<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | boniface's 'congress' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/tag/congress/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/tag/congress/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Martial Law Would Be Declared If Bailout Not Passed In House</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F4D80E84-657E-4280-B552-ACB9EC292FD2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/sahara/"&gt;sahara&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  As former California congressman Dan Hamburg said earlier this year, the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act gives the executive the power to invoke martial law in case of “major public emergencies,” not limited to “a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack,” but also “any other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order.” Obviously, a financial crash and ensuing social chaos of the sort now being implemented by the ruling elite would be characterized as a dire emergency and a near perfect excuse to impose martial law, a long standing goal of the elite.  As the Army Times reported last month, a battle-hardened “homeland” brigade is now “going domestic” after spending time in Iraq. It appears this illegal deployment (under Posse Comitatus) is designed to respond to “public disorder” as the economy is deliberately and cynically dismantled at the behest of our rulers.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://blog.puppetgov.com/?p=8772" title="http://blog.puppetgov.com/?p=8772"&gt;blog.puppetgov.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Verdana" size="+3" color="#990000"&gt;I&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Verdana" size="-1"&gt;n House debate on the banker “rescue” bill, Rep. &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2008/10/03/a_wait_to_see_if_tax_breaks_will_swing_bailout_vote/?page=2"&gt;Brad Sherman&lt;/A&gt; told his fellow Congress critters the government will declare martial law and the stock market will drop 3,000 points if the bill is not passed. “The panic-mongers were to the point of telling people the market would drop 3,000 points and there would be martial law,” said Sherman.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Sherman’s comment was not in the same context as a comment issued by Rep. Michael Burgess earlier in the week. Burgess, who appeared on the Alex Jones Show, said Pelosi threatened to invoke House rule XIII(6)(a), described as “martial law,” intended to suspend normal procedures and safeguards and thus allowing the House leadership to operate in a more authoritarian fashion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The bailout plan is not only “economic fascism,” as &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/paulsons-700-billion-bailout-wall/story.aspx?guid=%7BB01C634E-C8F5-4843-884C-E4F595D7D5E8%7D&amp;dist=hppr"&gt;Richard Viguerie&lt;/A&gt; has correctly noted, designed to loot the U.S. Treasury and reorganize and further consolidate elite control over the economy, but it is also a brazen effort to impose a martial law and dictatorship&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dictatorship/" rel="tag"&gt;dictatorship&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fascism/" rel="tag"&gt;fascism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://blog.puppetgov.com/?p=8772</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:34:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Economists' great concern for the plan proposed by Paulson</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F4FAC2E6-84E3-4EF5-A826-77DF9AB04125/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/mortgage_protest.htm" title="http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/mortgage_protest.htm"&gt;faculty.chicagogsb.edu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;To the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of
the Senate:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
As economists, we want to express to Congress our great concern for the plan
proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson to deal with the financial crisis. We
are well aware of the difficulty of the current financial situation and we
agree with the need for bold action to ensure that the financial system
continues to function. We see three fatal pitfalls in the currently proposed
plan:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;U&gt;1) &lt;SPAN class="GramE"&gt;Its&lt;/SPAN&gt; fairness&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;2) &lt;U&gt;Its ambiguity.&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;3) &lt;U&gt;Its long-term effects.&lt;/U&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;For these reasons we ask Congress not to rush, to hold appropriate hearings,
and to carefully consider the right course of action, and to wisely determine
the future of the financial industry and the U.S. economy for years to
come.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/mortgage_protest.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:45:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Stop Paulson's Plunder</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/816033DA-DDAC-4AA9-B2FE-10977F4DCF25/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democrats.com/stop-paulsons-plunder" title="http://www.democrats.com/stop-paulsons-plunder"&gt;www.democrats.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/boniface/512/E9ED7B8A-55E5-47EB-9AC8-B17F86FA4879.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;George Bush wants taxpayers to give Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson a $700 billion blank check - $2,333 for every man, woman, and child - to bail out Wall Street for its reckless speculation and greed. That's on top of $1.1 trillion for Bush's other recent bailouts, including A.I.G., Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Bear Stearns.
&lt;P&gt;
The Paulson Plan is a total outrage with no restrictions, no accountability, and no repair of the underlying problem of foreclosures on fraudulent mortgages. Each of Bush's previous bailouts was sold as a cure for the financial crisis, but each had little effect. The Paulson Plan achieves only one goal with certainty: stealing from the middle class to protect the rich. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Congress must reject Paulson's Plunder and enact a plan with these &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://backbonecampaign.org/storydetail.cfm?id=237"&gt;progressive principles from the Backbone Campaign&lt;/A&gt;:
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The people who caused the problem or profited most should pay for it
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Re-regulate to prevent this from happening again
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democrats.com/stop-paulsons-plunder</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:25:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judge Rules White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8D75B6F2-988A-4354-ABB6-9493B64A4A9E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/washington/01SUBPOENA.html?em" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/washington/01SUBPOENA.html?em"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;President Bush’s top advisers cannot ignore  subpoenas issued by Congress, a federal judge ruled on Thursday in a case that involves the firings of several &lt;A title="More articles about United States Attorneys." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/united_states_attorneys/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier"&gt;United States attorneys&lt;/A&gt; but has much wider constitutional implications for all three branches of government.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“The executive’s current claim of absolute immunity from compelled Congressional process for senior presidential aides is without any support in the case law,” Judge &lt;A title="More articles about John D. Bates." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/john_d_bates/index.html?inline=nyt-per"&gt;John D. Bates&lt;/A&gt; ruled in United States District Court here.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It was the latest setback for the Bush administration, which maintains that current and former White House aides are immune from congressional subpoena.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;“Today’s landmark ruling is a ringing reaffirmation of the fundamental principle of checks and balances and the basic American idea that no person is above the law,” said Representative John D. Conyers, the Michigan Democrat who is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/washington/01SUBPOENA.html?em</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:31:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Rep. Wexler to House Judiciary re: impeachment</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5553F84E-E27E-4308-9AA9-A3BCBFE550A3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "Our government was founded by a delicate balance of powers, whereby one branch carefully checks the other branches to prevent a dangerous consolidation of power. The actions of this White House have eviscerated this careful balance. This is not a Democratic or Republican issue; this is an American issue." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/28/house_judiciary_committee_hold_historic_hearings" title="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/28/house_judiciary_committee_hold_historic_hearings"&gt;www.democracynow.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;REP. ROBERT WEXLER: &lt;/B&gt;Never before in the history of this nation has an administration so successfully diminished the constitutional powers of the legislative branch&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;This is not how our founders so carefully and delicately designed our democracy. 
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;failure of administration witnesses to even appear is unprecedented in the history of our nation&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our government was founded by a delicate balance of powers, whereby one branch carefully checks the other branches to prevent a dangerous consolidation of power. The actions of this White House have eviscerated this careful balance. This is not a Democratic or Republican issue; this is an American issue. Without these checks and balances, a president can run roughshod over any law with impunity. Congress must end this disturbing pattern of behavior. And in these circumstances, unfortunately, the only option left is impeachment hearings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/impeachment/" rel="tag"&gt;impeachment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/28/house_judiciary_committee_hold_historic_hearings</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:40:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Elizabeth Holtzman to House Judiciary re: Impeachment</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C107CCFA-A370-4D16-BF6D-32A091F386F2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/masbury/"&gt;masbury&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "You may not be able to finish the task, but you certainly can start the task, which will send an important signal not just to this president, but to future presidents." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/28/house_judiciary_committee_hold_historic_hearings" title="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/28/house_judiciary_committee_hold_historic_hearings"&gt;www.democracynow.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN: &lt;/B&gt;I think the question for this committee is what is to be done now and what can be done now. Prosecution is unrealistic. The administration will never prosecute itself. Truth commissions? The administration will stonewall them, as they have so many committees of Congress. So, what is the realistic remedy? The only remedy, and that’s the one the framers gave to the Congress of the United States, the House and the Senate, is the remedy of impeachment, because no one can interfere with it. 
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;You ask the President or the Vice President to give you the contents of the FBI statement, they don’t do that. That becomes an impeachable offense. You could ask them to provide them the information under oath. You may not be able to finish the task, but you certainly can start the task, which will send an important signal not just to this president, but to future presidents.
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/28/house_judiciary_committee_hold_historic_hearings</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:33:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cheney's Office Pushed Purge Of Climate Change Testimony</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/348D0F1B-E647-4CA7-BB12-664ECA982D40/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121554228130836473.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121554228130836473.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"&gt;online.wsj.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="times"&gt;WASHINGTON -- U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney's office was behind a push to censor congressional testimony that global warming poses a danger to the public, a former Environmental Protection Agency official told Congress.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="times"&gt;The director of the Centers for Disease Control testified to a U.S. Senate panel last year about the public health effects of climate change in testimony that was heavily edited by the White House's Office of Management and Budget. Until now, Mr. Cheney's office hadn't been publicly linked to the efforts to keep information about climate change out of the public eye.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="times"&gt;"We know that the administration's efforts have been about covering up the real dangers of global warming and hiding facts from the public," Sen.  Boxer said at a press conference Tuesday. "This cover-up is being directed from the White House and the Office of the Vice President."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cheney/" rel="tag"&gt;cheney&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/office/" rel="tag"&gt;office&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pushed/" rel="tag"&gt;pushed&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/purge/" rel="tag"&gt;purge&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/climate/" rel="tag"&gt;climate&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/change/" rel="tag"&gt;change&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/testimony/" rel="tag"&gt;testimony&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121554228130836473.html?mod=googlenews_wsj</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:30:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>When it comes to civil rights, McCain has some explaining to do</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/FCE0D709-64A9-4D87-9879-DEAE757FFCE3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "In an effort to show that, if elected, he would be president of "all the people," John McCain has visited the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Ala., the scene of one of the bloodiest civil rights marches in history. He's also traveled though Alabama's impoverished Black Belt region, and showed up for services commemorating the 40th anniversary of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination in Memphis." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080612_When_it_comes_to_civil_rights__McCain_has_some_explaining_to_do.html" title="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080612_When_it_comes_to_civil_rights__McCain_has_some_explaining_to_do.html"&gt;www.philly.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Those gestures, designed to soften McCain's public image, cannot hide his awful record on civil rights.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
In 11 grading periods since he began serving in the U.S. House of Representatives in 1983 and the Senate in 1987, McCain has earned an F for every period, according to an annual report by the NAACP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Of the 11 grading periods, McCain's highest score was 50 percent (1985-86), meaning he supported positions on legislation favored by the NAACP half of the time. His second-highest score was 40 percent (1997-1998). In the nine other grading periods, he supported the NAACP 30 percent of the time or less.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Instead of getting better on civil rights in recent years, McCain has grown worse. Since his unsuccessful 2000 bid for president, McCain voted with the NAACP just 27 percent of the time during the 107th Congress, 15 percent in the 108th Congress and an all-time low of 7 percent during the first session of the 109th Congress, which ended in 2006.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080612_When_it_comes_to_civil_rights__McCain_has_some_explaining_to_do.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:30:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>No More Funds for Iraq</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/522E86E8-0458-4EFB-9CB5-5E0D177FE919/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/124?ad=d1" title="http://www.democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/124?ad=d1"&gt;www.democrats.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2 class="content-title"&gt;No More Funds for Iraq&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;George Bush is bullying Congress to give him $102 billion more to continue the disastrous occupation of Iraq into 2009 and beyond.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bush's Iraq disaster has already cost American families the loss of &lt;B&gt;4,000&lt;/B&gt; soldiers and cost American taxpayers &lt;B&gt;$562 billion&lt;/B&gt;, and could cost &lt;B&gt;$3 trillion&lt;/B&gt; if it continues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The occupation of Iraq has greatly increased Al Qaeda terrorism worldwide, devastated the morale of American troops through repeated deployments and lowered recruiting standards, increased oil prices to $110 per barrel, and pushed the U.S. economy into a recession.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;George Bush is defying the will of the American people, who elected a Democratic Congress in 2006 to end the occupation. Polls consistently show over 60% of Americans disapprove of the occupation, and over 70% of Iraqis want us to leave.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;If Bush rejects all Democratic plans to bring our troops home, Congress must simply refuse to provide any more funds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Sign below to tell Congress: Bring our troops home now!&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/124?ad=d1</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:01:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush: "If I don't get my way, it'll hurt national security!"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7804B9B2-375D-47CA-BE68-5514D41F69AD/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1219099420080312" title="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1219099420080312"&gt;www.reuters.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Bush says Congress must vote on Colombia pact&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;President George W. Bush said on Wednesday he intended to send a controversial free trade pact with Colombia to Congress soon for a vote and warned rejecting the pact would harm U.S. national security.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Bush said approval of the pact was essential to support a key ally in Latin America facing threats from the FARC guerrilla group at home and from neighboring Venezuela, led by leftist President Hugo Chavez.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1219099420080312</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:37:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Nader vs. the Democrats</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8C4E0FD8-E864-4513-85C0-BEFA6109A1EE/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This idiot is going to put another Republican in office! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/nader_vs_the_democrats/" title="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/nader_vs_the_democrats/"&gt;www.boston.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In 2000, when Nader ran under the Green Party banner, about 2.9 million voters bought that argument. His views haven't much changed.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Nader's desire to see more than two major presidential candidates would make more sense if the United States had a parliamentary system, in which parties are represented in government roughly according to their percentage of the vote. But the president and the 535 members of Congress are chosen in winner-take-all races. This process leads almost inexorably to the emergence of two well-organized parties. In such races, third-party candidates are far more likely to play the spoiler  - that is, to sink the candidate closest to them ideologically  - than to be elected themselves.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;After Bush prevailed in 2000, his administration honored the wishes of industry and weakened such agencies as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/nader_vs_the_democrats/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:29:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Time to Vote Contempt</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E3594D04-73FA-484E-95E3-928A30C4C3C1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/opinion/14thu1.html?hp" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/opinion/14thu1.html?hp"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alberto Gonzales may be out, but the country is still waiting for a full accounting of how he and his White House patrons cynically politicized the Justice Department. Congress is rightly asking questions about the actions of yet another United States attorney: New Jersey’s Christopher J. Christie. The House also needs to stop procrastinating and vote to hold witnesses in contempt for refusing to testify in the wider scandal. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Federal prosecutors must be scrupulously nonpartisan. Mr. Christie, a Republican activist who got his job despite a lack of trial and criminal-law experience, has gone up to the line of acceptable behavior — and possibly crossed it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The founders did not want that when they wrote the Constitution, and the voters who elected this Congress do not want it today.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/opinion/14thu1.html?hp</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:20:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>He should just apologize and leave!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/61C479B0-47BC-4534-A2AF-12455233A6D7/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/boniface/"&gt;boniface&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-01-25-voa20.cfm" title="http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-01-25-voa20.cfm"&gt;www.voanews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="articleheadline"&gt;Bush to Make His Last State of the Union Address&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;President Bush's final State of the Union address before both houses of Congress this Monday continues a long-standing tradition in the relations between the executive and legislative branches of the United States government. This year's nationally-televised address comes as several key issues are foremost in the minds of many Americans. VOA's Robert Raffaele explains.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="200" align="left" class="APIMAGE"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;IMG width="200" vspace="2" hspace="2" height="195" border="0" src="http://www.voanews.com/english/images/ap_President_Bush_UAE_195_eng_13jan08.jpg" alt="President Bush speaks at the Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research in Abu Dhabi, 13 Jan 2008" id="||CPIMAGE:421289|" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD class="imagecaption"&gt;President Bush (file photo)&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;President Bush faces continuing concerns about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and unsettled world financial markets. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-01-25-voa20.cfm</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:45:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>1947 - Congress Declares Waterboarding A War Crime</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/174A8A03-FB1E-4058-9821-2DCBFA42BE84/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/BartendingBear/"&gt;BartendingBear&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Punishment cast? 15 years HARD LABOR. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/04/AR2006100402005.html" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/04/AR2006100402005.html"&gt;www.washingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;On Jan. 21, 1968, The Washington Post published a front-page photograph of a U.S. soldier supervising the questioning of a captured North Vietnamese soldier who is being held down as water was poured on his face while his nose and mouth were covered by a cloth. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Twenty-one years earlier, in 1947, the United States charged a Japanese officer, Yukio Asano, with war crimes for carrying out another form of waterboarding on a U.S. civilian. The subject was strapped on a stretcher that was tilted so that his feet were in the air and head near the floor, and small amounts of water were poured over his face, leaving him gasping for air until he agreed to talk.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"Asano was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor," &lt;A target="" href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/k000105/"&gt;Sen. Edward M. Kennedy&lt;/A&gt; (D-Mass.) told his colleagues last Thursday during the debate on military commissions legislation. "We punished people with 15 years of hard labor when waterboarding was used against Americans in World War II," he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/04/AR2006100402005.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:12:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are These 9/11 Whistleblowers Credible? </title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7F154288-1665-47FB-811B-8CE37A4C2988/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/thisnamecantbetaken/"&gt;thisnamecantbetaken&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Wow. Go to the source. The list goes on and on and on. Are they all crazies? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(They forgot to mention former Italian President Francesco Cossiga) &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://infowars.net/articles/december2007/071207Whistleblowers.htm" title="http://infowars.net/articles/december2007/071207Whistleblowers.htm"&gt;infowars.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; Are These 9/11 Whistleblowers 
                Credible?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;The following people question the government's version 
                of 9/11 (are they credible or not?):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;MILITARY LEADERS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President 
                Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that &lt;A href="http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2006/010706doesnthunt.htm"&gt;the 
                official story of 9/11 is "the dog that doesn't hunt"&lt;/A&gt; 
                (bio)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;(Col. Robert Bowman) 
                stated that &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm"&gt;9/11 
                was an inside job&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;(Capt. Daniel Davis)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation 
                Board&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;(Lt. Col. Jeff Latas)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European 
                Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;(General Wesley Clark)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/movies/Hellyer.mov"&gt;Canadian 
                Minister of Defense&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11222.htm"&gt;Assistant 
                German Defense Minister&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010913033540/http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/09/12/14983.html"&gt;Commander-in-chief 
                of the Russian Navy&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/230106doesnotexist.htm"&gt;Chief 
                of staff of the Russian armed forces&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;9/11 COMMISSIONERS&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;SCIENTISTS&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;STRUCTURAL 
                ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS&lt;BR /&gt;
                &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LEGAL SCHOLARS&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;MEMBERS 
                OF CONGRESS&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
                FAMILY MEMBERS&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;FIRST RESPONDERS&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;THOUSANDS OF OTHERS&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/911/" rel="tag"&gt;911&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/conspiracy/" rel="tag"&gt;conspiracy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/or/" rel="tag"&gt;or&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/not/" rel="tag"&gt;not&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://infowars.net/articles/december2007/071207Whistleblowers.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:51:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>