<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | masbury's 'clinton' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/search/clinton/sort/latest-comments/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/search/clinton/sort/latest-comments/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Bill Clinton home run as DNC celebrates</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/11E5DC7E-2AA1-456A-AE3B-5AE2E76674EF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  A truly magnificent speech:  "My fellow Democrats, I say to you: Barack Obama is ready to lead America and to restore American leadership in the world." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/27/bill-clinton-throws-his-full-weight-behind-obama-blasts-bushmccain-legacy/" title="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/27/bill-clinton-throws-his-full-weight-behind-obama-blasts-bushmccain-legacy/"&gt;www.crooksandliars.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="post-32253" class="storytitle"&gt;&lt;A rel="bookmark" href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/27/bill-clinton-throws-his-full-weight-behind-obama-blasts-bushmccain-legacy/"&gt;Bill Clinton Throws His Full Weight Behind Obama, Blasts Bush/McCain Legacy&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;EM&gt;My fellow Democrats, I say to you: Barack Obama is ready to lead America and to restore American leadership in the world.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Barack Obama is ready to honor the oath, to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Barack Obama is ready to be president of the United States. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;People the world over have always been more impressed by the power of our example than by the example of our power.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;In this decade, American workers have consistently given us rising productivity. That means, year after year, they work harder and produce more.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt; Now, what did they get in return? Declining wages, less than one-fourth as many new jobs as in the previous eight years, smaller health care and pension benefits, rising poverty, and the biggest increase in income inequality since the 1920s. American families by the millions are struggling with soaring health care costs and declining coverage.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Full transcript below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/27/bill-clinton-throws-his-full-weight-behind-obama-blasts-bushmccain-legacy/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:02:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Poll: Without Edwards, Clinton loses Iowa by greater margin</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D9B1E5EC-4D22-4902-805C-769AFDBB52A7/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Poll conducted on caucus night at caucuses suggests 82% of Edwards backers had Obama as 2nd choice.  Wolfson wrong.  Again. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.gazetteonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080812/NEWS/18337217/-1/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01" title="http://www.gazetteonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080812/NEWS/18337217/-1/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01"&gt;www.gazetteonline.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B class="dateline"&gt;IOWA CITY - &lt;/B&gt;


John Edwards' admission&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;has prompted Hillary Clinton's forces to suggest that if Edwards had been forced out of the race sooner, she -- not Barack Obama -- would have won the Iowa Caucuses and thus, presumably, the nomination.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;A University of Iowa Hawkeye Poll conducted the night of the Iowa Caucuses suggests the opposite: that the absence of Edwards would have helped Obama.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The survey administered &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;in every precinct in Iowa&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;included a question on second-choice preferences&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Eighty-two percent of those who had Edwards as their first choice said if he was not viable, they would support another candidate. When asked which candidate they would support, 51 percent said Obama and only 32 percent picked Clinton.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"Monday's claim from Howard Wolfson &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;that two-thirds of Edwards supporters would have supported Clinton is just not supported in data&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"Had Edwards not been running,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;my data suggest that Obama would have ended up even further ahead of Clinton than he was."&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/edwards/" rel="tag"&gt;edwards&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.gazetteonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080812/NEWS/18337217/-1/rss01&amp;rssfeed=rss01</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:40:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hillary, We Hardly Knew Ye</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/3A31DA3F-49C0-4BB3-AD43-C38CDD0B5ACB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  But the one in the concession speech was a compelling candidate; would she have won if she'd been this way the whole time? Did she lose by trying to be the things that stereotypes say you have to be to win as a woman, rather than being herself? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-ostertag/the-hillary-we-hardly-kne_b_105929.html" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-ostertag/the-hillary-we-hardly-kne_b_105929.html"&gt;www.huffingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;For her last hurrah as a presidential contender yesterday, Hillary Clinton repackaged herself yet again, this time as a vocal and thoughtful feminist. I &lt;EM&gt;like&lt;/EM&gt; this Hillary. Where has she been the last six months?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally, with the race over, yesterday we were presented with the kinder, gentler Hillary. And you know what? I &lt;EM&gt;liked&lt;/EM&gt; her. She spoke &lt;EM&gt;passionately&lt;/EM&gt; .- about things she had not mentioned during all those previous incarnations! She spoke as the worthy spokeswoman for gender equality. She radiated confidence and appeal. She called us to our better selves. She made us believe that we could move past the divisions that have hobbled us. . (Is this starting to sound familiar?) "Yes, we can!" she proclaimed. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Hillary," I shouted back, "where have you been? This country is in dire shape! The planet is in dire need! The moment is critical! We &lt;EM&gt;need&lt;/EM&gt; a woman like you! &lt;EM&gt;Have you ever considered running for president?&lt;/EM&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;What I do know is that I hope this Hillary stays with us.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-ostertag/the-hillary-we-hardly-kne_b_105929.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:07:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The phone rings at 3 AM . . .</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B8CCD2EF-A857-44FC-B1B0-8AC4764B97AA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Tom Toles cartoon &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_main.html?hpid=opinionsbox1" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_main.html?hpid=opinionsbox1"&gt;www.washingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/masbury/512/F5A7FE8B-586E-4A53-81A3-EF55555D46B6.gif" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_main.html?hpid=opinionsbox1</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:20:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Clinton winning "popular vote"? Don't believe it.</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A9ABF12E-7351-4F62-A34E-C9107F2B5980/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Add in all the details that her campaign omits, and you'll get the real figure.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/1/16747/37393" title="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/1/16747/37393"&gt;www.dailykos.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/masbury/512/54C4444B-427B-4085-93F1-4AF9C5C69FDD.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;So pulling it ALL together (drumroll please):&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/renarf/FinalRealMathTotal.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;When you use Clinton's own criteria and apply that criteria &lt;EM&gt;fairly&lt;/EM&gt;, Obama clearly wins the so-called "popular vote".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, there's only ONE math that matters:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/renarf/delegatemath.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;But as long as her campaign wants to distribute misleading (and frankly dishonest), cherry-picked "popular vote" figures, I wanted to set the record straight.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/1/16747/37393</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:12:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Clinton winding down Tuesday night?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/1F0A5B16-404E-4281-8218-2311C083B390/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Astonishing, conciliatory developments &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/02/clinton-summons-top-donor_n_104715.html" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/02/clinton-summons-top-donor_n_104715.html"&gt;www.huffingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Hillary Clinton has summoned top donors and backers to attend her New York speech tomorrow night in an unusual move that is being widely interpreted to mean she plans to suspend her campaign&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Obama and Clinton spoke Sunday night and agreed that their staffs should begin negotiations over post-primary activities&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Clinton is known to want Obama to assist black officials who endorsed her and who are now taking constituent heat&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Earlier in the day &lt;A href="http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/06/more_clinton_clues.php"&gt;it was reported&lt;/A&gt; that Clinton staffers were being urged by the campaign's finance department "to turn in their outstanding expense receipts by the end of the week,"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/Clinton_camp_converging_on_New_York_Tuesday_and_shedding_staff.html"&gt;Politico wrote that&lt;/A&gt; members of Clinton's advance staff had received calls and emails Sunday night, summoning them to New York City and telling them their roles on the campaign are ending.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/02/clinton-summons-top-donor_n_104715.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:25:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Poll: Name recognition wins Puerto Rico primary</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C1269E5A-0F68-4C94-BF1C-98651FC3782C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  With few hard feelings among supporters of either &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Name_recognition_helps_Clinton_in_P_06012008.html" title="http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Name_recognition_helps_Clinton_in_P_06012008.html"&gt;www.rawstory.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hillary Rodham Clinton had far greater name recognition than Barack Obama in Puerto Rico, giving her a big advantage in the Democratic presidential primary Sunday, according to a poll for The Associated Press and television networks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The survey also found that — unlike in recent primaries on the U.S. mainland — neither side's voters had a particularly harsh view of the other candidate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fully one-third, or 34 percent, of likely voters said they hadn't heard enough about Obama to express an opinion about him. Only 16 percent said that about Clinton, the former first lady and current U.S. senator from New York, a state with many Puerto Ricans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only one in five Obama backers viewed Clinton unfavorably and one in seven Clinton supporters gave Obama an unfavorable rating.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/news/" rel="tag"&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Name_recognition_helps_Clinton_in_P_06012008.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:39:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>DNC, don't disenfranchise me by counting "popular" vote!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/94442929-0853-4478-AF48-CDE7A7F74669/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Eleven caucus states and Samoa aren't included!  What kind of a popular vote ignores a fifth of the states?  It's purely fictitious.  Coincidentally, the Clinton campaign under-performed in the caucus states, and the Clinton campaign proposes this metric - popular vote - which leaves them out. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/donald-sutherland/hillarys-popular-vote-not_b_104152.html" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/donald-sutherland/hillarys-popular-vote-not_b_104152.html"&gt;www.huffingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It is incomprehensible to me that Mrs. Clinton can seriously be touting the
notion, with the support of the punditocracy of CNN and Fox, that she is
leading in the popular vote and should therefore be seriously considered as the
most electable candidate in the November election.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;She's including those who
voted for her in Florida and Michigan's name recognition ballot saying that to
exclude them would be to disenfranchise them.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;What about the Democrats in
Alaska, American Samoa, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, New Mexico,
North Dakota, Nebraska, Washington, Hawaii and Wyoming who did not cast
ballots because they were playing by the pledged delegates playbook and voted
by caucus. What about them? Certainly if the rules are going to be changed and
judgment is based on the 'popular' vote those voters in the eleven caucus
states and Samoa will be disenfranchised. What about them?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/donald-sutherland/hillarys-popular-vote-not_b_104152.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:39:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>DNC lawyers rule against Clinton</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/51955224-C9F6-4A61-B517-F5DE260136D2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  No more than half of MI and FL may be legally recognized &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&amp;forum=102&amp;topic_id=3328118&amp;mesg_id=3329819" title="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&amp;forum=102&amp;topic_id=3328118&amp;mesg_id=3329819"&gt;www.democraticunderground.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's prospects of persuading Democratic officials to override party rules and recognize all delegates selected in the Florida and Michigan primaries suffered a setback yesterday after lawyers for the party ruled that no more than half of those delegations could be legally recognized. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Democratic National Committee lawyers wrote in a memo that the two states must forfeit at least half of their delegates as punishment for holding primaries earlier than DNC rules allowed. Clinton (N.Y.) prevailed in both contests, although the Democratic candidates had agreed not to campaign in Florida and Michigan, and Sen. Barack Obama removed his name from the Michigan ballot. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;But in the memo, party lawyers determined that full restoration, as sought by Clinton, would violate DNC rules&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&amp;forum=102&amp;topic_id=3328118&amp;mesg_id=3329819</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:41:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes, Virginia, there will be another woman candidate ...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AAE0E3BA-7DD8-4DC0-B995-6BC3996D5BA8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  She won "more than 16 million votes in the primaries and around 1,779 delegates. Clinton kicked ass as a woman."&lt;br/&gt;A woman with some of her strengths but without her considerable liabilities will be a formidable candidate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2192220/" title="http://www.slate.com/id/2192220/"&gt;www.slate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="article_top"&gt;&lt;DIV class="kicker"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="department_name"&gt;xx factor xxtra: &lt;/SPAN&gt;Women writing about politics, etc.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;H1&gt;One-Hit Wondering&lt;SPAN class="h1_subhead"&gt;Yes, Virginia, there will be another woman candidate in your lifetime.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;SPAN class="byline"&gt;By Dahlia Lithwick&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN class="dateline"&gt;Posted Tuesday, May 27, 2008, at 6:14 PM ET
&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's enough to make a girl want to run for president …&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;With Hillary Clinton edging ever closer to the won't-finish line in the Democratic primary, the inevitable rending of garments that a woman may never again mount a successful run for the presidency has begun.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The folks claiming we've allowed the presidency to slip through our fingers arrive at this conclusion by pressing the same flawed syllogism: The only viable woman candidate thus far has been Hillary; Hillary did not win; ergo there will never be another viable woman candidate.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;If the Clinton candidacy has taught us anything, however, it's that a woman can straddle all those irreconcilable demands and still win. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;more than 16 million votes in the primaries and around 1,779 delegates&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Clinton kicked ass &lt;EM&gt;as a woman&lt;/EM&gt;. Why take that away&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/women/" rel="tag"&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/feminism/" rel="tag"&gt;feminism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.slate.com/id/2192220/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:20:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Clinton says she leads in "every poll"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/991EC342-B59D-4689-AE70-BB3AA18EE921/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Eeyow.  Would you buy a used car from someone who said that?  CBS headline is "Clinton Casts Wide Net of Exaggeration." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/05/28/politics/fromtheroad/entry4130842.shtml" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/05/28/politics/fromtheroad/entry4130842.shtml"&gt;www.cbsnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3 class="blog_big"&gt;Clinton Casts Wide Net of Exaggeration, Claims to Lead in “Every Poll”&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“You have to ask yourself, who is the stronger candidate?  And based on every analysis, of every bit of research and every poll that has been taken and every state that a Democrat has to win, I am the stronger candidate against John McCain in the fall,”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The problem is, there are a number of polls that show Clinton in a close race with John McCain, many within the margin of error, not including a few that show Barack Obama beating McCain by a larger margin than Clinton.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/05/28/politics/fromtheroad/entry4130842.shtml</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 23:54:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sullivan: "very important Obama not ask her to be VP"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4A57F3BA-A786-4821-9961-AFF45B9DD783/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Clinton says not counting FL and MI is like Gore losing in FL in 2000. First two paragraphs are Clinton quotes, balance is Sullivan. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/05/shameless-1.html" title="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/05/shameless-1.html"&gt;andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I’ve heard some say that counting Florida and Michigan would be
changing the rules&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; I say that not counting Florida and Michigan is
changing a central governing rule of this country - that whenever we
can understand the clear intent of the voters, their votes should be
counted. I remember very well back in 2000, there were those who argued
that people's votes should be discounted over technicalities. For the
people of Florida who voted in this primary, the notion of discounting
their votes sounds way too much of the same.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;How do you respond to a sociopath like this? She &lt;EM&gt;agreed&lt;/EM&gt; that
Michigan and Florida should be punished&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Obama took his name off the ballot in deference to their agreement &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;That he should now be punished for playing by
the rules and she should be rewarded for skirting them is
unconscionable&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;she has now made it very important that Obama not ask her to be
the veep&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The way she is losing is so ugly, so feckless&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;this kind of person should never be
a heartbeat away from the presidency&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/05/shameless-1.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:10:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bill Clinton: "Cover-up" hiding Hillary's chances</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/28AD3CE3-5D09-4B66-9D7E-4157734E51FA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Browbeating media into singing her song? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/26/bill.clinton.mon/index.html?eref=rss_topstories" title="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/26/bill.clinton.mon/index.html?eref=rss_topstories"&gt;edition.cnn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;B&gt;(CNN)&lt;/B&gt; -- Former President Bill Clinton said that Democrats were more likely to lose in November if Hillary Clinton is not the nominee, and suggested some were trying to "push and pressure and bully" superdelegates to make up their minds prematurely.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; "I can't believe it. It is just frantic the way they are trying to push and pressure and bully all these superdelegates to come out,"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;   Clinton also suggested some were trying to "cover up" Sen. &lt;A href="http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/candidates/hillary.clinton.html"&gt;Clinton&lt;/A&gt;'s chances of winning in key states that Democrats will have to win in the general election.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   " 'Oh, this is so terrible: The people they want her. Oh, this is so terrible: She is winning the &lt;A class="cnnInlineTopic" href="http://topics.edition.cnn.com/topics/u_s_presidential_election"&gt;general election&lt;/A&gt;, and he is not. Oh my goodness, we have to cover this up.' "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I have never seen anything like it. I have never seen a candidate treated so disrespectfully just for running."&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/26/bill.clinton.mon/index.html?eref=rss_topstories</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:32:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dignified response to Clinton's RFK comment</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/10BBC9CE-D3F8-4FF8-93CB-A64519A75087/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=4925145&amp;page=1" title="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=4925145&amp;page=1"&gt;abcnews.go.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;'You Get Careless': Obama Blames Clinton RFK Quip on Stress of Long Campaign&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Sen. Barack Obama gives Hillary Clinton the benefit of the doubt that she had no hidden meaning when she invoked the assassination of Bobby Kennedy as an explanation for remaining in the Democratic presidential race.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
"I have learned that when you are campaigning for as many months as Sen. Clinton and I have been campaigning," he told the Puerto Rico radio station Isla, "sometimes you get careless in terms of the statements that you make. And I think that is what happened here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
"Sen. Clinton says that she did not intend any offense by it," he added, "and I would take her at her word on that."&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=4925145&amp;page=1</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 01:24:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Send a message: I'm done with lying politicians</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E5E8E22A-4DEA-46B3-BF36-4919C6E43C00/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  What I dislike most about Bush is his lying. Likewise, Clinton. She'll not have my vote. &lt;br/&gt;For I wonder how different things would be if politicians were sure that voters won't support liars. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/24/111213/825" title="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/24/111213/825"&gt;www.dailykos.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;as much attention and outrage has been generated by the RFK references, I'm still ultimately more bothered by her willful and repeated distortions of truth.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;her "only big states matter" b.s., her "small states don't matter" b.s., her "the only swing states are the ones I won primaries in" b.s., her "I'm winning the popular vote" b.s., her "I was for punishing Florida and Michigan and signed a letter to that effect, but now changed my mind because it's politically expedient" b.s., and her "Obama can't win states in the fall in which lost the primary" b.s. Her rank and willful dishonesty drives me up the wall&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right?
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; The 1992 primaries ended on June 2&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;first caucus, Iowa, took place February 10th, more than one month later than this year's January 3rd caucuses&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;after eight years of Bush rule, I'm sick and tired of politically expedient alternate realities.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/lying/" rel="tag"&gt;lying&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/24/111213/825</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:04:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>