<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | blueridge's 'surveillance' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/tag/surveillance/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/tag/surveillance/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>FBI Illegally Obtained Reporters Phone Records</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0F9078D2-1C2A-41D1-BD48-4405AF2FD5DF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  by playing the "terrorism" card.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The question now is, &lt;b&gt;what was going on in Indonesia (where the reporters were) that made them desperate to violate the law in order to do some surveillance? (What did they fear the reporters might be on to?)&lt;/b&gt;  Reporters should now do some research to answer the question and they would have an important story.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Indonesia is a highly Islamic area targetted for change on the "Pentagon's New Map", and where the Tsunami took place. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/washington/09inquire.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/washington/09inquire.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;NYT_HEADLINE _moz-userdefined="" type=" " version="1.0"&gt;
F.B.I. Says It Obtained Reporters’ Phone Records
&lt;/NYT_HEADLINE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;WASHINGTON — The &lt;A title="More articles about the Federal Bureau of Investigation." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/federal_bureau_of_investigation/index.html?inline=nyt-org"&gt;Federal Bureau of Investigation&lt;/A&gt; said Friday that it had improperly obtained the phone records of reporters for The New York Times and The Washington Post in the newspapers’ &lt;A title="More news and information about Indonesia." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/indonesia/index.html?inline=nyt-geo"&gt;Indonesia&lt;/A&gt; bureaus in 2004.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="More articles about Robert S. Mueller III." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/robert_s_iii_mueller/index.html?inline=nyt-per"&gt;Robert S. Mueller III&lt;/A&gt;, director of the F.B.I., disclosed the episode in a phone call to Bill Keller, the executive editor of The Times, and apologized for it. He also spoke with Leonard Downie Jr., the executive editor of The Washington Post, to apologize.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;F.B.I. officials said the incident came to light as part of the continuing review by the Justice Department inspector general’s office into the bureau’s improper collection of telephone records through “emergency” records demands issued to phone providers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the records of two reporters for The Times in Indonesia, Raymond Bonner and Jane Perlez, as well as two reporters there for The Post, Ellen Nakashima and Natasha Tampubolon, officials said&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fbi/" rel="tag"&gt;fbi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/phone+records/" rel="tag"&gt;phone records&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/spying/" rel="tag"&gt;spying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/reporters/" rel="tag"&gt;reporters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/washington/09inquire.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 04:12:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Secrecy of the Feds Cyber Security Program</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6B4DFEB2-48F7-465F-9CBB-9A10B6BD903C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Homeland Security is Homeland Secrecy, for this anti-constitutional agency that is.  You are not permitted any privacy about you under this new government. CNet tried to find facts about this internet security program but was thwarted.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The more secret a government is the less it is a government by and for the people. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10004266-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news" title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10004266-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news"&gt;news.cnet.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;DHS stays mum on new 'Cyber Security' center&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;

The Bush administration's newly created National Cyber Security Center remains shrouded in secrecy, with officials refusing to release information about its budget, what contractors will run it, and how its mission relates to Internet surveillance.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
In correspondence with the U.S. Senate posted on Thursday, the Bush administration said it would not provide that information publicly. An 18-page, partially redacted &lt;A href="http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/Dem_Files/DHSCyberLetter.pdf"&gt;letter&lt;/A&gt; from DHS said that disclosure could affect "the conduct of federal programs, or other programs or operations essential to the interests of our nation."
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The censored letter--a nonredacted, "For Official Use Only" version was provided to senators--came in response to queries from the top Democratic and Republican members of the Senate's Homeland Security committee.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Oddly, DHS seemed to change its mind about whether even the &lt;I&gt;mere existence&lt;/I&gt; of the National Cyber Security Center was classified or not.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/internet/" rel="tag"&gt;internet&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cyber+security/" rel="tag"&gt;cyber security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10004266-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:29:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>"My First-Hand Experience with Gov't Spies"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/774946D9-F92A-4188-B06E-AF5CFED22BD4/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  America's new government, including the states, in action:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act and the ACLU, we now know that "Lucy" was only one part of a vast, insidious project. The Maryland State Police's Department of Homeland Security devoted near 300 hours and thousands of taxpayer dollars from 2005 and 2006 to harassing people whose only crime was dissenting on the question of the war in Iraq and Maryland's use of death row.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20080721/cm_huffpost/113930" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20080721/cm_huffpost/113930"&gt;news.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;
					&lt;DIV class="source"&gt;
                                                						&lt;A href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/huffpost/brand/SIG=119emofh4;_ylt=Aov4wXJF0q.2s2hpE6Ytzw4e6sgF/**http:%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2F"&gt;&lt;IMG width="145" height="17" border="0" alt="HuffingtonPost.com" src="http://l.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/nws/p/huffingtonpost145.gif" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
                                                					&lt;/DIV&gt;
                                                &lt;DIV class="opinionhd"&gt; Opinion &lt;/DIV&gt;
                                        COINTELPRO Comes to My Town: My First-Hand Experience With Government Spies                &lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I have been a target of state police surveillance for activities -- in my case against the death penalty -- that were legal, non-violent, and, so we assumed, constitutionally protected. In classified reports compiled by the &lt;SPAN id="lw_1216607638_1" class="yshortcuts"&gt;Maryland State Police&lt;/SPAN&gt; and the &lt;SPAN id="lw_1216607638_2" class="yshortcuts"&gt;Department of Homeland Security&lt;/SPAN&gt;, I am "Dave Z."  This nickname was given by an undercover agent known to us as "Lucy."  She sat in our meetings of the Campaign to End the Death Penalty, smiling and engaged, taking copious notes about actions deemed threatening by the &lt;SPAN id="lw_1216607638_3" class="yshortcuts"&gt;Governor of Maryland&lt;/SPAN&gt;, Robert Ehrlich. Our seditious crimes, as Lucy reported, involved such acts as planning to set up a table at the local farmer's market and writing up a petition. Adding a dash of farce to this outrage, she was monitoring us in the liberal enclave of &lt;SPAN id="lw_1216607638_4" class="yshortcuts"&gt;Takoma Park, Maryland&lt;/SPAN&gt;, a place known more for vegans than violence, more for tie-dying than terrorism.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/terrorism/" rel="tag"&gt;terrorism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20080721/cm_huffpost/113930</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:21:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Homeland Security Merchandisers Go to China</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EDFFBDDC-199F-4271-8683-C90A8C75947C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Note:  Communist, fascist governments like the same technology being setup in America!  Kaa-chiiing!  Selling out liberty is highly profitable and driving the agenda more.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Note the sales pitches and methodology to establish tyranny by identifying it with patriotic labels, just more proof that there is a global conspiracy to increase strength of governments against their people invoking the (microscopic) threat of "terrorism":&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;The surveillance experiment is part of the heroically named Golden Shield Project (Patriot Act, anyone?) which also gave birth to another of our favorite censorship models the Great Firewall.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://shanghaiist.com/2008/07/20/big_brother_arrives_with_a_little_h.php" title="http://shanghaiist.com/2008/07/20/big_brother_arrives_with_a_little_h.php"&gt;shanghaiist.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3 class="title"&gt;Big Brother arrives (with a little help from the US)&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/E5B47DC1-820B-4C3C-B813-67082AE886B7.jpg" alt="surveillance.jpg" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;With the help of U.S. defense contractors, an estimated 2 million closed circuit tv-cameras or CCTVs for short (oh the irony) will be installed over the next three years in Shenzhen.  The surveillance experiment is part of the heroically named &lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Shield_Project"&gt;Golden Shield Project&lt;/A&gt; (Patriot Act, anyone?) which also gave birth to another of our favorite censorship models the &lt;A href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/chinese-firewall"&gt;Great Firewall&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Considering the U.S. of A's recent track record of "homeland security" measures, it should  come as little surprise that a large part of the funding for this system of high-tech control comes from global corporations, "American giants like IBM, Honeywell and General Electric."  And why not?  In China, control equals stability equals return on investment.  Kaaaa-ching.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regardless of whether or not the cameras are actually being monitored (or even turned on), one thing is certain, digital surveillance suppliers are banking in the global anti-terrorism boom.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/patriot+act/" rel="tag"&gt;patriot act&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/china/" rel="tag"&gt;china&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/07/20/big_brother_arrives_with_a_little_h.php</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:00:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama and McCain Both Changing Now</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5F905789-33DE-4C00-8D3F-BDBE9FFCF25C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The Maverick is not and the "Change" candidate is shifting.  Politicians are like Chameleons, changing color depending their context to fit in.   Trustworthiness and forthrightness are not to be found, and considered detrimental to obtaining power, ironically, when most Americans want to &lt;i&gt;reverse the present course&lt;/i&gt; without question, instead of simply tailoring and amending it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Don't think the BBC article is correct about McCain however, he is shifting left, distancing from Bush, since republicans are left without an alternative (except for increasing third party candidates). &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7474558.stm" title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7474558.stm"&gt;news.bbc.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;
					US candidates practise their U-turns
				&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/DB3B1632-EB4E-4023-8BED-85E4E018D5DC.jpg" alt="Barack Obama (L) and John McCain (R), both pictured from behind" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;In order to pass their political driving test, successful politicians need to be masters of one tricky manoeuvre in particular - the U-turn.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The contenders in this year's US presidential election are no exceptions - both John McCain and Barack Obama have engaged in some nifty repositioning.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are some examples.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;JOHN MCCAIN&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Immigration&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Christian right&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Interrogation rules&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Guantanamo&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Oil drilling&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;BARACK OBAMA&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Campaign finance&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Surveillance programme&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Gun control&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Iraq&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Free trade&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Mr McCain's U-turns have mostly increased his appeal to the Republican Party's base, placing him on a rightward trajectory.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Barack Obama has been performing a more traditional manoeuvre: running to the left during the primaries, when party activists need to be wooed, then shifting to the centre once the nomination is clinched.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Flip-flopping politicians will always attract charges of hypocrisy and opportunism:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mccain/" rel="tag"&gt;mccain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/2008+candidates/" rel="tag"&gt;2008 candidates&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7474558.stm</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:39:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Book Review:  ID Crisis, The Abuse and Tyranny of ID</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DD9A2AB0-E04E-4A23-9C0A-0D08ADBCC363/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Give your Congressmen, governor, and state legislators a gift to restore sanity and liberty against REAL ID and the increasing total surveillance society.  Remember the &lt;i&gt;security merchandisers &lt;/i&gt;are lobbying them all everyday, selling their products at the expense of your liberty.  This, along with the Constitution, is your ammo to fight back.  Educate them with hard facts that refutes the effectiveness of ID methods as a means increasing security.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Harper is the leading expert on countering ID propaganda. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=reader_req_dp" title="http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=reader_req_dp"&gt;www.amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="btAsinTitle"&gt;Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood (Paperback)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/C94912C5-5D38-4D69-809E-FA162EBAAB85.jpg" alt="Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
  The advance of identification technology biometrics, identity cards, surveillance, databases, dossiers threatens privacy, civil liberties, and related human interests. Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, demands for identification in the name of security have increased. In this insightful book, Jim Harper takes readers inside identification a process everyone uses every day but few people have ever thought about. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Harper dissects identification processes and technologies, showing how identification works when it works and how it fails when it fails. Harper exposes the myth that identification can protect against future terrorist attacks. He shows that a U.S. national identification card, created by Congress in the REAL ID Act, is a poor way to secure the country or its citizens.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;that transfer threatens liberty, enables identity fraud, and subjects people to unwanted surveillance.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/police+state/" rel="tag"&gt;police state&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/real+id/" rel="tag"&gt;real id&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=reader_req_dp</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:34:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Lawsuit to Counter Spy Bill Promised</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C66A68C9-852A-428A-B83F-46E17AABDE2B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The constitution is supreme law over all legislation, period.  ACLU promises a needed legal challenge.  No tyranny permitted even if legislated.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; A legislative act, contrary to the Constitution, is not law.--Supreme Court Justice John Marshall &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/35928prs20080709.html" title="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/35928prs20080709.html"&gt;www.aclu.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/3A44D1D5-3A33-4FB2-B339-D784A5BE7A62.jpg" alt="American Civil Liberties Union" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="interiorHeadline"&gt;Senate Passes Unconstitutional Spying Bill And Grants Sweeping Immunity To Phone Companies&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ACLU Announces Legal Challenge To 
Follow President’s Signature&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;WASHINGTON – Today, in a blatant assault upon 
civil liberties and the right to privacy, the Senate passed an unconstitutional 
domestic spying bill that violates the Fourth Amendment and eliminates any 
meaningful role for judicial oversight of government surveillance. The FISA 
Amendments Act of 2008 was approved by a vote of 69 to 28 and is 
expected to be signed into law by President Bush shortly. This bill essentially 
legalizes the president’s unlawful warrantless wiretapping program revealed in 
December 2005 by the New York Times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“Once 
again, Congress blinked and succumbed to the president’s fear-mongering. With 
today’s vote, the government has been given a green light to expand its power to 
spy on Americans and run roughshod over the Constitution,” said Anthony D. 
Romero&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;This 
fight is not over.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/domestic+spying/" rel="tag"&gt;domestic spying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/spy+bill/" rel="tag"&gt;spy bill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/35928prs20080709.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:25:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Senators Votes on Telecom/Spy Bill--Obama, Clinton, McCain</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A7535EA2-75B9-44E1-A391-070C01063B61/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Clinton, Nay; Obama, Yea; McCain, No Vote!  See more traitors and defenders of the Constitution here. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00168" title="http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00168"&gt;senate.gov&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="contentsubtitle"&gt; U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes
	   110&lt;SUP&gt;th&lt;/SUP&gt;
Congress -
	   2&lt;SUP&gt;nd&lt;/SUP&gt;
Session&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="contenttext"&gt;as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;A name="top"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN class="contentsubtitle"&gt;Vote Summary&lt;/SPAN&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" class="contenttext"&gt;
    &lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD class="contenttext" colspan="4"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Question: &lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;QUESTION _moz-userdefined=""&gt;On Passage of the Bill&lt;/QUESTION&gt;
(H.R. 6304
)
	 &lt;/TD&gt;
    &lt;/TR&gt;
    &lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Vote Number: &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;168&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;B&gt; Vote Date: &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;July 9, 2008,  02:47 PM&lt;/TD&gt;
    &lt;/TR&gt;
    &lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;B&gt; Required For Majority: &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD class="contenttext"&gt;1/2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;B&gt; Vote Result: &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;Bill Passed&lt;/TD&gt;
    &lt;/TR&gt;
    &lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Measure Number: &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext" colspan="3"&gt;&lt;A href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR6304:"&gt;H.R. 6304&lt;/A&gt;
                (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978
)&lt;/TD&gt;
    &lt;/TR&gt;
    &lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Measure Title: &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="contenttext" colspan="3"&gt;A bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for other purposes.&lt;/TD&gt;
    &lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="50%" border="0" valign="TOP" class="contenttext"&gt;
    &lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD width="25%" valign="top" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Vote Counts:&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="50%" class="contenttext"&gt;YEAs&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%" align="right" class="contenttext"&gt;69&lt;/TD&gt;
    &lt;/TR&gt;
    &lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="50%" class="contenttext"&gt;NAYs&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%" align="right" class="contenttext"&gt;28&lt;/TD&gt;
    &lt;/TR&gt;
    &lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="50%" class="contenttext"&gt;Not Voting&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%" align="right" class="contenttext"&gt;3&lt;/TD&gt;
    &lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="100%" border="0" valign="TOP" class="contenttext"&gt;
    &lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
        &lt;TD width="20%" align="center" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;A href="#top"&gt;Vote Summary&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="20%" align="center" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;A href="#name"&gt;By Senator Name&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="20%" align="center" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;A href="#position"&gt;By Vote Position&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="20%" align="center" class="contenttext"&gt;&lt;A href="#state"&gt;By Home State&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Byrd (D-WV), &lt;B&gt;Nay&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Clinton (D-NY), &lt;B&gt;Nay&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Leahy (D-VT), &lt;B&gt;Nay&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;McCain (R-AZ), &lt;B&gt;Not Voting&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Webb (D-VA), &lt;B&gt;Yea&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Obama (D-IL), &lt;B&gt;Yea&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Rockefeller (D-WV), &lt;B&gt;Yea&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Feinstein (D-CA), &lt;B&gt;Yea&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Kennedy (D-MA), &lt;B&gt;Not Voting&lt;/B&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/domestic+spying/" rel="tag"&gt;domestic spying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/terrorism/" rel="tag"&gt;terrorism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00168</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:18:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>US Military to Patrol the Internet</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DC2BAABF-E97B-4311-95EE-9A080D4094AB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2008/06/30/Analysis_US_military_to_patrol_Internet/UPI-83401214841029/" title="http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2008/06/30/Analysis_US_military_to_patrol_Internet/UPI-83401214841029/"&gt;www.upi.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Analysis: U.S. military to patrol Internet&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
				



				
					WASHINGTON,  June 30 (UPI) -- 					&lt;SPAN id="intelliTXT"&gt;

					The U.S. military is looking for a contractor to patrol cyberspace, watching for warning signs of forthcoming terrorist attacks or other hostile activity on the Web.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The purpose of the services will be to identify and assess stated and implied threat, antipathy, unrest and other contextual data relating to selected Internet domains," says the solicitation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solicitation says the successful contractor will "analyze various Web pages, chat rooms, blogs and other Internet domains to aggregate and assess data of interest," adding, "The contractor will prioritize foreign-language domains that relate to specific areas of concern … (and) will also identify new Internet domains" that might relate to "specific local requirements" of the command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/domestic+spying/" rel="tag"&gt;domestic spying&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2008/06/30/Analysis_US_military_to_patrol_Internet/UPI-83401214841029/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:46:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Senate Approves Telecom Immunity &amp; Spy Bill</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F1670B9F-B8ED-49C8-87F3-192CEF3B0AD3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Proof the democrats (e.g. Obama) are not safer than the neocon controlled republicans:  4th Amendment trampled, violators now immune.  This is not "compromise", but capitulation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For more indepth interview with the Telecom (AT&amp;amp;T) technician and whistleblower who discovered Americans were being spied on, listen to the &lt;a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/7/att_t_whistleblower_urges_against_immunity" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Democracy Now interview here.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Terrorist-Surveillance.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Terrorist-Surveillance.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;NYT_HEADLINE _moz-userdefined="" type=" " version="1.0"&gt;
Senate Approves Telecom Immunity and New Eavesdropping Rules
&lt;/NYT_HEADLINE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/9312" title="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/9312"&gt;www.capitolhillblue.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
       &lt;DIV class="heading"&gt;&lt;A href=""&gt;The new FISA compromise: it's worse than you think&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Telco immunity is the icing, not the cake&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Specifically, the new legislation dramatically expands the government's ability to wiretap without meaningful judicial oversight, by redefining "oversight" so that the feds can drag their feet on getting authorization almost indefinitely. It also gives the feds unprecedented new latitude in selecting eavesdropping targets, latitude that could be used to collect information on non-terrorist-related activities like P2P copyright infringement and online gambling. In short, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 opens up loopholes so large that the feds could drive a truck loaded down with purloined civil liberties through it. So the telecom immunity stuff is just the smoke; let's take a look at the fire.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the legislation would grant broad, retroactive immunity to firms that participated in the president's warrantless surveillance program. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/domestic+spying/" rel="tag"&gt;domestic spying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war+powers/" rel="tag"&gt;war powers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/telecoms/" rel="tag"&gt;telecoms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Terrorist-Surveillance.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:30:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Democrats Say "I Love Big Brother", Pelosi and Obama Support Spy Bill</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/37444147-5A3E-492D-B71E-7142DFE55A14/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Both Pelosi and Obama support the 4th amendment trampling revised FISA bill that gives the Telecoms immunity from lawsuits, which is now before the Senate.  Sen. Feingold plans to filibuster it, while as this article says Sen. Obama shows his true colors (read the last line). &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://socialistworker.org/2008/06/24/democrats-embrace-big-brother" title="http://socialistworker.org/2008/06/24/democrats-embrace-big-brother"&gt;socialistworker.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="headline"&gt;The Democrats embrace Big Brother&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="sw_author"&gt;Candace Cohn&lt;/SPAN&gt; explains how new federal legislation on domestic surveillance gives the government sweeping new spy powers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;IT MAY be June, but Christmas came early this year for Big Brother and the telecommunications giants. Unfortunately, it is average Americans who will pay--dearly--on three separate counts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;First, precious constitutional and other legal protections against warrantless domestic surveillance have been shattered. The federal government may now secretly and legally eavesdrop on virtually any American's e-mail, cell phone and landline communications--without first getting a court-ordered warrant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;New federal legislation gives the government and phone companies sweeping new domestic surveillance powers. It allows for mass, untargeted, warrantless eavesdropping against ordinary American citizens and political activists.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Barack Obama gave fresh evidence of what can be expected of him if he wins the presidency.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pelosi/" rel="tag"&gt;pelosi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/congress/" rel="tag"&gt;congress&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/democrats/" rel="tag"&gt;democrats&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fisa/" rel="tag"&gt;fisa&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/spying/" rel="tag"&gt;spying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://socialistworker.org/2008/06/24/democrats-embrace-big-brother</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:08:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>America Becoming Land of Surveillance</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B55838CB-F78B-4083-8720-1EF4403DF867/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Despite lack of evidence that it is effective, or evidence that proves it is not from UK studies.  But the security merchandisers are making a fortune and state and local governments are impulsively spending faster than a woman with a credit card:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;.P. Freeman said the domestic market for such systems last year had doubled over five years, to $9.2 billion, and estimated that it would more than double again by 2010, to more than $21 billion.&lt;/blockquote&gt; You are paying for your loss of liberty, while they profit, which is insult to injury.  It's worth wondering how many government officials own stock in security companies, which would be a conflict of interest in that lawmakers also profit through authorizing this spending. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25355673/" title="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25355673/"&gt;www.msnbc.msn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Smile! More and more, you’re on camera&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Public surveillance video mushrooms despite lack of evidence it works&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;TABLE cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" align="left"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;DIV class="box_3027626 sitewrapperbox"&gt;&lt;TABLE width="102" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="boxH_3027626"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="1%" class="boxHI_3027626"&gt;&lt;IMG width="100" vspace="0" hspace="0" height="20" border="0" src="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Components/ColorBoxes/Styles/img/byline_msnbcDotCom.gif" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="*" nowrap="" class="boxHC_3027626"&gt;&lt;DIV class="hauto textSmallBold"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;TABLE width="102" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="boxB_3027626"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR valign="top"&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;IMG vspace="0" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Bylines/mugs/MSNBC Interactive/msnbc_johnson_alex_smile.thumb.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR valign="top"&gt;&lt;TD class="boxBI_3027626"&gt;&lt;DIV class="textMed"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Alex Johnson&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="credit"&gt;Reporter&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;HR width="85%" size="1" color="#cccccc" align="center" /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class="bulletRedSmall"&gt;• &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="textMed"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10913647/"&gt;Profile&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;TABLE width="102" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="boxF_3027626"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class="boxFI_3027626"&gt;&lt;DIV class="textSmall"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, local governments across the country set aside concerns over privacy and installed surveillance cameras in public streets and plazas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Now — even after a damning report by the head of London’s extensive surveillance network and with little evidence that the systems work — police in many cities are trying to add thousands more cameras to their networks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;“‘Cameras Everywhere’ continues to be the best description of the trend in the video surveillance market,” security market analysts J.P. Freeman Co. said in a report in 2006 that estimated that a quarter of major U.S. cities were investing in the technology. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Officials in many cities are eager to take advantage of money from state and federal security agencies to install the cameras on street corners and intersections&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cctv/" rel="tag"&gt;cctv&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cameras/" rel="tag"&gt;cameras&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government+spending/" rel="tag"&gt;government spending&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25355673/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:07:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The UK REAL ID Program</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/49C97788-2A4D-4043-97CF-A2318D189DF1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Same as the US but more blatant spying.  The US REAL ID incorporates the social security number from which all financial, medical, credit and personal info can be data-mined easily.  Here the UK admits open collection of a broad amount of information.  The UK does not have a bill of rights and the US acts like it does not.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;"Membership has its privileges" could be their slogan, without this you cannot "buy or sell".   &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91211-1318399,00.html" title="http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91211-1318399,00.html"&gt;news.sky.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="main-headline"&gt;ID Cards 'Could Be Used To Spy On You'&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/F9A809E2-CC53-4E81-945B-3A608538F025.jpg" alt="British Passport Office volunteer has his fingerprints scanned for a biometrics enrolment card" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;UK authorities may be able to spy on people using information gathered for the planned compulsory ID card scheme, a group of MPs have warned.&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ministers say they have no plans to carry out individual surveillance using details stored on a national database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the Home Affairs Select Committee said it was worried about "function creep".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The multi-billion pound National Identity Scheme is due to begin this year as work gets underway on building a massive database on every person over 16 in Britain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The committee of MPs expressed concern that the sensitive information gathered for the database could later be used for spying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at the issue of surveillance generally, the committee called on the Government to minimise the amount of information it collected and held on citizens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/uk/" rel="tag"&gt;uk&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/real+id/" rel="tag"&gt;real id&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/domestic+spying/" rel="tag"&gt;domestic spying&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91211-1318399,00.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:08:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Arizona Joins the Revolt, Outlaws REAL ID</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/56D259FE-6A9F-43B2-B78B-7D6F8D5846E9/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Next!  Liberty is a threatening thing to Homeland Security.  If it was really about making drivers licenses secure then the Feds would not care.  But it's really about federal power and their matrix of surveillance that they want to construct that is at stake. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0618real-id0618.html" title="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0618real-id0618.html"&gt;www.azcentral.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="topHeadline"&gt;Napolitano: Real ID a no-go in Arizona&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
				Arizona will join roughly a dozen states that have vowed not to participate in federal plans for a uniform standard on state-issued driver's licenses and identification cards.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;



On Tuesday, Gov. Janet Napolitano signed a measure, House Bill 2677,  barring Arizona's compliance with the Real ID program. In so doing, she called it an unfunded federal mandate that would stick states such as Arizona with a  multibillion-dollar bill for the cost to develop and implement the series of new fraud-proof identification cards. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;



HB 2677 is a rare recent example of broad, bipartisan agreement at the state Capitol, with the Democratic governor and GOP-led Legislature finding common ground in their opposition to Real ID.
&lt;TABLE width="50" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" align="left"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" align="center"&gt;advertisement&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD rowspan="3"&gt;&lt;IMG width="7" height="1" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.azcentral.com/imgs/clear.gif" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;IMG width="1" height="7" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.azcentral.com/imgs/clear.gif" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;

&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;



Some of that opposition is grounded in concerns about privacy and government advancement toward a national identification card. For Napolitano, the biggest issue is related to Real ID's costs for the states.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/real+id/" rel="tag"&gt;real id&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/drivers+license/" rel="tag"&gt;drivers license&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0618real-id0618.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:26:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>CCTV and Surveillance Cams Ineffective</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/79EDA60E-012B-4AD9-9346-98AE674AA7A4/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Many UK studies have concluded same.  But as with this article they always try to justify it anyway, despite the enormous cost of installing these police state grids.  Let your state and local authorities know that not only do they trample the 4th amendment (treating all citizens like criminal suspects, without probable cause), but they do not deter crime or even catch many criminals.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The "security merchandisers" are busy reaping profits from the trampling of your liberties by seducing authorities with the latest toys and technology. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/may/06/ukcrime1" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/may/06/ukcrime1"&gt;www.guardian.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="article-no-standfirst" id="heading-alone"&gt;CCTV boom has failed to slash crime, say police&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/1E918A04-CA2C-4CBA-A1F8-21B5E9E04293.jpg" alt="Police officers monitor CCTV screens in the control room at New Scotland Yard in London" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Massive investment in CCTV cameras to prevent crime in the UK has failed to have a significant impact, despite billions of pounds spent on the new technology, a senior police officer piloting a new database has warned. Only 3% of street robberies in London were solved using CCTV images, despite the fact that Britain has more security cameras than any other country in Europe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The warning comes from the head of  the Visual Images, Identifications and Detections Office (Viido) at New Scotland Yard as the force launches a series of initiatives to try to boost conviction rates using CCTV evidence. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="caption"&gt;
			&lt;A href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/audio/2008/may/06/cctv.police.failure" name="&amp;lid={inArticleElement}{Link to this audio}&amp;lpos={inArticleElement}{1}"&gt;Link to this audio&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
			Owen Bowcott on why CCTV is catching few criminals
		&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;

Use of CCTV images for court evidence has so far been very poor, according to Detective Chief Inspector Mick Neville, the officer in charge of the Metropolitan police unit.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance+cameras/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance cameras&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cctv/" rel="tag"&gt;cctv&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/crime/" rel="tag"&gt;crime&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/terrorism/" rel="tag"&gt;terrorism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/may/06/ukcrime1</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:09:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>