<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | Painey's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>repeating tasks in iCal</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D691CFA9-EB11-46DB-B064-A61893EC3021/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  never have and probably never will. why is Apple so shit at updating such simple yet extremely practical things? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://selil.com/?p=178" title="http://selil.com/?p=178"&gt;selil.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It turns out that recurring tasks are not part of iCal or Apple Mail.  Never have been.  I did research.  After all, surely someone else has had this problem and has posted a solution or maybe a little application that would work for me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://selil.com/?p=178</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:38:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Brian Ward on creating an online persona - is good!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A2DE180C-F42F-4E49-8E3C-7C0086DC0B80/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://indolentdandy.net/fitzroyalty/2009/07/01/a-beginners-guide-to-blogging-ethics-and-strategy/" title="http://indolentdandy.net/fitzroyalty/2009/07/01/a-beginners-guide-to-blogging-ethics-and-strategy/"&gt;indolentdandy.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;My name is Brian Ward and I write and publish Fitzroyalty but if you think that the persona you see here is a straightforward representation of my real personality then you are naive and mistaken. My online persona is a deliberate and artificial construct designed to gain and retain your attention.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://indolentdandy.net/fitzroyalty/2009/07/01/a-beginners-guide-to-blogging-ethics-and-strategy/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:35:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>publication rate at Spot.us</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E63773CE-7A44-415F-8FF9-8C0C89AC3913/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.google.com/reader/view/" title="http://www.google.com/reader/view/"&gt;www.google.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;One story a week &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/citizen+journalism/" rel="tag"&gt;citizen journalism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.google.com/reader/view/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:05:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>False Balance</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DFED7344-7A49-49AC-B86C-0229ADB670F4/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/" title="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/"&gt;journalism.nyu.edu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;“How much more evidence do you need?” is the kind of exasperation a lot of us have felt with what he calls “false balance,” which is another name for the pattern I’m describing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/journalism+styles/" rel="tag"&gt;journalism styles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:39:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>He said, she said journalism</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/1D95691A-F55D-4D27-BB79-1026F82D4859/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/" title="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/"&gt;journalism.nyu.edu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;There I am, sitting at the breakfast table, with my coffee and a copy of the New York Times, in the classic newspaper reading position from before the Web.  And I come to &lt;A href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/business/03aig.html"&gt;this article&lt;/A&gt;, headlined “Ex-Chairman of &lt;SPAN class="caps"&gt;A.I.G. &lt;/SPAN&gt;Says Bailout Has Failed.”  I immediately recognize in it the signs of a &lt;EM&gt;he said, she said&lt;/EM&gt; account.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/journalism/" rel="tag"&gt;journalism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/journalism+styles/" rel="tag"&gt;journalism styles&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pressthink/" rel="tag"&gt;pressthink&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:12:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>cheeky buggers</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F119BA47-2B0E-4BEC-B177-364E94A08BD3/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  i wonder how they found me ...  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.theweek.com/article/index/95694/The_Twitter_revolution" title="http://www.theweek.com/article/index/95694/The_Twitter_revolution"&gt;www.theweek.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;In recent months, a long list of corporate giants that includes Comcast, JetBlue, and Whole Foods has used Twitter to find out what customers are thinking. By reading tweets about their products, the companies can respond quickly to consumer complaints and fine-tune their marketing.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/twitter/" rel="tag"&gt;twitter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/blogging/" rel="tag"&gt;blogging&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/blogosphere/" rel="tag"&gt;blogosphere&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/whole+foods/" rel="tag"&gt;whole foods&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.theweek.com/article/index/95694/The_Twitter_revolution</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:02:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Twitter's business model?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/7DE0DAE5-E7CF-4159-B2A4-6B75FB47BE03/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  how do they generate income, then? legitimately curious &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.theweek.com/article/index/95694/The_Twitter_revolution" title="http://www.theweek.com/article/index/95694/The_Twitter_revolution"&gt;www.theweek.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Twitter takes no advertising, and employs only about 30 people.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/twitter/" rel="tag"&gt;twitter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/blogosphere/" rel="tag"&gt;blogosphere&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/business/" rel="tag"&gt;business&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/blogging/" rel="tag"&gt;blogging&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.theweek.com/article/index/95694/The_Twitter_revolution</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:56:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>function of Technorati</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2353359B-BDB9-43F2-AF2B-C24BFB6CC959/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I hadn't really understood the function of Technorati - have never used it, but heard it mentioned often. This is exactly what blogs should be doing ...  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.jonathancrossfield.com/blog/frequently-asked-questions.html" title="http://www.jonathancrossfield.com/blog/frequently-asked-questions.html"&gt;www.jonathancrossfield.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.technorati.com/"&gt;Technorati&lt;/A&gt;, for those of you unfamiliar, is a free online service that ranks blogs based on the number of other blogs linking back to them. Therefore it rewards blogs for their influence on the wider blog community in sparking conversation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.jonathancrossfield.com/blog/frequently-asked-questions.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:26:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>religious fallacy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EA0A4C66-66A2-4BCB-80FD-89F7791F856F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  WHO'S ERECTING STRAW MEN? you mention in the beginning that you haven’t read the arguments against atheism, then you propose to frame your own definition of God, which you then vehemently defend. this is a text book strawman fallacy ... Get off the interent until you've got something rational to say. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0" title="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0"&gt;www.onlineopinion.com.au&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is time that atheists come clean and really enter the debate about God instead of triumphantly knocking over straw men and saying “See, it is all a myth!”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:54:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> religions rationalims</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/CBF5C9B7-ED03-4FD7-8DAB-048358DA0D11/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  WHAT IS IRRATIONAL!!!???? believing that a mythical figure redefined humanity 2000 years ago and that we should still live according to these principles, regardless of any other evidence to the contrary that there might be better ways to live .... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0" title="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0"&gt;www.onlineopinion.com.au&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;But what is irrational about coming to the conclusion that this man Jesus in his 
life and death redefined what humanity is, so that he displaced all of our 
concepts of the good and the true and subsequently all the things we live by, 
our gods, and set us free?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:52:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>e</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5A87A985-5001-49C5-8815-8FFF3E2D585A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  this is argument based on character judgement (implied character, rather than ad hominem, which is far worse&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and based on analysis of the Bible, instead of the Bible AND EVERYTHING ELSE &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0" title="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0"&gt;www.onlineopinion.com.au&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So atheism is not as simple as it first appears, it is a rather darker animal 
than we could image. To be a real atheist you would have to decide after reading 
the gospels, say, that the life of Jesus was not about free grace and that it 
did not display the love that is the basis of all human life. To be a real 
atheist would be to find that this man Jesus is the enemy of life; to have a 
character that is pure darkness. To be a real atheist you would have to argue 
that the disciples of Jesus were bent on human destruction, were entirely self 
serving, and essentially mean. By any standard this is a tall order! This is why 
I assert that there are no real atheists. Perhaps there are instances in which 
human evil is complete in one person, but I doubt it. Certainly the self 
professed atheists of our time are tame pretenders compared with the real 
character of atheism.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bullshit/" rel="tag"&gt;bullshit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:48:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>uck </title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0668F638-4FB1-4664-816A-1619961C55B0/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  what the fuck does this even mean? even if Jesus did once exist, he doesn't now and he's not gonna save us! it's such a passive ideology ... &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0" title="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0"&gt;www.onlineopinion.com.au&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Saying that we believe in God is saying that when we look to Jesus we see the 
essence of humanity whose fulfilment in us will change the social world. This is 
the one who will bring peace to the world.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bullshit/" rel="tag"&gt;bullshit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:46:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>existence of Jesus' 'spirit' remains today ... </title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/02A914CE-0B07-464D-85D3-CE5B70C22DC8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  how can i trust the arguments of this person (and the evidence provided to support them) when they provide belief statements like this? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0" title="http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0"&gt;www.onlineopinion.com.au&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;it was his grace - in obedience to the love of the Father - that is with us in 
the past the present and the future in his Spirit&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8444&amp;page=0</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:38:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>US leading lit publishers old</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6A722529-5E72-42CA-8368-011276A5B8C9/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  if this is the case, this could be a problem. how are young people finding the challenge of gaining some of the small market share of these older publishers? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://clmp.org/indie_publishing/indi_litpubl.html" title="http://clmp.org/indie_publishing/indi_litpubl.html"&gt;clmp.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The leading nonprofit literary presses were established in the 1970s and early 
1980s by editors with a vision to publish literary works not being published by 
commercial houses. The majority (90 percent) of these presses are still run by 
their founders.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/gatekeepers%3f/" rel="tag"&gt;gatekeepers?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://clmp.org/indie_publishing/indi_litpubl.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:38:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>who are lit mags for?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/03CF4B86-2A71-4BE5-A062-A8EA01FBB10F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Painey/"&gt;Painey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  interesting perspective - ronnie and i were talking about the need for lit mags to reach a wider audience, to be as much for readers as they are for writers. with CLMP's attitude to literature and business though, I guess they do actually back up this claim with audience development.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://clmp.org/indie_publishing/indi_litpubl.html" title="http://clmp.org/indie_publishing/indi_litpubl.html"&gt;clmp.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Literary magazines have always been first and foremost about writers.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/literary+magazines/" rel="tag"&gt;literary magazines&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/literature/" rel="tag"&gt;literature&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/writers/" rel="tag"&gt;writers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/readers/" rel="tag"&gt;readers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/clmp/" rel="tag"&gt;clmp&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/business/" rel="tag"&gt;business&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://clmp.org/indie_publishing/indi_litpubl.html</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:33:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>