<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | grimmy's 'evolution' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/grimmy/search/evolution/sort/newest-clips/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/grimmy/search/evolution/sort/newest-clips/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Dawkins lets the cat out of the bag!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/78F15E89-E256-47B7-9880-589EBF858C6B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/grimmy/"&gt;grimmy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  At last, Dawkins admits something amazing! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.whatyououghttoknow.com/show/2008/05/01/darwins-intelligent-design/" title="http://www.whatyououghttoknow.com/show/2008/05/01/darwins-intelligent-design/"&gt;www.whatyououghttoknow.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
DAWKINS: Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.whatyououghttoknow.com/show/2008/05/01/darwins-intelligent-design/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:36:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Darwinists Lose Minds Over New Behe Book</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/21766E02-2F2C-4462-A687-4B296F593092/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/grimmy/"&gt;grimmy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A3DGRQ0IO7KYQ2/ref=cm_blog_dp_pdp/105-1176708-6988463" title="http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A3DGRQ0IO7KYQ2/ref=cm_blog_dp_pdp/105-1176708-6988463"&gt;www.amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Major reviews of &lt;I&gt;The Edge of Evolution&lt;/I&gt; have begun to
appear. Because the conclusion of the book is so controversial, it’s no
surprise that responses by some Darwinists so far have been pretty emotional
and defensive. I’ll be writing brief replies here to unfavorable reviews by the
most prominent academic Darwinists, just to point out important miscues and
errors.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A3DGRQ0IO7KYQ2/ref=cm_blog_dp_pdp/105-1176708-6988463</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:01:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Science vs. Darwinism</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6419479A-F63C-410F-BBF4-3D68D110C687/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/grimmy/"&gt;grimmy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/840" title="http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/840"&gt;www.ideacenter.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Technological advances have provided detailed information about the inner workings of the cell. Michael Denton, in his book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, states "Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10^-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable microminiaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machine built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world." In a word, the cell is complicated. Very complicated.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/id/" rel="tag"&gt;id&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/darwin/" rel="tag"&gt;darwin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/840</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 06:14:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Darwinist censorship</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D0CF3BAF-85FA-4657-BA14-5CD174404D23/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/grimmy/"&gt;grimmy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://creationsafaris.com/crev200703.htm" title="http://creationsafaris.com/crev200703.htm"&gt;creationsafaris.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;A rapid ouster from the classroom was what biology teacher
Kris Helphinstine faced when he dared question Darwinism before students in an Oregon high school.  According
to &lt;A href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,259844,00.html"&gt;Fox News&lt;/A&gt;, Helphinstine went out of
his way to not to teach creationism.  His unforgivable sin, though, was to link
Darwinism to Planned Parenthood and Nazi Germany in a Powerpoint presentation. 
He explained, “&lt;B&gt;Critical thinking is vital to scientific inquiry.&lt;/B&gt;  My whole purpose was
to give accurate &lt;B&gt;information&lt;/B&gt; and to &lt;B&gt;get them thinking.&lt;/B&gt;”  Comparing President
Bush to Nazis would probably not have gotten him in so much trouble.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://creationsafaris.com/crev200703.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:49:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Skull 1470 poorly reconstructed?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/51F5C720-F073-456F-8EF0-EE07910697A9/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/grimmy/"&gt;grimmy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://creationsafaris.com/crev200703.htm" title="http://creationsafaris.com/crev200703.htm"&gt;creationsafaris.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
The skull of an alleged human ancestor Richard Leakey made
famous in 1972 was poorly reconstructed, claims a paleoanthropologist who specializes in craniofacial biology. 
According to Dr. Timothy Bromage of New York University, Leakey employed
nonstandard principles while assembling the bones of his “Skull 1470”, giving the face a flatter,
more human-like profile.  Many at the time of the discovery were stunned to find such a human-like
face dated to 3 million years ago.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://creationsafaris.com/crev200703.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:46:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>