<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | missmartini's 'slate' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/tag/slate/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/tag/slate/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>A Return to the Cash &amp; Carry Economy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C9666587-C7E3-4D29-8748-645349A722F0/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Fascinating article in Slate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2198942/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2198942/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The Death of the Credit Card Economy&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;Car leases, student loans, no-money-down mortgages, and high credit limits are vanishing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The most revolutionary notion in commerce today is one of the oldest. If you want to buy something, you may actually have to pay for it. We are reverting from a "borrow and buy" economy to the "cash and carry" model of our grandparents.   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/credit/" rel="tag"&gt;credit&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cash/" rel="tag"&gt;cash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/economy/" rel="tag"&gt;economy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/money/" rel="tag"&gt;money&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/finance/" rel="tag"&gt;finance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2198942/</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 00:05:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>From Slate: If Obama Loses</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/81E2390E-551C-4F4C-B70B-031121434F1F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Whether you are comfortable with the discussion of race or not. Whether you believe race is still an issue or not. This is a very interesting article.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2198397/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2198397/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;If Obama Loses&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;Racism is the only reason McCain might beat him.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/missmartini/512/1D97E546-8400-4654-B010-6F1CE11DB488.jpg" alt="Barack Obama. Click image to expand." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it makes you feel better, you can rationalize Obama's missing 10-point lead on the basis of Clintonite sulkiness, his slowness in responding to attacks, or the concern that Obama may be too handsome, brilliant, and cool to be elected. But let's be honest: If you break the numbers down, the reason Obama isn't ahead right now is that he trails badly among one group, older white voters. He does so for a simple reason: the color of his skin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/race/" rel="tag"&gt;race&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/2008/" rel="tag"&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/election/" rel="tag"&gt;election&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2198397/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:18:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Where are these troops going to come from?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4587D40B-48B8-45ED-98EE-B637364854BA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Yeah. Shocking - we don't have enough troops ; the troops in Fort Bragg live in a literal cess pool ; there is not enough health care (physical or mental) for the troops coming back ; enlistment is down (even though I've heard otherwise) - yes, there is a problem and we are already over-working the troops in Iraq &amp;amp; Afganistan and in turn, destroying families. I don't get it and this just pisses me off.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2190661/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2190661/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The Army's Math Problem&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;We don't have any more soldiers to send to Afghanistan unless we take some out of Iraq.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/missmartini/512/007D00C4-FB0E-4142-AD2D-A71C7B5F62C7.jpg" alt="Robert Gates. Click image to expand." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secretary of Defense Robert Gates wants to send 7,000 more U.S. troops—about two brigades—to Afghanistan, according to the &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/world/asia/03military.html?scp=1&amp;sq=%22Pentagon+considers+adding+forces+in+Afghanistan%22&amp;st=nyt"&gt;May 3 &lt;EM&gt;New York Times&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;. But there's a problem, which the story underplays: We don't have any more troops to send. The Army is in a zero-sum state: No more soldiers can be sent to Afghanistan without a one-for-one reduction of soldiers in Iraq.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's look at the numbers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/iraq/" rel="tag"&gt;iraq&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/increase/" rel="tag"&gt;increase&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/troops/" rel="tag"&gt;troops&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/afganistan/" rel="tag"&gt;afganistan&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/slate/" rel="tag"&gt;slate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2190661/?from=rss</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:09:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>This recession ...what will it be like?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/464DC721-C2C1-4788-B9B2-DB4AEAF5ACFD/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  A good article in Slate about how bad this recession could be... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2190516/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2190516/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;How Bad Could It Get?&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;Will the recession be more like the 1990-'91 downturn or the Great Depression?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question of whether the U.S. economy is in a recession is, at this point, a matter of decimal points. Since the population grows faster than 1 percent, anyway, &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm"&gt;Wednesday's announcement&lt;/A&gt; of a 0.6 percent rise in gross domestic product for the first quarter is functionally a drop. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The real question now is: How bad could it get? Are we facing another version of the brief recession of 1990-'91, which, as James Fallows once memorably wrote, "was over by the time it was identified"? Or are we going to be wearing barrels for clothes and burning Ikea furniture to heat our homes, in a rerun of the Great Depression?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/recession/" rel="tag"&gt;recession&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/2008/" rel="tag"&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2190516/?from=rss</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:14:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ewww. Come on people! What are you doing to these kids?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/9ED050FD-6B76-4577-8B49-A0616DA39B70/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Ok, so I posted a comment about Miley Cyrus but not because she was being sexy but because she looked dead in that photo and Michael K had me cracking up. Anyway, this was on Slate, and it is pretty frickin' creepy. What are these people doing to these kids? We sit here and talk about protecting children but this is what is out there all over the world. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sorry, I know, there is a lot more going on in the world that I am  paying attention to, I just do not post it. But this is gross. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2190209/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2190209/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Mickey Mouse Operation&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;Forget Miley Cyrus. Check out Disney's Chinese underwear ad.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reading McTeague's comment over coffee yesterday morning, I couldn't help but think of an advertisement I'd seen a few months ago while on a reporting trip to China. I was walking from my Beijing bed-and-breakfast to a nearby subway station when I was stopped in my tracks by a billboard that made the controversial 1990s &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/resources/educational/handouts/ethics/calvin_klein_case_study.cfm"&gt;Calvin Klein underwear ads&lt;/A&gt; look artistic by comparison. Staring down at the throngs of shoppers on Beijing's Xinjiekou Nandajie Avenue, a busy commercial thoroughfare about a mile west of the Forbidden City, was a white girl who looked all of 12, reclining in a matching bra-and-panties set adorned with Disney's signature mouse-ear design. In a particularly creepy detail, the pigtailed child was playing with a pair of Minnie Mouse hand puppets. In the upper left-hand corner was the familiar script of the Disney logo. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/missmartini/512/C54BE518-A037-4EF0-9576-D7FA575A1728.jpg" alt="Disney Billboard. Click image to expand." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2190209/?from=rss</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:15:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Fall Out Boy &amp; The Roots</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8BB69025-C017-47CA-8DB5-875DF5B8D68F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Ok, this article cracked me up. Just that one paragraph had me giggling behind the circulation desk. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, I will admit, I kind of like how Patrick Stump from the Fall Out Boy sings. I blame it on my nephews.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2189817/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2189817/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Falling for Fall Out Boy&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;Did the Roots just trick me into liking a lame emo band?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I don't really know anything about Fall Out Boy, but I understand that I'm expected not to like them. They wear hair gel, and one of the guys in the band dates Ashlee Simpson, so it's fair to assume that they suck and that their fans are vapid teeny-boppers whose heads would explode if they heard what real rock 'n' roll sounds like. What kind of lame middlebrow loser do the Roots take me for?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/missmartini/512/73D3869A-AB90-4F5E-907B-BF405692F2E1.jpg" alt="The Roots in concert. Click image to expand." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/music/" rel="tag"&gt;music&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/the_roots/" rel="tag"&gt;the_roots&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fall_out_boy/" rel="tag"&gt;fall_out_boy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/slate/" rel="tag"&gt;slate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/opinion/" rel="tag"&gt;opinion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/funny/" rel="tag"&gt;funny&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2189817/?from=rss</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:50:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dealing with this Liar Loan Tale first hand</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/07FB53E9-C792-45BD-BA65-44EFAB8A76B3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I am sure a lot of people out there are also dealing with this. I have not seen anyone really write about it on a personal level because (1) it's embarrassing (2) people feel swindled (3) there is a lot of shame in losing a home.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We have not lost our childhood home yet but it is a possibility. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Mama Martini is excitable. She falls for these things. She is not stupid or anything like that, she is a little ill-informed. She's also a bandwagoner. I love her to death but Mama Martini has no one to reel her in anymore. Papa Martini was the one to do that and now, he's no longer here.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We (the Martini sibs) had a sit down with her and my brother was so angry at the people who convinced her that using our childhood home as collateral for another one was a good idea. So, here it is. From Slate, an article that finally addresses the other side - the side that people who have been swindled feel. Thank goodness. I was wondering when this was going to happen.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hopefully, we don't lose th &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2189576/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2189576/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="article_top"&gt;&lt;DIV class="kicker"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="department_name"&gt;moneybox: &lt;/SPAN&gt;Commentary about business and finance.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Inside the Liar Loan&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;How the mortgage industry nurtured deceit.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;SPAN class="byline"&gt;By Mark Gimein&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN class="dateline"&gt;Posted Thursday, April 24, 2008, at 11:25 AM ET
&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's the narrative we've heard about the mortgage meltdown: miscalculation and unfounded optimism, clueless investors, cash-strapped home buyers clobbered by rate resets. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's the story of the liar's loan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/home/" rel="tag"&gt;home&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/loan/" rel="tag"&gt;loan&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/crisis/" rel="tag"&gt;crisis&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mortage+industry/" rel="tag"&gt;mortage industry&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/slate/" rel="tag"&gt;slate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/shady/" rel="tag"&gt;shady&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2189576/?from=rss</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:14:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>What if...? - 5 years in Iraq</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F208E88F-52BA-4A3D-922D-95749D62F3F3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I saw this on Slate. I thought I'd share. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2186740/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2186740/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="article_top"&gt;&lt;DIV class="kicker"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="department_name"&gt;politics: &lt;/SPAN&gt;Who's winning, who's losing, and why.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;H1&gt;How Did I Get Iraq Wrong?&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;I didn't.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;SPAN class="byline"&gt;By Christopher Hitchens&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN class="dateline"&gt;Posted Monday, March 17, 2008, at 2:10 PM ET
&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Editor's note: To mark the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, &lt;STRONG&gt;Slate&lt;/STRONG&gt; has asked a number of writers who originally supported the war to answer the question, "Why did we get it wrong?" We have invited contributions from the best-known "liberal hawks," many of whom participated in two previous &lt;STRONG&gt;Slate&lt;/STRONG&gt; debates about the war, &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2071522/entry/2071561/"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;the first&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt; before it began in fall of 2002, &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.slate.com/id/2093620/entry/2093641/"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;the second&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt; in early 2004. We will be publishing their responses through the week.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2186740/?from=rss</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:11:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>236.com - Spitzer Thought Process Flowchart</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DC68D30B-2547-4E16-9034-1989593DA20A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I know, people like Spitzer. He just can't keep his friend in his pants and likes prostitutes and his wife is seriously seriously pissed off at him.  There is a great Slate article on the whole PR campaign with how politicians deal wit sex scandals but she seriously looks peeved.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This, though, is hilarious! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.236.com/news/2008/03/11/thought_process_flowchart_elio_5065.php" title="http://www.236.com/news/2008/03/11/thought_process_flowchart_elio_5065.php"&gt;www.236.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H5&gt;Thought Process Flowchart: Eliot Spitzer&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Eliot Spitzer, what were you thinking?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/missmartini/512/09DC9096-8311-428D-B83B-53D07123E04D.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/eliot+spitzer/" rel="tag"&gt;eliot spitzer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/flowchart/" rel="tag"&gt;flowchart&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/236.com/" rel="tag"&gt;236.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hilarious/" rel="tag"&gt;hilarious&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.236.com/news/2008/03/11/thought_process_flowchart_elio_5065.php</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:23:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hillary as the Devil</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B9451C45-A3BC-4606-ACEC-65EFD6DB8621/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I love Slate magazine. But seriously, what else can you say about this image - which I accidentally clipped twice!  For emphasis!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2185592/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2185592/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Reuters Claps Horns on Hillary&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;The Obama Messiah Watch, Part 10&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo/080228/ids_photos_ts/r315812455.jpg/" title="http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo/080228/ids_photos_ts/r315812455.jpg/"&gt;news.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20080228/i/r315812455.jpg?x=400&amp;y=307&amp;sig=8rYHTMnbyW0zvTfAYVf_hw--" alt="US Democratic presidential candidate Senator Hillary Clinton ..." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20080228/i/r315812455.jpg?x=400&amp;y=307&amp;sig=8rYHTMnbyW0zvTfAYVf_hw--" alt="US Democratic presidential candidate Senator Hillary Clinton ..." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2185592/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2185592/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last month, Reuters &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures/searchpopup?picId=3052185"&gt;clapped a halo&lt;/A&gt; on Michelle Obama. The March 10 &lt;EM&gt;Time, &lt;/EM&gt;in its cover photograph&lt;EM&gt;,&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20080310,00.html"&gt;bathes the head of the candidate himself&lt;/A&gt; in otherworldly white light. But the good book says that before Christ, there was the Antichrist. We know him as the devil, the beast, the foul fiend, the cloven hoof, the prince of darkness, the angel of the bottomless pit, Old Scratch, Satan, Beelzebub, Belial, Lucifer, and Mephistopheles. The iconographers in Reuters' photo department propose a new name. Care to guess? Hint: It's someone with &lt;EM&gt;at least&lt;/EM&gt; 35 years of experience and a fondness for red phones. Yes, Reuters wants you to know that these days the Antichrist travels under the &lt;EM&gt;nom de guerre&lt;/EM&gt; "Hillary." I don't know how else to read &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo/080228/ids_photos_ts/r315812455.jpg/"&gt;this photograph&lt;/A&gt;. Me, I have my doubts. Wouldn't the devil do better advance work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hillary/" rel="tag"&gt;hillary&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/slate/" rel="tag"&gt;slate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/devil/" rel="tag"&gt;devil&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2185592/?from=rss</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:29:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Slate Article - Irving Penn : one of my all time favorite photographers</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/33706B34-F592-40D8-82F2-4396503B9A8F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I love Irving Penn and his portraits.  I have a book that is a collection of his work on my shelf at home.  This is an interesting Slate article about him because of the recent acquisitions made by a number of museums, like the Getty here in L.A.  I cannot wait for next year when they will show the collection in the "Small Trades" exhibit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2185054/?from=rss" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2185054/?from=rss"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Irving Penn&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;He photographed the most important artists of the last half-century—and in the process joined their ranks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Irving Penn photographed so many prominent cultural figures of the 20&lt;SUP&gt;th&lt;/SUP&gt; century that, over the years, he came to be regarded as an equal among them. But his stature grew not just because of his venerated subjects—he advanced the genre of portraiture. His formal rigor, graphic daring, and studied simplicity brought the portrait to a new level of representation. The rich, mottled tones with which he crafted his portraits are less about creating mood than about rendering pure physicality. With bold, contrasting light, he cast his accomplished subjects in nothing less than monumental terms—as if each one is chiseled, for the ages, in stone. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/missmartini/512/DC63EEFE-B234-4242-9352-E405A19D8054.jpg" alt="Photograph of Jean Cocteau by Irving Penn." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/irving+penn/" rel="tag"&gt;irving penn&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/getty/" rel="tag"&gt;getty&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/slate+magazine/" rel="tag"&gt;slate magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2185054/?from=rss</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:46:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Equal time - equal talk</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8DAF90FF-DEFC-4C8F-9F0B-B4D52230F268/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I like this piece from Slate about Chris Matthews and how he should talk to his male guests just like he talks to his female guest.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Can you image that? He can tell his male guests that they are beautiful and have a great face and are a gift to women-kind. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2182544/fr/rss/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2182544/fr/rss/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Hardballs&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;How would Chris Matthews sound if he talked to men like he talks to women?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matthews also &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4155266&amp;page=1"&gt;recently apologized&lt;/A&gt; to Hillary Clinton for saying that the "reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around." It's ridiculous for Matthews to have to apologize to the women he's interviewed. What he needs to do is treat the guys equally.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2182544/fr/rss/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:13:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AT&amp;T loves spying on us</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8681B171-D8AD-4F7E-806D-F916156315CB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  When I saw this article in Slate, all I could think of was, "WTF?"  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2182152/fr/rss/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2182152/fr/rss/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Has AT&amp;T Lost Its Mind?&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;A baffling proposal to filter the Internet.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chances are that as you read this article, it is passing over part of AT&amp;T's network. That matters, because last week AT&amp;T &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/att-and-other-isps-may-be-getting-ready-to-filter/"&gt;announced&lt;/A&gt; that it is seriously considering plans to examine all the traffic it carries for potential violations of U.S. intellectual property laws. The prospect of AT&amp;T, already accused of &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/us/nationalspecial3/13nsa.html"&gt;spying on our telephone calls&lt;/A&gt;, now scanning every e-mail and download for outlawed content is way too totalitarian for my tastes. But the bizarre twist is that the proposal is such a bad idea that it would be not just a disservice to the public but probably a disaster for AT&amp;T itself. If I were a shareholder, I'd want to know one thing: Has AT&amp;T, after 122 years in business, simply lost its mind?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2182152/fr/rss/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:19:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Another op-ed piece - response to Steinem</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/16AFEC00-9086-453E-AF3D-EFD79376C618/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I thought this was an interesting op-ed piece on Slate in response to Steinem's NYT piece on Clinton and gender &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2181646/fr/rss/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2181646/fr/rss/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Steinem Makes Excuses for Hillary&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;Gender, race, and the presidency.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="byline"&gt;By Timothy Noah&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/steinem/" rel="tag"&gt;steinem&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/timothy_noah/" rel="tag"&gt;timothy_noah&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/op-ed/" rel="tag"&gt;op-ed&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/race/" rel="tag"&gt;race&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gender/" rel="tag"&gt;gender&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/2008/" rel="tag"&gt;2008&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/candidacy/" rel="tag"&gt;candidacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2181646/fr/rss/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:53:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>SoCal Wildfire Preparedness</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D72CBF83-AE6D-4D91-AA4D-58E18B0A5F43/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/missmartini/"&gt;missmartini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2178805/pagenum/all/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2178805/pagenum/all/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The Fire Next Time&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;How wildfire preparedness is turning California into Arizona.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;When your biggest investment is a house in fire country, every green thing that could turn brown starts to look like "flammable material," in the terminology of firefighters. Indeed, a relatively &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=prc&amp;group=04001-05000&amp;file=4291-4299"&gt;new law&lt;/A&gt; requires Californians to remove dead, brown flammable material and to severely thin out even potentially flammable green material. Property owners must maintain a lean, clean relatively bare zone in an area of 30 feet immediately surrounding a house, plus a "reduced fuel zone" in the remaining 70 feet or to the property line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/wildfires/" rel="tag"&gt;wildfires&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/prepare/" rel="tag"&gt;prepare&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/slate/" rel="tag"&gt;slate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/article/" rel="tag"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/southern+california/" rel="tag"&gt;southern california&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/california/" rel="tag"&gt;california&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2178805/pagenum/all/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:45:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>