<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | n2sooners's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/date/2008/5/5/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/date/2008/5/5/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Clinton within margin of error in NC</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/977FF68D-2DAD-42AF-A6DC-56A32D7D50D5/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/"&gt;n2sooners&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_55_380.aspx" title="http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_55_380.aspx"&gt;www.southernpoliticalreport.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;May 5, 2008&lt;/STRONG&gt; — &lt;SPAN&gt;An InsiderAdvantage / Majority Opinion Survey conducted for the Southern Political Report shows the Democratic Primary in North Carolina tightening. The results:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Obama: 48%&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Clinton: 45%&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Undecided: 7%&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The telephone survey was conducted Sunday May 4&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;  &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;of 781 registered likely voters in the Tuesday Democratic primary. It was weighted for age, race, and gender, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3%.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Clinton has increased her lead among white voters to 58% - very close to the 60% plus level needed to pull off a victory. She now leads among those who say they are Democrats but has started to trail among Unaffiliated voters, who are allowed to participate in Tuesday’s election. Additionally, African-American voters are not quite as solid with Obama as they have been, at least based on previous exit polls.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Our poll is based on a turnout model of 35% African-American vote. Anything under that number could give Clinton a shocking upset.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/north+carolina/" rel="tag"&gt;north carolina&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrat/" rel="tag"&gt;democrat&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/primary/" rel="tag"&gt;primary&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/poll/" rel="tag"&gt;poll&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/storylink_55_380.aspx</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:02:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Clinton up by 12% in Indiana</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/72AEE423-407E-4A92-AFC1-1BD7C0993148/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/"&gt;n2sooners&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport_main.aspx?g=777e9395-9b22-44ec-a525-981fcb9029e9" title="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport_main.aspx?g=777e9395-9b22-44ec-a525-981fcb9029e9"&gt;www.surveyusa.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;24 hours till votes are counted in the Indiana Democratic Primary, Hillary Clinton defeats Barack Obama in the symbolically important popular vote, and possibly by enough to pick up more than a trivial number of net Convention delegates, according to SurveyUSA's final pre-primary tracking poll&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;At the wire, they finish: Clinton 54%, Obama 42%. 

Among males, the two have been tied in 3 of the 4 tracking polls. Among females, Clinton has always led by at least 14, and finishes ahead by 22. 

Among Republicans and Independents, the two are effectively tied.
Among Democrats, Clinton finishes ahead by 19.

Clinton leads among Conservatives, Moderates and Liberals. 
She leads among Pro Life and Pro Choice voters, among regular and not-so-regular church goers. In Northern Indiana, she leads by 11. In Central and Southern Indiana, she leads by 27. In greater Indianapolis, Obama leads. Among voters under 35, Obama leads. Among voters over 35, Clinton leads.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/poll/" rel="tag"&gt;poll&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/indiana/" rel="tag"&gt;indiana&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/primary/" rel="tag"&gt;primary&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/election/" rel="tag"&gt;election&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport_main.aspx?g=777e9395-9b22-44ec-a525-981fcb9029e9</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 21:57:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CNN puts liberals desires above reporting news</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D9BDD0EE-D532-4382-8C76-764D714AD469/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/"&gt;n2sooners&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://minx.cc/?post=261721" title="http://minx.cc/?post=261721"&gt;minx.cc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://thepage.time.com/on-mondays-morning-shows-2/" linkindex="6" set="yes"&gt;Funny how the networks are quick to accede to the political desires of liberals,&lt;/A&gt; without worrying too much about "pandering" or subcontracting their own highly-trained sense of news-value to the lay public, so long as that lay public can be used as a pretext to do what what the liberals in the newsroom want to do anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Imagine if FoxNews announced "We're going to have Wright updates every half hour, because that's what our viewers want."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
I imagine they'd be castigated for deferring to their bitter, gun-clinging audiences' wishes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Because CNN has a &lt;I&gt;better&lt;/I&gt; audience, of course.  It's liberal, and, as such, can be trusted to help make the big news-judgment decisions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Because ultimately it's not a J-school credential that empowers one to decide what should and should not be in the national debate -- it's an adherence to the liberal political philosophy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cnn/" rel="tag"&gt;cnn&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/media/" rel="tag"&gt;media&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bias/" rel="tag"&gt;bias&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/msm/" rel="tag"&gt;msm&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/wright/" rel="tag"&gt;wright&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/news/" rel="tag"&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liberals/" rel="tag"&gt;liberals&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://minx.cc/?post=261721</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 21:48:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Wright hurts Obama according to USA Today/Gallup poll</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2BF240A6-AAD7-4D54-928F-505BC433B7F8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/"&gt;n2sooners&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Pretty much the opposite results of the CBS/NYT poll that had Obama up by 12 yesterday. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080505/pl_nm/usa_politics_democrats_poll_dc" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080505/pl_nm/usa_politics_democrats_poll_dc"&gt;news.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Democratic presidential contender
&lt;SPAN id="lw_1210009789_0" class="yshortcuts"&gt;Barack Obama&lt;/SPAN&gt;'s standing has been significantly damaged by the
controversy over his former pastor, according to &lt;SPAN id="lw_1210009789_1" class="yshortcuts"&gt;USA
Today/Gallup poll&lt;/SPAN&gt; published on Monday.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The poll showed &lt;SPAN id="lw_1210009789_2" class="yshortcuts"&gt;Hillary Clinton&lt;/SPAN&gt; leading Obama 51 percent to
44 percent nationally among Democrats and Democratic-leaning
independent voters&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The &lt;SPAN id="lw_1210009789_6" class="yshortcuts"&gt;USA Today&lt;/SPAN&gt;/Gallup results were a sharp reversal from two
weeks ago, before the latest controversy over the &lt;SPAN id="lw_1210009789_7" class="yshortcuts"&gt;Rev. Jeremiah
Wright&lt;/SPAN&gt;, when Obama led Clinton by 10 percentage points.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;USA Today said the results showed the Wright controversy
had raised questions for some voters about Obama's values,
credibility and electability.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The USA Today poll said one-third of primary voters were
less likely to vote for Obama because of his ties to Wright.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The results also showed the same portion less likely to
vote for Clinton, a New York senator, because of her husband,
&lt;SPAN id="lw_1210009789_13" class="yshortcuts"&gt;former President Bill Clinton&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/election/" rel="tag"&gt;election&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrat/" rel="tag"&gt;democrat&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/primary/" rel="tag"&gt;primary&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/polls/" rel="tag"&gt;polls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080505/pl_nm/usa_politics_democrats_poll_dc</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:18:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bill Ayers stomping US flag (photo)</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/1E733287-C92D-4C22-8F00-BA00AA6C61D1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/"&gt;n2sooners&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2008/05/bill-ayers-stepping-on-us-flag-in-2001.html" title="http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2008/05/bill-ayers-stepping-on-us-flag-in-2001.html"&gt;marathonpundit.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_AvCOzxKSFT0/SB5rV-zXYZI/AAAAAAAACOQ/baEjD3zn7gs/s1600-h/Ayersflagstomp.jpg" linkindex="4"&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5196709045411996050" alt="" src="http://bp2.blogger.com/_AvCOzxKSFT0/SB5rV-zXYZI/AAAAAAAACOQ/baEjD3zn7gs/s400/Ayersflagstomp.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;My good friend Anne Leary of &lt;A href="http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2008/05/wright-wrong-again.html" linkindex="5" set="yes"&gt;Backyard Conservative,&lt;/A&gt; a fabulous North Shore blogger, tipped me off to this picture, which I've heard rumors about, of Bill Ayers stepping on a US flag in 2001. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I believe it's from Chicago Magazine, and it accompanied an article in which Ayers was peddling his terrorist memoir, &lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http:%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FFugitive-Days-Memoir-Bill-Ayers%2Fdp%2F0142002550&amp;tag=marathonpundi-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325" linkindex="490"&gt;Fugitive Days.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;IMG width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=marathonpundi-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;At the time this photograph was taken, Obama and Ayers were serving together on the board of the Woods Fund. It was in 2001 &lt;A href="http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/02/15/obamas-terrorist-ties/" linkindex="7" set="yes"&gt;when Ayers donated $200&lt;/A&gt; to Obama's State Senate campaign fund.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;"Guilty as sin, free as a bird, it's a great country" is one of the Ayers quotes in the top clipping.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/ayers/" rel="tag"&gt;ayers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/terrorism/" rel="tag"&gt;terrorism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/election/" rel="tag"&gt;election&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2008/05/bill-ayers-stepping-on-us-flag-in-2001.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:33:45 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>