<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | wildcat's evolution collection</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/collection/evolution/sort/most-pops/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/collection/evolution/sort/most-pops/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Comprehension Climbs When You Slooooow Doooown</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F41123FE-D357-4086-9B01-03B135D70A2A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  clipversity, where art though? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-05/gs_12slowdown" title="http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-05/gs_12slowdown"&gt;www.wired.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/C455F584-D31E-447C-97E5-EB4386C67C48.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;It should take&lt;/STRONG&gt; you two and a half seconds to read this sentence. Any faster and you won't absorb its meaning. The motor response of the retina, and the time it takes the image of a word to travel from the macula to the thalamus to the visual cortex for processing, limits the eye to about 500 words a minute. (That's peak efficiency; the average college student can expect a rate about half that.) "There is no such thing as speed reading," says Keith Rayner a cognitive psychologist at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst. "Not if your definition of reading is comprehending text." Studies show that fast readers fare worse than slower ones when questioned about the text. So, to get smarter, slow down. It's even OK to move your lips.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/brain/" rel="tag"&gt;brain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/reading/" rel="tag"&gt;reading&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/slowing+down/" rel="tag"&gt;slowing down&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/comprehension/" rel="tag"&gt;comprehension&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-05/gs_12slowdown</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:54:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thought control: it's the computer world's latest game plan</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/418AC79B-99B3-4DF8-A4BD-2900FA4B27DC/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  “This is the tip of the iceberg for what is possible,” said Tan Le, another of Emotiv's co-founders, during a recent press demonstration. “There will be a convergence of gesture-based technology and the brain as a new interface - the Holy Grail is the mind.”  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/gadgets_and_gaming/article4354041.ece" title="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/gadgets_and_gaming/article4354041.ece"&gt;technology.timesonline.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/8D11474E-CFD4-4A66-AB73-6485B4861912.jpg" alt="undefined" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;First came the joystick. Then came the motion-sensing Wii remote. Now get
ready for another radical and rather unsettling leap in video games
technology: thought control. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Satoru Iwata, the president and chief executive of Nintendo - which is
expected to sell about 25million units of its successful Wii video games
console this financial year - has no doubts about the next gaming boom. “As
soon as we think something in our brain, it will appear within a video
game,” he told The Times in an exclusive interview.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“You'll probably need to wear some kind of hat or helmet or something.”
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;As far-fetched as it sounds, Mr Iwata's claim - which brings to mind the plot
of Craig Thomas's bestselling 1977 novel Firefox, about a mind-reading
Soviet fighter aircraft - is already coming true: the world's first
thought-controlled game is expected to be launched by the Sydney company
Emotiv by the end of this year.
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gaming/" rel="tag"&gt;gaming&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/neuroscience/" rel="tag"&gt;neuroscience&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mind/" rel="tag"&gt;mind&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/emotiv/" rel="tag"&gt;emotiv&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/gadgets_and_gaming/article4354041.ece</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:44:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Einstein, Newton displayed autistic traits</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/06B6B4D5-40AE-4146-A967-F3AC82FA52FB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "Psychiatry tends to focus almost exclusively on the negative side of different forms of mental illness," Fitzgerald said in statement. "I want to show that psychiatric disorders can also have positive dimensions." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.physorg.com/news123084642.html" title="http://www.physorg.com/news123084642.html"&gt;www.physorg.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="Preview"&gt; 
Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton displayed symptoms of psychiatric disorders that may have been a key to their genius, a Dublin psychiatrist said. 
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; 
Michael Fitzgerald, Professor of Psychiatry at Trinity College, Dublin, said characteristics linked to autism spectrum disorders such as Asperger's syndrome are the same as those associated with creative genius, The Daily Telegraph said.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Fitzgerald, author of the book, "Genius Genes: How Asperger Talents Changed the World," said Enoch Powell and Charles de Gaulle both appear to have had Asperger's syndrome.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Speaking at a meeting of the Royal College of Psychiatrists' Academic Psychiatry, Fitzgerald said De Gaulle's Asperger's syndrome was critical to his success. He was aloof, had a massive memory, lacked empathy with other people, and was extremely controlling and dominating.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Isaac Newton was known to work non-stop for days and Einstein worked in a patent office because he was too disruptive to get a university job, the newspaper said.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/einstein/" rel="tag"&gt;einstein&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/newton/" rel="tag"&gt;newton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/genius/" rel="tag"&gt;genius&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/creativity/" rel="tag"&gt;creativity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.physorg.com/news123084642.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:10:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Faster than the Speed of Light? VSL Theory Says, "Yes"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F453B543-75B4-406B-95BB-8C982E0D092C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/04/faster-than-the.html" title="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/04/faster-than-the.html"&gt;www.dailygalaxy.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/96E90A3A-EB13-461C-83DD-9047E155C9C7.jpg" alt="1684" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
 A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo  asks the heretical question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not constant?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Magueijo, a 40-year old native of Portugal, puts forth the heretical idea that in the very early days of the universe light traveled faster—an idea that if proven could dethrone Einstein and forever change our understanding of the universe. He is a pioneer of the varying speed of light (VSL) theory of cosmology -an alternative to the more mainstream theory of cosmic inflation- which proposes that the speed of light in the early universe was of 60 orders of magnitude faster than its present value. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/EF2CE514-ACC3-4639-AF62-E56F28B1260B.jpg" alt="Vsl" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
Solving the most intractable problems of cosmology in one brilliant
leap, Magueijo’s varying-speed-of-light theory (VSL) would have
stunning implications for space travel, black holes, time dilation, and
string theory—and could help uncover the grand unified theory that
ultimately eluded Einstein.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/light/" rel="tag"&gt;light&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/speed/" rel="tag"&gt;speed&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/vsl/" rel="tag"&gt;vsl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/04/faster-than-the.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:14:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What Does It Mean to Be Human?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F2ADE956-BA61-4577-8737-BEADF9217E4A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  and your answer? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/what-does-it-me.html" title="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/what-does-it-me.html"&gt;blog.wired.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/63EBC194-82A6-4131-A79E-72CDBA8FF2AA.jpg" alt="Humanpanel_2" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;A star-studded panel of scientists gathered to discuss those heady themes last night at the &lt;A href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/world_science_festival/index.html" linkindex="45"&gt;World Science Festival&lt;/A&gt; in New York City. Here are their answers in convenient nutshell form: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/ " linkindex="46"&gt;Marvin Minsky&lt;/A&gt;, artificial intelligence pioneer: We do something other species can't: We remember. We have cultures, ways of transmitting information. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Dennett " linkindex="47"&gt;Daniel Dennett&lt;/A&gt;, cognitive scientist: We are the first species that represents our reasons, and can reason with each other. "The planet has grown a nervous system," he said. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.usc.edu/programs/neuroscience/faculty/profile.php?fid=27" linkindex="56" set="yes"&gt;
Antonio Damasio&lt;/A&gt;, neuroscientist: The critical unique factor is
language. Creativity. The religious and scientific impulse. And our
social organization, which has developed to a prodigious degree. We
have a record of history, moral behavior, economics, political and
social institutions. We're probably unique in our ability to
investigate the future, imagine outcomes, and display images in our
minds&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/question/" rel="tag"&gt;question&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/deep+question/" rel="tag"&gt;deep question&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/human/" rel="tag"&gt;human&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/meaning/" rel="tag"&gt;meaning&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/what-does-it-me.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:14:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>10 Important Differences Between Brains and Computers</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E4BCCC05-CD73-45B8-B081-70CAB2A10668/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2007/03/why_the_brain_is_not_like_a_co.php" title="http://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2007/03/why_the_brain_is_not_like_a_co.php"&gt;scienceblogs.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Although the brain-computer metaphor has served cognitive psychology well, research in cognitive neuroscience has revealed many important differences between brains and computers.  Appreciating these differences may be crucial to understanding the mechanisms of neural information processing, and ultimately for the creation of artificial intelligence.  Below, I review the most important of these differences (and the consequences to cognitive psychology of failing to recognize them): similar ground is covered in this excellent (though lengthy) &lt;A href="http://www.msri.org/cgi-bin/real.cgi?realhost=real.msri.org&amp;realfile=/hosted/pmmb/2002/mumford/1" linkindex="132"&gt;lecture&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Difference # 1: Brains are analogue; computers are digital&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Difference # 2: The brain uses content-addressable memory&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Difference # 3: The brain is a massively parallel machine; computers are modular and serial&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Difference # 4: Processing speed is not fixed in the brain; there is no system clock&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Difference # 5 - Short-term memory is not like RAM&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Difference # 6: No hardware/software distinction can be made with respect to the brain or mind&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/computers/" rel="tag"&gt;computers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/brains/" rel="tag"&gt;brains&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/metaphors/" rel="tag"&gt;metaphors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2007/03/why_the_brain_is_not_like_a_co.php</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:34:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Your brain lies to you </title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/662AACFA-3BFC-4689-825E-A7013CE10D69/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This phenomenon, known as source amnesia, can also lead people to forget whether a statement is true. Even when a lie is presented with a disclaimer, people often later remember it as true. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/29/opinion/edwang.php" title="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/29/opinion/edwang.php"&gt;www.iht.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;False beliefs are everywhere. Eighteen percent of Americans think the sun revolves around the earth, one poll has found. Thus it seems slightly less egregious that, according to another poll, 10 percent of us think that Senator Barack Obama, a Christian, is instead a Muslim. The Obama campaign has created a Web site to dispel misinformation. But this effort may be more difficult than it seems, thanks to the quirky way in which our brains store memories - and mislead us along the way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The brain does not simply gather and stockpile information as a computer's hard drive does. Facts are stored first in the hippocampus, a structure deep in the brain about the size and shape of a fat man's curled pinkie finger. But the information does not rest there. Every time we recall it, our brain writes it down again, and during this re-storage, it is also reprocessed. In time, the fact is gradually transferred to the cerebral cortex and is separated from the context in which it was originally learned&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/brain/" rel="tag"&gt;brain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/misleading/" rel="tag"&gt;misleading&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/false+beliefs/" rel="tag"&gt;false beliefs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/29/opinion/edwang.php</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:28:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Lab Freaks Gone Wild?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/06CDCCCB-33AA-42A2-A967-9678B1331997/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  “What was once only science fiction is now becoming a reality, and we need to ensure that experimentation and subsequent ramifications do not outpace ethical discussion and societal decisions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/01/18/cow-human-embryo-research-gets-ok/" title="http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/01/18/cow-human-embryo-research-gets-ok/"&gt;www.livescience.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scientists plan to make “cybrids” by putting human DNA into cow eggs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The British government gave the go-ahead this week for two separate groups to experiment with the process. Scientists will “inject human DNA into empty eggs from cows, to create embryos known as cytoplasmic hybrids that are 99.9 per cent human in genetic terms,” according to &lt;A href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3204128.ece�"&gt;The Times&lt;/A&gt; of London.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The government had planned to ban such cybrid research, but scientists protested, leading to the reversal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The argument is an emotional and speculative one, scientists would say, conjuring images of &lt;A href="http://www.livescience.com/bestimg/index.php?cat=freakylabanimals�"&gt;lab freaks gone wild&lt;/A&gt; that no reputable researcher envisions. Nobody has suggested the cybrids be raised and let loose in London (or Manhattan, for that matter, where the movie will likely be set. I mean, whoever heard of London being taken over by cybrids?).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“Creating human-animal hybrids could irrevocably harm the basic human genetic makeup and intentionally or unintentional change what it means to be human,”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cybrids/" rel="tag"&gt;cybrids&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dna/" rel="tag"&gt;dna&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/biology/" rel="tag"&gt;biology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.livescience.com/blogs/2008/01/18/cow-human-embryo-research-gets-ok/</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:40:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Conscious Choice an Illusion?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A3E267C0-748E-4924-A29E-AD89FDBC610A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/04/is-conscious-ch.html" title="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/04/is-conscious-ch.html"&gt;www.dailygalaxy.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/wildcat/512/45930D14-B564-4585-AA18-44FA829E51CD.jpg" alt="Slide74_2_3" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
How
much of the decision making process do we actually have a say in?
That’s the question being raised thanks to new research coming out of
the Max Planck Institute. Using brain scanners, researchers were able
to predict people’s decisions seven seconds before the test subjects
were even aware of making them. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The
decision is not necessarily one that involves a lot of mental
preparation – whether to hit a button with your left or right hand – so
whether this study is representative of our own self-direction is up
for debate. Nevertheless, questions are naturally going to be raised
over whether we have free will at all, or whether conscious choice is
just an illusion. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="MsoNormal"&gt;"Your
decisions are strongly prepared by brain activity. By the time
consciousness kicks in, most of the work has already been done," said
study co-author John-Dylan Haynes, a Max Planck Institute
neuroscientist.&lt;O:P _moz-userdefined=""&gt;&lt;/O:P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/consciousness%3f/" rel="tag"&gt;consciousness?&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/choice/" rel="tag"&gt;choice&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/free+will%3f/" rel="tag"&gt;free will?&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/illusion/" rel="tag"&gt;illusion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/04/is-conscious-ch.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:08:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Genetic 'telepathy'? A bizarre new property of DNA</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8C7C6919-FF7F-40C3-909C-F2D68AC36F64/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  life stranger than sci fi &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://physorg.com/news120735315.html" title="http://physorg.com/news120735315.html"&gt;physorg.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="Preview"&gt; 
Scientists are reporting evidence that intact, double-stranded DNA has the “amazing” ability to recognize similarities in other DNA strands from a distance. And then like friends with similar interests, the bits of genetic material hangout or congregate together. The recognition — of similar sequences in DNA’s chemical subunits — occurs in a way once regarded as impossible, the researchers suggest in a study scheduled for the Jan. 31 issue of ACS’ &lt;I&gt;Journal of Physical Chemistry B&lt;/I&gt;.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;This recognition may help increase the accuracy and efficiency of the homologous recombination of genes — a process responsible for DNA repair, evolution, and genetic diversity. The new findings thus may shed light on ways to avoid recombination errors, which underpin cancer, aging, and other health problems.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;“Amazingly, the forces responsible for the sequence recognition can reach across more than one nanometer of water separating the surfaces of the nearest neighbor DNA,” said the authors. 
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dna/" rel="tag"&gt;dna&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/telepathy/" rel="tag"&gt;telepathy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/recognition+at+a+distance/" rel="tag"&gt;recognition at a distance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://physorg.com/news120735315.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:47:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Extinct Human Species That Was Smarter Than Us</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6E953ABA-9761-4844-8EA2-EBF309803ED8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/mar/21-the-extinct-human-species-that-was-smarter-than-us?utm_campaign=DISCOVER%20Magazine%20Human%20Origins%20Newsletter%203%2E24%2E2008&amp;utm_content=tygerx9@gmail.com&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_term=The%20Extinct%20Human%20Species%20That%20Was%20Smarter%20Than%20Us" title="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/mar/21-the-extinct-human-species-that-was-smarter-than-us?utm_campaign=DISCOVER%20Magazine%20Human%20Origins%20Newsletter%203%2E24%2E2008&amp;utm_content=tygerx9@gmail.com&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_term=The%20Extinct%20Human%20Species%20That%20Was%20Smarter%20Than%20Us"&gt;discovermagazine.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3&gt;The superintelligent Boskops had small, childlike faces and huge melon heads.&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;“Sometimes I think my head is so big because it is so full of dreams,” says John Merrick in the play &lt;I&gt;The Elephant Man&lt;/I&gt;. He might have been speaking for the Boskops, an almost forgotten group of early humans who lived in southern Africa between 30,000 and 10,000 years ago. Judging from fossil remains, scientists say the Boskops were similar to modern humans but had small, childlike faces and huge melon heads that held brains about 30 percent larger than our own.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;ust as we’re smarter than apes, they were probably smarter than us,” they speculate. More insightful and self-reflective than modern humans, with fantastic memories and a penchant for dreaming, the Boskops may have had “an internal mental life literally beyond anything we can imagine.”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;They also explore what the Boskops’ big brains tell us about evolution (why didn’t they survive?) and about the future of human intelligence (can we engineer bigger brains?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/boskops/" rel="tag"&gt;boskops&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/brains/" rel="tag"&gt;brains&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/intelligence/" rel="tag"&gt;intelligence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://discovermagazine.com/2008/mar/21-the-extinct-human-species-that-was-smarter-than-us?utm_campaign=DISCOVER%20Magazine%20Human%20Origins%20Newsletter%203%2E24%2E2008&amp;utm_content=tygerx9@gmail.com&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_term=The%20Extinct%20Human%20Species%20That%20Was%20Smarter%20Than%20Us</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:49:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Duplicates Paradox</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D0F201F7-4DC8-4F4F-96D9-ECF8020D6B63/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;   Personal identity is perceived as continuous through time. Yet this perception cannot be instantaneous, and must be based on memory. Given the fact that memories can be forgotten, altered or even fabricated, the question arises as to whether memories are essential for personal identity. Certainly no specific memory seems necessary for identity, but a perception of a continuity of the memory process is often believed to be. Subjective experience involves not just memory, but thoughts, desires, feelings and personality. Even when subjectivity is focused on the "outside world", this focus necessarily has a point of view. Any attempt to describe personal identity impersonally will lose an essential element. A self has both sensation and will.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.benbest.com/philo/doubles.html" title="http://www.benbest.com/philo/doubles.html"&gt;www.benbest.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The idea that personal identity (mind, self, will) is entirely 
contained in the molecular and biological structure of the brain (ie, is
entirely material) implies that a duplicate identity could be created 
that is identical in &lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;every&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt; way except physical location&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It is said that most molecules in the body are replaced every few 
years, presumably also including the molecules of the brain. This
implies that the exact atoms and molecules of which our identity
is constituted are not essential to that identity. Thus, lives and minds are
much like a candle flame -- life, consciousness and selfhood continues with
a material basis despite the fact that the exact material (atoms and 
molecules) change. 

&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Personal identity is perceived as continuous through time. Yet 
this perception cannot be instantaneous, and must be based on memory&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mind/" rel="tag"&gt;mind&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/philosophy/" rel="tag"&gt;philosophy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/duplicates/" rel="tag"&gt;duplicates&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/paradox/" rel="tag"&gt;paradox&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.benbest.com/philo/doubles.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:38:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Words in your brain</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7DF2BB33-99DA-45C3-BE11-70041B75EFC8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2008/02/09/brain-teaser-words-in-your-brain-learn-as-you-exercise/" title="http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2008/02/09/brain-teaser-words-in-your-brain-learn-as-you-exercise/"&gt;www.sharpbrains.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;A title="Permanent Link to Brain Teaser: Words in your brain, learn as you exercise!" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2008/02/09/brain-teaser-words-in-your-brain-learn-as-you-exercise/"&gt;Brain Teaser: Words in your brain, learn as you exercise!&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.sharpbrains.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/313px-brainlobessvg.thumbnail.png" alt="Temporal lobe Frontal Lobe" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Do you know where words are stored in your brain...?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In your temporal lobe! Here is a drawing of the brain so you can see where your temporal lobe is (in green) on a profile view of the right side of your brain.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;As you know your brain has two sides (two hemispheres) connected by the corpus callosum. So you have one temporal lobe on each side of the brain.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Words in the brain are not stored randomly. They seemed to be quite organized. Research has shown that words that are often heard together (such as salt and pepper) or words that share some meaning (such as nurse and doctor) are connected or associated in the brain. Once you hear one, the other is activated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a brain exercise whose aim is to stimulate the connections or associations between words in your temporal lobe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ready to stimulate connections in your temporal lobe(s)? Enjoy! (Solutions are below. Please don't check them until you have trid to solve all the pairs!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/brain/" rel="tag"&gt;brain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/words/" rel="tag"&gt;words&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/training/" rel="tag"&gt;training&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2008/02/09/brain-teaser-words-in-your-brain-learn-as-you-exercise/</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:36:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Human culture subject to natural selection</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/97A6DA49-F32C-45D4-B755-D079931018EB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://physorg.com/news122577140.html" title="http://physorg.com/news122577140.html"&gt;physorg.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="Preview"&gt; 
The process of natural selection can act on human culture as well as on genes, a new study finds. Scientists at Stanford University have shown for the first time that cultural traits affecting survival and reproduction evolve at a different rate than other cultural attributes. Speeded or slowed rates of evolution typically indicate the action of natural selection in analyses of the human genome.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;		
							"Biological evolution of inherited traits is the essential organizing principle of biology, but does evolution play a corresponding role in human culture?" said Jared Diamond, a professor of geography at the University of California-Los Angeles and author of Guns, Germs and Steel. "This paper makes a decisive advance in this controversial field."
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;					
					  	The field of cultural evolution is controversial because not all historians, social scientists or even biologists agree that cultural change can be understood in an evolutionary context. Some say that human beliefs and behaviors are too unpredictable.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://physorg.com/news122577140.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:10:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Human skin cells hide circadian clock</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/96201414-6F68-4516-A006-FA69AC496066/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/wildcat/"&gt;wildcat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13231-human-skin-cells-hide-circadian-clock.html" title="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13231-human-skin-cells-hide-circadian-clock.html"&gt;www.newscientist.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;An internal clock hidden in human skin cells could reveal whether your body clock is out of sync with your lifestyle, say researchers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steven Brown of the University of Zurich in Switzerland and his colleagues knew that the brain’s circadian clock causes a gene called &lt;I&gt;Bmal1&lt;/I&gt; to be more active in the body’s other cells during the daytime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;To find out how closely matched this activity was, they used a virus to equip skin cells taken from 11 early-rising people dubbed "larks" and 17 late-rising "owls" with a firefly gene that would produce a visible glow whenever &lt;I&gt;Bmal1&lt;/I&gt; was active. “The result is light coming out of the cell in a 24-hour rhythm,” says Brown.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;By monitoring the times when the cells glowed, they demonstrated that skin cells showed the same sleep-wake patterns as those reported in questionnaires by at least half the donors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“Knowing that skin clocks ‘tick’ in the same way as brain clocks provides a nice tool to address whether a person is likely to be an early or late riser,” &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/internal+clock/" rel="tag"&gt;internal clock&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/skin+cells/" rel="tag"&gt;skin cells&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13231-human-skin-cells-hide-circadian-clock.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:11:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>