<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | blueridge's 'privacy' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/tag/privacy/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/tag/privacy/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>UK Expands Total Citizen Surveillance</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/ED3B19E0-9BCE-452B-AB59-D067C765D854/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The US tends to follow what the UK implements, and under the pretense of a "war on terrorism" the US has been following suit with little lag time.  From REAL ID to the security merchandisers total camera surveillance in every state and municipality this fascism is being erected where "free citizens" are tagged, tracked, recorded, and watched like criminal suspects and the "democratic government" separates itself from and above the people.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The article details yet even more:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Local authorities&lt;/i&gt; have since adapted their own CCTV systems to capture licence plates on behalf of police, massively expanding the network of available cameras. Mobile cameras have been installed in patrol cars and unmarked vehicles parked by the side of roads.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Police helicopters have been equipped with infrared cameras that can read licence plates from 610 metres (2,000ft).&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/sep/15/civilliberties.police" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/sep/15/civilliberties.police"&gt;www.guardian.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Fears over privacy as police expand surveillance project&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/12FBCBCE-6400-4DF0-96A0-4D4B828FC6A5.jpg" alt="A CCTV camera in London" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;CCTV cameras, converted to read ANPR data, capturing people’s movement. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2 id="stand-first"&gt;Database to hold details of millions of journeys for five years&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The police are to expand a car surveillance operation that will allow them to record and store details of millions of daily journeys for up to five years, the Guardian has learned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="caption"&gt;
			Paul Lewis on police plans to store car surveillance records &lt;A href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/audio/2008/sep/15/police.camera.cars" name="&amp;lid={inBodyElement}{Link to this audio}&amp;lpos={inBodyElement}{1}"&gt;Link to this audio&lt;/A&gt;
		&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;A national network of roadside cameras will be able to "read" 50m licence plates a day, enabling officers to reconstruct the journeys of motorists. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Police have been encouraged to "fully and strategically exploit" the database, which is already recording the whereabouts of 10 million drivers a day, during investigations ranging from counter-terrorism to low-level crime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The project relies on automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras to pinpoint the precise time and location of all vehicles on the road.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cctv/" rel="tag"&gt;cctv&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/police+state/" rel="tag"&gt;police state&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/sep/15/civilliberties.police</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:20:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Secrecy of the Feds Cyber Security Program</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6B4DFEB2-48F7-465F-9CBB-9A10B6BD903C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Homeland Security is Homeland Secrecy, for this anti-constitutional agency that is.  You are not permitted any privacy about you under this new government. CNet tried to find facts about this internet security program but was thwarted.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The more secret a government is the less it is a government by and for the people. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10004266-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news" title="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10004266-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news"&gt;news.cnet.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;DHS stays mum on new 'Cyber Security' center&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;

The Bush administration's newly created National Cyber Security Center remains shrouded in secrecy, with officials refusing to release information about its budget, what contractors will run it, and how its mission relates to Internet surveillance.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
In correspondence with the U.S. Senate posted on Thursday, the Bush administration said it would not provide that information publicly. An 18-page, partially redacted &lt;A href="http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/Dem_Files/DHSCyberLetter.pdf"&gt;letter&lt;/A&gt; from DHS said that disclosure could affect "the conduct of federal programs, or other programs or operations essential to the interests of our nation."
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The censored letter--a nonredacted, "For Official Use Only" version was provided to senators--came in response to queries from the top Democratic and Republican members of the Senate's Homeland Security committee.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Oddly, DHS seemed to change its mind about whether even the &lt;I&gt;mere existence&lt;/I&gt; of the National Cyber Security Center was classified or not.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/internet/" rel="tag"&gt;internet&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cyber+security/" rel="tag"&gt;cyber security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10004266-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:29:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Book Review:  ID Crisis, The Abuse and Tyranny of ID</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DD9A2AB0-E04E-4A23-9C0A-0D08ADBCC363/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Give your Congressmen, governor, and state legislators a gift to restore sanity and liberty against REAL ID and the increasing total surveillance society.  Remember the &lt;i&gt;security merchandisers &lt;/i&gt;are lobbying them all everyday, selling their products at the expense of your liberty.  This, along with the Constitution, is your ammo to fight back.  Educate them with hard facts that refutes the effectiveness of ID methods as a means increasing security.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Harper is the leading expert on countering ID propaganda. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=reader_req_dp" title="http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=reader_req_dp"&gt;www.amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="btAsinTitle"&gt;Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood (Paperback)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/C94912C5-5D38-4D69-809E-FA162EBAAB85.jpg" alt="Identity Crisis: How Identification is Overused and Misunderstood" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
  The advance of identification technology biometrics, identity cards, surveillance, databases, dossiers threatens privacy, civil liberties, and related human interests. Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, demands for identification in the name of security have increased. In this insightful book, Jim Harper takes readers inside identification a process everyone uses every day but few people have ever thought about. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Harper dissects identification processes and technologies, showing how identification works when it works and how it fails when it fails. Harper exposes the myth that identification can protect against future terrorist attacks. He shows that a U.S. national identification card, created by Congress in the REAL ID Act, is a poor way to secure the country or its citizens.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;that transfer threatens liberty, enables identity fraud, and subjects people to unwanted surveillance.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/police+state/" rel="tag"&gt;police state&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/real+id/" rel="tag"&gt;real id&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.amazon.com/Identity-Crisis-Identification-Overused-Misunderstood/dp/1930865856/ref=reader_req_dp</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:34:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Lawsuit to Counter Spy Bill Promised</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C66A68C9-852A-428A-B83F-46E17AABDE2B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The constitution is supreme law over all legislation, period.  ACLU promises a needed legal challenge.  No tyranny permitted even if legislated.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; A legislative act, contrary to the Constitution, is not law.--Supreme Court Justice John Marshall &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/35928prs20080709.html" title="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/35928prs20080709.html"&gt;www.aclu.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/3A44D1D5-3A33-4FB2-B339-D784A5BE7A62.jpg" alt="American Civil Liberties Union" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="interiorHeadline"&gt;Senate Passes Unconstitutional Spying Bill And Grants Sweeping Immunity To Phone Companies&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ACLU Announces Legal Challenge To 
Follow President’s Signature&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;WASHINGTON – Today, in a blatant assault upon 
civil liberties and the right to privacy, the Senate passed an unconstitutional 
domestic spying bill that violates the Fourth Amendment and eliminates any 
meaningful role for judicial oversight of government surveillance. The FISA 
Amendments Act of 2008 was approved by a vote of 69 to 28 and is 
expected to be signed into law by President Bush shortly. This bill essentially 
legalizes the president’s unlawful warrantless wiretapping program revealed in 
December 2005 by the New York Times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“Once 
again, Congress blinked and succumbed to the president’s fear-mongering. With 
today’s vote, the government has been given a green light to expand its power to 
spy on Americans and run roughshod over the Constitution,” said Anthony D. 
Romero&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;This 
fight is not over.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/domestic+spying/" rel="tag"&gt;domestic spying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/spy+bill/" rel="tag"&gt;spy bill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/35928prs20080709.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:25:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>US Military to Patrol the Internet</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DC2BAABF-E97B-4311-95EE-9A080D4094AB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2008/06/30/Analysis_US_military_to_patrol_Internet/UPI-83401214841029/" title="http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2008/06/30/Analysis_US_military_to_patrol_Internet/UPI-83401214841029/"&gt;www.upi.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Analysis: U.S. military to patrol Internet&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
				



				
					WASHINGTON,  June 30 (UPI) -- 					&lt;SPAN id="intelliTXT"&gt;

					The U.S. military is looking for a contractor to patrol cyberspace, watching for warning signs of forthcoming terrorist attacks or other hostile activity on the Web.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The purpose of the services will be to identify and assess stated and implied threat, antipathy, unrest and other contextual data relating to selected Internet domains," says the solicitation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solicitation says the successful contractor will "analyze various Web pages, chat rooms, blogs and other Internet domains to aggregate and assess data of interest," adding, "The contractor will prioritize foreign-language domains that relate to specific areas of concern … (and) will also identify new Internet domains" that might relate to "specific local requirements" of the command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/domestic+spying/" rel="tag"&gt;domestic spying&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2008/06/30/Analysis_US_military_to_patrol_Internet/UPI-83401214841029/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:46:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Louisiana Kills REAL ID, Rejects Implementing</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5EA524D1-FE4A-43BC-B6D0-4663DAB78212/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Liberty is gaining momentum, people are learning what this is really all about.  Be sure your state legislature does the same and send them a copy of LA's bill. linked here. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://delawarecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2008/07/louisiana-latest-to-reject-real-id.html" title="http://delawarecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2008/07/louisiana-latest-to-reject-real-id.html"&gt;delawarecurmudgeon.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
Louisiana &lt;A href="http://www.legis.state.la.us/"&gt;House Bill 715 &lt;/A&gt;was signed by Governor Bobby Jindal on 7/7/2008:&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;"An Act to direct the Department of Public Safety and Corrections to not implement the provisions of the Federal Real ID Act of 2005."&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(2) ..these potential breaches in privacy that could result directly from compliance with the REAL ID Act may violate the right to privacy, as secured by Article 24 I, Section 5 of the Constitution of Louisiana..&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"The Legislature of Louisiana does hereby direct the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, including the office of motor vehicles, not to implement the provisions of the REAL ID Act and to report to the governor any attempt by agencies or agents of the United States Department of Homeland Security to secure the implementation of the REAL ID Act through the operations of that division and department." (&lt;A href="http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=504246"&gt;LINK&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/real+id/" rel="tag"&gt;real id&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://delawarecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2008/07/louisiana-latest-to-reject-real-id.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:41:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Senate Approves Telecom Immunity &amp; Spy Bill</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F1670B9F-B8ED-49C8-87F3-192CEF3B0AD3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Proof the democrats (e.g. Obama) are not safer than the neocon controlled republicans:  4th Amendment trampled, violators now immune.  This is not "compromise", but capitulation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For more indepth interview with the Telecom (AT&amp;amp;T) technician and whistleblower who discovered Americans were being spied on, listen to the &lt;a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2008/7/7/att_t_whistleblower_urges_against_immunity" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Democracy Now interview here.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Terrorist-Surveillance.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Terrorist-Surveillance.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;NYT_HEADLINE _moz-userdefined="" type=" " version="1.0"&gt;
Senate Approves Telecom Immunity and New Eavesdropping Rules
&lt;/NYT_HEADLINE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/9312" title="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/9312"&gt;www.capitolhillblue.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
       &lt;DIV class="heading"&gt;&lt;A href=""&gt;The new FISA compromise: it's worse than you think&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Telco immunity is the icing, not the cake&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Specifically, the new legislation dramatically expands the government's ability to wiretap without meaningful judicial oversight, by redefining "oversight" so that the feds can drag their feet on getting authorization almost indefinitely. It also gives the feds unprecedented new latitude in selecting eavesdropping targets, latitude that could be used to collect information on non-terrorist-related activities like P2P copyright infringement and online gambling. In short, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 opens up loopholes so large that the feds could drive a truck loaded down with purloined civil liberties through it. So the telecom immunity stuff is just the smoke; let's take a look at the fire.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;the legislation would grant broad, retroactive immunity to firms that participated in the president's warrantless surveillance program. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/domestic+spying/" rel="tag"&gt;domestic spying&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war+powers/" rel="tag"&gt;war powers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/telecoms/" rel="tag"&gt;telecoms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Terrorist-Surveillance.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:30:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Feds Settle Lawsuit, $5.8 Million for Anthrax "Person of Interest"</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/427957CB-DBA7-4A19-9799-15362EC2AF88/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Huge cover-up in the anthrax case, and the media is to blame for not questioning the motives, story, of the government looking into this man publicly:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The statement also blamed journalists for not questioning the motives of the government's statements or its tactics.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Now look at the terms in which the government settled this out of court.  Why not let it go to trial instead of paying up?  The only motive could be to cover-up the truth of what happened and silence his legal allegations:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;"The United States does not admit to any violation of the Privacy Act and continues to deny all liability in connection with Dr. Hatfill's claims,"&lt;/blockquote&gt; So the Feds pay the man $5.8 million for nothing?  It was not "Islamo Fascists" who wrote "Allah is great" on the anthrax letters...it was a false flag directed at Leahy and Daschle in Congress!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/frameup.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;See the 9/11 Anthrax Frame Up&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080627/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/anthrax_hatfill" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080627/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/anthrax_hatfill"&gt;news.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;
					&lt;DIV class="source"&gt;
                                                						&lt;A href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/ap/brand/SIG=br2v03;_ylt=A0WTcXIEamVICFYA7BSWwvIE/*http://www.ap.org"&gt;&lt;IMG width="106" height="27" border="0" alt="AP" src="http://l.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/nws/p/ap_logo_106.png" /&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
                                                					&lt;/DIV&gt;
                                        $5.8 million for scientist in anthrax lawsuit                &lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
                        WASHINGTON - A former Army scientist who was named as a person of interest in the 2001 anthrax attacks will receive $5.8 million to settle his lawsuit against the Justice Department. Steven Hatfill claimed the Justice Department violated his privacy rights by speaking with reporters about the case.                        
                        &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Settlement documents were filed in federal court Friday. Both sides have agreed to the deal, according to the documents, and as soon as they are signed, the case will be dismissed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The deal requires the Justice Department to pay $2.825 &lt;SPAN id="lw_1214605381_0" class="yshortcuts"&gt;million dollars&lt;/SPAN&gt; up front and buy Hatfill a $3 million annuity that will pay him $150,000 each year for 20 years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Our government failed us, not only by failing to catch the anthrax mailers but by seeking to conceal that failure," Hatfill's lawyers said in a statement. "Our government did this by leaking gossip, speculation, and misinformation to a handful of credulous reporters."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;statement also blamed journalists&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/anthrax/" rel="tag"&gt;anthrax&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/9%2f11/" rel="tag"&gt;9/11&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/terrorism/" rel="tag"&gt;terrorism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/false+flag/" rel="tag"&gt;false flag&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/steven+hatfill/" rel="tag"&gt;steven hatfill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080627/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/anthrax_hatfill</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:41:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>America Becoming Land of Surveillance</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B55838CB-F78B-4083-8720-1EF4403DF867/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Despite lack of evidence that it is effective, or evidence that proves it is not from UK studies.  But the security merchandisers are making a fortune and state and local governments are impulsively spending faster than a woman with a credit card:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;.P. Freeman said the domestic market for such systems last year had doubled over five years, to $9.2 billion, and estimated that it would more than double again by 2010, to more than $21 billion.&lt;/blockquote&gt; You are paying for your loss of liberty, while they profit, which is insult to injury.  It's worth wondering how many government officials own stock in security companies, which would be a conflict of interest in that lawmakers also profit through authorizing this spending. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25355673/" title="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25355673/"&gt;www.msnbc.msn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Smile! More and more, you’re on camera&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Public surveillance video mushrooms despite lack of evidence it works&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;TABLE cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" align="left"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;DIV class="box_3027626 sitewrapperbox"&gt;&lt;TABLE width="102" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="boxH_3027626"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="1%" class="boxHI_3027626"&gt;&lt;IMG width="100" vspace="0" hspace="0" height="20" border="0" src="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Components/ColorBoxes/Styles/img/byline_msnbcDotCom.gif" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="*" nowrap="" class="boxHC_3027626"&gt;&lt;DIV class="hauto textSmallBold"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;TABLE width="102" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="boxB_3027626"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR valign="top"&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;IMG vspace="0" hspace="0" border="0" src="http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Bylines/mugs/MSNBC Interactive/msnbc_johnson_alex_smile.thumb.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR valign="top"&gt;&lt;TD class="boxBI_3027626"&gt;&lt;DIV class="textMed"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Alex Johnson&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="credit"&gt;Reporter&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;HR width="85%" size="1" color="#cccccc" align="center" /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN class="bulletRedSmall"&gt;• &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="textMed"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10913647/"&gt;Profile&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;TABLE width="102" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="boxF_3027626"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD class="boxFI_3027626"&gt;&lt;DIV class="textSmall"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, local governments across the country set aside concerns over privacy and installed surveillance cameras in public streets and plazas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Now — even after a damning report by the head of London’s extensive surveillance network and with little evidence that the systems work — police in many cities are trying to add thousands more cameras to their networks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;“‘Cameras Everywhere’ continues to be the best description of the trend in the video surveillance market,” security market analysts J.P. Freeman Co. said in a report in 2006 that estimated that a quarter of major U.S. cities were investing in the technology. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Officials in many cities are eager to take advantage of money from state and federal security agencies to install the cameras on street corners and intersections&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cctv/" rel="tag"&gt;cctv&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cameras/" rel="tag"&gt;cameras&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government+spending/" rel="tag"&gt;government spending&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25355673/</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:07:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>293 House Members vote against 4th amendment</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/1FBCE60E-3D4A-4079-AC20-5060743F20E0/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Here is what the MSM did not show you.  The 4th amendment is actually about "security"...a right to be secure from government intrusion.  This is worth watching and forwarding. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIJdmePn4lY" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIJdmePn4lY"&gt;www.youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;HR 6304 - A Bill to Abolish the 4th Amendment&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;On June 20, 2008 - 293 Representatives voted in favor to invalidate the 4th Amendment&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/4th+amendment/" rel="tag"&gt;4th amendment&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIJdmePn4lY</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:12:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Arizona Joins the Revolt, Outlaws REAL ID</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/56D259FE-6A9F-43B2-B78B-7D6F8D5846E9/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Next!  Liberty is a threatening thing to Homeland Security.  If it was really about making drivers licenses secure then the Feds would not care.  But it's really about federal power and their matrix of surveillance that they want to construct that is at stake. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0618real-id0618.html" title="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0618real-id0618.html"&gt;www.azcentral.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="topHeadline"&gt;Napolitano: Real ID a no-go in Arizona&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
				Arizona will join roughly a dozen states that have vowed not to participate in federal plans for a uniform standard on state-issued driver's licenses and identification cards.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;



On Tuesday, Gov. Janet Napolitano signed a measure, House Bill 2677,  barring Arizona's compliance with the Real ID program. In so doing, she called it an unfunded federal mandate that would stick states such as Arizona with a  multibillion-dollar bill for the cost to develop and implement the series of new fraud-proof identification cards. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;



HB 2677 is a rare recent example of broad, bipartisan agreement at the state Capitol, with the Democratic governor and GOP-led Legislature finding common ground in their opposition to Real ID.
&lt;TABLE width="50" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" align="left"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" align="center"&gt;advertisement&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD rowspan="3"&gt;&lt;IMG width="7" height="1" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.azcentral.com/imgs/clear.gif" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;IMG width="1" height="7" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.azcentral.com/imgs/clear.gif" /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;

&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;



Some of that opposition is grounded in concerns about privacy and government advancement toward a national identification card. For Napolitano, the biggest issue is related to Real ID's costs for the states.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/real+id/" rel="tag"&gt;real id&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/drivers+license/" rel="tag"&gt;drivers license&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0618real-id0618.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:26:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Alaska Becomes 9th State to Outlaw REAL ID</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F86DA0CF-CCA5-41F0-B194-AAC6C6B9F8AF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Tyrannical federal legislation sparked another Civil War against federal despotism, and the states are seceding from REAL ID continually, essentially using the doctrine of Nullification based upon the 10th amendment of the Constitution.  &lt;blockquote&gt;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Any state that respects the Constitution and freedom for its citizens will do the same. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/35470prs20080529.html" title="http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/35470prs20080529.html"&gt;www.aclu.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="interiorHeadline"&gt;Alaska Becomes 9th State to Reject Real ID&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Governor Palin allowed the bill to become law, effective August of this year. Real ID is a federal mandate imposing a national ID card on all Americans through their state drivers' licenses.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Real ID Act of 2005 mandates that all states have compliant identification cards consistent with federal regulations, as well as requiring that all Americans' private information be held in a giant federal database – the cost and security of which is unknown. The states' response to the passage of Real ID has been steady. To date, 19 states have passed either resolutions or statutes against the program, including nine that have opted out completely. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"Alaska has joined a growing nationwide movement against Real ID&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;As the Department of Homeland Security continues its practice of kicking the can down the road, states are continuing to stand up for their residents' privacy and reject Real ID. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Officials of both parties came together to pass legislation &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/real+id/" rel="tag"&gt;real id&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/drivers+license/" rel="tag"&gt;drivers license&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/national+id/" rel="tag"&gt;national id&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/35470prs20080529.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 07:03:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Chertoff Wants to Israelize US Airport Security</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/FF00AB50-7853-48EF-BED8-E173B6057613/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Big Brother expansion while he signs an agreement with Israel (can he do that?) to "share technologies".  &lt;a href="http://salonesoterica.wordpress.com/2008/04/03/dual-us-israeli-citizens-running-american-government/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Chertoff holds dual citizenship&lt;/a&gt; and is part of the neocon-Israeli fifth column revolutionizing America into a police state.  I wonder how much the Israeli companies will profit from this "sharing".&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;By the way, what threat of terrorism?  The probabilities are microscopic in comparison to crime or traffic accidents, yet we bow to the most extreme and expensive measures, none of which would stop a real suicidal terrorist?  Everyone is treated as suspicious, and we call it "freedom"?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But don't worry, you will be treated as well as a Palestinian in your "homeland". &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L29854328.htm" title="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L29854328.htm"&gt;www.alertnet.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="ANTitle"&gt;
		INTERVIEW-Chertoff keen on Israeli airport security technology
		&lt;SPAN class="timestamp"&gt;
			

		&lt;/SPAN&gt;
	&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; JERUSALEM, May 29 (Reuters) - U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said on Thursday he will seek to adopt novel Israeli methods, like behaviour-detection technologies, to better secure America's airports.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; Israel's Ben-Gurion International Airport, known for its strict security measures, relies heavily on techniques that detect suspicious behaviour among travellers.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; Chertoff, at a conference in Jerusalem for public and homeland security ministers from around the world, signed an agreement with Israel to share technology and information on methods to improve homeland security.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; One of the new systems presented at the conference, developed by the Israeli technology company WeCU, uses behavioural science, together with biometric sensors, to detect sinister intentions among travellers.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/chertoff/" rel="tag"&gt;chertoff&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/israel/" rel="tag"&gt;israel&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/police+state/" rel="tag"&gt;police state&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L29854328.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 17:40:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Minnesota REAL ID Showdown:  Governor vs Legislature</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/CB6DD5A3-ACEB-4507-8A56-7E79938516A1/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  In this very bias article by the newspaper the reader is left with an incorrect impression:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; Gov. Tim Pawlenty killed a bill to bar national identity card rules, but issued a conciliatory executive order.&lt;/blockquote&gt; No, it is entirely dishonest to say the Governor "killed" the bill against REAL ID when they later inform the reader of this fact:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; A bill prohibiting Minnesota's compliance with the Real ID requirement passed last week &lt;b&gt;by overwhelming veto-proof margins in both the House and the Senate.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; The Governor cannot "kill" a bill that the legislature can over-ride.  This battle is not over, but its clear the governor is playing the sycophant, carefully, for the Dept of Homeland Tyranny:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The executive order, he added, "will give us an &lt;b&gt;opportunity to work with our federal partners &lt;/b&gt;and state legislators to resolve the valid concerns regarding this program."&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/19042374.html?location_refer=Business" title="http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/19042374.html?location_refer=Business"&gt;www.startribune.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Real ID ban vetoed, tweaked &lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="precede"&gt;Gov. Tim Pawlenty killed a bill to bar national identity card rules, but issued a conciliatory executive order. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gov. Tim Pawlenty vetoed a bill on Friday that would have blocked Minnesota's participation in a federal program setting nationwide standards for state identification cards. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;But on Saturday, he issued an executive order that would prevent full state compliance with the federal Real ID program before June 1, 2009, unless the Legislature approves.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Combined, the moves appear to be an attempt at compromise over an issue that has united liberal and conservative legislators in opposition to what critics call a national identification system and a threat to privacy and civil liberties.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;A bill prohibiting Minnesota's compliance with the Real ID requirement passed last week by overwhelming veto-proof margins in both the House and the Senate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Pawlenty said in a statement. "Opponents have also raised important constitutional questions that should be considered.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/real+id/" rel="tag"&gt;real id&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/drivers+license/" rel="tag"&gt;drivers license&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/19042374.html?location_refer=Business</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:25:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>FBI Pushes for Internet Dragnet</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E381A23B-BB98-439D-9E27-400A5B329A51/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/blueridge/"&gt;blueridge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  FBI wants to go Big Brother versus the limits of the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution.  The excuse includes the doctrine of "preemption", the plea of "necessity". &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#e5e5e5"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9926899-7.html" title="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9926899-7.html"&gt;www.news.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;FBI wants widespread monitoring of 'illegal' Internet activity&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/81D1BC42-7B32-4949-AF89-A3BBD8793F03.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
WASHINGTON--The FBI on Wednesday called for new legislation that would allow federal police to monitor the Internet for "illegal activity." 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
The suggestion from FBI Director Robert Mueller, which came during a House of Representatives Judiciary Committee hearing, appears to go beyond a current plan to monitor traffic on federal-government networks. Mueller seemed to suggest that the bureau should have a broad "omnibus" authority to conduct monitoring and surveillance of private-sector networks as well.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
If any omnibus Internet-monitoring proposal became law, it could implicate the Fourth Amendment's guarantee of freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. In general, courts have ruled that police need search warrants to obtain the content of communication, and the federal Wiretap Act created "&lt;A href="http://law.gsu.edu/library/index/bibliographies/view?id=148"&gt;super warrant&lt;/A&gt;" wiretap orders that require additional steps and judicial oversight.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/blueridge/512/88257131-2AB7-4C3A-A70B-627F5A2546AA.jpg" alt="Robert Mueller " /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;includes &lt;A href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9882031-7.html" title="Congress worries that .gov monitoring will spy on Americans -- Thursday, Feb 28, 2008"&gt;a shadowy program known as Einstein&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag"&gt;surveillance&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/fbi/" rel="tag"&gt;fbi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homeland+security/" rel="tag"&gt;homeland security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/privacy/" rel="tag"&gt;privacy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/crime/" rel="tag"&gt;crime&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9926899-7.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:28:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>