<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | seriousnews's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Highlights of Rebuttal to Obama on FISA</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E2CA9FE4-3AA5-4682-A818-5D050729E119/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Just a few highlights of a thorough, entertaining rebuttal to Barack Obama's latest justification of supporting the FISA Amendments Act. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/07/03/point-by-point-rebuttal-of-new-obama-statement-on-fisa-amendments-act/" title="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/07/03/point-by-point-rebuttal-of-new-obama-statement-on-fisa-amendments-act/"&gt;irregulartimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The FISA Amendments Act &lt;B&gt;is itself&lt;/B&gt; a law that supersedes the authority of the FISA court.  It strips power from the FISA court, making them impotent to stop spy programs initiated by the Attorney General.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;You know what has happened as a result of that Inspectors General report that the Barack Obama campaign says so proudly will serve as a model for investigating George W. Bush’s warrantless wiretapping program?  &lt;FONT color="red"&gt;Two&lt;/FONT&gt; newspaper articles about the report were written.  Then, 29 blog articles were written about what was revealed in those newspaper articles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Scrambled eggs with arsenic, mercury and broken glass is better than scrambled eggs with arsenic, mercury, broken glass, anthrax spores and plutonium on the side.  That doesn’t mean that you should eat the scrambled eggs with arsenic, mercury and broken glass.  Saying that one thing is better than another ought not to convince anyone that the better thing is any good at all.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fisa+amendments+act/" rel="tag"&gt;fisa amendments act&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/barack+obama/" rel="tag"&gt;barack obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/rebuttal/" rel="tag"&gt;rebuttal&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/spying/" rel="tag"&gt;spying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/freedom/" rel="tag"&gt;freedom&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/senate/" rel="tag"&gt;senate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/vote/" rel="tag"&gt;vote&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/election/" rel="tag"&gt;election&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/07/03/point-by-point-rebuttal-of-new-obama-statement-on-fisa-amendments-act/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:11:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Myanmar and McCain - the Dirty Connection</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2A6DD161-AB99-4EED-A47E-7E16D1EB2D81/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  John McCain has become linked to the military junta of Myanmar at an embarrassing time, as one of his top aides was caught working for dictatorship.  Now reasonable people may wonder - what other projects are all those other lobbyists on the McCain campaign working on, on the side? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/12/yet-another-values-problem-for-a-mccain-lobbyist/" title="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/12/yet-another-values-problem-for-a-mccain-lobbyist/"&gt;irregulartimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/136321"&gt;Newsweek broke the news this week&lt;/A&gt; (see, that’s why they call it &lt;I&gt;Newsweek&lt;/I&gt;) that John McCain’s official Convention Chair, Doug Goodyear, is also a lobbyist.  He’s not just any lobbyist, either; he’s CEO of DCI, a lobbying corporation that has promoted the interests of the autocratic military regime in Myanmar (nee Burma).  In exchange for loads of cash, Goodyear used DCI to instigate a public relations campaign denying the abuses of the Myanmar junta and arguing for special favors for the brutes.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;(Source: &lt;A href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/136321"&gt;Newsweek, May 18 2008 issue&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/myanmar/" rel="tag"&gt;myanmar&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/burma/" rel="tag"&gt;burma&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/doug+goodyear/" rel="tag"&gt;doug goodyear&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mccain/" rel="tag"&gt;mccain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/lobbyists/" rel="tag"&gt;lobbyists&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/ethics/" rel="tag"&gt;ethics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/12/yet-another-values-problem-for-a-mccain-lobbyist/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:32:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Be a Flag Waving Liberal To Confront GOP</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4008FA56-6028-480A-BA4F-208A4581AE94/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This sticker challenges people to become flag-waving liberals, confronting the superficial patriotism of Republicans with genuine substantial progressive civic patriotism. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://progressivebumpersticker.com/2008/05/12/flag-waving-liberal/" title="http://progressivebumpersticker.com/2008/05/12/flag-waving-liberal/"&gt;progressivebumpersticker.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The simpleton element of Republican ideology shows itself whenever Republicans start talking about the flag.  They have little competitions with each other about who loves the flag the most, and they work up into a fury whenever they see someone who doesn’t have little flags plastered all over their clothes, their cars, and their homes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cafepress.com/theproudliberal.250065434"&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" align="left" alt="american flag waving liberal patriot" src="http://progressivebumpersticker.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/250065434v1_240x240_front.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;Real patriotism is harder than just displaying a flag.  Real patriotism means knowing who your representatives in Congress are, and how they’ve voted on issues that matter to you.  Real patriotism means calling up elected officials and telling them what you think about what’s they’re doing in your name.  Real patriotism means talking back to power, instead of just worshipping it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/flag/" rel="tag"&gt;flag&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liberal/" rel="tag"&gt;liberal&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/symbolism/" rel="tag"&gt;symbolism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/patriotism/" rel="tag"&gt;patriotism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/citizenship/" rel="tag"&gt;citizenship&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://progressivebumpersticker.com/2008/05/12/flag-waving-liberal/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:23:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Progressives More Coherent Than Democrats</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B5975D6C-BE04-41EA-8069-5BA6FD4DF434/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The analysis in this article astounds me, and gives me some hope.  Its essential message is this: In terms of how they cosponsor bills in the Senate, separating Senators into Democrats and non-Democrats doesn't make much sense.  Separating Senators into progressives and non-progressives, as defined by the Progressive Patriots legislative scorecard, does. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.zimbio.com/American+Politics/articles/69/Party+Progressivism+Determinants+Bill+Activity" title="http://www.zimbio.com/American+Politics/articles/69/Party+Progressivism+Determinants+Bill+Activity"&gt;www.zimbio.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;A 21.6% explanation isn’t awful when trying to predict the thoroughly chaotic behavior of people in groups, but we can do better. I’ve looked at &lt;A rel="nofollow" href="http://www.zimbio.com/pilot?ZURL=%2FAmerican%2BPolitics%2Farticles%2F69%2FParty%2BProgressivism%2BDeterminants%2BBill%2BActivity&amp;URL=http:%2F%2Fprogressivepatriots.com%2Fsenate"&gt;ratings of Senators on an progressive political index at Progressive Patriots&lt;/A&gt;, and the correlation between Senators’ progressive action score and Senators’ level of bill activity is higher (+0.69). Just by itself, Senators’ progressivism accounts for 48.0% of the variation in bill activity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bottom line is that if you’re wanting to understand why some members of the U.S. Senate are more active in bill sponsorship and promotion than other members, ditch party as an explanation. A much better explanation of that variation is the progressivism that a Senator maintains in his or her legislative conduct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/progressive/" rel="tag"&gt;progressive&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democratic+party/" rel="tag"&gt;democratic party&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/statistics/" rel="tag"&gt;statistics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cosponsorship/" rel="tag"&gt;cosponsorship&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/legislation/" rel="tag"&gt;legislation&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.zimbio.com/American+Politics/articles/69/Party+Progressivism+Determinants+Bill+Activity</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:46:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>No Playboy For American Troops!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A15DDD43-1F58-40CB-B9A2-4A3A72939811/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Republican killjoy Congressman Paul Broun has joined with 16 other Republican members of the House of Representatives to try to ban American soldiers from buying Playboy Magazine.  It's amazing to me that what with the rising death toll in Iraq, the American economy going down the drain, and climate change rearing its ugly head to devastate Americans' livelihoods, the Republicans think that the big problem facing America is that its young soldiers, exhausted and on the verge of cracking from years on end on fighting for their lives, want to look at pictures of beautiful women.  Could they possibly get more out of touch? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/04/29/the-killjoy-coalition/" title="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/04/29/the-killjoy-coalition/"&gt;thatsmycongress.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, why is it that 17 Republican members of Congress are coming together to support a law that forbids the troops from getting the things they want  for support while fighting over in Iraq?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;They’re living half a world away from their wives and girlfriends.  Most of them are teenagers, or in their early 20s.  They’re full of hormones, and they’ve been given tremendous responsibilities, and they don’t have any release for their tension.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are a lot more serious problems for America to face than whether soldiers can buy Playboy with their own hard-earned money.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/playboy/" rel="tag"&gt;playboy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/sex/" rel="tag"&gt;sex&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pornography/" rel="tag"&gt;pornography&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/censorship/" rel="tag"&gt;censorship&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/soldiers/" rel="tag"&gt;soldiers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/paul+broun/" rel="tag"&gt;paul broun&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republican/" rel="tag"&gt;republican&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/legislation/" rel="tag"&gt;legislation&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/sexual/" rel="tag"&gt;sexual&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/04/29/the-killjoy-coalition/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:39:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Loren Davis and McCain Satanic Symbols</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/59CB428A-3B48-46D9-8A0A-3670BB59373B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  John McCain uses a 5 pointed star in his campaign logo.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;McCain's supporters use slurs against Barack Obama from Loren Davis.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Loren Davis Ministries says that a 5 pointed star is a sign of Satan's followers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, let's follow the logic of John McCain's followers, then to its obvious conclusion: If they follow along with Loren Davis's attacks against Obama, they must also conclude that John McCain is a Satanist.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hoo boy.  That seems weird, doesn't it?  That's because the politics of John McCain's right wing supporters has become contorted into grotesque forms as a result of its attempt to avoid the obvious truth: John McCain's politics of war and religious fervor have failed America. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://irregular.gaia.com/blog/2008/4/barack_obama_loren_davis_and_the_new_mccain_satanism" title="http://irregular.gaia.com/blog/2008/4/barack_obama_loren_davis_and_the_new_mccain_satanism"&gt;irregular.gaia.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Loren Davis is discovered to also be the source of &lt;A title="public schools nfl satanic conspiracy" href="http://www.care2.com/news/member/390564382/716172"&gt;rumors that public schools in the USA and the NFL are a satanic conspiracy&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A title="Loren Davis satanic censorship" href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2008/04/21/attempted-coverup-of-alleged-john-mccain-satanic-symbol/"&gt;Loren Davis Ministries deletes its article&lt;/A&gt; accusing the NFL of being an agent of Satan in an attempt to quell the controversy, but they are caught in the process, and Irregular Times publishes a PDF of the deleted article&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;In the same article, Loren Davis is seen to claim that the 5 pointed star is a symbol of Satan, and guess what?  The primary symbol in the campaign of John McCain for President is a 5 pointed star.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mccain/" rel="tag"&gt;mccain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/john+mccain/" rel="tag"&gt;john mccain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/barack+obama/" rel="tag"&gt;barack obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/loren+davis/" rel="tag"&gt;loren davis&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/satan/" rel="tag"&gt;satan&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/satanism/" rel="tag"&gt;satanism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/football/" rel="tag"&gt;football&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/symbolism/" rel="tag"&gt;symbolism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republican/" rel="tag"&gt;republican&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/presidential/" rel="tag"&gt;presidential&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/2008/" rel="tag"&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/election/" rel="tag"&gt;election&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/rumors/" rel="tag"&gt;rumors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://irregular.gaia.com/blog/2008/4/barack_obama_loren_davis_and_the_new_mccain_satanism</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:23:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ron Paul Rakes In Big Bank Money</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/57064902-DBD9-4E78-92B6-2E72ECAD0340/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Ron Paul is a fair weather libertarian who won't use the power of Congress to help ordinary working Americans, but does a whole lot to protect the interests of the wealthy and powerful, like financial corporations.  That's why Ron Paul gets more campaign donations from big banks than any other member of the House of Representatives.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://progressivepatriots.com/2008/04/03/ron-paul-bank-money/#comment-46" title="http://progressivepatriots.com/2008/04/03/ron-paul-bank-money/#comment-46"&gt;progressivepatriots.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why is it, then, that of all the hundreds of members of the U.S. House of Representatives, Ron Paul ranks among the highest in terms of campaign donations from large banks?  Ron Paul is &lt;A href="http://opensecrets.org/industries/recips.asp?Ind=F03&amp;cycle=2008&amp;recipdetail=H&amp;Mem=Y&amp;sortorder=U"&gt;third highest out over over 400 members of the House&lt;/A&gt;, taking in huge amounts of money funneled to him by banks through their employees.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Democrats in Ron Paul’s district aren’t even bothering to run a candidate against the man whose “Revolution” led down a dark alley filled with millions of dollars for Ron Paul to play around with.  That’s very slick for Ron Paul, but not so slick for the people of the 14th congressional district.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/ron+paul/" rel="tag"&gt;ron paul&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bank/" rel="tag"&gt;bank&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/money/" rel="tag"&gt;money&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/campaign/" rel="tag"&gt;campaign&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/libertarian/" rel="tag"&gt;libertarian&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/corruption/" rel="tag"&gt;corruption&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/economy/" rel="tag"&gt;economy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://progressivepatriots.com/2008/04/03/ron-paul-bank-money/#comment-46</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:37:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Frank Marshall Davis and Barack Obama</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E5C4FD33-EC67-4F75-B7EC-AB358E7B0495/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  What's the truth about poet Frank Marshall Davis and Barack Obama?  It's nothing so alarming as what the right wing activists want to make it out to be.  Barack Obama talked to Frank Marshall Davis a few times when Obama was a teenager, three decades after Frank Marshall Davis left the American Communist Party.  Frank Marshall Davis died over 20 years ago.  THAT is what Republican activists call Obama's "ties to Communism".  Pardon me if I'm not impressed.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.squidoo.com/frankmarshalldavis" title="http://www.squidoo.com/frankmarshalldavis"&gt;www.squidoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;IMG class="write_image" src="http://static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/draft_lens1959933module9269693photo_1209125124obama2008.jpg" id="moduleImage9269693" /&gt;Let's be up front about this: Frank Marshall Davis is getting an increasing amount of attention because of someone he met way back in the 1970s - &lt;A href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/category/election-2008/obama/" target="_blank"&gt;Barack Obama&lt;/A&gt;. Barack Obama talked with Frank Marshall Davis a few times, when Obama was &lt;U&gt;between the ages of ten and eighteen years old&lt;/U&gt;. The two both lived in Hawaii at the time, and their paths crossed.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DD&gt;Did Frank Marshall Davis make Barack Obama into a raging Communist? The truth is rather inconvenient, but for who?&lt;/DD&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/barack+obama/" rel="tag"&gt;barack obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/communist/" rel="tag"&gt;communist&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/communism/" rel="tag"&gt;communism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/marxist/" rel="tag"&gt;marxist&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/frank+marshall+davis/" rel="tag"&gt;frank marshall davis&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/poet/" rel="tag"&gt;poet&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/scandal/" rel="tag"&gt;scandal&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/rumors/" rel="tag"&gt;rumors&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/2008/" rel="tag"&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/president/" rel="tag"&gt;president&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.squidoo.com/frankmarshalldavis</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:16:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Michelle Bachmann Defends Waste!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C555B3F4-B2CB-4B00-A524-15249842DB55/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/seriousnews/"&gt;seriousnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Why are Republicans so strongly in favor of waste when it comes to America's energy? Michelle Bachmann leads the Dim Bulb Caucus in Congress, opposing efficient light bulbs in favor of outdated technology. Tell Representative Bachmann to stop defending waste! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/04/27/bachmann-light-bulb/" title="http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/04/27/bachmann-light-bulb/"&gt;thatsmycongress.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Dim Bulb Caucus has formed around the effort to pass a particularly dim witted piece of legislation, the &lt;I&gt;Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act&lt;/I&gt;.  The &lt;I&gt;Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act&lt;/I&gt;, H.R. 5616, would repeal sections of the &lt;I&gt;Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007&lt;/I&gt; that establish a national phase out of old-fashioned inefficient light bulbs and a phase in of compact fluorescent light bulbs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It’s sad that Michelle Bachmann has put her head in the sand, deciding to ignore the larger threats of mercury pollution, the economic impact of energy inefficiency, and the devastating effects that climate change is already having on humanity around the world.  What’s even more regrettable, however, is that Michelle Bachmann has convinced 24 other members of the House of Representatives to go along with her scheme to attack the &lt;I&gt;Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007&lt;/I&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/energy/" rel="tag"&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/environment/" rel="tag"&gt;environment&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/light+bulbs/" rel="tag"&gt;light bulbs&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bachmann/" rel="tag"&gt;bachmann&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fluorescent/" rel="tag"&gt;fluorescent&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/michelle+bachmann/" rel="tag"&gt;michelle bachmann&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/legislation/" rel="tag"&gt;legislation&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/waste/" rel="tag"&gt;waste&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://thatsmycongress.com/index.php/2008/04/27/bachmann-light-bulb/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:46:06 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>