<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | foacashman's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Obama shocked? by Britian's actions?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/90311F83-207A-4101-B414-EFD5CC1A8941/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Obama grovels for forgiveness - the britts were just practicing what Obama preached - see how well that worked out for us.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/25/a-few-more-chickens-home-to-the-roost/?feat=home_headlines" title="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/25/a-few-more-chickens-home-to-the-roost/?feat=home_headlines"&gt;washingtontimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Imitation is the highest form of flattery, and this is their thanks to the president for spreading the Obamamania that's making the world such a wet, warm and wonderful place.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The White House professes to be shocked -- shocked! -- that the British would abuse Anglo-Saxon justice so easily, even risking damage to "the special relationship." But these are phony sentiments, too. President Obama makes the apology to those who wish America harm, performed with the full grovel, the grace note of his administration. He went almost to Mecca to bow to the Saudi throne. Why shouldn't the Scots and the British follow the Obama example, to go squishy soft in dealing with terrorists?
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/aug/25/a-few-more-chickens-home-to-the-roost/?feat=home_headlines</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:31:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah this will work</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/3EFA29C0-7FCE-4866-868B-E36A2E0B6072/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  It's a good thing all this high income earners won't be hiring accountants to 'hide' some of this income.  I'm glad they will freely pay over 1/2 of their income to the gov't, otherwise this whole ponzi healthcare scheme may not work. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/16/terrifying-tax-looms-biggest-earners-nyc/?test=latestnews" title="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/16/terrifying-tax-looms-biggest-earners-nyc/?test=latestnews"&gt;www.foxnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;57 Percent Tax Looms for Biggest Earners in NYC&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;New York's top income bracket could reach as high as 57 percent -- rates not seen in three decades -- to pay for the massive
      health coverage proposed by House Democrats this week.
   &lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;New
      York's top income bracket could reach as high as 57 percent -- rates not seen in three decades -- to pay for the massive health
      coverage proposed by House Democrats this week.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The $544 billion
      tax hike would violate one of President Obama's ironclad campaign promises: No family will pay higher tax rates than they
      would have paid in the 1990s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/16/terrifying-tax-looms-biggest-earners-nyc/?test=latestnews</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:22:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Know your facts...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B6FA2F9D-DCE8-46C5-88E8-5CBAAD819ED2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Hmm... think Obama is another JFK, you might just be alone in your assessment.  Look at the following graphs and tell me which one looks more like Obama's numbers have in his first few months in office.  Understand that the George W numbers are pre-9/11 and Reagan's economy in 1981 had a double digit inflation and an unemployment rate comparable to today's. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/121553/Obama-Job-Approval-Drifts-Down-58-So-Far-July.aspx" title="http://www.gallup.com/poll/121553/Obama-Job-Approval-Drifts-Down-58-So-Far-July.aspx"&gt;www.gallup.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Obama Job Approval &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Comparisons to Other First-Year Presidents&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/image_cache/foacashman/512/2052943E-1F16-4BB8-A9CC-9ADC50D6EF94.gif" alt="ayrcs3cxd0eixafvn5rtca" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/Barack-Obama-Presidential-Job-Approval.aspx"&gt;From a historical perspective, Obama's current July rating is not exceptional&lt;/A&gt;. It is roughly the same as the rating of George W. Bush in early July of his first year, although well above that of Bill Clinton in July 1993 (Clinton had by far the worst ratings in the summer of his first year of all presidents elected to their first terms since Eisenhower). &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Thus, Obama's current approval rating is above-average only in comparison to Clinton at the same point in time. It is essentially on par with where Bush and Nixon were, but at least slightly worse than all other presidents (with the exception of Clinton). In particular, Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, and George H.W. Bush all had significantly higher ratings in the summer of their first year than does Obama at this point.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.gallup.com/poll/121553/Obama-Job-Approval-Drifts-Down-58-So-Far-July.aspx</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:30:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Know your facts...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A2338FE8-04EA-45B3-8EB8-81F03B9B4578/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Hmm... think Obama is another JFK, you might just be alone in your assessment.  Look at the following graphs and tell me which one looks more like Obama's numbers have in his first few months in office. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx" title="http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx"&gt;www.gallup.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="noDateMiddle"&gt;Presidential Approval Ratings -- Gallup Historical Statistics and Trends&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/foacashman/512/F3013226-8198-4C98-9428-9E61A8830091.gif" alt="kclqtqbh_uquf7cxj7evfq" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/image_cache/foacashman/512/09585F9D-D603-4FF9-A2A0-A065D1E7E5CC.gif" alt="kfhdcfrky0mnd0pa_uuq8w" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/image_cache/foacashman/512/300D3074-6C94-4A13-AFB9-EB86782F1CBD.gif" alt="josphpgireozn00z_9q_gq" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/image_cache/foacashman/512/40DF87A4-7512-4C62-8105-5C2A28DB58B0.gif" alt="i1nhm2cr60uhmgo21lusbq" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/foacashman/512/6F8D1013-7972-4BB1-AF5A-9C014D04A579.gif" alt="0qp28ii710sji0hrxtondg" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:11:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Something to believe in??</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5EFC4B3C-1F64-4514-A3AE-F8C88FA76917/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/13/120297/" title="http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/13/120297/"&gt;catholicexchange.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;There is a disturbing phenomenon that is being weaved into the Catholic culture of Mexico known as Santa Muerte, or Holy Death.&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;The origins of Santa Muerte are not exactly clear, but the dangers are implicit. Stylistically speaking, the Santa Muerte figure is a cross between the grim reaper and the Virgin Mary. &lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;They call upon Santa Muerte for help in deeds that they feel other saints would turn from, such as prayers of vengeance or sexual desires.&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Saints lives are devoted to the glorify God; the symbol of Santa Muerte stands for self-glorification through wrongful deeds.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://catholicexchange.com/2009/07/13/120297/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:06:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama dropping like a stone</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/1BFB53CD-A342-4EA0-945C-7E06293D5CD0/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.diageohotlinepoll.com/" title="http://www.diageohotlinepoll.com/"&gt;www.diageohotlinepoll.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Obama Job Approval Rating Drops Nine Points&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Poll Finds Decreased Confidence in Stimulus Spending and Concerns Over Deficit&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Double-Digit Increase in Percentage of Voters Saying Country Is On the “Wrong Track”&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/image_cache/foacashman/512/C05CC7A9-A197-4957-8334-68466DE1E29B.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Poll also finds that the percentage of voters who say that "things are seriously off on the wrong track" has increased 12 percentage points from a record-low of 43% in last month's Poll to 55% in today's Poll.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.diageohotlinepoll.com/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:57:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cost of a cow fart</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/320A2B77-BBED-4A53-BA3A-C6A59D4C00C4/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/06/26/the_cap-and-trade_bill_is_an_economic_disaster_97284.html" title="http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/06/26/the_cap-and-trade_bill_is_an_economic_disaster_97284.html"&gt;www.realclearmarkets.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The American Farm Bureau warns that cap and trade would cost the average farmer $175 on every dairy cow and $80 for beef cattle. So farm-state politics trumped climate change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/06/26/the_cap-and-trade_bill_is_an_economic_disaster_97284.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:14:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>If justice delayed is justice denied...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8821E39C-593B-40D6-BEF4-40859BAB9712/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/06/canadian.health.care.system/index.html" title="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/06/canadian.health.care.system/index.html"&gt;www.cnn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; However, Zelt does concede that in Canada's system, where every Canadian citizen is covered, there are limited resources, shortages and often delays.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; "In our health care system, we're looking at what we have to do to prioritize patients -- critically ill versus purely elective surgeries," Zelt said.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"I'm not going to say we don't have issues with timeliness for some things. It does happen. But again take the other side of the coin -- these patients have access. They're on somebody's waiting list if they have a problem, &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; Still, people can wait for months, or even years, for elective surgery.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; Wright's friend Rick Hession has a heart condition that could cause a stroke, but he has a three-month wait or more for an operation to help correct it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/06/canadian.health.care.system/index.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:09:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stimulus is no Help</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/41DEC6FF-CA82-4638-ABC1-AB3252DBF0A5/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/07/06/get_ready_for_14_percent_unemployment_97295.html" title="http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/07/06/get_ready_for_14_percent_unemployment_97295.html"&gt;www.realclearmarkets.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current 9.5% unemployment rate is causing great economic pain, and life with a 14% jobless rate would be much, much worse. Unfortunately, almost everything that the government has done or is proposing to do to right the economy is actually counterproductive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Federal government ran a deficit of $303 billion (and therefore had to sell $303 billion of new bonds) and business investment fell by 21.7%. In the first quarter of 2009, the Federal deficit was $650 billion and business investment fell by 37.3%. The economy is being forced to invest in Barack's Bailout Bonds rather than in businesses that create jobs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Obama's "stimulus" will depress PBI, and therefore employment. This is because the "stimulus" plan requires selling an additional $787 billion in government bonds. The money to buy these bonds will have to come from &lt;EM&gt;somewhere&lt;/EM&gt;, and much of it will come from people who would otherwise invest in starting or expanding businesses.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2009/07/06/get_ready_for_14_percent_unemployment_97295.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:17:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A matter of time</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4B8669B2-1BEF-4A4B-97F9-1463A318D2C8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31512315/ns/health-womens_health/" title="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31512315/ns/health-womens_health/"&gt;www.msnbc.msn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;New drugs could transform cancer treatment&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Just-released research about a new class of drugs called “PARP inhibitors” is the most exciting development in cancer research in a decade or more. In just a few years it could save thousands of lives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;All this enthusiasm is based on a small report published today in the New England Journal of Medicine. It focuses on one clinical trial in its earliest stage in 60 patients with breast, ovarian and prostate cancer. Some — but not all — of the patients whose cancers seemed hopeless saw them shrink drastically or disappear. Many avoided the typical side effects — nausea, &lt;A class="iAs" classname="iAs" href="#" target="_blank" itxtdid="9180294"&gt;hair&lt;/A&gt; loss — associated with cancer treatment. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;If cells have defective genes, when the drug is added, the DNA cannot be repaired at all. As a result, the cells die. And that is how PARP inhibitors kill cancer cells.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31512315/ns/health-womens_health/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:03:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Duh...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D0D4C024-DA4D-4923-A9CC-FF65F8E9825D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The article fails to mention that the research was funded by Playboy and Pearl  Vision Centers.  LOL... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre55t2nh-us-sex-fertility/" title="http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre55t2nh-us-sex-fertility/"&gt;www.newsdaily.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3 class="story"&gt;Daily sex makes for healthier sperm&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LONDON, June 30, 2009 (Reuters) — &lt;/SPAN&gt;Having sex every day improves the quality of men's sperm and is recommended&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Frequent sex does decrease semen volume but for most men this is not a problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre55t2nh-us-sex-fertility/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:58:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>YAHOO!!!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/883EFD8C-6061-4F9E-A37F-7F7F79222611/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Yes Yes and more YES... Equal opportunity does not necessarily mean equal OUTCOME. If there is no intention to discriminate, and the process is fair and balanced - then OVER TIME, one should expect a balanced outcome. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31609275/ns/politics-white_house/" title="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31609275/ns/politics-white_house/"&gt;www.msnbc.msn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The city declined to validate the test after it was given, a step that could have identified flaws or determined that there were no serious problems with it. In addition, city officials could not say what was wrong with the test, other than the racially skewed results. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his opinion for the court. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;New Haven was wrong to scrap a promotion exam because no African-Americans and only two Hispanic firefighters were likely to be made lieutenants or captains based on the results, the court said Monday in a 5-4 decision. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31609275/ns/politics-white_house/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:29:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Do you think?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6F89ED21-D37E-47B2-BA1E-FADC81E2EA5C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cleveland.com/" title="http://www.cleveland.com/"&gt;www.cleveland.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/06/sleeping_jurors_didnt_give_cle.html"&gt;Sleeping jurors didn't give Cleveland man fair trial, murder conviction tossed&lt;/A&gt; &lt;SPAN class="time_stamp"&gt;6:46 PM&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cleveland.com/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:31:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Inconvenient TRUTH</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C2F6DF29-0FFE-4D2C-89F8-252D7EB4FF3D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Best line: "To reduce modern climate change to one variable..is not science.  To try to predict the future based on just one variable in extraordinarily complex natural system is FOLLY (emphasis added)." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/24/could_australia_blow_apart_the_great_global_warming_scare_97148.html" title="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/24/could_australia_blow_apart_the_great_global_warming_scare_97148.html"&gt;www.realclearpolitics.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Earth's climate is driven by the receipt and redistribution of solar    energy. Despite this crucial relationship, the sun tends to be brushed aside    as the most important driver of climate. Calculations on supercomputers are    primitive compared with the complex dynamism of the Earth's climate and ignore    the crucial relationship between climate and solar energy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To reduce modern climate change to one variable, CO2, or a small proportion    of one variable—human-induced CO2—is not science. To try to predict the future    based on just one variable (CO2) in extraordinarily complex natural systems is    folly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In response, this is Sheehan's conclusion: "&lt;EM&gt;Heaven and Earth&lt;/EM&gt; is an  evidence-based attack on conformity and orthodoxy, including my own, and a  reminder to respect informed dissent and beware of ideology subverting  evidence." &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/24/could_australia_blow_apart_the_great_global_warming_scare_97148.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:13:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vision vs Tactics</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2507E00E-EC7C-4F5D-AFE5-C855E3EFB85C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/foacashman/"&gt;foacashman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110005204" title="http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110005204"&gt;www.opinionjournal.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
I distinguish between two kinds of politicians. There are those who view politics as a tactical game, a game in which they do not reveal any individuality, in which they lose their own face. There are, however, leaders for whom politics is a means of defending and furthering values. For them, it is a moral pursuit. They do so because the values they cherish are endangered. They're convinced that there are values worth living for, and even values worth dying for. Otherwise they would consider their life and work pointless. Only such politicians are great politicians and Ronald Reagan was one of them. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
In the Europe of the 1980s, Ronald Reagan presented a vision. For us in Central and Eastern Europe, that meant freedom from the Soviets. Mr. Reagan was no ostrich who hoped that problems might just go away. He thought that problems are there to be faced. This is exactly what he did.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110005204</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:14:50 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>