<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | Ilsadago1's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>These Ain't Nickles and Dimes...</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/8D80702A-46A1-436A-BD4B-90B1D9FB90A8/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=54762" title="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=54762"&gt;www.cnsnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="ctl00_ContentArea_lblTitle"&gt;President and First Lady Travel 4,000 Miles -- on Separate Planes -- to Lobby for Olympics&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;B&gt;(CNSNews.com)&lt;/B&gt; – President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama are both traveling to Copenhagen this week to promote Chicago's bid to host to the 2016 Olympic Games--and they will be making the 3,979-mile trip on separate airplanes.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
Taxpayers will pick up the tab for both jets ferrying the president and  first lady separately to Europe.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
“Everything they do, whether it’s signing pieces of legislation or flying around the world, everything is costing the taxpayer,” David Williams, vice president of policy for Citizens Against Government Waste, told CNSNews.com. “The taxpayer is picking up the tab for everything.”&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; the first lady's plane would range from $29,532 (White House Military Office) to $107,717 (U.S. Air Force).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; Air Force One on the one-way 7.5-hour trip from Washington, D.C. to Copenhagen ranges from $343,448 (White House Military Office) to $567,089 (U.S. Air Force).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=54762</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:08:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>ACORN:  Rotten Nuts</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4508CFFA-037C-4E3B-80A3-5887AFA1E03F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/13/filmmaker-demands-apology-acorn-claiming-undercover-video-doctored/?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a16:g2:r1:c0.179360:b27689764:z0" title="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/13/filmmaker-demands-apology-acorn-claiming-undercover-video-doctored/?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a16:g2:r1:c0.179360:b27689764:z0"&gt;www.foxnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Filmmaker Demands Apology From ACORN for Claiming Undercover Video 'Doctored'&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;James O'Keefe and friend Hannah Giles posed as a pimp and prostitute looking to evade the IRS and apply for an illegal housing
      loan for a brothel. The sting operation caught four ACORN workers in the Baltimore and Washington, D.C., offices appearing
      to offer their help. 
   &lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The independent filmmaker whose hidden-camera videos prompted the firing of four ACORN workers is demanding an apology
      from ACORN for calling his work a fabricated "scam" and daring the activist group to take legal action against him. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Bring
      it on," filmmaker James O'Keefe said Sunday on FOX News. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;ACORN chief organizer Bertha Lewis issued a written statement Saturday saying that while she cannot
      defend the actions of the workers who were terminated, O'Keefe may have committed a "felony" with his operation. She also
      threatened legal action against FOX News, which aired the videos but did not produce them. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/13/filmmaker-demands-apology-acorn-claiming-undercover-video-doctored/?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a16:g2:r1:c0.179360:b27689764:z0</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:42:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Wanna Bet?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/C0B53F48-2BB5-45D1-9AAD-0EA4C85AADBA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Not taking people seriously is one way to motivate others who were previously quiet.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thank you Mr. Axelrod. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/13/axelrod-says-tea-party-protesters-wrong/" title="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/13/axelrod-says-tea-party-protesters-wrong/"&gt;www.foxnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Axelrod Says 'Tea Party' Protesters Are 'Wrong'&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;White House senior adviser David Axelrod says that the demonstrations in Washington, D.C., Saturday do not represent the views
      of the broader public when it comes to health care reform. 
   &lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The White House has a message to the tens of thousands of protesters who railed against big government during a rally in
      Washington Saturday: You're wrong. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;White House senior adviser David Axelrod said Sunday that the protesters, part
      of the "tea party" movement, do not represent the views of the broader public when it comes to health care reform. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"I
      don't think it's indicative of the nation's mood," Axelrod said on CBS' "Face the Nation." "You know, I don't think we ought
      to be distracted by that. My message to them is, they're wrong." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Axelrod suggested Sunday
      that the more over-the-top demonstrations were representative of a minority view -- the kind exhibited at some town hall meetings
      over the summer. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;they're not representative of the majority&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/13/axelrod-says-tea-party-protesters-wrong/</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:38:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How Will MSM Report THIS?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/3C87F49E-54AF-4FA1-ADF6-6AA2D0FE9AED/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  It will either be ignored, rejected or ridiculed.  Does anyone really think that the Obamaites will be fair or objective? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090912/ap_on_re_us/us_taxpayer_rally" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090912/ap_on_re_us/us_taxpayer_rally"&gt;news.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;WASHINGTON – Tens of thousands of protesters fed up with government spending marched to the U.S. Capitol on Saturday, showing their disdain for the president's &lt;SPAN id="lw_1252795541_0" class="yshortcuts"&gt;health care plan&lt;/SPAN&gt; with slogans such as "Obamacare makes me sick" and "I'm not your ATM."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The line of protesters clogged several blocks near the Capitol, according to the &lt;SPAN id="lw_1252795541_1" class="yshortcuts"&gt;D.C. Homeland Security&lt;/SPAN&gt; and Emergency Management Agency. Demonstrators chanted "enough, enough" and "We the People." Others yelled "You lie, you lie!" and "Pelosi has to go," referring to &lt;SPAN id="lw_1252795541_2" class="yshortcuts"&gt;House Speaker Nancy Pelosi&lt;/SPAN&gt;, D-Calif.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Throngs of people waved U.S. flags and held signs reading "Go Green Recycle Congress" and "Obama Bin Lyin.'" Men wore &lt;SPAN id="lw_1252795541_3" class="yshortcuts"&gt;colonial costumes&lt;/SPAN&gt; as they listened to speakers who warned of "judgment day" — &lt;SPAN id="lw_1252795541_4" class="yshortcuts"&gt;Election Day&lt;/SPAN&gt; 2010.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Armey and other speakers directed their ire at Pelosi — Armey took a photo, telling the crowd he wanted to be able to prove to her they were there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt; &lt;SPAN id="lw_1252795541_17" class="yshortcuts"&gt;images of Martin Luther King Jr&lt;/SPAN&gt;. and Obama&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;"He had a dream, we got a nightmare."&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090912/ap_on_re_us/us_taxpayer_rally</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:53:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Just Not the Answer For the USA</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/765F99FF-8B69-4661-9F88-F2FC0C4EB1FF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Modeling a system on the UK or any European country just won't work here.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Rationing, guidelines for docs to follow, the high cost...just three reasons to stop this nonsense.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;TORT REFORM FIRST! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32674616/ns/health-health_care/" title="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32674616/ns/health-health_care/"&gt;www.msnbc.msn.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;U.K. doctors question treatment of terminally ill&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Some physicians say some are dying prematurely due to care guidelines&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;LONDON - A group of senior British doctors expressed concern Thursday about the treatment of the terminally ill, saying some people are dying prematurely because of guidelines for dealing with patients in their final hours.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;In a letter to The Daily Telegraph newspaper, the six palliative care specialists criticized the "tick-box approach to the management of death" in guidelines used by hundreds of hospitals within Britain's universal health care system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="textBodyBlack"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="byLine"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Most Britons strongly support the NHS, which provides free medical care for all. But the service also receives frequent criticism from doctors, politicians and patients, and funding it is a constant challenge for governments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;20 billion pound ($33 billion) shortfall expected by 2014.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;advised the health service to cut a tenth of its 1.5 million-strong work force&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;sell off hospitals and cut back on some services.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32674616/ns/health-health_care/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:49:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>So Now I'm A Terrorist... wow.</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/EB593067-58D9-4532-A3CD-1DDBEB1ADD50/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Read the entire article - unless you are so totally in the pocket of the liberal left as to no longer think for yourself, you should be outraged.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I know I am. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/01/obamas-team-crosses-the-rhetorical-line/" title="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/01/obamas-team-crosses-the-rhetorical-line/"&gt;blog.heritage.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H3 class="postTitle"&gt;  &lt;A title="Permanent Link: Obama’s Team Crosses the Rhetorical Line" rel="bookmark" href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/01/obamas-team-crosses-the-rhetorical-line/"&gt;Obama’s Team Crosses the Rhetorical Line&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;(&lt;EM&gt;Update: The website cited below has been suspended by barackobama.com.  The screenshot to the right is the original page, but the embedded links will no longer work. Click on the picture to the right for a full-screen view.&lt;/EM&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/Ilsadago1/512/AB0FC073-36B5-45A3-BFC1-8C2189EB3451.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today, President Obama’s campaign organization “&lt;A href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/healthcareorganizingevent/gpk4cjRead"&gt;Organizing for America&lt;/A&gt;” sent out a notice to its “grassroots” supporters. It asked them to wage a coordinated phone campaign for health care by calling their U.S. Senators on September 11 – also known as &lt;EM&gt;Patriot Day&lt;/EM&gt; in honor of the thousands of Americans killed by Al Qaeda terrorists eight years ago. &lt;A href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/event/detail/healthcareorganizingevent/gpk4cjRead"&gt;It goes on&lt;/A&gt;: “&lt;STRONG&gt;All 50 States are coordinating in this – as we fight back against our own Right-Wing Domestic Terrorists who are subverting the American Democratic Process, whipped to a frenzy by their Fox Propaganda Network ceaselessly re-seizing power for their treacherous leaders.&lt;/STRONG&gt;” Please read that again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/01/obamas-team-crosses-the-rhetorical-line/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:30:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>That's 50% of the Population Ya Know.</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F60696C5-C7B3-448E-903F-8D75A1DF7C47/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I really dislike this guy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/02/white-house-green-jobs-adviser-republicans-assholes/" title="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/02/white-house-green-jobs-adviser-republicans-assholes/"&gt;www.foxnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;White House Green Jobs Adviser: Republicans Are 'Assholes'&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Van Jones, the Obama administration's "green jobs" adviser, told a group of listeners earlier in the year that the reason
      Republicans are stonewalling the president is because they're "assholes." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jones' remarks were recorded in a video
      from February that was posted to YouTube. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;He made the remark during an energy lecture in Berkeley, Calif., after
      a woman in the audience asked him why President Obama and congressional Democrats were having trouble moving legislation --
      even though Republicans, with a smaller majority, didn't have as much trouble earlier in the Bush administration. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Well,
      the answer to that is, they're assholes," Jones said, to uproarious laughter. "That's a technical, political science term." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The
      questioner responded, "I was afraid that that was the answer." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;But Jones said that, even though Obama is "not
      an asshole," others have to step up the fight. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Now, I will say this. I can be an asshole&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;a little bit uppity&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/02/white-house-green-jobs-adviser-republicans-assholes/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:05:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Decline Month to Month</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/97E8EB7A-7695-49C4-ACC8-D2B8C3B63C87/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The thing I like about Rasmussen Polls is that they only interview 'likely voters' -- and ask party affiliation.  They break things down further on their site and it's really revealing.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_month_by_month" title="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_month_by_month"&gt;www.rasmussenreports.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="articleHeader"&gt;
				&lt;DIV class="articleTitle"&gt;Obama Approval Index Month-by-Month&lt;/DIV&gt;
									&lt;DIV class="articleSubTitle"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
							&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Looking back, after the initial euphoria of inauguration day, the President’s ratings slipped a bit but remained steady and positive from February thru May. In June, the numbers began to move down a bit, still remained generally positive. July and August were less positive months for the President. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/image_cache/Ilsadago1/512/B0910C5C-C227-40F5-AF46-5AB30AFEB5EB.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Overall, the number who Strongly Approve has fallen from 43% in January to 30% in August. During that same time frame, the number who Strongly Disapprove has grown from 20% to 39%. Those numbers translate to a Presidential Approval Index that has declined from +23 in January to -9 in August. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Also in August, the President’s total approval fell below 50% for the first time. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/image_cache/Ilsadago1/512/A987180D-D2D0-44A7-BC3F-51AEF6C11CD4.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;TABLE width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1" class="scoreboard"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
2009
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Strongly&lt;BR /&gt;Approve
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Strongly&lt;BR /&gt;Disapprove
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Approval &lt;BR /&gt;Index
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Total&lt;BR /&gt;Approve
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;

Total &lt;BR /&gt;Disapprove
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Jan
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
43
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
20
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
23
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
62
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
34
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Feb
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
39
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
25
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
14
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
59
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
39
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Mar
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
37
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
30
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
7
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
57
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
42
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Apr
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
35
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
31
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
4
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
55
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
44
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
May
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
35
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
29
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
6
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
57
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
42
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Jun
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
34
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
32
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
2
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
54
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
45
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Jul
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
30
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
37
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
-7
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
50
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
49
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Aug
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
30
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
39
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
-9
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
49
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
50
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_month_by_month</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:58:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Van Jones - Green Jobs 'Czar' - Communist</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/1F06558E-744D-40B0-AA96-E76E0A8F34D7/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I've been reading more and more about this guy...and he scares me.  No matter what role he plays in our government, the fact is, he's not elected, hasn't been appointed and then confirmed by the Congress.  He's just 'THERE'.  He has the President's ear.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Of course, I previously clipped a piece about Obama's membership in the New Party.  So maybe not just his ear - but his heart? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=108441" title="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=108441"&gt;www.wnd.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Jones on 9-11: Blame U.S. 'imperialism'&lt;/STRONG&gt; 
 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last week, WND reported one day after the 9/11 attacks, &lt;A href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=108180"&gt;Jones led a vigil that expressed solidarity with Arab and Muslim Americans&lt;/A&gt; as well as what he called the victims of "U.S. imperialism" around the world. 
 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jones was the leader and founder of a radical group, the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM. That group, together with Jones' Elle Baker Center for Human Rights, led a vigil Sept. 12, 2001, at Snow Park in Oakland, Calif. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;STORM's official manifesto, titled, "Reclaiming Revolution," &lt;A href="http://www.capitalresearch.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/stormsummation.pdf"&gt; surfaced on the Internet&lt;/A&gt;.

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The radical group's manual boasted the 9/11 vigil was held to express solidarity with Arab and Muslim Americans and to mourn the civilians killed in the terrorist attacks "as well as the victims of U.S. imperialism around the world."

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=108441</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:10:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bailout Money To Benefit CHINA???</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/643AB729-BA82-424F-B644-5B9CE6F04D22/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This falls 100 % under the heading of 'WTF???'&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Someone PLEASE explain the logic of this move! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_gm_china" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_gm_china"&gt;news.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 id="yn-story-title"&gt;GM to form China venture, invest $293 million&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;SHANGHAI (Reuters) – 
&lt;SPAN id="lw_1251632139_0" class="yshortcuts"&gt;General Motors&lt;/SPAN&gt; (GM.UL) said on Sunday it has agreed to set up a &lt;SPAN id="lw_1251632139_1" class="yshortcuts"&gt;light commercial vehicle production&lt;/SPAN&gt; venture with major Chinese automaker FAW Group, with total investment of 2 billion yuan ($293 million).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
"For us in &lt;SPAN id="lw_1251632139_5" class="yshortcuts"&gt;China&lt;/SPAN&gt;, this is an important complement to the rest of our portfolio," Kevin Wale, president and managing director for GM's China operations, told reporters in a conference call.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
GM, which now holds 34 percent of SAIC-GM-Wuling, has been seeking to raise its stake in the venture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Domestic media reported earlier this month that GM had secured an initial deal to take over Liuzhou Wuling Auto's 15.9 percent stake for roughly 300 million yuan ($43.9 million).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Wale reiterated the U.S. automaker's interest in raising its stake in the venture but made no further comment on the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_gm_china</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:03:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Another Power Grab?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DEE0E7B1-DD72-4498-A2FA-891D37571CAB/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "Clinton, of the Internet Security Alliance, praised President Obama's May science policy review, which he said would take cybersecurity in the right direction by promoting incentives to get the private industry to improve its own security measures.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But he faulted the Senate bill, which he said would centralize regulations for an industry that is too varied to fall under the control of a single set of rules without endangering the economy and security.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;"We think a lot of things need to be done to enhance cybersecurity," he told FOXNews.com, but this bill is "not something that we could support." "&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Here's my simple thought:  At what point do we say 'stop'?  At what point is the government taking things a step too far?  When will Americans wake up? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/" title="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/"&gt;www.foxnews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Senate Bill Would Give President Emergency Control of Internet&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 show the Senate bill could give the president a "kill switch"
      on the Internet and allow him to shut out private networks from online access.
   &lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"In the original bill
      they empowered the president to essentially turn off the Internet in the case of a 'cyber-emergency,' which they didn't define,"
      said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"We
      think it's a very bad idea ... to put in legislation," he told FOXNews.com.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The current language is so unclear
      that we can't be confident that the changes have actually been made," he said.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"I know the threats we face," Rockefeller said in a prepared statement
      when the legislation was introduced. "Our enemies are real. They are sophisticated, they are determined and they will not
      rest."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;it's a job the
      government is ill-equipped to handle,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;who has the expertise?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:46:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hope Someone Listens</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/F2C5AFDB-5196-42DE-BBF8-D2280A0FB3FA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:#ffffcc"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/america_s_best_days" title="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/america_s_best_days"&gt;www.rasmussenreports.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="articleSubTitle"&gt;70% Prefer Government That Provides Fewer Services With Lower Taxes&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="articleDate"&gt;Wednesday, August 26, 2009&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Seventy percent (70%) of likely voters now favor a government that offers fewer services and imposes lower taxes over one that provides more services with higher taxes, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
That’s up five points over &lt;A  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/mood_of_america_archive/benchmarks/49_now_say_america_s_best_days_are_in_the_past"&gt;the past month&lt;/A&gt; and is the highest level measured in nearly three years. 
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Just 19% would prefer a government that provides more services in exchange for higher taxes, down five points from July and the lowest level in over two years. This marks the first time the percentage of voters who prefer this type of government has fallen below 20%.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Most Republicans (88%) and voters not affiliated with either major party (78%) like a government with lower taxes and fewer services, and 48% of Democrats agree. However, one-in-three Democrats (34%) prefer more government services and higher taxes.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/america_s_best_days</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:46:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>I Knew It!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A3A27B74-B7DC-42B5-8E1D-B2AA0315F0B4/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://my.yahoo.com/" title="http://my.yahoo.com/"&gt;my.yahoo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/image_cache/Ilsadago1/512/68F412C8-33A7-4775-BEE3-683F0A849AAD.gif" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://my.yahoo.com/</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:09:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Perceptions of Obama by Likely Voters</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4714D283-F2AC-4761-AE53-BAD50796B814/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  "It is important to remember that the Rasmussen Reports job approval ratings are based upon a sample of likely voters. Some other firms base their approval ratings on samples of all adults. President Obama's numbers are always several points higher in a poll of adults rather than likely voters. That's because some of the President's most enthusiastic supporters, such as young adults, are less likely to turn out to vote. Other factors are also important to consider when comparing Job Approval ratings from different polling firms.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For more measures of the President's performance, see Obama By the Numbers and recent demographic highlights from the tracking polls. " &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/scoreboards/by_the_numbers2/by_the_numbers" title="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/scoreboards/by_the_numbers2/by_the_numbers"&gt;www.rasmussenreports.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV class="articleDate"&gt;Sunday, August 23, 2009&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;TABLE width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" class="scoreboard"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;

&lt;TH valign="top" colspan="3"&gt;  &lt;P&gt;
Perceptions of Obama
&lt;/P&gt;

  &lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;TH valign="top"&gt;  &lt;P&gt;
Results
&lt;/P&gt;

  &lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;TH valign="top"&gt;  &lt;P&gt;
Links
&lt;/P&gt;

  &lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Obama Approval Index&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;-14&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll"&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;B&gt;, C, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Strongly Approve&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;27%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll"&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;B&gt;, C, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Strongly Disapprove&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;41%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll"&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;B&gt;, C, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Taxes Will Go Down&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;6%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/taxes/june_2009/more_voters_see_their_taxes_increasing_under_obama"&gt;A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/taxes/august_2009/6_expect_tax_cut_during_obama_years"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_on_taxes_government_spending_historical_data"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Gov't&lt;/B&gt; &lt;B&gt;Spending Will Go Up&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;70%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/taxes/june_2009/more_voters_see_their_taxes_increasing_under_obama"&gt;A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/taxes/august_2009/6_expect_tax_cut_during_obama_years"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_on_taxes_government_spending_historical_data"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Obama on Economy - Ex/Good&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;42%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/most_recent_videos2/politics/voters_continue_to_trust_their_own_economic_judgment_more_than_obama_s"&gt;V&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/august_2009/crosstabs_obama_on_economy_national_security_august_17_18_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/rate_obama_on_economy_national_security"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Obama on Nat'l Sec - Ex/Good&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;44%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/july_2009/41_like_obama_s_handling_of_national_security"&gt;A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/august_2009/crosstabs_obama_on_economy_national_security_august_17_18_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/rate_obama_on_economy_national_security"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Leadership - Ex/Good &lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;45%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/august_2009/45_rate_obama_good_or_excellent_as_a_leader_down_19_points_from_january"&gt;A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/august_2009/crosstabs_obama_leadership_august_7_8_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_leadership_inexperience_historical_data"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Views Society as Fair&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;40%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/most_recent_videos2/politics/gap_widens_between_obama_and_voters_on_fairness_of_u_s_society"&gt;V&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/july_2009/crosstabs_obama_s_views_on_society_july_26_27_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/beliefs_of_american_society_historical_data"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Politically Liberal&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;76%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/july_2009/48_say_obama_is_very_liberal"&gt;A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;,&lt;B&gt; &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/july_2009/crosstabs_obama_biden_ideology_july_24_25_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;,&lt;/B&gt; &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_ideology_trends"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Iraq Priority - Troops Home &lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;59%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/april_2009/voters_are_a_little_less_confident_obama_is_bringing_the_troops_home"&gt;A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/may_2009/crosstabs_obama_iraq_may_9_11_2009"&gt;&lt;B&gt;C&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_iraq_historical_data"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Troops Home - End of 1st Term&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;66%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/april_2009/voters_are_a_little_less_confident_obama_is_bringing_the_troops_home"&gt;A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/may_2009/crosstabs_obama_iraq_may_9_11_2009"&gt;&lt;B&gt;C&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_iraq_historical_data"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Obama on Energy - Ex/Good&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;45%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/environment/energy_update"&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/july_2009/crosstabs_obama_on_energy_july_12_13_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_on_energy"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Supreme Ct Choices Too Liberal&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;45%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/most_recent_videos2/politics/voters_sure_obama_s_supreme_court_pick_won_t_be_too_conservative"&gt;V&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/august_2009/crosstabs_obama_on_supreme_court_august_19_20_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_supreme_court_trends"&gt;T&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;More Ethical Than Most Politicians&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;38%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;A, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/july_2009/crosstabs_obama_ethics_july_5_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_ethics_trends"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Ethics Ex/Good&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;49%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/august_2009/45_rate_obama_good_or_excellent_as_a_leader_down_19_points_from_january"&gt;A&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/august_2009/crosstabs_obama_ethics_august_5_6_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/obama_ethics_trends"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Trust Obama on Economic Crisis&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;27%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;A, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/august_2009/crosstabs_economic_blame_august_15_16_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, T&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="5" class="light_gray_background"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Select above: A = Article, V = Video, C = Crosstabs, T = Trends
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;TABLE width="100%" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" class="scoreboard"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;

&lt;TH valign="top" colspan="3"&gt;  &lt;P&gt;
Congressional Favorables
&lt;/P&gt;

  &lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Fav&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TH valign="top"&gt;  &lt;P&gt;
Unfav
&lt;/P&gt;

  &lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;TH valign="top"&gt;  &lt;P&gt;
Links
&lt;/P&gt;

  &lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Nancy Pelosi&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;35%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;57%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/most_recent_videos2/politics/voters_sure_obama_s_supreme_court_pick_won_t_be_too_conservative"&gt;V&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/july_2009/crosstabs_congressional_favs_july_24_25_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/congressional_favorable_ratings_trends"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Mitch McConnell&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;28%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;30%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/most_recent_videos2/politics/voters_sure_obama_s_supreme_court_pick_won_t_be_too_conservative"&gt;V&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/july_2009/crosstabs_congressional_favs_july_24_25_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/congressional_favorable_ratings_trends"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Harry Reid&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;26%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;48%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/most_recent_videos2/politics/voters_sure_obama_s_supreme_court_pick_won_t_be_too_conservative"&gt;V&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/july_2009/crosstabs_congressional_favs_july_24_25_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/congressional_favorable_ratings_trends"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="3" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;John Boehner&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;27%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;31%&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="top" class="halign_right"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/most_recent_videos2/politics/voters_sure_obama_s_supreme_court_pick_won_t_be_too_conservative"&gt;V&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/political_tracking_crosstabs/july_2009/crosstabs_congressional_favs_july_24_25_2009"&gt;C&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;A class="blue"  href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/premium_content/historical_data/congressional_favorable_ratings_trends"&gt;&lt;B&gt;T&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD valign="top" colspan="6" class="halign_left"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Select above: V = Video, C = Crosstabs, T = Trends&lt;/B&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.rasmussenreports.com/scoreboards/by_the_numbers2/by_the_numbers</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:13:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Lots of Money</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/6E0B1A01-D313-4D0B-AD28-6F1680A14795/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/Ilsadago1/"&gt;Ilsadago1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  If Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security by themselves, required $41 trillion to be put aside in 2008 (and it wasn't of course) where will the money come for a 'public option'?  These are UNFUNDED - meaning that the money comes directly out of your paychecks - not the general fund.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But if fewer people are working, more people are retired and living longer than ever and programs such as Medicaid are used by illegals - where will the money come from?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;THIS is why we need to fight the current bills being shoved down our throats.  THIS is why we can not be silent.  THIS is why we need to get tax and spend and spend and spend liberals out of Washington. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_public_debt&amp;oldid=309356729" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_public_debt&amp;oldid=309356729"&gt;en.wikipedia.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mw-headline"&gt;Unfunded obligations&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;these programs will significantly exceed tax revenues over the next 75 years&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Medicare Part A (hospital insurance) payouts already exceed program tax revenues &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Social Security payroll taxes fully cover payouts only until 2017&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;require funding from other tax sources or borrowing.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;present value&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;an estimated $41 trillion&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;would have to be set aside during 2008&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;pay for the unfunded commitments through 2082&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;$7 trillion relates to Social Security, while $34 trillion relates to Medicare and Medicaid.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;nearly five times as serious a funding challenge as Social Security&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Adding this to the national debt during September 2008 of nearly $10 trillion and other federal commitments brings the total obligations to nearly $53 trillion.&lt;SUP class="reference" id="cite_ref-52"&gt;&lt;A href="#cite_note-52"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[&lt;/SPAN&gt;53&lt;SPAN&gt;]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_public_debt&amp;oldid=309356729</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:08:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>