<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | masbury's 'military' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/search/military/sort/latest-comments/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/search/military/sort/latest-comments/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>McCain "proud of" GI bill he opposed</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EB1FFC6F-0777-483C-9C20-7D4365A0AE87/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Speaking to VFW, who criticized him for opposing it.  VFW will award citation to Democrat Jim Webb, the bill's sponsor, tomorrow. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/18/mccain-vfw-response/" title="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/18/mccain-vfw-response/"&gt;thinkprogress.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a political proposition, it would have much easier for me to have just signed on to what I considered flawed legislation. But the people of Arizona, and of all America, expect more from their representatives than that, and &lt;STRONG&gt;instead I sought a better bill. I’m proud to say that the result is a law that better serves our military, better serves military families, and better serves the interests of our country.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It is audacious for McCain to go before the VFW and claim credit for a bill he nearly destroyed, considering the VFW was one of the bill’s strongest backers&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/04/veterans-mccain-gi-bill/"&gt;VFW’s deputy director for legislative affairs Eric Hilleman&lt;/A&gt;: The Graham-Burr-McCain plan is “&lt;STRONG&gt;very partisan and is seen as a way to convolute the GI bill&lt;/STRONG&gt;, or to slow the Webb-Hagel proposal down.” &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In fact, tomorrow the VFW will award &lt;A href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/30/webb-mccain-is-so-full-of-it/"&gt;Sen. Jim Webb&lt;/A&gt; (D-VA), the original sponsor of the GI Bill, &lt;A href="http://hrblogs.typepad.com/the_shad_plank/2008/08/vfw-to-honor-we.html"&gt;a gold medal and citation of merit&lt;/A&gt; for his leadership&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;McCain also promoted his&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;veterans health plan, &lt;A href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/08/vfw_versus_mccain.php"&gt;which the VFW actively opposes&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mccain/" rel="tag"&gt;mccain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/18/mccain-vfw-response/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:50:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>US Aid to Africa Increasingly Militarized</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E387749C-DC8D-459C-BA83-BA9273296A12/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Oh great, here we go again. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/18/headlines" title="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/18/headlines"&gt;www.democracynow.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H4 id="6" class="headlines"&gt;Group: US Aid to Africa Increasingly Militarized&lt;/H4&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The advocacy group Refugees International is warning US aid to Africa is becoming increasingly militarized at the expense of humanitarian needs. In a new report, Refugees International says the Pentagon is exerting increasing control over aid traditionally run by the State Department and US aid agencies. The Pentagon now controls 22 percent of US aid money, up from three percent a decade ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/news/" rel="tag"&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/18/headlines</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:21:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Army official fired for questioning $1B payout to KBR</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/00651408-CF4E-47C7-9C37-8B8236DC0437/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Told Iraq contractor to improve "chaotic" performance, held up payment on questionable charges &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/18/headlines" title="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/18/headlines"&gt;www.democracynow.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H4 id="2" class="headlines"&gt;Army Ousted Official for Questioning KBR Contract&lt;/H4&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The &lt;I&gt;New York Times&lt;/I&gt; reports the Army official who managed the Pentagon’s largest contract in Iraq says he was ousted from his job when he refused to approve paying more than $1 billion in questionable charges to the former Halliburton subsidiary KBR. Charles Smith said that he was forced from his job in 2004, after informing KBR officials that the Army would impose escalating financial penalties if they failed to improve their chaotic Iraqi operations. Although KBR’s performance in Iraq has come under fierce criticism from lawmakers, the Pentagon recently awarded the company part of a ten-year $150 billion contract in Iraq. Until last year, KBR was known as Kellogg Brown &amp; Root and was a subsidiary of Halliburton, the Texas oil services giant, where Vice President Dick Cheney previously served as chief executive&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;KBR has repeatedly gouged the taxpayer, and the Bush administration has looked the other way&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/iraq/" rel="tag"&gt;iraq&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/18/headlines</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:25:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>$80M Pentagon contract to FBI fugitive; Bush crony</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6E38AEF2-481C-4535-B565-040C4786C123/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Saudi national, barred from doing business in the USA, indicted by FBI, classmate of Bush &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/7/154413/4034" title="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/7/154413/4034"&gt;www.dailykos.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4996285&amp;page=1"&gt;Gretchen Peters&lt;/A&gt; reports that the Pentagon has awarded an international fugitive, shadowy Saudi financier Gaith Pharaon, an $80 million contract to supply jet fuel in Afghanistan (&lt;A href="http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2008/06/bushsaudi-crime.html"&gt;h/t Ron Beasley&lt;/A&gt;). Pharaon is a fugitive from the FBI as well as the subject of investigations by France and Italy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Pharaon was also an investor in President George W. Bush's first business venture, Arbusto Energy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Pharaon was a Harvard classmate of Bush's and a &lt;A href="http://wapedia.mobi/en/Arbusto_Energy"&gt;key investor&lt;/A&gt; in Arbusto/Harken Energy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In the US, he was the second largest shareholder in CenTrust when it went belly up. The Federal Reserve then &lt;A href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jun/08/bae48"&gt;barred Pharaon from doing business in the US&lt;/A&gt;, and the &lt;A href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CEFD9143AF93AA15751C0A964958260"&gt;FBI indicted him&lt;/A&gt;. Pharaon has been a fugitive ever since.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The FBI accuses the Saudi millionaire of fraud "involving millions of dollars" in the case of the Bank of Commerce and Credit International...In 1995 a US judge ordered Pharaon to give up $102m of his assets for his role in the BCCI fraud&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Another in a long line of scandalous war-contracts&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/7/154413/4034</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 05:08:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why is military spending highest since WWII?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AC0C25DC-FEA9-4277-AE7D-29211EE76B2F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Hi-tech cold-war toys in development. One thing's sure: if we get them, we'll use them on a few thousand poor suckers.  Meanwhile Lieberman crusades for deep water submarines that, coincidentally, are made in his home state, but serve no strategic purpose. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080601_indefensible_spending/" title="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080601_indefensible_spending/"&gt;www.truthdig.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Indefensible Spending&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
What should be the most important issue in this election is one that is rarely, if ever, addressed: Why is U.S. military spending at the highest point, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than at any time since the end of World War II? Why, without a sophisticated military opponent in sight, is the United States spending trillions of dollars on the development of high-tech weapons systems that lost their purpose with the collapse of the Soviet Union two decades ago?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The Pentagon’s budget for fiscal year 2008 set a post-World War II record at $625 billion, and that does not include more than $100 billion in other federal budget expenditures for homeland security, nuclear weapons and so-called black budget—or covert—operations. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;We are talking high-tech war toys designed to fight a Cold War enemy that no longer exists&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
Since President Bush’s first year&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Defense Department has doubled its future planned investment in those ultra-pricey weapons from $790 billion to $1.6 trillion&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/defense/" rel="tag"&gt;defense&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080601_indefensible_spending/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:08:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>US military spending twice that of any other gov't program</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/3F4BDAE1-BA60-4AD6-8F49-63C9EF05CA3F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Where are the critics of Big Government? Dabbing at the trickles, rather than stanching the gusher.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.journeywithjesus.net/Essays/20080526JJ.shtml" title="http://www.journeywithjesus.net/Essays/20080526JJ.shtml"&gt;www.journeywithjesus.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Jim Wallis observes in his book &lt;EM&gt;God's Politics&lt;/EM&gt; that government budgets are "moral documents."&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;here's how the government spent my 2007 tax dollars:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;42% went to Past and Current Military&lt;BR /&gt;
            22% Health&lt;BR /&gt;
            10% Interest on Non-Military Debt&lt;BR /&gt;
            9% Anti-Poverty Programs&lt;BR /&gt;
            4% Education, Training &amp; Social Services&lt;BR /&gt;
            4% Government &amp; Law Enforcement&lt;BR /&gt;
            3% Housing &amp; Community Development&lt;BR /&gt;
            3% Environment, Energy &amp; Science&lt;BR /&gt;
            2% Agriculture, Commerce and Transportation&lt;BR /&gt;
            1% International Relations &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In 2005 the United States accounted for 48% of the entire world's military spending — which is to say that our one country nearly spent more on the military than the rest of the world combined. Our Department of Defense says that America deploys 254,788 military personnel (double that number if you include dependents) to at least 725 military bases in 153 countries. Our own country is home to 969 separate bases in all fifty states. By these budgetary metrics, the United States prioritizes war like no nation on earth.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/taxes/" rel="tag"&gt;taxes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.journeywithjesus.net/Essays/20080526JJ.shtml</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 19:59:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>111 nations adopt cluster bomb ban; US refuses</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8DE5EBD9-55ED-4114-A732-20A59358E392/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  US corporations make and sell cluster bombs &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&amp;forum=102&amp;topic_id=3331964&amp;mesg_id=3331964" title="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&amp;forum=102&amp;topic_id=3331964&amp;mesg_id=3331964"&gt;www.democraticunderground.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;111 nations adopt cluster bomb treaty, but not US&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;DUBLIN, Ireland (AP) - Diplomats from 111 nations formally adopted a landmark treaty banning cluster bombs on Friday after futile calls for participation by the weapons' biggest makers and users, particularly the United States.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged every nation in the world to sign the painstakingly negotiated pact "without delay."&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Twelve days of negotiations ended after diplomats from scores of nations delivered speeches embracing the accord. It requires signatories not to use cluster bombs, to destroy existing stockpiles within eight years, and to fund programs that clear old battlefields of dud bombs.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Washington this week dismissed the prospect that the treaty would alter U.S. policy&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cluster+bombs/" rel="tag"&gt;cluster bombs&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/un/" rel="tag"&gt;un&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&amp;forum=102&amp;topic_id=3331964&amp;mesg_id=3331964</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:46:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Navy accidentally bombs Ocala National Forest</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AF87EC7E-4BB5-4265-9668-CFB67BCE7931/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Even America's not safe from America. Burns down 250 acres. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/16273603/detail.html" title="http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/16273603/detail.html"&gt;www.clickondetroit.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B class="Dateline"&gt;JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- &lt;/B&gt;During what was supposed to be a routine training exercise, a bomb landed off-target, landing and igniting a fire in the Ocala National Forest this week.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;The 500-pound, laser-guided bomb was released from an F/A-18 Super Hornet on Tuesday, and detonated about 1 mile east of the Pinecastle target range, WJXT-TV in Jacksonville reported.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;About 250 acres of forest and swampland were burned, according to Mike Drayton, a fire management officer with the U.S. Forest Service&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/masbury/512/0764899C-EEB5-4422-86D0-0335B8367170.jpg" alt="Map: Navy bomb off target, starts woods fire" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/16273603/detail.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:01:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Lawmakers &amp; corporations to earn millions if war continues</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4B4387B2-A496-4A2A-BC08-9DB1E24D5653/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Military - industrial complex beyond Eisenhower's wildest dreams:  Lawmakers have millions invested in defense contractors; Almost all major US corporations rake in huge profits from the Pentagon.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://peoplesgeography.com/2008/05/11/wars-shopping-cart/" title="http://peoplesgeography.com/2008/05/11/wars-shopping-cart/"&gt;peoplesgeography.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;lawmakers have as much as $196 million “invested in companies doing business with the Defense Department, earning millions since the start of the Iraq war.”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Civilian firms such as PepsiCo and IBM form the backbone of what more accurately can be described as a “military-corporate complex.”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;PepsiCo and IBM ranked among the Pentagon’s top 100 contractors, taking in $286,696,943 and $291,825,309, respectively&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;top 100 suppliers also included such well-known civilian firms as Tyson Foods ($335,239,095), Goodrich Corp. ($344,091,017), Procter &amp; Gamble ($362,461,808), Kraft Foods ($500,799,104), Dell ($636,343,593), ExxonMobil ($1,176,354,936), FedEx ($1,303,032,027) and General Electric ($2,327,705,161)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It’s high time we at least recognize that PepsiCo, IBM, Microsoft, and Johnson &amp; Johnson and just about every other corporate giant&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;are benefiting not only from our purchases of cola, computers, software and bandages but from our tax dollars, via the Pentagon&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pentagon/" rel="tag"&gt;pentagon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/defense/" rel="tag"&gt;defense&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/news/" rel="tag"&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://peoplesgeography.com/2008/05/11/wars-shopping-cart/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:19:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Networks' military analysts pitched gov't views, sought millions in contracts</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0B426EAE-9EA0-4797-B96B-BE222BA963A2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Illegal covert Pentagon program not being covered by MSM &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.counterpunch.org/farsetta05032008.html" title="http://www.counterpunch.org/farsetta05032008.html"&gt;www.counterpunch.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="+3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color="#990000"&gt;T&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="-1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"&gt;he Pentagon launched its covert media analyst program in 2002, to sell the Iraq war. Later, it was used to sell an image of progress in Afghanistan, whitewash the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, and defend the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping, as David Barstow reported in his New York Times expose.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
      &lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="-1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"&gt;But the pundits weren't just selling government talking points. As Robert Bevelacqua, William Cowan and Carlton Sherwood enjoyed high-level Pentagon access through the analyst program, their WVC3 Group sought "contracts worth tens of millions to supply body armor and counterintelligence services in Iraq," reported Barstow. Cowan admitted to "push[ing] hard" on a WVC3 contract, during a Pentagon-funded trip to Iraq.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Today, the broadcast and cable networks are steadfastly refusing to cover or otherwise address the Pentagon military analyst program&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;These officers participated in a covert government program designed to shape U.S. public opinion -- an illegal program&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/media/" rel="tag"&gt;media&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pentagon/" rel="tag"&gt;pentagon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.counterpunch.org/farsetta05032008.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:38:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>22-yr-old had $300M arms contract with Pentagon</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/13985657-3A29-41DC-A17E-7CB7A11648B5/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Ho ho!  The news is amusing tonight! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/army_looks_to_learn_lesson_fro.php" title="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/army_looks_to_learn_lesson_fro.php"&gt;tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;IMG vspace="5" hspace="5" align="left" src="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/images/diveroli2-muck.jpg" /&gt;Army Looks to Learn Lesson from Contract to 22 Year-Old&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks like the Pentagon is just in a lesson-learning mood lately. While they're busily &lt;A href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/message_force_multipliers_put.php"&gt;reviewing&lt;/A&gt; whether the carefully-orchestrated use of military analysts was improper, the Army is &lt;A href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/world/27ammo.html?ei=5088&amp;en=eb63778d8651dff3&amp;ex=1366948800&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;reviewing&lt;/A&gt; whether it should have known better than to award a $300 million contract to supply arms to the Afghan security forces to &lt;A href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/todays_must_read_304.php"&gt;a company run by a 22 year-old&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;As &lt;EM&gt;The New York Times&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;A href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/world/27ammo.html?ei=5088&amp;en=eb63778d8651dff3&amp;ex=1366948800&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;reports&lt;/A&gt;, the key lesson seems to be that if a contractor's price seems too good to be true, then it probably is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/humor/" rel="tag"&gt;humor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pentagon/" rel="tag"&gt;pentagon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/contracts/" rel="tag"&gt;contracts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/army_looks_to_learn_lesson_fro.php</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:35:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pentagon: "Stick our hands up your backs and move your mouth for you"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/84386DE2-FADB-423F-A933-4815923C0941/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Sen. Levin says new analysts "apparently on the payroll of defense contractors" &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N22334887.htm" title="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N22334887.htm"&gt;www.alertnet.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="ANTitle"&gt;
		US senator complains Pentagon grooming TV analysts
		&lt;SPAN class="timestamp"&gt;
			

		&lt;/SPAN&gt;
	&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
	

	



			WASHINGTON, April 22 (Reuters) - A newspaper report that U.S. military analysts working for television networks were coached by the Pentagon provided "very clear evidence of conflicts of interest" at the Defense Department, a senior U.S. senator said on Tuesday.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt; Sen. Carl Levin, the Michigan Democrat who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he was sending Defense Secretary Robert Gates a letter&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; The New York Times on Sunday reported that retired senior officers received private briefings, trips and access to classified intelligence to influence their comments about the Iraq war on television networks.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt; "It's a very, very significant disclosure of the New York Times," Levin told reporters.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt; The newspaper quoted Robert Bevelacqua, a retired Green Beret and former Fox News analyst, as saying, "It was them (the Bush administration) saying, 'We need to stick our hands up your back and move your mouth for you.'"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/media/" rel="tag"&gt;media&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/news/" rel="tag"&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N22334887.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:33:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Network "military analysts" got talking points from Pentagon</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8CAED501-56D4-4E4F-B90F-92062375520B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  While being paid by military contractors.  NY Times breaks a major story ... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/21/24457/4269/526/499856" title="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/21/24457/4269/526/499856"&gt;www.dailykos.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Yesterday the &lt;EM&gt;New York Times&lt;/EM&gt; carried an in-depth, documented &lt;A href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?scp=3&amp;sq=Pentagon&amp;st=nyt"&gt;report&lt;/A&gt; on a propaganda war that has been waged against the American people&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the Pentagon has been sending out a cadre of military analysts to blanket the airways with "favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance." &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;They are the retired military officers that appear on every network and cable news show as paid analysts to explain the intricacies of war to us&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;what we weren't told was that they have also been working for the White House, the State Department and the Justice Department, receiving briefings from high level government officials, including Dick Cheney, before heading to the T.V. studio to offer their "personal opinion"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;And what's worse, these "experts" not only regularly receive their talking points from the administration, they also represent:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;...more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It is nothing less than propaganda for profit&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/media/" rel="tag"&gt;media&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/news/" rel="tag"&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pentagon/" rel="tag"&gt;pentagon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/21/24457/4269/526/499856</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:23:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Chart: Compare military spending with preventive spending</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/34A60AC9-CAA9-4ACD-9D8C-8E22FF6D5061/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  If you can find the tiny slice &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nationalpriorities.org/national_security" title="http://www.nationalpriorities.org/national_security"&gt;www.nationalpriorities.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;American taxpayers expect the federal government to provide national security. Achieving that security is a constant and complicated challenge that cannot be met by military might alone. A sound national security policy involves three broad strategies: 
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;preventive measures such as securing nuclear materials abroad and participating in multi-lateral diplomatic and peacekeeping operations; &lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;homeland security such as providing port security and coordinating emergency first responders; and&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;the military&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/masbury/512/A78F6AD4-8D1A-4665-9E62-F8795A9FB104.gif" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/foreign+policy/" rel="tag"&gt;foreign policy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nationalpriorities.org/national_security</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:10:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pentagon Study: Hack blogs "antithetical to US interests"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/31466690-949F-4987-9D98-70A145762B4A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Will Pentagon hack your blog if it doesn't like your point of view? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/4/1/headlines" title="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/4/1/headlines"&gt;www.democracynow.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Wired.com has uncovered a 2006 study written for the US Special Operations Command that suggests the military should clandestinely recruit or hire prominent bloggers. The report stated, “Hiring a block of bloggers to verbally attack a specific person or promote a specific message may be worth considering.” The report also suggested the Pentagon hack blogs that promote messages that are antithetical to US interests. The report went on to say, “Hacking the site and subtly changing the messages and data—merely a few words or phrases—may be sufficient to begin destroying the blogger’s credibility with the audience.”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/blogs/" rel="tag"&gt;blogs&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/internet/" rel="tag"&gt;internet&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/freedom/" rel="tag"&gt;freedom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democracynow.org/2008/4/1/headlines</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:46:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>