<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | jklugman's 'republicans' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jklugman/tag/republicans/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/jklugman/tag/republicans/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>California Republicans Cool to Youth-Voting Bills</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A331B58F-475B-4D01-91F4-F3888DAAE0BD/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/tabsey/"&gt;tabsey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This is a wonderful idea as it educates towards understanding that the vote is a right and important. If the Republicans are against it then they know their policies need changing to attract voters. ( This article indicates to me that the GOP people are not willing to make a forward step, let alone cater for younger voters.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.truthout.org/article/state-republicans-cool-youth-voting-bills" title="http://www.truthout.org/article/state-republicans-cool-youth-voting-bills"&gt;www.truthout.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;    A pair of Assembly bills designed to bring more young people into the voting booths are being fought by Republicans who worry that too many of those new voters will be liberal Democrats.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;    One of the measures would allow 16- and 17-year-olds to "preregister" to vote, while the other would allow 17-year-olds to vote in a primary election if they will be 18 by the date of the next general election. Both bills have prompted straight party-line votes, with no hint of GOP support.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;    While Democrats sponsoring the bills say they are merely good-government measures, studies show that their party would get a major election-day boost if more young voters cast ballots.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;    Exit polls done during this year's presidential primary season showed that the number of voters younger than 30 has more than doubled since the 2004 and 2000 elections, with Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, drawing an enthusiastic and growing response from those young voters.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/the/" rel="tag"&gt;the&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/next/" rel="tag"&gt;next&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dance/" rel="tag"&gt;dance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/is/" rel="tag"&gt;is&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gop+3step/" rel="tag"&gt;gop 3step&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/backwards/" rel="tag"&gt;backwards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.truthout.org/article/state-republicans-cool-youth-voting-bills</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:54:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The true heart of the conservative movement</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/CEE06A3C-4E1B-47EC-9B68-BF13C73501F3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jklugman/"&gt;jklugman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Matt Yglesias said:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Of course as tends to be the case with Helms' most repugnantly racist bile, he said that a good ways back in the past. But even at that time, most Americans managed not to be repugnant racists. But not Helms. And unlike a lot of people who did take the white supremacist line in the 1950s and 60s, Helms never apologized and, indeed, never backed down doing things like mounting a filibuster against making Martin Luther King Day into a federal holiday. Remarkably, mainstream American conservatives are eager to tell us that this man is their hero. Even more remarkably, you sometimes hear conservatives talk about reaching out to black voters.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/the_true_heart.php" title="http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/the_true_heart.php"&gt;matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/11530.html"&gt;Politico&lt;/A&gt;: "To many on the right, it was Helms, not Reagan, who was the true heart of the conservative movement."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mitch McConnell: "Today we lost a senator whose stature in Congress had few equals, . . . Senator Jesse Helms was a leading voice and courageous champion for the many causes he believed in.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jesse Helms: "The Negro cannot count forever on the kind of restraint that's thus far left him free to clog the streets, disrupt traffic, and interfere with other men's rights."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/race/" rel="tag"&gt;race&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/jesse+helms/" rel="tag"&gt;jesse helms&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/conservatives/" rel="tag"&gt;conservatives&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/racism/" rel="tag"&gt;racism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/the_true_heart.php</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:41:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>92% of max Bush contributors not giving now; Iraq concern</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/BD6381D6-0E0B-4BBC-8BC9-1D0B220E200E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "I always considered myself a Republican, primarily because of a belief in smaller government. And if you want a smaller government, you don’t want wars — especially wars that can be avoided." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/10/citing-iraq-opposition-former-bush-donors-are-reluctant-to-donate-to-mccain/" title="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/10/citing-iraq-opposition-former-bush-donors-are-reluctant-to-donate-to-mccain/"&gt;thinkprogress.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2 class="title"&gt;&lt;A title="Permanent link to 'Citing Iraq opposition, former Bush donors are reluctant to donate to McCain.'" rel="bookmark" href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/10/citing-iraq-opposition-former-bush-donors-are-reluctant-to-donate-to-mccain/"&gt;Citing Iraq opposition, former Bush donors are reluctant to donate to McCain.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN class="storyexpander"&gt;&lt;A id="exlink1-19090" class="storyexpander"&gt;»&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;A CQ analysis shows that &lt;A href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&amp;docID=news-000002892934"&gt;only about 8 percent of the 62,800 donors&lt;/A&gt; who gave the maximum contribution of $2,000 to Bush in 2004 had given to McCain as of April 30. Moreover, at least 46 of Bush’s 2004 donors have contributed significantly to both Obama and Clinton but are not listed as McCain donors. One, a lifelong Republican who donated $2,000 to Bush in 2004, said that he will not donate to McCain &lt;A href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002892934&amp;parm1=5&amp;cpage=3"&gt;because of the senator’s fervent support of the Iraq war&lt;/A&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I always considered myself a Republican, primarily because of a belief in smaller government. &lt;STRONG&gt;And if you want a smaller government, you don’t want wars — especially wars that can be avoided.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/10/citing-iraq-opposition-former-bush-donors-are-reluctant-to-donate-to-mccain/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:51:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Who's to Blame for High Gas Prices?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D7A493DC-FBE7-4DE1-900E-DD8C30BD9237/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/"&gt;n2sooners&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/06/020696.php" title="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/06/020696.php"&gt;www.powerlineblog.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;For several decades, the Democratic Party has pursued policies designed to drive up the cost of petroleum, and therefore gas at the pump.  Remarkably, the Democrats don't seem to have taken much of a political hit from the current spike in gas prices.  Probably that's because most people don't realize how different the two parties' energy policies have been.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;ANWR Exploration
House Republicans: 91% Supported
House Democrats: 86% Opposed&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Coal-to-Liquid&lt;BR /&gt;
House Republicans: 97% Supported&lt;BR /&gt;
House Democrats: 78% Opposed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oil Shale Exploration&lt;BR /&gt;
House Republicans: 90% Supported&lt;BR /&gt;
House Democrats: 86% Opposed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Exploration&lt;BR /&gt;
House Republicans: 81% Supported&lt;BR /&gt;
House Democrats: 83% Opposed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refinery Increased Capacity&lt;BR /&gt;
House Republicans: 97% Supported&lt;BR /&gt;
House Democrats: 96% Opposed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;91% of House Republicans have historically voted to increase the production of American-made oil and gas&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;86% of House Democrats have historically voted against increasing the production of American-made oil and gas&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gas/" rel="tag"&gt;gas&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/oil/" rel="tag"&gt;oil&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/06/020696.php</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:42:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Republicans:  Only Our Pastors Can Say Crazy Shit</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7D6C1BAD-5DA1-467E-AF4A-F74F34A2A2B5/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/debbyski/"&gt;debbyski&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/18/republicans-only-our-pastors-are-allowed-to-say-crazy-shit/" title="http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/18/republicans-only-our-pastors-are-allowed-to-say-crazy-shit/"&gt;firedoglake.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG width="240" height="180" align="left" alt="14956476_f653291433_m.jpg" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/14/14956476_f653291433_m.jpg" /&gt;As the wingnut chorus &lt;A href="http://www.memeorandum.com/080318/p42#a080318p42"&gt;predictably disses&lt;/A&gt; Obama's &lt;A href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/18/obama-race-speech-read-t_n_92077.html"&gt;eloquent speech&lt;/A&gt;, it's important to remember &lt;A href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/03/17/wright/index.html"&gt;how completely ridiculous and manufactured this whole Wright "controversy" is&lt;/A&gt;: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Neither Jerry Falwell nor Pat Robertson ever retracted or denounced their view that America provoked the 9/11 attacks by doing things to anger God.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, yeah. Duh. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The Republican Party has tied itself at the hip to a whole slew of "anti-American extremists" -- people who believe that the U.S. provoked the 9/11 attacks because God wants to punish us for the evil, wicked nation we've become -- and yet there is virtual silence about these associations.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once again, it's important to keep making the point that when you've built an entire political movement on the backs of a crazy mob of Dixiecrat Savonarolas who make outrageous hateful comments pretty much every day, you've sort of opted-out of your ability to throw stones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/18/republicans-only-our-pastors-are-allowed-to-say-crazy-shit/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:12:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Unemployed, and Skewing the Picture</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/93E7AC06-6E5E-4BC2-A96F-3E396407F781/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jklugman/"&gt;jklugman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;...you can be sure of one thing: Politicians will be quick to point out that joblessness remains low by historical standards. “Five percent is still a low unemployment rate,” Ed Lazear, the chairman of President Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, said recently. “It’s below the average for the last three decades.”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The president and Senator John McCain also recently noted that unemployment remained low. Senators Judd Gregg of New Hampshire and Johnny Isakson of Georgia, both Republicans, have said the economy continues to be at “full employment.” Two Democratic governors, Christine Gregoire of Washington and Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, have bragged that their states recently recorded their lowest unemployment rates in history.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Statistically, all this is true enough. But it’s also deeply misleading. &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/05/business/05leonhardt.html?sq=leonhardt&amp;st=nyt&amp;scp=2&amp;pagewanted=print" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/05/business/05leonhardt.html?sq=leonhardt&amp;st=nyt&amp;scp=2&amp;pagewanted=print"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Consider this: the average unemployment rate in this decade, just above 5 percent, has been lower than in any decade since the 1960s. Yet the percentage of prime-age men (those 25 to 54 years old) who are not working has been &lt;SPAN class="italic"&gt;higher &lt;/SPAN&gt;than in any decade since World War II. In January, almost 13 percent of prime-age men did not hold a job, up from 11 percent in 1998, 11 percent in 1988, 9 percent in 1978 and just 6 percent in 1968. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;There are only two possible explanations for this bizarre combination of a falling employment rate and a falling unemployment rate. The first is that there has been a big increase in the number of people not working purely by their own choice.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second possible explanation — a jump in the number of people who aren’t working, who aren’t actively looking but who would, in fact, like to find a good job — is less comforting. It also appears to be the more accurate explanation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g252/joshtk76/?action=view&amp;current=leonhardtlarge.jpg" title="http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g252/joshtk76/?action=view&amp;current=leonhardtlarge.jpg"&gt;s58.photobucket.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/jklugman/512/364694F7-B33F-48B7-8637-71C6ED245495.jpg" alt="leonhardtlarge.jpg picture by joshtk76" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/jklugman/512/3DE179A9-9A0A-4A6C-994C-B86FE279A180.jpg" alt="leonhardtlarge.jpg picture by joshtk76" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/unemployment/" rel="tag"&gt;unemployment&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/statistics/" rel="tag"&gt;statistics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/teaching/" rel="tag"&gt;teaching&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/teaching-statistics/" rel="tag"&gt;teaching-statistics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/comparison/" rel="tag"&gt;comparison&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/comparisons/" rel="tag"&gt;comparisons&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/comparisons-over-time/" rel="tag"&gt;comparisons-over-time&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/05/business/05leonhardt.html?sq=leonhardt&amp;st=nyt&amp;scp=2&amp;pagewanted=print</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:00:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Name that party Slideshow version</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/830ABF5E-F7CE-4295-B2CB-FF6AB895D4A7/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/n2sooners/"&gt;n2sooners&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  ABC makes it easy. Instead of having to go search for media bias, ABC does all the work in a nice pretty slideshow format.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The official numbers go like this. Of the 13 sex scandals, 12 involve elected officials. Of those, 7 are republican and 5 are democrat. And if you counted you know that they mention party only once for the democrats (20%), but they mention it in six of the clips involving republicans (86%). &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Blotter/popup?id=2841254&amp;contentIndex=1&amp;page=1" title="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Blotter/popup?id=2841254&amp;contentIndex=1&amp;page=1"&gt;abcnews.go.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV id="header"&gt;
&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" title="ABCNews.com" href="http://abcnews.go.com/" linkindex="0"&gt;&lt;IMG width="75" height="29" border="0" id="logospace" alt="ABC News" src="http://a.abcnews.com/assets/images/spacer.gif" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&lt;H2 class="replace"&gt;POLITICAL SEX SCANDALS REDUX&lt;/H2&gt;

&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3&gt;Political Sex Scandals&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/n2sooners/512/2619C922-D833-437E-8C89-5916BC8647D8.jpg" alt="Spitzer" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/media/" rel="tag"&gt;media&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bias/" rel="tag"&gt;bias&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/sex/" rel="tag"&gt;sex&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/msm/" rel="tag"&gt;msm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Blotter/popup?id=2841254&amp;contentIndex=1&amp;page=1</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:40:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Jack Kingston R-GA - stupidest man in Congress</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/62CD4D41-0141-4F48-AA12-6B7C0BDAA304/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jklugman/"&gt;jklugman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/180661.php" title="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/180661.php"&gt;talkingpointsmemo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Rep. Jack Kingston (R-GA) has always been one of my favorite buffoons in Congress.  No one trick pony, he's been putting in long moron hours for years up on the Hill and on the chat shows.   But it was a particular &lt;EM&gt;tour de force&lt;/EM&gt; even for Jack when he showed up last night on MSNBC to bash Barack Obama for not wearing a flag lapel ... without remembering to wear one himself ...&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/stupid/" rel="tag"&gt;stupid&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/humor/" rel="tag"&gt;humor&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/jack+kingston/" rel="tag"&gt;jack kingston&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hypocrisy/" rel="tag"&gt;hypocrisy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/180661.php</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:19:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Shame on Clinton, McCain, &amp; Obama</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EDDD20C9-782A-4DED-9D2C-E6E9C01A5082/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jklugman/"&gt;jklugman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The Senate narrowly passed the intelligence authorization bill which required the CIA to follow the Army Field Manual in interrogations (which forbids waterboarding).  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;McCain, a supposed torture opponent, voted against the bill.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Clinton &amp;amp; Obama, also alleged torture opponents, abstained.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;See righthand's &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A052988F-03AA-403C-AE2F-4F21D60A5EC6/"&gt;clip&lt;/a&gt; for a discussion of the bill itself. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/senate_passes_bill_with_ban_on.php" title="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/senate_passes_bill_with_ban_on.php"&gt;tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;So now it's on to that veto. The Senate just narrowly passed the intelligence authorization bill, which contained &lt;A href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/senate_expected_to_vote_on_use.php"&gt;a provision&lt;/A&gt; that would effectively ban the CIA's use of waterboarding and other "enhanced interrogation" techniques forbidden by the Army Field Manual. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The final vote was rather close -- 51-45, with a few Republicans crossing over to make the difference. There were a couple remarkable "no" votes, though, from senators who've vocally opposed the use of waterboarding. Both Sen. &lt;A href="http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/10/_mccain_sharply_rebukes_rudy_for_protorture_comments.php"&gt;John McCain&lt;/A&gt; (R-AZ), who's vocally opposed the use of waterboarding, and Arlen Specter (R-PA) voted against. We've inquired why and we'll let you know what we find out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00022" title="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00022"&gt;www.senate.gov&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Clinton (D-NY), &lt;B&gt;Not Voting&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;McCain (R-AZ), &lt;B&gt;Nay&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Obama (D-IL), &lt;B&gt;Not Voting&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/senate_passes_bill_with_ban_on.php</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:28:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Iowa: Obama 36, Edwards 30, Clinton 30</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/728A1200-41F9-419D-9C71-63BC409919E1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/faramarzb/"&gt;faramarzb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Giuliani out (almost!!) &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080103/caucus-rdp/" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080103/caucus-rdp/"&gt;www.huffingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/faramarzb/512/F599EED0-7CA3-4EC2-AE5E-9A280611524A.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;DES MOINES, Iowa — Sen. Barack Obama, bidding to become the nation's first black president, captured the Iowa caucuses Thursday night, opening test in the race for the 2008 Democratic nomination. Mike Huckabee rode a wave of support from evangelical Christians to victory in the Republican caucuses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Among Republicans, Huckabee, a preacher turned politician, handily defeated Mitt Romney despite being outspent by tens of millions of dollars, and deciding in the campaign's final days to scrap television commercials that would have assailed the former Massachusetts governor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/"&gt;www.huffingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/faramarzb/512/3A9AC7D7-8347-4C8E-AC2F-0DBB7D78F035.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H4 class="subhead"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080103/caucus-rdp/"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href=""&gt;Results: Obama 36; Edwards 30; Clinton 30; 
&lt;BR /&gt;Huckabee 36; Romney 23; Thompson 15; McCain 12; Paul 11; Giuliani 2&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/obama-wins-iowa-why-ever_b_79663.html"&gt;Arianna: What Obama's Wins Says About America&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H4&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elections/" rel="tag"&gt;elections&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/iowa/" rel="tag"&gt;iowa&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/edwards/" rel="tag"&gt;edwards&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/giuliani/" rel="tag"&gt;giuliani&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20080103/caucus-rdp/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:57:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>DREAM Act defeated in the Senate</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A0AF58D0-CF82-4A32-BC4E-1BC89AABE5EA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/amgin/"&gt;amgin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/immigration/entries/2007/10/24/dream_act_defeated_in_the_sena.html" title="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/immigration/entries/2007/10/24/dream_act_defeated_in_the_sena.html"&gt;www.statesman.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/immigration/entries/2007/10/24/dream_act_defeated_in_the_sena.html"&gt;DREAM Act defeated in the Senate&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="byline"&gt;By 	&lt;A href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/immigration/entries/2007/10/24/dream_act_defeated_in_the_sena.html#postcomment"&gt;Eunice Moscoso &lt;/A&gt;
 | 	Wednesday, October 24, 2007, 02:06 PM
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;After an emotional debate, the Senate voted down a controversial measure that would have allowed thousands of young illegal immigrants to stay in the United States if they attended college or joined the military. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The measure needed 60 votes to proceed, but only got 52. Eleven Republicans voted in favor of the bill and eight Democrats opposed it. The defeat showed the difficulty in passing any immigration legislation this year. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In an effort to gain support, lead sponsor Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., had included an age limit of 30 and dropped language that would have cleared the path for the students to receive in-state tuition. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;During the debate, Durbin said the illegal immigrant children should not be punished for the sins of their parents. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/immigration/" rel="tag"&gt;immigration&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dream/" rel="tag"&gt;dream&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/immigration/entries/2007/10/24/dream_act_defeated_in_the_sena.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:32:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Senators tried to suppress CIA testimony in Plame affair</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/42A14604-BFFF-4F63-9C26-D793E0D859E2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jklugman/"&gt;jklugman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Jim Marcinkowski is a former CIA official who trained with Valerie Plame.  He wanted to testify before Senate committees about the exposure of Plame.  After he testified before the Republican-led Senate Select Intelligence committee, Pat Roberts declared his testimony secret, so he couldn't testify  before the Democratic Policy Committee.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Marcinkowski, the lawyer and deputy city attorney, was stunned. "I sat on the park bench, in a daze. I didn't know what the hell to do. Now it hits me, that is why the Senate Select Intelligence Committee had scheduled their testimony for the day before the Senate Democratic public hearing. Until that happened we didn't hear shit from the Senate Select Intelligence Committee. They slapped the secrecy thing on it, that was their intention," to try to prevent Valerie's CIA colleagues from testifying publicly about what had happened to her, and why it was a betrayal of everyone in the CIA.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/006856.html" title="http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/006856.html"&gt;www.warandpiece.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcinkowski told the senators that the exposure of Plame by her own government was "unprecedented. It was our classmate. We had kept a secret for eighteen years. And we were all betrayed by this White House." Marcinkowski had prepared a statement to deliver in open session before the Senate Democratic Policy committee the next day. "I also said she was covert, and I knew it. And they were taking it very seriously." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;After he finished with his testimony and the senators' questions, Marcinkowski went out the back door of the building and walked over to a little park between the Senate office building and Union Station. He sat down to think about what had just happened and his cell phone rang. It was Tom Daschle's staffer, who was setting up the hearing for the next day's Democratic Policy Committee meeting. "And she told me, ‘Jim, Pat Roberts just declared all your testimony to be secret. I don't know what you are planning on saying tomorrow, but he declared it secret.'" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cia/" rel="tag"&gt;cia&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/jim+marcinkowski/" rel="tag"&gt;jim marcinkowski&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pat+roberts/" rel="tag"&gt;pat roberts&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/senate/" rel="tag"&gt;senate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/deception/" rel="tag"&gt;deception&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/secrecy/" rel="tag"&gt;secrecy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/plame-affair/" rel="tag"&gt;plame-affair&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/006856.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:22:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rich states, poor states, and support for Bush &amp; Kerry</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7C16C4A7-214C-45A9-BB0C-D50E0298388A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jklugman/"&gt;jklugman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;Thus, the familiar red-blue divide of cosmopolitan coastal Democrats and heartland-state Republicans shows up among the rich but not the poor.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2007/10/some_cool_graph.html" title="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2007/10/some_cool_graph.html"&gt;www.stat.columbia.edu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll take advantage of Paul Krugman's recent &lt;A href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/24/even-more-on-income-and-voting/"&gt;link&lt;/A&gt; to our paper on income and voting by putting up some cool scatterplots that we made recently.  It started with our maps of which states Bush and Kerry would've won if only the votes of the poor, middle-income, and rich were counted:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/jklugman/512/4824552A-1B7D-4FCE-BBA7-351EB2E3BAE6.png" alt="mappoor.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/jklugman/512/667B4A8B-1B83-4B9C-95F3-F3FB426B9922.png" alt="mapmiddle.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/jklugman/512/AA7371DF-A11E-4274-B7C3-19BEA2002974.png" alt="maprich.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;We noticed that the familiar red-blue pattern (rich northeast and west coast supporting the Democrats, rest of the country supporting the Republicans) showed up clearly among rich voters, but not among the poor or middle class.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thus, the familiar red-blue divide of cosmopolitan coastal Democrats and heartland-state Republicans shows up among the rich but not the poor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/andrew+gelman/" rel="tag"&gt;andrew gelman&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/voting/" rel="tag"&gt;voting&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/class/" rel="tag"&gt;class&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/income/" rel="tag"&gt;income&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/political/" rel="tag"&gt;political&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/kerry/" rel="tag"&gt;kerry&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/george+w.+bush/" rel="tag"&gt;george w. bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/george+bush/" rel="tag"&gt;george bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/john+kerry/" rel="tag"&gt;john kerry&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2007/10/some_cool_graph.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:38:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Surge Succeeds</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/94C7E84C-0872-49A4-8990-455BBEDBC362/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/caoilfhionn/"&gt;caoilfhionn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  They'd rather rely on their own ideas rather than listen to the military, just one of the reasons democrats should never be trusted in issues of national defense. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/07/the_surge_succeeds.html" title="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/07/the_surge_succeeds.html"&gt;www.americanthinker.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="3" face="times new roman,times"&gt;It's now quite clear how the results of the surge will be dealt with by domestic opponents of the Iraq war. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="3" face="times new roman,times"&gt;They're going to be ignored.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size="3" face="times new roman,times"&gt;They're being ignored now. Virtually no media source or Democratic politician (and not a few Republicans, led by Richard "I can always backtrack" Lugar) is willing to admit that the situation on the ground has changed dramatically over the past three months. Coalition efforts have undergone a remarkable reversal of fortune, a near-textbook example as to how an effective strategy can overcome what appear to be overwhelming drawbacks.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surge/" rel="tag"&gt;surge&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surrender+lobby/" rel="tag"&gt;surrender lobby&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/white+flag/" rel="tag"&gt;white flag&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/07/the_surge_succeeds.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:53:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Where Were Vocal Conservatives When It Mattered?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/ADE74331-A2B8-440E-9DB8-DCC38FC21332/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Kore7/"&gt;Kore7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Rod Dreher is a conservative writer for Beliefnet.&lt;blockquote&gt;Few of us stood up to Bush when he took us to this disastrous war in Iraq. Few, if any, stood up to him over his foolish support for Rumsfeld, long after it became obvious what a disaster Rumsfeld was. Few, if any, stood up to him over his amassing of power in the executive branch. Few, if any, stood up to him on the spending....&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/crunchycon/2007/06/noonan-to-bush-its-over.html" title="http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/crunchycon/2007/06/noonan-to-bush-its-over.html"&gt;www.beliefnet.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;So yes, by all means let's turn our backs on this failed presidency, and save what we can, while we can. But let's not kid ourselves: Bush has failed conservatives, yes, but we have also failed ourselves. It doesn't take much courage to stand up for conservative principle to a president as weak as this one has become. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;If we're looking to blame someone for the failure of Republican government and the conservative crack-up, look to the White House, yes, and look to the late, unlamented Republican Congress. But also look to the conservative talk show hosts, the conservative columnists, and finally, in the mirror. The only way we're going to rebuild after the present and coming political shattering is through honest reckoning, and taking responsibility for what we've done.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It is tempting to blame Bush for everything. But it's not fair, and it's not honest. Bush is today who he always was. The difference is we conservatives pretty much loved the guy -- when he was a winner.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/conservatives/" rel="tag"&gt;conservatives&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gop/" rel="tag"&gt;gop&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/failure/" rel="tag"&gt;failure&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/blame/" rel="tag"&gt;blame&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fear/" rel="tag"&gt;fear&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/responsibility/" rel="tag"&gt;responsibility&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/principles/" rel="tag"&gt;principles&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/honesty/" rel="tag"&gt;honesty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/crunchycon/2007/06/noonan-to-bush-its-over.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:11:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>