<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | earnric's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/sort/newest-clips/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/sort/newest-clips/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Financial joke...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A36ED083-8915-4481-AE08-DB1D22C63702/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I guess just because you make 10's of millions in salary -- well, you really shouldn't be expected to actually KNOW about the financial health of your company?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That's run-away capitalism for you: get all the bene's without the responsibility... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/business/economy/07lehman.html?hp" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/business/economy/07lehman.html?hp"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Testifying before the committee, Lehman’s chief executive, &lt;A title="More articles about Richard S. Fuld Jr.." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/f/richard_s_fuld_jr/index.html?inline=nyt-per"&gt;Richard S. Fuld Jr.&lt;/A&gt;, said that he took full responsibility for the decisions he made while at the helm. But he also told lawmakers that it was unreasonable to expect that he should have seen the financial crisis coming.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/finance/" rel="tag"&gt;finance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/economy/" rel="tag"&gt;economy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bailout/" rel="tag"&gt;bailout&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/crooks/" rel="tag"&gt;crooks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/business/economy/07lehman.html?hp</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:50:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Conservatives seem to believe their own spin...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/75FB6298-B32A-432A-95E5-89962421C52E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  David Brooks gives a sober picture of what's going on... I agree: free-markets are not panaceas for the economy. All systems need rules...  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;House Republicans&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;have once again confused talk radio with reality.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;With this vote, they’ve taken responsibility for this economy, and they will be held accountable. The short-term blows will fall on John McCain, the long-term stress on the existence of the G.O.P. as we know it. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I’ve spoken with several House Republicans over the past few days and most admirably believe in free-market principles. What’s sad is that they still think it’s 1984.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;We’re living in an age when a vast excess of capital sloshes around the world fueling cycles of bubble and bust. When the capital floods into a sector or economy, it washes away sober business practices, and habits of discipline and self-denial. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; What we need in this situation is authority. Not heavy-handed government regulation, but the steady and powerful hand of some public institutions that can guard against the corrupting influences of sloppy money and then prevent destructive contagions when the credit dries up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/finance/" rel="tag"&gt;finance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:35:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bailing...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7E26F699-C7E6-47FD-90BD-AD8A58899BE9/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I honestly do not know if this is a good plan. My inclination is to "reap what you sew" -- and we've had more than 15 years of republican (endorsed by dems) deregulation polices that have bred this crisis... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In 1933, Franklin Roosevelt inherited an economic crisis. He understood that his first job was to restore confidence, to give people a sense that somebody was in charge, that something was going to be done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;This generation of political leaders is confronting a similar situation, and, so far, they have failed utterly and catastrophically to project any sense of authority, to give the world any reason to believe that this country is being governed.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; And let us recognize above all the 228 who voted no — the authors of this revolt of the nihilists. They showed the world how much they detest their own leaders and the collected expertise of the Treasury and Fed. They did the momentarily popular thing, and if the country slides into a deep recession, they will have the time and leisure to watch public opinion shift against them. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fed/" rel="tag"&gt;fed&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/finance/" rel="tag"&gt;finance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/recession/" rel="tag"&gt;recession&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:27:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The emperor king of America...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/AC26D8F2-FF11-4283-9D5A-4D6A35169FE3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  And we impeached Clinton for lying about a blow job? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6330" title="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6330"&gt;www.cato.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2 align="center"&gt;Power Surge: The Constitutional Record of George W. Bush&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Unfortunately, far from defending the Constitution,
President Bush has repeatedly sought to
strip out the limits the document places on federal
power. In its official legal briefs and public actions,
the Bush administration has advanced a view of
federal power that is astonishingly broad, a view
that includes
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;
a federal government empowered to regulate
core political speech—and restrict it
greatly when it counts the most: in the days
before a federal election;
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;a president who cannot be restrained,
through validly enacted statutes, from pursuing
any tactic he believes to be effective in
the war on terror;
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;a president who has the inherent constitutional
authority to designate American citizens
suspected of terrorist activity as "enemy
combatants," strip them of any constitutional
protection, and lock them up without
charges for the duration of the war on terror—
in other words, perhaps forever; and
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republican/" rel="tag"&gt;republican&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/tyranny/" rel="tag"&gt;tyranny&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6330</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:19:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The gut feeling...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/940BC1E0-A8EC-424B-AF12-9B4A0EDD619C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  A good read... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/haidt08/haidt08_index.html" title="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/haidt08/haidt08_index.html"&gt;www.edge.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"&gt; For my dissertation research, I made up stories about people who did things that were disgusting or disrespectful yet perfectly harmless. For example, what do you think about a woman who can't find any rags in her house so she cuts up an old American flag and uses the pieces to clean her toilet, in private? Or how about a family whose dog is killed by a car, so they dismember the body and cook it for dinner?  I read these stories to 180 young adults and 180 eleven-year-old children, half from higher social classes and half from lower, in the USA and in Brazil. I found that most of the people I interviewed said that the actions in these stories were morally wrong, even when nobody was harmed. Only one group—college students at Penn—consistently exemplified Turiel's definition of morality and overrode their own feelings of disgust to say that harmless acts were not wrong. (A few even praised the efficiency of recycling the flag and the dog). &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/reason/" rel="tag"&gt;reason&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/morality/" rel="tag"&gt;morality&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gut+feelings/" rel="tag"&gt;gut feelings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/haidt08/haidt08_index.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:42:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Republican Hypocrisy... again!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B7256D10-E9F2-4699-B0CC-D5F10E2B4919/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Whether or not they got the $ amount right doesn't really matter... What matters is that if you believe the current republican presidential candidate is "less elitist" than the dem -- well, I have some swamp land I'd like to sell you. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/09/cindy-mccains-300000-outfit.html" title="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/09/cindy-mccains-300000-outfit.html"&gt;www.vanityfair.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3 class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/09/cindy-mccains-300000-outfit.html"&gt;Cindy McCain's $300,000 Outfit&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/For-Web_82621223.html"&gt;&lt;IMG height="378" width="242" class="mt-image-right" alt="" src="http://mtblog.vanityfair.com/online/politics/assets_c/2008/09/For-Web_82621223-thumb-242x378.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;One of the persistent memes in the Republican line of attack against Barack Obama is the notion that he is an elitist, whereas the G.O.P. represent real working Americans like Levi “F-in’ Redneck” Johnston. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Cindy McCain&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Oscar de la Renta dress:&lt;/I&gt; $3,000&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Chanel J12 White Ceramic Watch:&lt;/I&gt; $4,500&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Three-carat diamond earrings:&lt;/I&gt; $280,000&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Four-strand pearl necklace:&lt;/I&gt; $11,000–$25,000&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Shoes, designer unknown:&lt;/I&gt; $600&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;Total:&lt;/I&gt; Between $299,100 and $313,100&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hypocrisy/" rel="tag"&gt;hypocrisy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elitism/" rel="tag"&gt;elitism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/09/cindy-mccains-300000-outfit.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:55:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Policy is hard...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DB1C998E-97D0-489F-8A11-EAA1362C97E6/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Ideology can't govern... only intelligence and hard work: something this administration is sorely lacking. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/20/business/20prexy.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/20/business/20prexy.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;These experts, from both political parties, say Mr. Bush’s early personnel choices and overarching antipathy toward regulation created a climate, that, if it did not set off the turmoil, almost certainly aggravated it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; The president’s first two Treasury secretaries, for instance, lacked the kind of Wall Street expertise that might have helped them raise red flags about the use of complex financial instruments that are at the heart of the crisis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/finance/" rel="tag"&gt;finance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/20/business/20prexy.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:31:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ignorance and confidence - all wrapped up</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4F923554-0EC6-4EE2-93CB-D4B53535F792/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Sam Harris expresses my concerns perfectly... but I'd also add that by choosing her, McCain has demonstrated he wants to win far more than he is worried about the future of this country. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080/page/1" title="http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080/page/1"&gt;www.newsweek.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;What I do care about are all the other things Palin is guaranteed not to know—or will be glossing only under the frenzied tutelage of John McCain's advisers. What doesn't she know about financial markets, Islam, the history of the Middle East, the cold war, modern weapons systems, medical research, environmental science or emerging technology? Her relative ignorance is guaranteed on these fronts and most others, not because she was put on the spot, or got nervous, or just happened to miss the newspaper on any given morning. Sarah Palin's ignorance is guaranteed because of how she has spent the past 44 years on earth.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080/page/3" title="http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080/page/3"&gt;www.newsweek.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;What is so unnerving about the candidacy of Sarah Palin is the degree to which she represents—and her supporters celebrate—the joyful marriage of confidence and ignorance. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/craziness/" rel="tag"&gt;craziness&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/elitism/" rel="tag"&gt;elitism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/intellectualism/" rel="tag"&gt;intellectualism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080/page/1</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:32:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The perfect quote...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B02E7179-A501-46A0-AEBC-11AE9AC85B5F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/18/AR2008091803052.html" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/18/AR2008091803052.html"&gt;www.washingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
McCain, who told the &lt;A target="" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/The+Wall+Street+Journal?tid=informline"&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/A&gt; in March that "I'm always for less regulation," now asks voters to believe he will be a champion of tough, unblinking oversight. He's shocked and outraged that Wall Street's preening Masters of the Universe threw a drunken toga party and smashed all the furniture -- but he helped buy the beer and told the cops to look the other way.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/deregulation/" rel="tag"&gt;deregulation&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/financial+mess/" rel="tag"&gt;financial mess&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/18/AR2008091803052.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:53:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't pick on me...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5F724428-4D05-44FB-9A82-494CA2ABEF41/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The clip says it all... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.redroom.com/blog/tim-wise/this-your-nation-white-privilege" title="http://www.redroom.com/blog/tim-wise/this-your-nation-white-privilege"&gt;www.redroom.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;span class="sIFR-alternate"&gt;This is Your Nation on White Privilege&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;White privilege is when you can get pregnant at seventeen like Bristol Palin and everyone is quick to insist that your life and that of your family is a personal matter, and that no one has a right to judge you or your parents, because “every family has challenges,” even as black and Latino families with similar “challenges” are regularly typified as irresponsible, pathological and arbiters of social decay.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;White privilege is when you can call yourself a “fuckin’ redneck,” like Bristol Palin’s boyfriend does, and talk about how if anyone messes with you, you'll “kick their fuckin' ass,” and talk about how you like to “shoot shit” for fun, and still be viewed as a responsible, all-American boy (and a great son-in-law to be) rather than a thug. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/racism/" rel="tag"&gt;racism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.redroom.com/blog/tim-wise/this-your-nation-white-privilege</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:31:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Religious Non-sense - alive and well today.</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DE83FC39-66CE-410D-B018-F7E13BA6DCDB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  So what non-sense is the church putting forth today -- that is impeding science? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How about the idea that a ball of 150 or so cells is a human being -- and is thus stifling research into embryonic stem cells.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;When does the idiocy end? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2008/09/church_of_england_apologizes_t.html" title="http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2008/09/church_of_england_apologizes_t.html"&gt;newsweek.washingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2 id="archive-title"&gt;Sorry, Charley: Church Apologizes to Darwin&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Proving it's never too late to evolve, the Church of England has apologized to Charles Darwin for vilifying him for having the audacity to question, wonder, and doubt.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Charles Darwin: 200 years from your birth, the Church of England owes you an apology for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still," Rev. Malcolm Brown, director of missions and public affairs for the Church of England, &lt;A href="http://www.cofe.anglican.org/darwin/malcolmbrown.html"&gt;wrote in an essay&lt;/A&gt; entitled "Good Religion Needs Good Science."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/church/" rel="tag"&gt;church&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/science/" rel="tag"&gt;science&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/lunacy/" rel="tag"&gt;lunacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2008/09/church_of_england_apologizes_t.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:33:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Really? Are we really gonna believe this?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B1D00220-0B6E-4E98-B89B-AC0AF8096EA2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The champion of wall-street deregulation is now "flip flopping" ... are we really gonna believe he's a financial system reformer?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sadly, for the faithful, they'll believe anything... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/16/AR2008091603732.html?hpid=topnews" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/16/AR2008091603732.html?hpid=topnews"&gt;www.washingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;McCain Embraces Regulation After Many Years of Opposition&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
A decade ago, &lt;A target="" href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000303/"&gt;Sen. John McCain&lt;/A&gt; embraced legislation to broadly deregulate the banking and insurance industries, helping to sweep aside a thicket of rules established over decades in favor of a less restricted financial marketplace that proponents said would result in greater economic growth.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the Republican presidential nominee is scrambling to recast himself as a champion of regulation to end "reckless conduct, corruption and unbridled greed" on Wall Street.
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liars/" rel="tag"&gt;liars&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/regulation/" rel="tag"&gt;regulation&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/finance/" rel="tag"&gt;finance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/16/AR2008091603732.html?hpid=topnews</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:32:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are we really that stupid?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/880EFE8D-5BC0-434F-9771-014FDCC71C39/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Republican 'deregulation mania' is responsible for the current financial crisis... Why would we want to put these same ideologue BACK in the white house?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080916_earth_to_mccain_its_a_crisis/" title="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080916_earth_to_mccain_its_a_crisis/"&gt;www.truthdig.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;John McCain has been a master of the special-interest giveaways to Wall Street that enabled this meltdown. He voted for abolishing all of the significant rules put in place at the time of the Great Depression designed to prevent a repeat. The two main bills accomplishing that, bills which McCain enthusiastically supported, were the Commodity Futures Modernization Act and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/stupidity/" rel="tag"&gt;stupidity&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/crisis/" rel="tag"&gt;crisis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080916_earth_to_mccain_its_a_crisis/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:41:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why smarts &amp; experience matter...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/70BB6071-E1F1-4D17-B8E2-D155CDF2D71E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  From the conservative columnist David Brooks -- give it a read. &lt;br/&gt;Governance isn't something just anyone can do -- or do well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In the current Weekly Standard, Steven Hayward argues that the nation’s founders wanted uncertified citizens to hold the highest offices in the land. They did not believe in a separate class of professional executives. They wanted rough and rooted people like Palin.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; I would have more sympathy for this view if I hadn’t just lived through the last eight years. For if the Bush administration was anything, it was the anti-establishment attitude put into executive practice. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt; And the problem with this attitude is that, especially in his first term, it made Bush inept at governance. It turns out that governance, the creation and execution of policy, is hard. It requires acquired skills. Most of all, it requires prudence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:30:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Soo what's the diff again?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F65D88E1-6121-450B-A80C-3067F1E41773/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/earnric/"&gt;earnric&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I keep hearing how democrats are socialists that want to "ruin" the free market.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So what have the republicans been doing these last eight years? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1808465,00.html" title="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1808465,00.html"&gt;www.time.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
     
When President Bush vetoed a ban on waterboarding and other forms of torture, congressional Republicans backed him. When Bush blocked an expansion of children's health insurance, G.O.P. votes sustained his veto again. But now, after Bush vetoed a bloated farm bill that will lavish billions of dollars on wealthy farmers who are already enjoying record commodity prices, the President suddenly can't seem to rally his own party.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hypocrisy/" rel="tag"&gt;hypocrisy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republican/" rel="tag"&gt;republican&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1808465,00.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:12:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>