<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | masbury's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/date/2008/6/1/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/date/2008/6/1/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Why is military spending highest since WWII?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AC0C25DC-FEA9-4277-AE7D-29211EE76B2F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Hi-tech cold-war toys in development. One thing's sure: if we get them, we'll use them on a few thousand poor suckers.  Meanwhile Lieberman crusades for deep water submarines that, coincidentally, are made in his home state, but serve no strategic purpose. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080601_indefensible_spending/" title="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080601_indefensible_spending/"&gt;www.truthdig.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Indefensible Spending&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
What should be the most important issue in this election is one that is rarely, if ever, addressed: Why is U.S. military spending at the highest point, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than at any time since the end of World War II? Why, without a sophisticated military opponent in sight, is the United States spending trillions of dollars on the development of high-tech weapons systems that lost their purpose with the collapse of the Soviet Union two decades ago?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The Pentagon’s budget for fiscal year 2008 set a post-World War II record at $625 billion, and that does not include more than $100 billion in other federal budget expenditures for homeland security, nuclear weapons and so-called black budget—or covert—operations. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;We are talking high-tech war toys designed to fight a Cold War enemy that no longer exists&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
Since President Bush’s first year&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Defense Department has doubled its future planned investment in those ultra-pricey weapons from $790 billion to $1.6 trillion&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/military/" rel="tag"&gt;military&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/defense/" rel="tag"&gt;defense&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080601_indefensible_spending/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:08:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>US holding terror suspects on prison ships?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/BBEBC347-42B9-4F09-94DA-E13B8918F4C6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Far from prying eyes, treatment said to be worse than Gitmo &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/02/usa.humanrights?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=worldnews" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/02/usa.humanrights?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=worldnews"&gt;www.guardian.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;US accused of holding terror suspects on prison ships&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/masbury/512/456AEC80-DA2F-49CA-90FB-83460931AE6B.jpg" alt="An amphibious assault vehicle leaves the USS Peleliu, which was used to detain prisoners, according to the human rights group Reprieve" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to research carried out by Reprieve, the US may have used as many as 17 ships as "floating prisons" since 2001. Detainees are interrogated aboard the vessels and then rendered to other, often undisclosed, locations, it is claimed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clive Stafford Smith, Reprieve's legal director, said: "They choose ships to try to keep their misconduct as far as possible from the prying eyes of the media and lawyers. We will eventually reunite these ghost prisoners with their legal rights.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"By its own admission, the US government is currently detaining at least 26,000 people without trial in secret prisons, and information suggests up to 80,000 have been 'through the system' since 2001. The US government must show a commitment to rights and basic humanity by immediately revealing who these people are, where they are, and what has been done to them."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;200 new cases of rendition since 2006, when&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Bush declared that the practice had stopped.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gitmo/" rel="tag"&gt;gitmo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/torture/" rel="tag"&gt;torture&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/02/usa.humanrights?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=worldnews</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:55:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Clinton winning "popular vote"? Don't believe it.</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A9ABF12E-7351-4F62-A34E-C9107F2B5980/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Add in all the details that her campaign omits, and you'll get the real figure.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/1/16747/37393" title="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/1/16747/37393"&gt;www.dailykos.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/masbury/512/54C4444B-427B-4085-93F1-4AF9C5C69FDD.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;So pulling it ALL together (drumroll please):&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/renarf/FinalRealMathTotal.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;When you use Clinton's own criteria and apply that criteria &lt;EM&gt;fairly&lt;/EM&gt;, Obama clearly wins the so-called "popular vote".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, there's only ONE math that matters:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/renarf/delegatemath.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;But as long as her campaign wants to distribute misleading (and frankly dishonest), cherry-picked "popular vote" figures, I wanted to set the record straight.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/1/16747/37393</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:12:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Poll: Name recognition wins Puerto Rico primary</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C1269E5A-0F68-4C94-BF1C-98651FC3782C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  With few hard feelings among supporters of either &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Name_recognition_helps_Clinton_in_P_06012008.html" title="http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Name_recognition_helps_Clinton_in_P_06012008.html"&gt;www.rawstory.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hillary Rodham Clinton had far greater name recognition than Barack Obama in Puerto Rico, giving her a big advantage in the Democratic presidential primary Sunday, according to a poll for The Associated Press and television networks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The survey also found that — unlike in recent primaries on the U.S. mainland — neither side's voters had a particularly harsh view of the other candidate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fully one-third, or 34 percent, of likely voters said they hadn't heard enough about Obama to express an opinion about him. Only 16 percent said that about Clinton, the former first lady and current U.S. senator from New York, a state with many Puerto Ricans.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only one in five Obama backers viewed Clinton unfavorably and one in seven Clinton supporters gave Obama an unfavorable rating.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/news/" rel="tag"&gt;news&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Name_recognition_helps_Clinton_in_P_06012008.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:39:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ahmadinejad's hold on power "slipping badly"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/46C8CC99-BFD6-4C7C-814E-06563E3C66FC/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  More pragmatic speaker elected; likely to find agreement with the West &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1810456,00.html" title="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1810456,00.html"&gt;www.time.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Are Ahmadinejad's Days Numbered?&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
 Ali Larijani projected a presidential bearing as he accepted his election as speaker of Iran's parliament on Wednesday — a vote that &lt;A  href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1723901,00.html"&gt;boded ill for President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad&lt;/A&gt;. Larijani, a high-profile arch-rival of the President, addressed global themes in his address to the   opening session of the Majlis&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;While Iran's insistence on its right to enrich uranium unites all major factions in the country, Larijani represents a &lt;A  href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1723901,00.html"&gt;more pragmatic approach&lt;/A&gt; to handling the issue, aimed at finding agreement with the West and avoiding confrontation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;makes two things clear: President Ahmadinejad's hold on power is slipping badly, and next year's Iranian presidential election race is now wide open&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Prominent politicians and clerical figures have begun distancing themselves from Ahmadinejad and rallying around Larijani&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Ahmadinejad has alienated many in his own conservative camp with an arrogant personal style and erratic economic and foreign policies&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/iran/" rel="tag"&gt;iran&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1810456,00.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:08:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>