<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | edtechnnorris's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/sort/newest-clips/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/sort/newest-clips/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>The Media Equation - All of Us, the Arbiters of News</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/3A078CF2-7919-44E7-AEF6-C2AF676BAB95/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The impact of the Internet on news media isn't all bad. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/business/media/11carr.html?_r=1&amp;src=tp&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/business/media/11carr.html?_r=1&amp;src=tp&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Emerging technologies that threaten to destroy the current paradigm can have precisely the opposite effect. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; The Web leaks of entertainment that NBC bought and paid for  served as a kind of trailer for the real thing.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;How much more powerful is that networked intelligence than a reporter with a phone, a Rolodex and the space between his or her ears? &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;For the last few years, the locus of control has been shifting and consumers not only expect to customize their media experience, they demand it as a condition of engagement.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Consumers have no issue with time-shifting content — in some younger demographics, at least half the programming is consumed on a time-shifted basis — they just want to be the ones doing the programming&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;NBC’s game of “whack-a-mole” &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;was doomed to failure because information not only wants to be free, its consumers are cunning, connected and will find a workaround on any defense that can be conceived.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/business/media/11carr.html?_r=1&amp;src=tp&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:04:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>7 Ways Your Email Can Get You Fired</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AE24A8B6-3CAE-4CA3-982C-94E9B5FB27AF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Email cuts down on productivity. In addition, employees need to know that they don't own their email. Companies have a right to monitor their messages. People should not use company email for personal reasons. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/105525/7-Ways-Your-Email-Can-Get-You-Fired" title="http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/105525/7-Ways-Your-Email-Can-Get-You-Fired"&gt;finance.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Though many companies include e-mail rules in their employee contracts, workers   continue to send nonwork-related e-mails on the job. Of those who took an &lt;A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22732064/index.html"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="lw_1218057918_2" class="yshortcuts"&gt;msnbc.com survey&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt; that asked how   often workers send or receive personal e-mails on the job, 14 percent said they   do "constantly." An additional 31 percent said "very often." More than 50   percent said they "sometimes or occasionally" use personal e-mail at work, and   only 9.3 percent said they "never do."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if most workers may get away with it, companies &lt;EM&gt;are&lt;/EM&gt; using e-mail   as grounds for firing. According to a survey by the American Management   Association and the ePolicy Institute, over half of all employers fire workers   for e-mail and Internet abuse. The survey also found that of the 43 percent of   companies that monitor workers' e-mail, 73 percent use technology tools to   automatically monitor it and 40 percent assign an individual to read and review   the e-mail manually.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/105525/7-Ways-Your-Email-Can-Get-You-Fired</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:18:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Biggest Issue</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/10D2D323-F01B-4C45-81D1-54FBC42021D2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Blog about why US is falling behind. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/opinion/29brooks.html?em&amp;ex=1217563200&amp;en=e296ab54d60b33ed&amp;ei=5087%0A" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/opinion/29brooks.html?em&amp;ex=1217563200&amp;en=e296ab54d60b33ed&amp;ei=5087%0A"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Between 1975 and 1990, educational attainments stagnated completely. Since then, progress has been modest. America’s lead over its economic rivals has been entirely forfeited, with many nations surging ahead in school attainment.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; In “Schools, Skills and Synapses,” Heckman probes the sources of that decline. It’s not falling school quality, he argues. Nor is it primarily a shortage of funding or rising college tuition costs. Instead, Heckman directs attention at family environments, which have deteriorated over the past 40 years. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;there is a big debate under way over the sources of middle-class economic anxiety. Some populists emphasize the destructive forces of globalization, outsourcing and predatory capitalism. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; America rose because it got more out of its own people than other nations. That stopped in 1970. Now, other issues grab headlines and campaign attention. But this tectonic plate is still relentlessly and menacingly shifting beneath our feet. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/opinion/29brooks.html?em&amp;ex=1217563200&amp;en=e296ab54d60b33ed&amp;ei=5087%0A</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:32:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Facebook More Popular than Porn</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/13580C67-B0F3-4B79-B78F-1756B6B694C8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1678586,00.html?xid=newsletter-weekly" title="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1678586,00.html?xid=newsletter-weekly"&gt;www.time.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;where college students are going online is to assess which of the 172 web categories tracked by Hitwise get the most hits from 18- to 24-year-olds. Here's a shocker: Porn is not No. 1. I've actually been puzzled by the decrease in visits to the Adult Entertainment category over the last two years. Visits to porn sites have dropped from 16.9% of all site visits in the U.S. in October 2005 to 11.9% as of last week, a 33% decline. Currently, for web users over the age of 25, Adult Entertainment still ranks high in popularity, coming in second, after search engines. Not so for 18- to 24-year-olds, for whom social networks rank first, followed by search engines, then web-based e-mail — with porn sites lagging behind in fourth. If you chart the rate of visits to social-networking sites against those to adult sites over the last two years, there appears to be a strong negative correlation (i.e., visits to social networks go up as visits to adult sites go down). I&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1678586,00.html?xid=newsletter-weekly</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:53:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Technology Moral Panic: But Think of the Children!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/85EBF455-6863-4D0F-B2E3-F995F8BC3449/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Hype about online predators based on completely bogus figures &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0218421649.shtml" title="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0218421649.shtml"&gt;techdirt.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Recently I wrote about a dreadful article in USA Today hyping up the "oh-no-think-of-the-children problem" of &lt;A href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080703/0219211584.shtml"&gt;predators using console games&lt;/A&gt; to seek out kids.  This followed similarly &lt;A href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071109/020921.shtml"&gt;bogus&lt;/A&gt; news articles hyping up the threats of predators on social networks.  Yet, all the "panic" raised by those articles has politicians practically shoving each other aside to introduce &lt;A href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080507/1052211056.shtml"&gt;legislation&lt;/A&gt; against those social networks, or just various Attorneys General &lt;A href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070730/182742.shtml"&gt;threatening&lt;/A&gt; those social networks without any evidence that there's a significant problem, other than a few totally hyped up news articles.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Alice Marwick has recently published a paper &lt;A target="_new" href="http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2152/1966"&gt;discussing exactly this type of "moral panic,"&lt;/A&gt; focusing on the situation in 1996 in which Time Magazine famously published a scare mongering article about porn online, now known as the Rimm Report.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Marwick's paper has &lt;A href="http://463.blogs.com/the_463/2008/07/learnings-from.html"&gt;a good analysis of the Rimm Report's ripple effects&lt;/A&gt; as well &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; It was almost entirely wrong.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://techdirt.com/articles/20080711/0218421649.shtml</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:00:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Unboxed - If You're Open to Growth, You Tend to Grow</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F9E4A752-3FC6-4E79-BC19-FD26C5FA4488/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Relates to the article about over-praising your children. People who think success is based on talent, and not the willingness to grow, learn, make mistakes are not as successful. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/business/06unbox.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/business/06unbox.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;After three decades of painstaking research, the Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck  believes that the answer to the puzzle lies in how people think about intelligence and talent. Those who believe they were born with all the smarts and gifts they’re ever going to have approach life with what she calls a “fixed mind-set.” Those who believe that their own abilities can expand over time, however, live with a “growth mind-set.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;“People who believe in the power of talent tend not to fulfill their potential because they’re so concerned with looking smart and not making mistakes. But people who believe that talent can be developed are the ones who really push, stretch, confront their own mistakes and learn from them.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;But Ms. Dweck does not suggest that recruiters ignore innate talent. Instead, she suggests looking for both talent and a growth mind-set in prospective hires — people with a passion for learning who thrive on challenge and change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/business/06unbox.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:37:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How the Google generation thinks differently</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D6078E10-170B-4B31-82DE-F394B51B0428/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article4295414.ece" title="http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article4295414.ece"&gt;women.timesonline.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Digital natives&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Like receiving information quickly from multiple media sources.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like parallel processing and multi-tasking.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like processing pictures, sounds and video before text.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like random access to hyperlinked multimedia information.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like to network with others.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like to learn “just in time”.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Digital immigrants&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Like slow and controlled release of information from limited sources.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like singular processing and single or limited tasking.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like processing text before pictures, sounds and video.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like to receive information linearly, logically and sequentially.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like to work independently.&lt;BR /&gt;
Like to learn “just in case”.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article4295414.ece</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:42:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Gifted Isn't Everything</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/919A1926-2EF8-4803-B418-FBF931ED32A6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://lifestyle.msn.com/familyandparenting/raisingkids/articlesc.aspx?cp-documentid=8150918&amp;GT1=32001" title="http://lifestyle.msn.com/familyandparenting/raisingkids/articlesc.aspx?cp-documentid=8150918&amp;GT1=32001"&gt;lifestyle.msn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Must parents today be more vigilant about their kids' preparation for the future than previous generations had been? Certainly contemporary parents seem to be more &lt;I&gt;worried&lt;/I&gt; about their children's achievement, perhaps in part because the skills needed for the future are not as well-defined as they once were. There is a sense of urgency: start early; work hard at learning how to learn; strive for high scores on tests that may determine who will succeed someday. We seem to have concluded that, unless proven otherwise, those deemed "gifted" at learning will have the edge. It's a logical conviction, but one that needs some tempering, according to both anecdotal and statistical evidence. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://lifestyle.msn.com/familyandparenting/raisingkids/articlesc.aspx?cp-documentid=8150918&amp;GT1=32001</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:38:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are You Turning Your Child into a Wimp?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/846BB2CD-26EB-4D21-AF67-B8AF195C4BA6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Overparenting is a bad thing. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1817260,00.html" title="http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1817260,00.html"&gt;www.time.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;I&gt;A Nation of Wimps: The High Cost of Invasive Parenting&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;these kids lack coping skills because they've not been allowed to fully function.  They are the products of parental anxiety and all the lumps and bumps have been taken out of life for them, so they have no idea how to manage the normal vicissitudes of life.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;


The world has changed on our watch. I didn't grow up knowing how to use a computer.  So that instrument alone is highly symbolic that the world has changed. It's very fast, very dynamic, very fluid.  A kid in Bangalore can come up with a program that could make Microsoft obsolete in two years. This is scary.  This makes for great uncertainty.  So what we're really worried about is the success of our kids. That's why we push them to achieve.  And that's why we're focused on the Harvard, Yale, Princeton brand name education. In a world of uncertainty, a brand name carries some cachet and it's the closest thing you can get to a guarantee of some kind of success or achievement.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1817260,00.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:57:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Educational Benefits of Social Networking Sites Uncovered</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D4AA56AC-03FE-4FBF-A47F-E537CF27FFBF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080620133907.htm" title="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080620133907.htm"&gt;www.sciencedaily.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;esearchers at the University of Minnesota have discovered the educational benefits of social networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook. The same study found that low-income students are in many ways just as technologically proficient as their counterparts, going against what results from previous studies have suggested.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;What we found was that students using social networking sites are actually practicing the kinds of 21st century skills we want them to develop to be successful today,"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;educators can help students realize even more benefits from their social network site use by working to deepen students' still emerging ideas about what it means to be a good digital citizen and leader online.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"Students are developing a positive attitude towards using technology systems, editing and customizing content and thinking about online design and layout. They're also sharing creative original work like poetry and film and practicing safe and responsible use of information and technology.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080620133907.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:02:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Britannica Goes Wiki</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/65303CE0-4937-490E-A787-E37EF8AA35DD/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3064/encyclopedia-britannica-goes-gasp-wiki" title="http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3064/encyclopedia-britannica-goes-gasp-wiki"&gt;chronicle.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;But it’s not a complete free-for-all. The voice of Britannica adds that the core encyclopedia itself “will continue to be edited according to the most rigorous standards and will bear the imprimatur ‘Britannica Checked’ to distinguish it from material on the site for which Britannica editors are not responsible.”&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Long a standard reference source for scholarship, largely because of its tightly controlled editing, the &lt;A href="http://britannicanet.com/?p=86"&gt;Encyclopaedia Britannica announced&lt;/A&gt; this week it was throwing open its elegantly-bound covers to the masses. It will allow the “user community” (in the words of the encyclopedia’s blog) to contribute their own articles, which will be clearly marked and run alongside the edited reference pieces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3064/encyclopedia-britannica-goes-gasp-wiki</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:07:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Instant Messaging Proves Useful in Reducing Workplace Interruption</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/196B5127-D58A-4A67-BE1B-02181BDE7048/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080603120251.htm" title="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080603120251.htm"&gt;www.sciencedaily.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;research showed that instant messaging was often used as a substitute for other, more disruptive forms of communication such as the telephone, e-mail, and face-to-face conversations. Using instant messaging led to more conversations on the computer, but the conversations were briefer,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;“We found that the effect of instant messaging is actually positive. People who used instant messaging reported that they felt they were being interrupted less frequently.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Instead of dropping in unexpectedly, many are using the technology to check in with coworkers to see when they are available. Many also use the technology to get quick answers to general questions or to inquire about current work tasks instead of engaging in longer face-to-face conversations. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Ease of use and similarities to e-mail could foster greater acceptance of instant messaging in the workplace. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080603120251.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:56:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Principle's Blunder a Teachable Moment</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/CE1919A8-DBE2-46D6-82D5-4D880AAF2457/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2008/05/plagiarism-its.html" title="http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2008/05/plagiarism-its.html"&gt;blogs.chicagotribune.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Naperville Central High School Principal Jim Caudill delivered a speech last week at a school ceremony that included significant passages lifted without attribution from another source.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caudill told Gregory he wanted to get permission from that former student -- Megan Nowicki-Plackett, now a communication arts teacher at the school -- but it was 10:30 p.m., too late to call her at home. And he felt e-mail was "too impersonal for such a request," to use Gregory's paraphrase.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It may sound harsh, but Jim Caudill has to go.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Even if he had received Nowicki-Plackett's enthusiastic blessing to recycle her speech, he was ethically bound to give her full and clear credit when quoting her.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"I'm in the middle of my speech," he told Gregory, "and I paused and I thought, 'Oh my God, I have not talked to her before.'"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; That pause was the window into which he should have inserted a gracious and grateful footnote acknowledging Nowicki-Plackett, who was reportedly in attendance.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2008/05/plagiarism-its.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:26:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Clifford Stroll: Why Web Won't Be Nirvana</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/57F0518C-E00F-4661-B18C-228F621C12F2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  interesting perspective &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/106554/" title="http://www.newsweek.com/id/106554/"&gt;www.newsweek.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The Usenet, a worldwide bulletin board, allows anyone to post messages across the nation. Your word gets out, leapfrogging editors and publishers. Every voice can be heard cheaply and instantly. The result? Every voice is heard. The cacophany more closely resembles citizens band radio, complete with handles, harrasment, and anonymous threats. When most everyone shouts, few listen. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Internet is one big ocean of unedited data, without any pretense of completeness. Lacking editors, reviewers or critics, the Internet has become a wasteland of unfiltered data. You don't know what to ignore and what's worth reading. Logged onto the World Wide Web, I hunt for the date of the Battle of Trafalgar. Hundreds of files show up, and it takes 15 minutes to unravel them--one's a biography written by an eighth grader, the second is a computer game that doesn't work and the third is an image of a &lt;A class="related" href="http://www.newsweek.com/related.aspx?subject=London" title="London"&gt;London&lt;/A&gt; monument. None answers my question, &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.newsweek.com/id/106554/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:24:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>My Virtual Summer Job</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/36E4EFCF-FECE-4DC7-A912-644F91C4264E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/edtechnnorris/"&gt;edtechnnorris&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Kids working in Second Life making a boatload of money! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121088619095596515.html" title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121088619095596515.html"&gt;online.wsj.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="times"&gt;Mr. Everest, of Durango, Colo., is among a new breed of young entrepreneurs seeking their fortune online in imaginary worlds. As the pool of traditional summer jobs shrinks, tech-savvy young gamers are honing their computer skills to capitalize on growing demand for virtual goods and services. Some work as fashion designers, architects and real-estate developers in Second Life, a fantasy world populated by digital representations of real people. These so-called avatars shop in malls, buy property, hang out with friends or sit "home" watching TV, all manipulated by their real-life counterparts with computer key strokes and a mouse.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121088619095596515.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 21:11:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>