the chips contained in the gadgets in your pocket, office, and car. Instead of being powered by a mere billion tiny transistors, as your typical personal desktop is, it runs on a billion PC chips, each with its own billion transistors. Its memory is the collective hard disks and flash drives of the world. Its RAM is the sum of all memory chips online. Every second, a Library of Congress worth of data flows through it. The program it runs — its initial OS — is the World Wide Web.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/tech+evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;tech evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/megacomputer/" rel="tag"&gt;megacomputer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/connectivity/" rel="tag"&gt;connectivity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.wired.com/special_multimedia/2008/st_infoporn_1607</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:44:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>