<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | Rustee's 'politics' clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/tag/politics/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/tag/politics/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Reason in Politics</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/3974BDA4-ACE0-4FE7-BC31-6CFAEAE46FF2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Written in 1940. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://mises.org/story/1691" title="http://mises.org/story/1691"&gt;mises.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;What is wrong with Western civilization is the accepted habit of judging political parties merely by asking whether they seem new and radical enough, not by analyzing whether they are wise or unwise, or whether they are apt to achieve their aims. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The usual terminology of political language is stupid. What is “left” and what is “right”?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; Reaction against an unwise policy is not to be condemned. And progress towards chaos is not to be commended.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;People hasten to exchange their “old” ideas for “new” ones, because they fear to appear old-fashioned and reactionary. They join the chorus decrying the shortcomings of the capitalistic civilization and speak in elated enthusiasm of the achievements of the autocrats. Nothing is today more fashionable than slandering Western civilization.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“Orthodoxy” is not an evil if the doctrine on which the “orthodox” stand is sound. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;What mankind needs today is liberation from the rule of nonsensical slogans and a return to sound reasoning.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/ideology/" rel="tag"&gt;ideology&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/reason/" rel="tag"&gt;reason&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://mises.org/story/1691</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:06:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New Record Deficit, Same Old Politics</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/BB073236-1D72-43C6-90A7-ABF05D352E8A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=33387" title="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=33387"&gt;www.cnsnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Earlier this week the White House announced that the projected Fiscal Year 2009 deficit will be $490 billion, an amount much higher than originally anticipated and also a record for the national deficit.  The deficit for the current fiscal year is expected to reach $410 billion.  &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
As usual, politicians and many of the major media outlets explicitly or implicitly have blamed President George W. Bush’s tax cuts for much of the problem.  &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
The problem is not his tax cuts, though.  Bush’s tax cuts stimulated tremendous economic growth.  History and most economists inform us that a reduction in the tax burden almost always stimulates growth.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
The problem is that our elected officials lack the fortitude and wisdom to make the necessary cuts in spending that budget realities demand. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; Congress must make some difficult decisions and cut the Federal Government’s expenditures.  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/taxes/" rel="tag"&gt;taxes&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/economics/" rel="tag"&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=33387</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:28:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Coercive Federalism</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2C3B5F7C-30D7-4F3D-9F00-F75ECD765ACD/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.governing.com/articles/0803hark.htm" title="http://www.governing.com/articles/0803hark.htm"&gt;www.governing.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;To an extent we've not seen in decades, Washington is trying to dictate what states, counties and cities must do and to disallow them from promoting policies of their own.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Don Borut, who runs the National League of Cities, calls the trend a move to "coercive federalism" or, when he's being more blunt, "shift-and-shaft federalism," with Washington using regulations, mandates and pre-emptions to get its way.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's more, the feds want a greater say while picking up a declining portion of the bill. "On sheer revenues alone, the federal government isn't as relevant as it once was to the daily operations of cities," in Borut's view. At same time, in the half-century after World War II, mandates on local governments increased more than tenfold.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's new is that the states are pushing back, and on many key issues federal officials have been backing down, largely because the political imperative rests with the states.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/federalism/" rel="tag"&gt;federalism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.governing.com/articles/0803hark.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:31:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Identity Politics - Funny Poster</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2C74DF88-25FE-42B7-A79C-CCA1936E9AED/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.ktrh.com/pages/michaelberry.html" title="http://www.ktrh.com/pages/michaelberry.html"&gt;www.ktrh.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/Rustee/512/EF054D62-23AD-4102-BC08-B6589D5B3EE8.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/obama/" rel="tag"&gt;obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/funny/" rel="tag"&gt;funny&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.ktrh.com/pages/michaelberry.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 06:25:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Obama's Meteoric Rise</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6CE8B5D1-FCD9-464C-98C6-3777F590D4D7/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;So how has Obama repaid Jones?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Last June, to prove his commitment to government transparency, Obama released a comprehensive list of his earmark requests for fiscal year 2008. It comprised more than $300 million in pet projects for Illinois, including tens of millions for Jones's Senate district.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Shortly after Jones became Senate president, I remember asking his view on pork-barrel spending.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'll never forget what he said:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;"Some call it pork; I call it steak."&lt;/blockquote&gt; Fascinating article...but far too lengthy for this clip to suffice.      &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/print" title="http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/print"&gt;www.houstonpress.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;When asked about his legislative record, Obama rattles off several bills he sponsored as an Illinois lawmaker.


                                                &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a lengthy record filled with core liberal issues. But what's interesting, and almost never discussed, is that he built his entire legislative record in Illinois in a single year.


                                                &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Republican Illinois Senate Majority Leader James "Pate" Philip was replaced by Emil Jones Jr.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Jones had served in the Illinois Legislature for three decades.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jones appointed Obama sponsor of virtually every high-profile piece of legislation, angering many rank-and-file state legislators who had more seniority than Obama and had spent years championing the bills.


                                                &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;During his seventh and final year in the state Senate, Obama's stats soared. He sponsored a whopping 26 bills passed into law — including many he now cites in his presidential campaign when attacked as inexperienced.


                                                &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It was a stunning achievement that started him on the path of national politics — and he couldn't have done it without Jones.


                                                &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/election/" rel="tag"&gt;election&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/barack+obama/" rel="tag"&gt;barack obama&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/print</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:25:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>World Health Org's Problematic Ranking </title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0115AC90-76E3-4ADC-AE19-C0BBF8BBCE9D/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9236" title="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9236"&gt;www.cato.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.cato.org/images/logo.jpg" alt="header image" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those who cite the WHO rankings typically
present them as an objective measure of the relative
performance of national health care systems.
They are not. The WHO rankings depend crucially
on a number of underlying assumptions—
some of them logically incoherent, some characterized
by substantial uncertainty, and some rooted
in ideological beliefs and values that not everyone
shares.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;WHO rankings themselves have a strong ideological
component. They include factors that are
arguably unrelated to actual health performance,
some of which could even improve in response to
worse health performance. Even setting those
concerns aside, the rankings are still highly sensitive
to both measurement error and assumptions
about the relative importance of the components.
And finally, the WHO rankings reflect implicit
value judgments and lifestyle preferences that differ
among individuals and across countries.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Full Text of Briefing Paper no. 101&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
	
	&lt;P&gt;(&lt;A href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/bp/bp101.pdf"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;PDF, 216 KB&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt; | &lt;A href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/bp/html/bp101/bp101index.html"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;HTML&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/policy/" rel="tag"&gt;policy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/healthcare/" rel="tag"&gt;healthcare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9236</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:56:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Good Things Happen, Get Over It</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/693F009C-9FB0-4A1B-A948-D8216C7854AD/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/dhenninger/?id=110011073" title="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/dhenninger/?id=110011073"&gt;www.opinionjournal.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;On New Year's Eve, Gallup's poll delivered unto us the good news that 84% of Americans say they are satisfied with how things are going for them personally.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;One then has to account for the darker data Gallup released two weeks earlier: Some 70% of those responding believe the nation is headed in the wrong direction.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Times"&gt;It is to suggest that the never-off eye of modern political media leaves the impression that nothing good is possible. If progress happens, as with the surge in Iraq or a new therapy for cancer, it must be diminished by "analysis," listing four things that could "go wrong." As a way to absorb the way the world works, this is depressing. Good things happen. Get over it. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2" face="Verdana, Times"&gt;The New Year demands an admission that some good has been achieved, not by the wave of a politician's magic wand but through many daily hands at work in the nation. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/media/" rel="tag"&gt;media&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/dhenninger/?id=110011073</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:34:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Income Mobility</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C0C2C94B-89C6-486D-8AE0-A39EF73998F5/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "Unfortunately, because so many Americans buy into the politics of envy, politicians have a leg up in enacting measures that cripple economic growth." &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles/07/IncomeMobility.htm" title="http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles/07/IncomeMobility.htm"&gt;www.gmu.edu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Listening to people like Lou Dobbs, John Edwards and Mike
Huckabee lamenting the plight of America's middle class and poor, you'd have to
conclude that things are going to hell in a handbasket. According to them,
there's wage stagnation, while the rich are getting richer and the poor
becoming poorer. There are a couple of updates that tell quite a different
story.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="MsoNormal"&gt;The Nov. 13 Wall Street Journal editorial "Movin' On
Up" reports on a recent U.S. Treasury study of income tax returns from
1996 and 2005. The study tracks what happened to tax filers 25 years of age and
up during this 10-year period. Controlling for inflation, nearly 58 percent of
the poorest income group in 1996 moved to a higher income group by 2005.
Twenty-six percent of them achieved middle or upper-middle class income, and
over 5 percent made it into the highest income group.&lt;O:P _moz-userdefined=""&gt;&lt;/O:P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Over the decade, the inflation-adjusted median income of all
tax filers rose by 24 percent. As such, it refutes Dobbs-Edwards-Huckabee
claims&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/economics/" rel="tag"&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/income/" rel="tag"&gt;income&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles/07/IncomeMobility.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:19:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Belief in Global Warming</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A3EE905B-D615-4FFA-AEC5-FFD2577DE5DF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  What if everyone believes in global warmism only because everyone believes in global warmism?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/hjenkins/?id=110010947" title="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/hjenkins/?id=110010947"&gt;www.opinionjournal.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/Rustee/512/1787C0D0-76E6-416C-86FE-1C02F2081C0B.gif" alt="OpinionJournal" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;What if the heads being counted to certify an alleged "consensus" arrived at their positions by counting heads?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"Availability cascade" has been coined for the way a proposition can become irresistible simply by the media repeating it; "informational cascade" for the tendency to replace our beliefs with the crowd's beliefs; and "reputational cascade" for the rational incentive to do so.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Public opinion cascades are powerful but also fragile--liable to be overturned in an instant when new information comes along. The current age of global warming politics will certainly end with a whimper once a few consecutive years of cooling are recorded&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;No, this wouldn't prove or disprove a human role in warming, only that climate is variable and subject to complicated influences. But it would also eliminate the large incentive for politicians to traffic in doom-laden predictions--because such predictions would no longer command media assent and would cease to function as levers to redistribute resources&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/Rustee/512/4B080D81-AB62-48EA-B710-AA02986E7C44.gif" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/global+warming/" rel="tag"&gt;global warming&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/climate+change/" rel="tag"&gt;climate change&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/hjenkins/?id=110010947</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 03:52:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Liberals Are Now Progressives (Again)</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/83EE0BBA-A453-41E5-9A6B-13B382BFB3A0/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Rustee/"&gt;Rustee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://townhall.com/columnists/MattMayer/2007/09/20/liberals_are_now_progressives_again" title="http://townhall.com/columnists/MattMayer/2007/09/20/liberals_are_now_progressives_again"&gt;townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/Rustee/512/4A8CD884-B470-4EFF-AA65-1CC49BC43992.gif" alt="Townhall.com" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nonetheless, it is important to know what a progressive is since that is now the preferred term of the left.  It comes from the Progressive Era.  One of its intellectual and political leaders was President Woodrow Wilson.  The Progressive Movement's chief aim was to centralize power by eliminating those pesky little concepts of separation of powers and checks and balances and escape the confines of a fixed constitution so that America could progress (not that it hadn't up to that point as evidenced by the abolishment of slavery and its rise as a world power).

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The aim of the Progressive Movement succeeded as it gave birth to the rise of the administrative state and the consolidation of power in Washington during the New Deal and Great Society periods where many new rights and federal powers were suddenly found into the Constitution.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;When politicians are unconstrained by a fixed constitution and checks and balances, we better hope their idea of progress is the right one.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/liberals/" rel="tag"&gt;liberals&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/progressive/" rel="tag"&gt;progressive&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://townhall.com/columnists/MattMayer/2007/09/20/liberals_are_now_progressives_again</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:20:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>