<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | mklosinski's 'government' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/tag/government/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/tag/government/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Mortgage Crisis</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DDD5340A-F6D2-4EA6-9ACD-F0C464344115/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Congress Created the problem, and now they are going to fix it.  Yeah, right.  Leave no incumbent in office. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=35911" title="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=35911"&gt;www.cnsnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Many politicians and pundits claim that the credit crunch and high mortgage foreclosure rate is an example of market failure&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
These financial problems are not market failures but government failure. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 is a federal law that intimidated lenders into offering credit throughout their entire market and discouraged them from restricting their credit services to low-risk markets, a practice sometimes called redlining.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
The credit crunch and foreclosure problems are failures of government policy. In fact, what we see now is a market correction to foolhardy government policy. Congress’ move to bailout lenders and borrowers who made poor decisions will simply create incentives for people to make unwise decisions in the future. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mortgage/" rel="tag"&gt;mortgage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=35911</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:43:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Big Government Gets Bigger</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DC0BEED0-51EA-4237-ACF0-C64B2B7A9162/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122005098970184843.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122005098970184843.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"&gt;online.wsj.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Mr. Obama's sparse legislative record suggests that he is at the very least a high-tax, big-spending liberal. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Thus, a united president and Congress can, as a practical matter, do all or any of the following (plus much more): take your money and give it to someone else; tell businesses what to produce and sell, who to hire and what wages to pay; set all commodity, wholesale and retail prices; control all energy supplies, communication networks and financial markets; replace all private health-care with a government system; prescribe the curriculum for all schools; determine which students get a slot in elite universities; diminish political and other speech; and enroll all citizens above the age of 17 either in the military or in civilian corps for periodic instruction and service.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="times"&gt;Obama or no Obama, alarm bells about the size and scope of government should have been going off for years, but weren't. They may yet, in November -- after it is too late.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122005098970184843.html?mod=googlenews_wsj</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:16:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>23 Pillars of Change</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/69093893-B56C-467E-BD1E-2FA38878083D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Let's me see, we don't have enough government spending, or enough government programs.  And taxes, raising taxes lowers tax revenues.  Lowering taxes raises revenues.  But Barack Hussen Obama will magically raise revenues by raising taxes.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=34895" title="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=34895"&gt;www.cnsnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;B&gt;(CNSNews.com)&lt;/B&gt; – A review of four of the 23 pillars of “change” outlined in Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) “Blueprint for Change,” posted on the candidate’s campaign Web site, reveals nearly 100 objectives Obama has set for the federal government if he wins the election this fall. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
“It [the Blueprint for Change] is a laundry list of new government programs,” Nachama Soloveichik, communications director for the conservative Club for Growth, told &lt;B&gt;CNSNews.com&lt;/B&gt;. “It’s just a huge list. I am pretty sure that everything is going to cost even more than he says it will, and he has already promised to raise taxes.”&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
“I am sure we can’t afford it,” said Soloveichik. “Obama wants to pay for it by raising taxes, but there’s a real problem of affordability. I don’t know how much taxes would have to go up to pay for, but it would certainly be a lot.”&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/taxes/" rel="tag"&gt;taxes&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/spending/" rel="tag"&gt;spending&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=34895</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:28:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Social Security and Medicare</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/72D8B5DE-67C5-4471-8387-1B66DE500C99/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=33679" title="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=33679"&gt;www.cnsnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;B&gt;Washington&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt; (CNSNews.com)&lt;/B&gt; – The future costs of maintaining Social Security and Medicare will be a “disaster” for younger generations, Dr. Walter Williams, the conservative economist and syndicated columnist, told &lt;B&gt;CNSNews.com&lt;/B&gt; Tuesday. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
The report said that for Social Security and Medicare combined, the government would “need approximately $41 trillion invested today to deliver on the currently promised benefits not covered by earmarked revenues for the next 75 years.” &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
“A lot of people say it’s between $60 and 70 trillion [dollars],” he said. “And the unfunded liability means that in order to pay for all of the problems, Congress needs to put in the bank $60 trillion, and keep in mind our GDP (gross domestic product) is only 15 or 14 [trillion dollars].”&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“The only way that government can give one American citizen one dollar, is to first – through intimidation, threat and coercion – confiscate that one dollar from another American,” he said. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/social+security/" rel="tag"&gt;social security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/medicare/" rel="tag"&gt;medicare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cnsnews.com/public/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=33679</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:32:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm Speakless . . .</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EB2A576C-4F76-498E-ACB6-4D852154EBB2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  These clown are nuckin' futs.  They can't run Social Security, Medicare is a mess.  And now they think they can run an oil business. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Leave no incumbent in office. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.foxnews.com/urgent_queue/index.html" title="http://www.foxnews.com/urgent_queue/index.html"&gt;www.foxnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;House Democrats responded to President's Bush's call for Congress to lift the moratorium on offshore drilling. This was at an on-camera press conference fed back live.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Among other things, the Democrats called for the government to own refineries so it could better control the flow of the oil supply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;They also reasserted that the reason the Appropriations Committee markup (where the vote on the amendment to lift the ban) was cancelled so they could focus on preparing the supplemental Iraq spending bill for tomorrow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;We (the government) should own the refineries. Then we can control how much gets out into the market.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;What we do has to be in the interest of the American people. Not major corporations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/oil/" rel="tag"&gt;oil&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.foxnews.com/urgent_queue/index.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:34:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>California and Homeschooling</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D24658D4-FA24-48AE-BD57-A68AEF1471C6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Parents in California don't have a right to homeschool their children.  And what is the alternative, government schools.  These people are acting like sending your children to government schools is a good thing.  How far from reality can you get if you live in California? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/07/MNJDVF0F1.DTL" title="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/07/MNJDVF0F1.DTL"&gt;www.sfgate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"California courts have held that ... parents do not have a constitutional right to homeschool their children," Justice H. Walter Croskey said in the 3-0 ruling issued on Feb. 28. "Parents have a legal duty to see to their children's schooling under the provisions of these laws."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"A primary purpose of the educational system is to train school children in good citizenship, patriotism and loyalty to the state and the nation as a means of protecting the public welfare," the judge wrote, quoting from a 1961 case on a similar issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"We're happy," said Lloyd Porter, who is on the California Teachers Association board of directors. "We always think students should be taught by credentialed teachers, no matter what the setting."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"California is now on the path to being the only state to deny the vast majority of homeschooling parents their fundamental right to teach their own children at home," he said in a statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/schools/" rel="tag"&gt;schools&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/home+school/" rel="tag"&gt;home school&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/07/MNJDVF0F1.DTL</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:50:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Subprime Mortgage Mess</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/893E6CFD-8294-4001-A78A-E92AAA6473EB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Hillary has been quoted as saying the Free Market system has failed.  It is not the free market but the government that has failed us.  As the media and congress paints the current picture, it is the nasty evil greedy mortgage companies that got us into this mess.  Memories are short term.  It is government that got us into this mess.  Now we want government to get us out? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2008/01/23/subprime_bailout" title="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2008/01/23/subprime_bailout"&gt;www.townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;	As with most economic problems, we find the hand of government. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, whose provisions were strengthened during the Clinton administration, is a federal law that mandates lenders to offer credit throughout their entire market and discourages them from restricting their credit services to high-income markets, a practice known as redlining. In other words, the Community Reinvestment Act encourages banks and thrifts to make loans to riskier customers. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;	Government policy got us into the subprime mess and government's measure to fix the mess is going to create more mess. As such I'm reminded of Marcus Cook Connelly's spiritual play, "Green Pastures," where God laments to the Angel Gabriel, "Every time Ah passes a miracle, Ah has to pass fo' or five mo' to ketch up wid it," adding, "Even bein' God ain't no bed of roses." That's something the president and congressmen should think about and leave the miracle business up to God.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/subprime/" rel="tag"&gt;subprime&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hillary/" rel="tag"&gt;hillary&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mortgage/" rel="tag"&gt;mortgage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2008/01/23/subprime_bailout</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:55:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>President Hillary</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7B3B59CC-D1B5-44ED-87C0-54FC04E49D8D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This article gives the exact reason's why this woman or anybody else with this philosophy should not be president.  It is the individual, the drive and the desires of the individual, the effort of the individual that make this country great.  Not the incompetence of Government.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/21/us/politics/21clinton.html?ei=5065&amp;en=07b1c660076fe5b9&amp;ex=1201582800&amp;partner=MYWAY&amp;pagewanted=print" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/21/us/politics/21clinton.html?ei=5065&amp;en=07b1c660076fe5b9&amp;ex=1201582800&amp;partner=MYWAY&amp;pagewanted=print"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senator &lt;A title="More articles about Hillary Rodham Clinton." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/hillary_rodham_clinton/index.html?inline=nyt-per"&gt;Hillary Rodham Clinton&lt;/A&gt; said that if she became president, the federal government would take a more active role in the economy to address what she called the excesses of the market and of the Bush administration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;She said that economic excesses — including executive-pay packages she characterized as often “offensive” and “wrong” and a tax code that had become “so far out of whack” in favoring the wealthy — were holding down middle-class living standards. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; “If you go back and look at our history, we were most successful when we had that balance between an effective, vigorous government and a dynamic, appropriately regulated market,” Mrs. Clinton said. “And we have systematically diminished the role and the responsibility of our government, and we have watched our market become imbalanced.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/president/" rel="tag"&gt;president&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hillary+clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;hillary clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hillary/" rel="tag"&gt;hillary&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/21/us/politics/21clinton.html?ei=5065&amp;en=07b1c660076fe5b9&amp;ex=1201582800&amp;partner=MYWAY&amp;pagewanted=print</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:59:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hillary Care</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A2B14E65-D3FE-4713-AD04-1C6500FC83AE/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This is what your healthcare will be like, served up by Hillary.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article.jsp?content=20080102_101452_5180" title="http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article.jsp?content=20080102_101452_5180"&gt;www.news1130.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - A Surrey woman's holiday in California has turned into a healthcare nightmare.  The 68-year old needed emergency surgery after her appendix burst, but now she can't come home due to a lack of hospital beds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stephen Harris with the South Fraser Health Region says the issue is a shortage of ventilated intensive care unit beds, which are highly specialized.  He says over the holidays, it's not surprising to see those beds filled up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;NDP Health Critic Adrian Dix says the issue is one that's continued to plague the Lower Mainland and he's blaming Liberal government cuts to acute care beds.  "The number of acute care beds in British Columbia was reduced by 1,300 in the first mandate of the government, and some of the new facilities being opened won't be adding to that number."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hillary/" rel="tag"&gt;hillary&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/health+care/" rel="tag"&gt;health care&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article.jsp?content=20080102_101452_5180</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:21:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Our Government </title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F03D3689-D67C-4A86-B71B-A6A97F8645D6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Maybe the politicians in Washington should work one day a week. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/01/01/santa_claus_politics" title="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/01/01/santa_claus_politics"&gt;www.townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
      Santa Claus may turn out to be the real front-runner in the primaries, judging by the way candidates are vying with one another to give away government goodies to the voters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;

      We now have a bipartisan tradition of the government stepping in to rescue people who engaged in risky behavior -- whether by locating in the known paths of hurricanes in Florida or in areas repeatedly hit by wildfires over the years in California or by doing things that increase the probability of catching AIDS.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
      To this day, there are people who believe that the market economy failed when the stock market crashed in 1929 and that the Great Depression of the 1930s that followed required government intervention.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
      In reality, the stock market crashed by almost exactly the same amount on almost the same day in 1987 -- and 20 years of prosperity, low inflation and low unemployment followed.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=santa_claus_politics&amp;ns=ThomasSowell&amp;dt=01/01/2008&amp;page=2" title="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=santa_claus_politics&amp;ns=ThomasSowell&amp;dt=01/01/2008&amp;page=2"&gt;www.townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;1987, President Ronald Reagan decided to do nothing -- despite bitter criticisms in the media -- and the economy recovered on its own&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/entitilements/" rel="tag"&gt;entitilements&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/depression/" rel="tag"&gt;depression&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/01/01/santa_claus_politics</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:32:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>John Kerry and the NFL</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/99CE0C6F-AAAF-4F84-8084-203110499002/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Kerry is out of line.  This issue has nothing to do with government.  This is a private issue between the NFL and broadcasting companies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,318461,00.html" title="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,318461,00.html"&gt;www.foxnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;WASHINGTON —  Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, who represents New England Patriots' home turf in Boston, is threatening to hold a Senate hearing if the NFL refuses to allow national broadcasting of the Patriots-New York Giants game on Sunday night.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kerry wrote NFL commissioner Roger Goodell on Monday to request the game be seen by the wider football-watching audience..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"I remain deeply troubled that today as many as 250,000 Massachusetts households, and millions of Patriots fans nationwide, may be denied access to this historic sporting event," Kerry wrote.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Democratic senator also raised the threat of hearings should the NFL not fall on his side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/kerry/" rel="tag"&gt;kerry&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government+regulation/" rel="tag"&gt;government regulation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,318461,00.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:07:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Energy Bill</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/32117B61-5655-4351-BFCC-FF148A398F5E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Ayn Rand is absolutely amazing for foretelling this type of governmental intervention. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071223/COLUMNIST0130/712230369/1007/OPINION" title="http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071223/COLUMNIST0130/712230369/1007/OPINION"&gt;www.tennessean.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="bodytext"&gt;I was reminded of Rand's classic as President Bush and members of Congress recently gathered for the signing of the new energy bill. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 is less about energy and  more about control. The most ambitious projections by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy predict it will cut our energy consumption by a whopping 7 percent by 2030.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="bodytext"&gt;Ayn Rand could not possibly have known how prophetic her novel, &lt;I&gt;Atlas Shrugged&lt;/I&gt;, would be when it was published 50 years ago. Or, could she?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="bodytext"&gt;This landmark piece of literature foretold a United States where an ever-intrusive and expanding government begins to smother productivity and shutter the doors of entrepreneurship. Innovators, creators and producers are driven to destroy their own works rather than turn them over to the vultures who have taken over the government.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/global+warming/" rel="tag"&gt;global warming&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/energy+bill/" rel="tag"&gt;energy bill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071223/COLUMNIST0130/712230369/1007/OPINION</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:13:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Huckabee and the Fair Tax</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EC5710FE-55D5-42B8-B62E-B41579FD1AE1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I find this to be the real PLUS for Mike Huckabee.  If you don't know about the Fair Tax and want to learn more, read the book the Fair Tax by Boortz and Linder. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.latimes.com/la-na-salestax24dec24,0,5286232.story?coll=la-home-center" title="http://www.latimes.com/la-na-salestax24dec24,0,5286232.story?coll=la-home-center"&gt;www.latimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
					WASHINGTON -- 
				Mike Huckabee, one of the most conservative Republicans in the 2008 presidential race, has embraced one of the most radical ideas on the campaign trail: a plan to abolish all federal income and payroll taxes and replace them with a single 23% national sales tax.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
Still, the proposal inspires grass-roots passion, in large part because it would replace or abolish the Internal Revenue Service, one of the most hated federal agencies and a symbol of intrusive government in some conservative circles.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
Proponents of a national sales tax say it would be an improvement over the current system because it would increase the incentive to save, by taxing money spent instead of money earned.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
Also, the proposal would rid the tax code of its myriad loopholes and would free taxpayers and businesses from the time-consuming, often costly task of preparing annual tax returns.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/huckabee/" rel="tag"&gt;huckabee&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fair+tax/" rel="tag"&gt;fair tax&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.latimes.com/la-na-salestax24dec24,0,5286232.story?coll=la-home-center</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:29:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Government and Subprime Morgages</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4994460F-838E-4FF3-9EA3-220EA5E2A06F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertMurphy/2007/12/08/the_mortgage_mess" title="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertMurphy/2007/12/08/the_mortgage_mess"&gt;www.townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Now after individuals enter into these voluntary arrangements, what happens if the government swoops in and invalidates them?  There will be short term winners and losers, naturally.  And most Americans have no problem with this, because it seems fair to help struggling homeowners at the expense of Wall Street fat cats.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
No, lenders will rationally respond to the new environment, by being much pickier in giving new loans.  After all, it becomes much riskier to grant a mortgage to a young couple with little job experience, if the government will shield them from the consequences of default on the loan.  Many people say that “the American dream” involves homeownership, yet this will be harder to achieve if the government introduces yet another uncertainty for lenders.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/loans/" rel="tag"&gt;loans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/morgages/" rel="tag"&gt;morgages&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertMurphy/2007/12/08/the_mortgage_mess</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:56:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Chew on This</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/71340963-FF2C-4BCD-AA99-35CAC832998A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/mklosinski/"&gt;mklosinski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Thompson gets it right. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/04/thompson-dont-let-the-government-tell-you-what-to-eat/" title="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/04/thompson-dont-let-the-government-tell-you-what-to-eat/"&gt;politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Standing about 15 feet away from a mouth-watering steam tray buffet loaded with fried chicken, creamed corn and macaroni and cheese at Wade's Southern Cooking in Spartanburg, Thompson dismissed the idea that preventative care and wellness education should be central features of a government's health care system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"I'm telling you, I don’t think that it’s the primary responsibility of the federal government to tell you what to eat," Thompson said to applause when asked if his health care plan included any details on preventative care, a priority for Democratic candidates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"We shouldn’t be looking at the federal government in Washington first and working our way down, it ought to be just the other way around. With that, or whether you're talking about education, there's some things the federal government can't do," said Thompson.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/thompson/" rel="tag"&gt;thompson&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/food/" rel="tag"&gt;food&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/04/thompson-dont-let-the-government-tell-you-what-to-eat/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:01:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>