<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | dulios's 'democrats' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/tag/democrats/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/tag/democrats/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Alaska About to Eat its Own</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/9C550C4E-DBB0-4DAE-B2DC-883B11C112DC/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Another failed McCain gamble.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/163465" title="http://www.newsweek.com/id/163465"&gt;www.newsweek.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; Some weeks ago, the McCain team devised a plan to have Palin file an ethics complaint against herself with the State Personnel Board, arguing that it alone was capable of conducting a fair, nonpartisan inquiry into whether she fired Monegan because he refused to fire Wooten&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Some Democrats ridiculed the move, noting that the personnel board answered to Palin. But the board ended up hiring an aggressive Anchorage trial lawyer, Timothy Petumenos, as an independent counsel. McCain aides were chagrined to discover that Petumenos was a Democrat who had contributed to Palin's 2006 opponent for governor, Tony Knowles. Palin is now scheduled to be questioned next week, and the counsel's report could be released soon after. "We took a gamble when we went to the personnel board," said a McCain aide who asked not to be identified discussing strategy. While the McCain camp still insists Palin "has nothing to hide," it acknowledges a critical finding by Petumenos would be even harder to dismiss.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/go+home/" rel="tag"&gt;go home&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.newsweek.com/id/163465</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:30:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Dumbing Down of the GOP</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6AE20AEE-528C-4ACE-9AC4-C743B171000F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/10/04/dumb/" title="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/10/04/dumb/"&gt;www.salon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;The dumbing down of the GOP&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P id="deck"&gt;Why aren't more conservatives disgusted that their party nominated a person devoid of qualifications for the vice presidency (again)? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Why should we pretend not to notice when Gov. Palin's ideas make no sense? &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Why should we ignore her inability to string together a series of coherent thoughts? &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Why should we give her a pass on the most important issues of the day?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; Palin's phony populism is as insulting to working- and middle-class Americans as it is to American women. Why are basic diction and intellectual coherence presumed to be out of reach for "real people"? &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/dulios/512/FC034BD9-C001-47CA-AD2C-0AEE330F150F.jpg" alt="News" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;There was a time when conservatives lamented the dumbing down of American culture. Preservation of basic standards in schools and workplaces compelled them -- or so they said -- to resist affirmative action for women and minorities. Qualifications mattered; merit mattered; and demagogic appeals for leveling were to be left to the Democrats. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not anymore. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/lightweight/" rel="tag"&gt;lightweight&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/go+home/" rel="tag"&gt;go home&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/conservatism/" rel="tag"&gt;conservatism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/anti-intellectualism/" rel="tag"&gt;anti-intellectualism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/anti-feminism/" rel="tag"&gt;anti-feminism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/10/04/dumb/</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:23:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>First Two National Polls on Palin:  Men Approve, Women Don't</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/9C9EBF81-257B-4ECD-A7F2-EA79BA58FC01/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  . &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003844485" title="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003844485"&gt;www.editorandpublisher.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;FONT class="titlebar_black"&gt;Surprise? First Two  National Polls Find Palin Gains LESS Support from Women&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;B&gt;NEW YORK&lt;/B&gt; The first national polls on John McCain's pick of Sarah Palin yesterday came out today from Rasmussen and Gallup -- and contrary to what the GOP probably hoped, she scored less well with women than men. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; Among Democratic women &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;9% say Palin makes them more likely to support McCain, 15% less likely.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;From Rasmussen:  Some 38% of men said they were more likely to vote for McCain now, but only 32% of women.   By a narrow 41% to 35% margin, men said she was not ready to be president -- but women soundly  rejected her,  48% to 25%. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Only 9% of Obama supporters said  they might be more likely to vote for McCain.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Overall, voters expressed  a favorable impression of her by a 53/26 margin,  but there was a severe gender gap on this:  Men embraced her at 58% to 23%, while for women it was 48/30.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;And  by  a 29/44 margin, men and women together, they do not believe that she is ready to be President. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/rasmussen/" rel="tag"&gt;rasmussen&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gallup/" rel="tag"&gt;gallup&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/men/" rel="tag"&gt;men&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/women/" rel="tag"&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003844485</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:36:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Single-Digit Approval?  Not Exactly</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/FB1561BF-C27F-4D97-9A80-A695DC0CE27B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Rasmussen did not ask if voters "approved" or "disapproved" of Congress, but rather to rate Congress' performance as excellent, good, fair, or poor.  A total of 45% answered excellent (2%) good (7%), or fair(36%).   &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/11617.html" title="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/11617.html"&gt;www.politico.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="storyheaderlarge"&gt;Single-digit approval? Not exactly&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Matt Drudge blew the ram’s horn early Tuesday morning: “Congressional Approval Rating Falls to Single Digits for First Time Ever.” Within minutes, the conservative group Freedom’s Watch was blasting the news out to reporters. And by afternoon, Rep. Adam Putnam of Florida — the No. 3 Republican in the House — had welded it into a cudgel with which to beat the Democrats. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
The only catch: The news wasn’t exactly the news. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
Rasmussen didn’t ask respondents whether they approved or disapproved of Congress; it asked respondents to rank Congress’ job performance as excellent, good, fair or poor. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Just 2 percent rated the performance as excellent, and 7 percent rated it as good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Add those up, and you get 9 percent. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
But 36 percent of Rasmussen’s respondents said they consider Congress’ job performance to be fair. Is that approval or disapproval? &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/polls/" rel="tag"&gt;polls&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/rasmussen/" rel="tag"&gt;rasmussen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/11617.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:12:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gut Check Time for White Americans</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/81211640-31DA-4119-89CE-7248A7F75655/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;The Wright affair has such resonance in this campaign because Wright has shown himself to be the kind of black person that white people don't like. He brings out our prejudices. Yes, I said "our" prejudices.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Part of it is Wright's ignorance and part of it is his arrogance and part of it is that he talks louder than white people would prefer and part of it is that he uses the sing-song cadence they associate with other black ministers they have grown to hate over the years such as Jesse Jackson.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Obama is none of those things (OK, maybe a little arrogant at times), so Wright has been brought to the forefront as a substitute punching bag.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/brown/922710,CST-NWS-brown30.article" title="http://www.suntimes.com/news/brown/922710,CST-NWS-brown30.article"&gt;www.suntimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="story_headline"&gt;
		It's gut check time for white Americans 
	&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3 class="story_subhead"&gt;
		 Obama's in trouble because Wright brings out our biases 
	&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="story_subhead"&gt;A lot of whites freaked out by Wright&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can see the situation developing, and it doesn't look pretty from where I sit. Obama is likely going to lose the Indiana presidential primary, giving another huge lift to Hillary Clinton.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;And then what?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the Democratic party going to take away the nomination that was almost in Obama's grasp, that remains almost in his grasp, mainly because a lot of white people are freaked out by Wright and what they have convinced themselves it means about Obama? That seems to be a growing possibility, which to my mind would be an even bigger disaster for Democrats than John McCain handing Obama his lunch in November.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;So at the risk of repeating myself, let me repeat myself:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Barack Obama is not Jeremiah Wright.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've never heard Obama say any of the things that got Wright in trouble because Obama doesn't believe those things.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/wright/" rel="tag"&gt;wright&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/racism/" rel="tag"&gt;racism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.suntimes.com/news/brown/922710,CST-NWS-brown30.article</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 05:58:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Felony Disenfranchisement Aids Republicans</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/69C75117-206E-4387-97EC-ADEC4BFE1A68/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I can think of no logical reason why someone should have their right to vote taken away after they've served their time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/76340/" title="http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/76340/"&gt;www.alternet.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Felony Disenfranchisement Aids Republicans&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Restoring the right to vote for felons is essential to our democracy and could dramatically change election results. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since felony disenfranchisement disproportionately affects African-American and Latino men in the U.S., and since these groups overwhelmingly vote Democratic, the laws bolster the position of the Republican Party. The statistics are shocking. Ryan King, policy analyst with The Sentencing Project in Washington, D.C., summarized the latest:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;About 5.3 million U.S. citizens are ineligible to vote due to felony disenfranchisement; 2 million of them are African-American. Of these, 1.4 million are African-American men, which translates into an incredible 13 percent of that population, a rate seven times higher than in the overall population. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/disenfranchisement/" rel="tag"&gt;disenfranchisement&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/felons/" rel="tag"&gt;felons&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republicans/" rel="tag"&gt;republicans&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/76340/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:28:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>F#@k You Romney</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EDD592EB-DB5D-446D-88FD-C0FC59F34DA2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/" title="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/"&gt;www.alternet.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/76420/"&gt;F#@k You Romney&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Posted by &lt;A href="http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/blair/"&gt;Richard Blair&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="http://allspinzone.com/wp/"&gt;The All Spin Zone&lt;/A&gt; on February 8, 2008 at 5:26 AM. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to Mitt 's bailout speech yesterday, a vote for Hillary or Barack is surrendering to the terrorists. Message to Mitt: STFU and get the hell out of my country, you whiney, scared little man. You failed to mention that George Bush's GOP is the greatest terrorist enabling organization in the history of the planet. BTW, where's OSAMA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is short. I am not usually a profane man in my public writing, and think that I keep my political emotions fairly well in check. Not today.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am goddamned outraged. And you should be, too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Who in the &lt;B&gt;FUCK&lt;/B&gt; does Mitt Romney think he is that he can implicate either Sens. Clinton or Obama as terrorism enablers? Or if I support the Dems, that &lt;B&gt;I AM, BY IMPLICATION, A TERRORIST SUPPORTER?&lt;/B&gt; What level of hubris is he exhibiting by saying that if the Democratic Party nominee wins in November, the people of the United States have "surrendered to the terrorists"? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/romney/" rel="tag"&gt;romney&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clinton/" rel="tag"&gt;clinton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/terrorism/" rel="tag"&gt;terrorism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:03:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Give Them Death</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/25F8C4C3-E85A-4DE0-950B-8B17893AED96/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.alternet.org/rights/74884/?page=entire" title="http://www.alternet.org/rights/74884/?page=entire"&gt;www.alternet.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Give Them Death: Three Leading Democratic Candidates Support Capital Punishment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Opposing the death penalty used to distinguish Democrats from Republicans. Now, across party lines, death is just another day at the office. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;As opposition to state-sanctioned killing becomes more and more mainstream, however, the Democrats should be able to muster the courage to come out against it too. But there's no sign that that is a "moral challenge" they are ready to take on. Rather, the pro-death penalty, pro-"reform" stance occupied by Obama, Edwards and Clinton is little more than a gift to capital punishment supporters who claim the machinery of death just needs some fine-tuning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.alternet.org/rights/74884/?page=entire</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:44:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>NO FREE TRADE Deal With Colombia!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/71C5512F-8CE3-4802-B93B-AD567F03EF86/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/world/2008/01/25/D8UD08MO0_rice/index.html" title="http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/world/2008/01/25/D8UD08MO0_rice/index.html"&gt;www.salon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Rice Lobbies for Colombia Trade Deal&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rice's visit Friday is the latest, most high-profile one in a coordinated campaign by Colombia and the White House to win over skeptical Democrats and revive the trade pact, which was first signed in 2006 but has not yet been passed by Congress.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Colombia is the world's most dangerous country for labor organizing. Rice and nine Democratic lawmakers met in Medellin with union leaders who oppose the deal to hear complaints that President Alvaro Uribe has failed to stamp out the violence, including murder.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;More than 700 trade unionists have been killed in Colombia since 2001, according to the government. The number murdered annually has fallen sharply since Uribe took office in 2002, but the 25 killed in 2007 was still more than in any other country in the world. Only a small fraction of the killings have been solved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/free+trade/" rel="tag"&gt;free trade&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/colombia/" rel="tag"&gt;colombia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/world/2008/01/25/D8UD08MO0_rice/index.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:13:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How Bashing Hillary Backfired</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E72BEF76-A3BE-419D-BD09-84AA780D3AEA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/01/10/new_hampshire/" title="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/01/10/new_hampshire/"&gt;www.salon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P id="deck"&gt;The overwhelmingly negative press corps may have rallied voters to Clinton's side and turned her narrow victory into a resurrection. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan. 10, 2008 | Everybody has a theory about the remarkable resurgence of Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire. She &lt;A href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/opinion/08dowd.html?hp" target="_blank"&gt;"cried her way"&lt;/A&gt; to victory. Or she had a better vote-pulling operation. Or she benefited from a "Bradley effect" of white voters reluctant to actually pull the lever for an African-American candidate. But what seems just as plausible as any other explanation is also the most ironic: that New Hampshire Democrats -- and especially Democratic women -- were sick of the corrosive hostility and naked slant of the mainstream media against her. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hillary/" rel="tag"&gt;hillary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/01/10/new_hampshire/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:24:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama is "a Black Man"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E04DD316-1EA8-46E2-8419-A2334984036A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Thanks, Bill. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/01/04/bennett/index.html" title="http://salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/01/04/bennett/index.html"&gt;salon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;For sheer awkwardness Thursday night, conservative radio host, moralist and gambler &lt;A href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/william_bennett/"&gt;Bill Bennett&lt;/A&gt; -- who has previously gotten in trouble for &lt;A href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200509280006" target="_blank"&gt;insensitive&lt;/A&gt; racial commentary -- surely took the booby prize. You could almost feel CNN's producers and hosts cringing along with the audience when Bennett said this: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Barack Hussein Obama, a black man, wins this for the Democrats.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bill+bennett/" rel="tag"&gt;bill bennett&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/race/" rel="tag"&gt;race&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/01/04/bennett/index.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:27:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>2007:   Women's Rights</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/060B87E9-B003-4670-BB6B-151E96C2BFE0/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/dulios/"&gt;dulios&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/?last_story=/mwt/broadsheet/2007/12/22/year_end/" title="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/?last_story=/mwt/broadsheet/2007/12/22/year_end/"&gt;www.salon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/dulios/512/1F74B64A-6E0B-4734-BC23-4A3C107F2588.png" alt="Broadsheet" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Reproductive rights.&lt;/B&gt; It's been a roller coaster of a year for women's 
repro rights. Just a few weeks into the new year, conservative South Dakota 
legislators &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/01/31/abortion/index.html"&gt;reintroduced 
a bill banning abortion&lt;/A&gt; within the state, except in life-threatening cases 
and DNA-supported instances of incest and rape. Soon thereafter, South Dakota &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/02/08/ultrasound/index.html"&gt;introduced 
a bill&lt;/A&gt; forcing women to &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/03/16/abortion/index.html"&gt;"review" 
an ultrasound image&lt;/A&gt; of their fetus before having an abortion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Sex education.&lt;/B&gt; Veronica Mars' &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/02/09/mars/index.html"&gt;writers&lt;/A&gt; 
received a much-needed lesson on the difference between Plan B and RU-486; so 
did &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/10/30/reuters_ru486/index.html"&gt;Reuters.&lt;/A&gt; 
The &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/04/26/aclu_abstinence/index.html"&gt;ACLU 
took on&lt;/A&gt; abstinence-only education, we learned that an overwhelming 
percentage of Americans &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/06/08/pregnancy_prevention/"&gt;support 
comprehensive sex ed,&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/05/17/abstinence_only/index.html"&gt;Democrats 
abstained&lt;/A&gt; from renewing abstinence-only funding, a House Appropriations 
Committee subcommittee approved a &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/06/14/abstinence/"&gt;multimillion-dollar 
boost&lt;/A&gt; to abstinence education, while a growing number of states told the 
federal government to, please, &lt;A 
href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/12/18/abstinence/index.html"&gt;just 
keep their abstinence-only funds.&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/women/" rel="tag"&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/backlash/" rel="tag"&gt;backlash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/2007/" rel="tag"&gt;2007&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/?last_story=/mwt/broadsheet/2007/12/22/year_end/</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 05:16:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>