<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | jedipunk's 'atheism' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/tag/atheism/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/tag/atheism/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>If God Has A Plan, Free Will Is An Illusion</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AA8F8C5E-D5A0-4C77-8F28-DA757FBE5FB6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/08/if-god-has-plan-free-will-is-illusion.html" title="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/08/if-god-has-plan-free-will-is-illusion.html"&gt;debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3 class="post-title"&gt;
&lt;A href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/08/if-god-has-plan-free-will-is-illusion.html"&gt;If God Has A Plan, Free Will Is An Illusion&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;So when Christians say that God has a Plan, that means that things can only work out one way, and the variables only have the appearance of being unknown.  As long as God has a plan, free will only has the appearance of being unknown to us.  To an omniscient God, it must be obvious.  This is why, free will is an illusion as long as God has a plan.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/08/if-god-has-plan-free-will-is-illusion.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:19:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why I Deny the Virgin Birth of Jesus</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/92703ACC-619E-4C9D-BF20-8F470DC56635/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://unreasonablefaith.com/2008/06/20/why-i-deny-the-virgin-birth-of-jesus/" title="http://unreasonablefaith.com/2008/06/20/why-i-deny-the-virgin-birth-of-jesus/"&gt;unreasonablefaith.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Why I Deny the Virgin Birth of Jesus&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Paul, the earliest New Testament author, never mentions the virgin birth. For someone who we rely upon for much of Christian theology, it is an odd omission. Paul refers to Jesus’ birth twice (Rom 1:3; Gal 4:4) and never says he was born of a virgin or of different means than anyone else. You’d think that would be important.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The virgin birth is also not in Mark, the earliest gospel, or in John, the only other gospel not based on Mark. Why is such an important story left out of &lt;EM&gt;all&lt;/EM&gt; the early sources? Probably because it hadn’t been made up yet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why would the story be made up? Perhaps to fulfill an old prophecy of a virgin birth, which the Gospel of Matthew cites:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some scholars say “virgin” was a mistranslation in the Septuagint (the Greek translation the gospel writers used), and should have been translated “young woman.” That means the story might have been based on a mistranslation!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/christianity/" rel="tag"&gt;christianity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://unreasonablefaith.com/2008/06/20/why-i-deny-the-virgin-birth-of-jesus/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:41:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bananas are not proof of Design - Allee</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B29B9232-77DB-466D-B5A7-9D69F445F34C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/06/12/maybe-bananas-arent-our-worst-nightmare-after-all/" title="http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/06/12/maybe-bananas-arent-our-worst-nightmare-after-all/"&gt;friendlyatheist.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Alleee&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Okay, so- I just wanted to- because there’s been a lot of talk- even like… Penn from “Penn and Teller” is talking about this. There’s been a lot of talk about this- the banana thing about how God made it so perfectly for humans but… the biggest- the most logical argument I’ve heard and actually made myself was that God didn’t make the banana. Because… it’s called horticulture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Alleee&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Plantain, right. Before the plantain, the banana was kind of hard and not very tasty and not- not what we have designed it to fit the hand better… bananas are big and plump and sweet because of what we have done-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/creat/" rel="tag"&gt;creat&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://friendlyatheist.com/2008/06/12/maybe-bananas-arent-our-worst-nightmare-after-all/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:39:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Non Random and Not Designed</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/62940FAC-5704-4678-ACC9-E43DB54D740E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-lines-and-sines-disprove.html" title="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-lines-and-sines-disprove.html"&gt;debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;I&gt;Recently in a private forum where others are concerned with intelligent design I brought up the case of ERVs as evidence supporting common ancestry vs. common design. If common design instead of common ancestry the designer is evidently using existing species in situ as the template for new species. If that’s the case there’s effectively no difference whatsoever between common design and common ancestry.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Dave evidently is so ignorant he fails to distinguish between design and selection. For example. The wind blows. Which grains of sand will become blown dust that will pile up? The biggest ones or the smallest ones? Is the wind designing a sand dune? Yet DaveScot can't see that a sand dune is both non-random and not designed.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/creationism/" rel="tag"&gt;creationism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-lines-and-sines-disprove.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:17:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Detestable Practice of Divinely Sanctioned Child Sacrifice in the Bible</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2D4F334C-794E-4EEC-94BC-4147C83F0BC6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/05/detestable-practice-of-divinely.html" title="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/05/detestable-practice-of-divinely.html"&gt;debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The Detestable Practice of Divinely Sanctioned Child Sacrifice in the Bible&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Child sacrifice was something that several Biblical people either did, or assisted others in doing so. Abraham was not morally repulsed by the command itself (Genesis 22). Then there is Jepthah who probably sacrificed his daughter because of a stupid vow (Judges 11)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It was a problem for King Josiah ( II King 23:10), for Jeremiah (Jeremiah 7:30-31; 19:3-5; 32:35), and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 16:20-21; 20:25-26, 30-31). &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The prophet Micah wonders if he should sacrifice his oldest son “as a sin offering” (6:6-8). Child sacrifice to foreign gods was so prevalent that it’s named as one of the major reasons why God sent the Babylonians to conquer Israel and forcibly take many of them as captives (II Kings 17:16-18).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;We even read where the King of Moab sacrificed his son which caused the Israelites to retreat in defeat. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/christianity/" rel="tag"&gt;christianity&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2008/05/detestable-practice-of-divinely.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:53:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Science Leads to Killing..huh?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/268D6E67-C5EF-44A7-93F6-380C41D9C946/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://scienceblogs.com/evolutionblog/2008/05/evolution_and_atheism_revisite.php" title="http://scienceblogs.com/evolutionblog/2008/05/evolution_and_atheism_revisite.php"&gt;scienceblogs.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fact that creationists so casually link evolution to atheism, and ask stupid questions like, “How does evolution explain abiogenesis?” is indicative of a pathology that afflicts many people in American society.  Specifically, the unwillingness to do even a tiny bit of homework to understand the arguments made by people on the other side.  The people I meet at creationist conferences are completely uncritical in accepting what their preachers tell them about evolution.  The idea that they should read some books by scientists to learn about evolution never seems to enter their minds.  They seem to have no interest at all in learning what scientists really think, or what evolution really says.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That is what leads to that blend of ignorance and arrogance that is so typical of creationist thought and writing.  They know nothing about modern science, but pretend to know a great deal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism.+science/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism. science&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://scienceblogs.com/evolutionblog/2008/05/evolution_and_atheism_revisite.php</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:44:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Christian Bible Condemns Public Prayer</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7B6CE0BD-50AB-4420-81D6-AC7157866072/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://atheistrevolution.blogspot.com/2007/07/public-prayer.html" title="http://atheistrevolution.blogspot.com/2007/07/public-prayer.html"&gt;atheistrevolution.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;The Christian Bible Condemns Public Prayer&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Matthew 6:5 - 7 says:&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;5. And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites: for 
they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, 
that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their 
reward.&lt;BR&gt;6. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou 
hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which 
seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.&lt;BR&gt;7. But when ye pray, use not vain 
repetitions, as the heathen: for they think that they shall be heard for their 
much speaking.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://atheistrevolution.blogspot.com/2007/07/public-prayer.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:19:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dresden Codak Comic</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/846EF370-C312-420F-920F-FC1538F4194C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_MZc6XuZBLZo/RpzUca73t3I/AAAAAAAAAAU/mG4fSo9xlXw/s1600-h/stall10.jpg" title="http://bp2.blogger.com/_MZc6XuZBLZo/RpzUca73t3I/AAAAAAAAAAU/mG4fSo9xlXw/s1600-h/stall10.jpg"&gt;bp2.blogger.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/jedipunk/512/8D770AA9-52CF-481F-AF9B-11A84B5E0D3F.jpg" alt="[stall10.jpg]" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://bp2.blogger.com/_MZc6XuZBLZo/RpzUca73t3I/AAAAAAAAAAU/mG4fSo9xlXw/s1600-h/stall10.jpg</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:16:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Those fanatical atheists</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2A6B79FB-E205-4C1D-B95B-6D2B9E8E193A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://richarddawkins.net/article,990,Those-fanatical-atheists,Dan-Gardner-The-Ottawa-Citizen" title="http://richarddawkins.net/article,990,Those-fanatical-atheists,Dan-Gardner-The-Ottawa-Citizen"&gt;richarddawkins.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;This is completely contrary to how we live the rest of our lives. We demand 
proof of even trivial claims ("John was the main creative force behind Sergeant 
Pepper") and we dismiss those who make such claims without proof. We are still 
more demanding when claims are made on matters that are at least temporarily 
important ("Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction" being a notorious 
example).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So isn't it odd that when claims are made about matters as 
important as the nature of existence and our place in it we suddenly drop all 
expectation of proof and we respect those who make and believe claims without 
the slightest evidence? Why is it perfectly reasonable to roll my eyes when 
someone makes the bald assertion that Ringo was the greatest Beatle but it is 
"fundamentalist" and "fanatical" to say that, absent evidence, it is absurd to 
believe Muhammad was not lying or hallucinating when he claimed to have long 
chats with God?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://richarddawkins.net/article,990,Those-fanatical-atheists,Dan-Gardner-The-Ottawa-Citizen</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 19:22:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why I am NOT a friendly Atheist</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/97A4A345-D2D1-4622-B129-434C2FA58B6A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/jedipunk/"&gt;jedipunk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/03/12/why-im-not-a-friendly-atheist/" title="http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/03/12/why-im-not-a-friendly-atheist/"&gt;www.hanlonsrazor.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Religion is the only aspect, the ONLY aspect, of knowledge in which disagreements over facts is accepted. In history, we’re not allowed to disagree about who Socrates was or how he died. We can’t say that Christopher Columbus may not have actually sailed to America. Mathematicians can’t argue over how many the number 10 signifies, or whether or not the area of a triangle is one half its base multiplied by its height. Physicists don’t get to say that objects in a vacuum really do fall at different speeds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now this isn’t entirely true. Disagreements are accepted, but only when they can be proven and then the theory that is proven true is considered the new “fact”.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.hanlonsrazor.org/2007/03/12/why-im-not-a-friendly-atheist/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:33:20 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>