<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | mo0nangel's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mo0nangel/sort/latest-pops/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/mo0nangel/sort/latest-pops/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Fair Use</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/24E47C95-43B1-4DC9-8B64-A27A95905651/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mo0nangel/"&gt;mo0nangel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  debating the act of downloading movie, wrong or protected by fair use? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fair_use&amp;oldid=210625216" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fair_use&amp;oldid=210625216"&gt;en.wikipedia.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;A number of appellate decisions have recognized parody as a protected fair use, including both the &lt;A title="United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit"&gt;Second&lt;/A&gt; (&lt;I&gt;&lt;A title="Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibovitz_v._Paramount_Pictures_Corp."&gt;Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;) and Ninth Circuits (&lt;I&gt;Mattel v. Walking Mountain Productions&lt;/I&gt;). Most recently, &lt;I&gt;&lt;A title="Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suntrust_v._Houghton_Mifflin"&gt;Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;, a suit was brought unsuccessfully against the publication of &lt;I&gt;&lt;A title="The Wind Done Gone" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wind_Done_Gone"&gt;The Wind Done Gone&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;, which reused many of the characters and situations from &lt;I&gt;&lt;A title="Gone with the Wind" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gone_with_the_Wind"&gt;Gone with the Wind&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/I&gt;, but told the events from the point of view of the slaves rather than the slaveholders. The &lt;A title="United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eleventh_Circuit"&gt;Eleventh Circuit&lt;/A&gt;, applying &lt;I&gt;Campbell&lt;/I&gt;, recognized that &lt;I&gt;The Wind Done Gone&lt;/I&gt; was a protected parody, and vacated the &lt;A title="U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia" class="mw-redirect" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_Georgia"&gt;district court's&lt;/A&gt; injunction against its publication&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fair+use/" rel="tag"&gt;fair use&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fair_use&amp;oldid=210625216</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:54:20 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>