<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | carrerinyes's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/carrerinyes/date/2008/5/15/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/carrerinyes/date/2008/5/15/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Gay Marriage Ban Overturned By Cal Supreme Court</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8141E0A9-C427-4D86-97BF-7816A675E9B1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/carrerinyes/"&gt;carrerinyes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA&lt;br/&gt;)&lt;br/&gt;)&lt;br/&gt;) S147999&lt;br/&gt;)&lt;br/&gt;In re MARRIAGE CASES. ) Ct.App. 1/3 Nos. A110449,&lt;br/&gt;) A110450, A110451, A110463,&lt;br/&gt;[Six consolidated appeals.]1 ) A110651, A110652&lt;br/&gt;)&lt;br/&gt;) San Francisco County&lt;br/&gt;) JCCP No. 4365&lt;br/&gt;___________________________________ )&lt;br/&gt;In Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1055&lt;br/&gt;(Lockyer), this court concluded that public officials of the City and County of San&lt;br/&gt;Francisco acted unlawfully by issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in the&lt;br/&gt;absence of a judicial determination that the California statutes limiting marriage to&lt;br/&gt;a union between a man and a woman are unconstitutional. Our decision in&lt;br/&gt;Lockyer emphasized, however, that the substantive question of the constitutional&lt;br/&gt;1 City and County of San Francisco v. State of California (A110449 [Super.validity of the California marriage statutes was not before this court in that&lt;br/&gt;proceeding, and that our decision was not intended to reflect any view on that&lt;br/&gt;issue. (Id. at  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gaymarriage16-2008may16,0,6182317.story" title="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gaymarriage16-2008may16,0,6182317.story"&gt;www.latimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;California Supreme Court overturns gay marriage ban&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/carrerinyes/512/C1624422-566D-4B6F-8A47-E7A638C01912.jpg" alt="Supreme Court of California." /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Associate Justice Carlos R. Moreno, Associate Justice Joyce L. Kennard, Associate Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar, Chief Justice Ronald M. George, Associate Justice Ming W. Chin, Associate Justice Marvin R. Baxter, and Associate Justice Carol A. Corrigan.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="storysubhead"&gt;In a 4-3 ruling, the justices rule that state marriage laws are unconstitutional.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gaymarriage16-2008may16,0,6182317.story</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:55:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>