<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | strider72's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>The allure of liberalism</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/255B2477-234C-4F0E-AB87-632FDD6938A4/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Read the whole article! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/10/27/the-momentum-of-history/" title="http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/10/27/the-momentum-of-history/"&gt;hotair.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The allure of New Deal liberalism does not lie in collective economics – most voters are not eager to view themselves as living off the government dole. The allure lies within collective &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;morality.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; People love the idea of buying a slice of high-flying, big-spending government virtue for the low, low price of one little vote. After they cast that vote, they can go home and relax in front of the TV, while the latest out-of-control progressive spending program is quietly extracted from their paycheck… and their employers’ bank account. For many voters, the punitive class warfare of liberal politics is one of its benefits, not part of its cost.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liberalism/" rel="tag"&gt;liberalism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/socialism/" rel="tag"&gt;socialism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/10/27/the-momentum-of-history/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:04:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Overheard in comments</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AA550782-0B09-489C-B025-6C7F3DE34920/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  As an atheist, this amused me. &lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/images/icons/smilies/wink.gif" alt="" /&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://munchkinwrangler.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/health-care-as-a-human-right-part-the-58th/" title="http://munchkinwrangler.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/health-care-as-a-human-right-part-the-58th/"&gt;munchkinwrangler.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Amen, Marko!&lt;BR /&gt;
(or whatever the atheist equivalent is)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="entry"&gt;
					&lt;P&gt;“By the power of Grayskull.”  &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(Some atheists prefer “Wonder Twin powers, activate”, but we consider them heretics.)&lt;/P&gt;
				&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/humor/" rel="tag"&gt;humor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://munchkinwrangler.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/health-care-as-a-human-right-part-the-58th/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:28:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Quote of the Year</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EF8371A6-31D7-4095-B6E3-0D20084A98BF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  in 1,000 words or less.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/10/picture-of-week.html" title="http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/10/picture-of-week.html"&gt;smallestminority.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/image_cache/strider72/512/5C4D3AFC-5BF8-4ED1-93F3-256CA452FE0C.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/10/picture-of-week.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:21:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>America's Terrible Health Care System</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/057B96B6-086E-4E38-B244-C51B65BF1000/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Yes, it seems that our health care system is not very good at preventing murders. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/135458.html" title="http://www.reason.com/news/show/135458.html"&gt;www.reason.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;In their 2006 book, &lt;EM&gt;The Business of Health&lt;/EM&gt;, economists Robert L. Ohsfeldt and John E. Schneider set out to determine where the U.S. would rank in life span among developed nations if homicides and accidents are factored out. Their answer? First place. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/health+care/" rel="tag"&gt;health care&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obamacare/" rel="tag"&gt;obamacare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.reason.com/news/show/135458.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:40:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Compact Flourescents are not equal</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/20BB6A4B-E5B9-48DF-97D1-E36FD5628E65/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Now that countries are banning traditional lightbulbs, they're discovering that the replacement is not up to the task. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/6110547/Energy-saving-light-bulbs-offer-dim-future.html" title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/6110547/Energy-saving-light-bulbs-offer-dim-future.html"&gt;www.telegraph.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Buyers of the main type of energy-saving bulb, compact fluorescent lamps 
  (CFLs), are told on the packaging that they shine as brightly as an 
  old-fashioned bulb. For example, an 11W CFL is labelled as being the 
  equivalent of a 60W incandescent bulb. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;We found that under normal household conditions, using a single lamp to light 
  a room, an 11W low-energy CFL produced only 58 per cent of the illumination 
  of an "equivalent" 60W bulb – even after a 10-minute "warm-up". &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;a reading was taken in lux, a 
  measure of illumination. 
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;Traditional incandescent:&lt;/I&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Osram 60W (700 lumens) – 126 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Philips 60 W (700 lumens) -114 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Tesco 60W (700 lumens) – 122 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Maxim Pearl 60W pearled (no lumen info) – 101 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Energy Saving (all claim to be equivalent to 60W):&lt;/I&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Philips 12W T60 Softone (610 lumens) – 77 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Southern Electric/GE 11W (610 lumens) – 79 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Tesco Greener living stick 11W (640 lumens) – 70 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Eveready Energy Saver 11W (no lumen info) – 60 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Osram Duluxstar 11W (600 lumens) – 67 lux 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/energy/" rel="tag"&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/economy/" rel="tag"&gt;economy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/science/" rel="tag"&gt;science&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/consumer/" rel="tag"&gt;consumer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/lighting/" rel="tag"&gt;lighting&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/6110547/Energy-saving-light-bulbs-offer-dim-future.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:59:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Orwellian "Choices" and Socialised Medicine</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0F297FAB-3710-4BCC-A2D4-87D87BF414C2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  It's not "optional" if all other choices are outlawed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854" title="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854"&gt;www.ibdeditorials.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It didn't take long to run into an "uh-oh" moment when reading the House's "health care for all Americans" bill. Right there on Page 16 is a provision making individual private medical insurance illegal.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;When we first saw the paragraph Tuesday, just after the 1,018-page document was released, we thought we surely must be misreading it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The provision would indeed outlaw individual private coverage. Under the Orwellian header of "Protecting The Choice To Keep Current Coverage," the "Limitation On New Enrollment" section of the bill clearly states:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the bill itself will kill the market for private individual coverage by not letting any new policies be written after the public option becomes law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/heathcare/" rel="tag"&gt;heathcare&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obamacare/" rel="tag"&gt;obamacare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:39:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Other Hispanic Nominee</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F69EAFB2-BE92-49C0-9D8B-103688AB0506/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  We keep hearing about how Sotomayor is the first Hispanic nominated for the SCOTUS.  That's only because Democrats didn't allow another judge anywhere near the position.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32733" title="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32733"&gt;www.humanevents.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Every time a Democrat senator has talked during the Senate hearings on Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor this week,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Democrats revel in telling us what a racist country this is.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Their examples did not include Miguel Estrada&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;who was blocked from an appellate court judgeship by Senate Democrats expressly on the grounds that he is a Hispanic&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;in 2003, Estrada was blocked "by an extraordinary filibuster mounted by Senate Democrats" -- as The New York &lt;I&gt;Times&lt;/I&gt; put it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Memos from the Democratic staff of the Judiciary Committee were later unearthed, revealing that they considered Estrada "especially dangerous" -- as stated in a memo by a Sen. Dick Durbin staffer -- because "he is Latino and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment."&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;In frustration, Estrada finally withdrew his name on Sept. 5, 2003. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/sonia+sotomayor/" rel="tag"&gt;sonia sotomayor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/miguel+estrada/" rel="tag"&gt;miguel estrada&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/supreme+court/" rel="tag"&gt;supreme court&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/racism/" rel="tag"&gt;racism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32733</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:32:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ten Commandments for Liberals Who Want To Argue Politics</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E3E37151-230D-4B24-B1DF-06368FE9C6C6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Note: These are the rules they **should** follow, not the rules they **do** follow.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Follow the link for the whole thing. &lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/images/icons/smilies/happy.gif?r=2" style="margin-bottom: -4px;" alt="" /&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.peekinthewell.net/blog/ten-commandments-for-liberals-who-want-to-argue-about-politics/" title="http://www.peekinthewell.net/blog/ten-commandments-for-liberals-who-want-to-argue-about-politics/"&gt;www.peekinthewell.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Ten Commandments For Liberals Who Want to Argue About Politics&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;IN, or OUT. Your preference is to argue politics, or not to. One or the other&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;2. You get to change your mind later if you’re out and then want in. But not vice-versa.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;7. You’ve got some facts on your side; your “opponent” might have some on his side. Don’t be too surprised when he gives you some.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;If you find some facts agreeable and others less so, even though they’re all verifiable&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;This selective sensitivity of yours is &lt;I&gt;&lt;B&gt;your&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt; problem. Yours. Not his. Yours.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;8. Of course you think the world is a better place if &amp; when your ideas prevail. Just remember, if you think the ends justify the means in whatever you’re saying or doing — your noble goals have metastasized into something that isn’t good&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;You are heading down a steep, slippery road to a very dark place.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;9. If you really want a civil discourse, stay away from the “the other guy did it too” defense. That isn’t a valid defense and you know it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/argument/" rel="tag"&gt;argument&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/logic/" rel="tag"&gt;logic&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liberals/" rel="tag"&gt;liberals&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/progressives/" rel="tag"&gt;progressives&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/rules/" rel="tag"&gt;rules&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.peekinthewell.net/blog/ten-commandments-for-liberals-who-want-to-argue-about-politics/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:50:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>One (Cl)ass Act</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/545F2E27-FFBA-4590-BB7A-F18B69039191/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Isn't that Michelle standing *right behind him*?  Nice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.ilgiornale.it/a.pic1?ID=365566" title="http://www.ilgiornale.it/a.pic1?ID=365566"&gt;www.ilgiornale.it&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/strider72/512/1111D6B7-B1CE-4B6F-AF45-FC211D6D7016.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/men/" rel="tag"&gt;men&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/women/" rel="tag"&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.ilgiornale.it/a.pic1?ID=365566</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:35:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Lies, Damned Lies, and Health Care</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/40983256-B387-41E9-B6C8-9AD1EE8E01CA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  It's amazing what you can come up with when you mess with the numbers enough. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=331254362316405" title="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=331254362316405"&gt;www.ibdeditorials.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Infant mortality rates are often cited as a reason socialized medicine and a single-payer system is supposed to be better than what we have here.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;these comparisons are bogus.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;in the U.S., low birth-weight babies are still babies. In Canada, Germany and Austria, a premature baby weighing less than 500 grams is not considered a living child and is not counted in such statistics. They're considered "unsalvageable" and therefore never alive.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Norway boasts one of the lowest infant mortality rates in the world — until you factor in weight at birth, and then its rate is no better than in the U.S.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other countries babies that survive less than 24 hours are also excluded and are classified as "stillborn." In the U.S. any infant that shows any sign of life for any length of time is considered a live birth. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;A child born in Hong Kong or Japan that lives less than a day is reported as a "miscarriage" and not counted.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In Switzerland&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;not counted as a baby if it is less than 30 centimeters in length.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/socialism/" rel="tag"&gt;socialism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/health+care/" rel="tag"&gt;health care&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/statistics/" rel="tag"&gt;statistics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/single-payer+system/" rel="tag"&gt;single-payer system&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=331254362316405</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:41:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>USA Gun Deaths</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A50CF2E7-6EF3-4805-B28A-757E94C46489/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/05/ah-yes-guns-as-disease-vector-meme.html" title="http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/05/ah-yes-guns-as-disease-vector-meme.html"&gt;smallestminority.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Yes, we have a high homicide rate involving firearms &lt;I&gt;for an industrialized nation&lt;/I&gt;, but &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_percap-crime-murders-per-capita"&gt;we rank 24th in the world for homicide&lt;/A&gt;, far behind Mexico, Columbia, South Africa, and Venezuela - countries not known for their lax gun-control laws.  And our homicide epidemic is heavily concentrated in a tiny, easily identifiable demographic: young, black, urban males.  In 2006 (latest data available from &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html"&gt;the CDC&lt;/A&gt;) there were 18,573 deaths recorded as violent homicides.  Of those victims, 7,611 or 41% were black males.  Of &lt;SPAN&gt;those&lt;/SPAN&gt;, 5,589 were under the age of 35.  Black men under 35 are just 3.7% of the population of the country, but they provided 30% of the victims of violent homicide in 2006.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;You want to do something about the number of deaths in this country?  Stop trying to blame the guns, and start addressing the &lt;I&gt;cultural&lt;/I&gt; problems that lead young black men to kill and get killed at a rate &lt;SPAN&gt;eight times greater&lt;/SPAN&gt; than the rest of the population.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"gun control" is what you do instead of &lt;SPAN&gt;something&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/guns/" rel="tag"&gt;guns&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/law/" rel="tag"&gt;law&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gun+control/" rel="tag"&gt;gun control&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/statistics/" rel="tag"&gt;statistics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/united+states/" rel="tag"&gt;united states&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/05/ah-yes-guns-as-disease-vector-meme.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:24:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RIP Free Markets</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7EAC3AC9-0B3A-4EDD-B1F6-37D0DA5A523D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  There's a word for when government takes control of formerly private industry..... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/new-allegations-of-white-house-threats-over-chysler-2009-5" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/new-allegations-of-white-house-threats-over-chysler-2009-5"&gt;www.businessinsider.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Creditors to Chrysler describe negotiations with the company and the Obama administration as "a farce," saying the administration was bent on forcing their hands using hardball tactics and threats.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sources, who represent creditors to Chrysler, say they were taken aback by the hardball tactics that the Obama administration employed to cajole them into acquiescing to plans to restructure Chrysler. One person described the administration as the most shocking "end justifies the means" group they have ever encountered.  Another characterized Obama was "the most dangerous smooth talker on the planet- and I knew Kissinger." Both were voters for Obama in the last election.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;it was convinced to support the plan by this stark drawing of a line between firms that have the president's backing and those that did not. They didn't want to be on the wrong side of Obama. Privately, administration officials have expressed confidence that other firms will switch sides for this reason.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/communism/" rel="tag"&gt;communism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/socialism/" rel="tag"&gt;socialism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/intimidation/" rel="tag"&gt;intimidation&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/barack+obama/" rel="tag"&gt;barack obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.businessinsider.com/new-allegations-of-white-house-threats-over-chysler-2009-5</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:51:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The paranoia of leftist thought</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/03099435-284A-4D64-BD21-929F86FEEA13/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This is a great article.  Read The Whole Thing &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2009/05/obama-and-neo-marxist-left-clever.html" title="http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2009/05/obama-and-neo-marxist-left-clever.html"&gt;drsanity.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;neo-Marxist logic goes like this:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are you poor? Someone must have robbed you of what you are entitled to!&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are you angry and experiencing hatred, but like to think of yourself as a loving, compassionate sort of person? Then the object of your hatred magically becomes the one who hates...you!&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is your genius not universally recognized? You must have powerful enemies that prevent you from achieving the success you know should be yours.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Have you made mistakes in your life or shown poor judgment? Someone has clearly tricked you into acting a certain way otherwise you wouldn't have.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Has your ideology continually and repeatedly failed in the real world and resulted in death and misery for all who implement it? Take heart! It is not your fault or your ideology's! Either it wasn't implemented virutously enough; or there were evil people [Capitalists, Republicans, Neocons, Males, Whites, Christians, Jews] (choose one or more) who have been plotting against it!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/leftists/" rel="tag"&gt;leftists&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/marxism/" rel="tag"&gt;marxism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/socialism/" rel="tag"&gt;socialism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/communism/" rel="tag"&gt;communism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/paranoia/" rel="tag"&gt;paranoia&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/projection/" rel="tag"&gt;projection&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2009/05/obama-and-neo-marxist-left-clever.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:49:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Climate Doom -- 1970 Style</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B0D70750-51FC-4076-A3AF-66A69EA604C3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Global Cooling!  Ice Age!  We're Doooooomed! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://urbin.net/blog/?p=196" title="http://urbin.net/blog/?p=196"&gt;urbin.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Earth Day Predictions from 1970&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/environment/" rel="tag"&gt;environment&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/predictions/" rel="tag"&gt;predictions&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/global+warming/" rel="tag"&gt;global warming&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/global+cooling/" rel="tag"&gt;global cooling&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/famine/" rel="tag"&gt;famine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://urbin.net/blog/?p=196</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:35:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>English earns its keep.</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/BEFDBF96-63EA-4953-B742-0C31F2D012B8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/strider72/"&gt;strider72&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://townhall.com/columnists/DennisPrager/2009/04/21/the_more_given,_the_less_earned?page=full&amp;comments=true" title="http://townhall.com/columnists/DennisPrager/2009/04/21/the_more_given,_the_less_earned?page=full&amp;comments=true"&gt;townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the reasons for the ascendance of the English-speaking world has been that the English language is almost alone among major languages in having the word “earn.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	Those of us whose native language is English assume that the phrase “to earn a living” is universal. It isn’t. It is almost unique to English. Few languages have the ability to say this.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;“ganar” in Spanish, “gagner” in French. The word literally means “to win.” In Hebrew the word “marveach” means “profits.” In German, the word “verdient” means “deserves.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	Obviously, it is very different to “win” or to “deserve” or to “profit” than to “earn.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;a concerted effort has been made to weed the word, and therefore the cultural value, of “earning” from American life.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Many American kids no longer earn awards or trophies for athletic success. They are given trophies and awards for showing up&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Parental unconditional love means&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;no matter how disgracefully they act&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;No one earns God’s love; we receive it, like sports trophies, for breathing&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/soclalism/" rel="tag"&gt;soclalism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/respect/" rel="tag"&gt;respect&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/language/" rel="tag"&gt;language&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://townhall.com/columnists/DennisPrager/2009/04/21/the_more_given,_the_less_earned?page=full&amp;comments=true</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:29:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>