<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | AtlLiberal's clips</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/sort/newest-clips/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/sort/newest-clips/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Tradition or Atrocity?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D5C16095-D364-4B61-91D4-006FBBEC6058/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Isn't it time more people stepped up to condemn this practice? Should modern day knowledge not replace outdated tribal rituals? I have no idea how common place this practice is but I think most would find it injurious to the child.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/09/04/saudi-arabia-eight-year-old-girl-wants-divorce.htm" title="http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/09/04/saudi-arabia-eight-year-old-girl-wants-divorce.htm"&gt;atheism.about.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Saudi Arabia: Eight-Year-Old Girl Wants Divorce&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/AtlLiberal/512/FCBB71A5-2D29-42C3-90A4-FF11133A4F2B.jpg" alt="Iranian Women in Full Burqas" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;A girl as young as eight shouldn't even be married, never mind trying to get a divorce — and from a man who is fifty years older! It's only because traditionalist Islam continues to sanction the barbaric practice of marrying off prepubescent girls is this even an issue and that's only because Muslims believe that their prophet, Muhammad, married a girl of about the same age.

&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;This practice would probably be easier to stamp out if only it were permitted for Muslims to say "Not everything Muhammad did was right, and just because Muhammad did it doesn't mean we should today." That, however, is difficult in a religion that considers even visual depictions of Muhammad to be blasphemous, never mind criticism. It's good that most Muslims around the world reject marrying little girls, but it's only in spite of Islamic traditions.



&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/islam/" rel="tag"&gt;islam&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/child+bride/" rel="tag"&gt;child bride&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/saudi+arabia/" rel="tag"&gt;saudi arabia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/09/04/saudi-arabia-eight-year-old-girl-wants-divorce.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:12:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>It Beats Jesus on Toast!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/5D9BB470-A320-48F0-A748-877C79D8755C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I'm astounded too. Not by the "Allah meat" but by the gullibility of people. And they even found a vet who gave credence by claiming it "defied scientific explanation". As far as no explanation this shows an astounding lack of imagination. I'm no vet but can readily come with an explanation as could any rational person. But then, who ever claimed that the Allah beef followers were rational?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There is a name for this phenomenon: pareidolia:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;"The tendency to interpret a vague stimulus as something known to the viewer; such as interpreting marks on Mars as canals or seeing shapes in clouds."&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm off to McD now and fully expect to find a holy patty.  Ha! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7520149.stm" title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7520149.stm"&gt;news.bbc.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;
					'Allah meat' astounds Nigerians
				&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/AtlLiberal/512/A7ABF371-A441-432A-B30C-108AA72841BE.jpg" alt="The gristle spells 'Muhammad' in Arabic" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Diners have been flocking to a restaurant in northern Nigeria to see pieces of meat which the owner says are inscribed with the name of Allah.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;What looks like the Arabic word for God and the name of the prophet Muhammad were discovered in pieces of beef by a diner in Birnin Kebbi.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;He was about to eat it, when he suddenly noticed the words in the gristle, the restaurant owner said.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"When the writings were discovered there were some Islamic scholars who come and eat here and they all commented that it was a sign to show that Islam is the only true religion for mankind," he said.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thousands of people have already gone to the restaurant to see them since they were discovered last week.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;A vet told the newspaper the words "defied scientific explanation".
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;"Supposing only one piece of meat was found then it would be suspicious, but given the circumstances there is no explanation," Dr Yakubu Dominic said.

&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7520149.stm</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:34:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Palin a Good Christian Soldier</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DDDA4A10-BCD6-4D57-8E05-F0B1728C7B07/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Well, there goes her cred in the Arab street. But then, I never thought for a moment that the McCain/Palin ticket was focused on peace in the Middle East. Her proclamation of what amounted to a call for a Crusade just might fit perfectly with the bomb, bomb, bomb - Iran mentality of McCain.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;These are dangerous people. Unless you wish to keep squandering billions in revenue and wasting countless lives in needless wars they must be defeated in November. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/2/201858/4068/850/583919" title="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/2/201858/4068/850/583919"&gt;www.dailykos.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="diaryTitle"&gt;Palin: Soldiers on a task that is from God&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;As mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, Sarah Palin was asked to address the graduating class of commission students at a local church. As she spoke about her family, she mentioned Track, her 19 year old son, was to be deployed to Iraq shortly. All good so far. She continued:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;She urged students to pray “that our leaders -- that our national leaders -- are sending [soldiers] out on a task that is from God.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;She added, “That's what we have to make sure that we are praying for: that there is a plan and that that plan is God's plan.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;“I can do my job there in developing our natural resources, in doing things like getting the roads paved and making sure our troopers have their cop cars and their uniforms and their guns, and making sure our public schools are funded. But really that stuff doesn't do any good if the people of Alaska's hearts aren't right with God.”
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hypocrite/" rel="tag"&gt;hypocrite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/2/201858/4068/850/583919</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:05:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Off Limits? I Think Not</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4AD0A4C4-1348-494C-B609-0F878EA56B68/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Ordinarily a situiation such as the pregnancy of Sarah Palin's daughter would be off-limits but the Republican party has been the first to put it front and center as a political tool. The Holier than Anyone Right has used this to showcase how "special" their darling VP hopeful really is and the point has driven home at the RNC yesterday. That and the supposed non-political issue of McCain's POW status. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have the voters become so inured to the Republican machine that they are incapable of seeing through their deceptions and lies? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/Palin-and-the-Christian-Pe-by-Bruce-Allen-Morris-080902-253.html" title="http://www.opednews.com/articles/Palin-and-the-Christian-Pe-by-Bruce-Allen-Morris-080902-253.html"&gt;www.opednews.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Palin and the Christian Persecution Syndrome&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;            &lt;/SPAN&gt;The McCain camp explains that the pregnancy does not disqualify an otherwise highly qualified person.&lt;SPAN&gt;  &lt;/SPAN&gt;But Palin’s utter lack of qualifications and questionable record in office call this explanation into question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;            &lt;/SPAN&gt;I have been wondering amid all the evidence on Sarah Palin’s lack of qualifications, questionable dealings as governor, and her big-spending, sales-tax raising and debt-ridden mayoral tenure, why in the world the Rovian Republican machine picked her.&lt;SPAN&gt;  &lt;/SPAN&gt;Yes, I know she was selected to appeal to the hard core Christian dominionists and their somewhat less fanatical ilk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;That, however, does not explain signing off on a pregnant minor daughter in a candidate being sold on family values, abstinence only education and the principle of much of modern right-wing Christianity that parents are absolutely responsible for their children’s walks as Christians.&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republican/" rel="tag"&gt;republican&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hypocrite/" rel="tag"&gt;hypocrite&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/abortion/" rel="tag"&gt;abortion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.opednews.com/articles/Palin-and-the-Christian-Pe-by-Bruce-Allen-Morris-080902-253.html</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:57:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>USA minus Alaska</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/71BC86B3-8A0A-497B-94F1-2562F96629D5/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  If all you look at is Fox Noise or read is The Washington Times then you may have missed this tidbit. It stands as yet another example in a growing list of examples of poor choices that McCain has recently made. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/2/95340/25869/18/582717" title="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/2/95340/25869/18/582717"&gt;www.dailykos.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="diaryTitle"&gt;Recapping Palin's Secession Scandal&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you spent yesterday at a Labor Day picnic rather than at the computer, you missed the story that broke here regarding Sarah Palin's 1990s membership in the Alaskan Independence Party (AIP).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note I said &lt;EM&gt;Independence&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; Independent.  It's not just an "independent" party--it is a party whose explicit goal is to have a vote on Alaskan independence.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;As user &lt;STRONG&gt;Liz Arnett&lt;/STRONG&gt; first informed us yesterday morning, the AIP is a political party in Alaska whose motto is "Alaska First."  It's goal is to have a vote on Alaska's state status so that Alaskans may decide whether the state should secede, become a territory, become a commonwealth, or remain a state.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Yesterday night, it was is confirmed that Sarah Palin and her husband were members of the AIP at least in 1994. Indeed, Palin reportedly attended the AIP convention.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/mccain/" rel="tag"&gt;mccain&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/alaska/" rel="tag"&gt;alaska&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/2/95340/25869/18/582717</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:03:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>An Old Myth Investigated</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/D1E51043-2387-4658-9FA3-B85E88FA8C18/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  This clip is from a short piece explaining very well why, as Cline points out, freedom of and freedom from are two sides of the same coin. You can't have one without the other. Interested people might benefit from linking to the original and reading it in its entirety.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://atheism.about.com/od/churchstate/a/FreedomFrom.htm" title="http://atheism.about.com/od/churchstate/a/FreedomFrom.htm"&gt;atheism.about.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;What is Freedom From Religion?&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;Freedom of Religion Requires Freedom From Religion&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Conservatives insist that the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom from religion, and argue against strict separation of church and state. Too often, though, conservatives seem to have a flawed understanding of what freedom from religion really entails and fail to realize that freedom from religion is crucial to religious liberty in general.

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is evident that a person misunderstands the concept of freedom from religion when they say that promotion of the idea is part of an effort to eliminate religion from the public square, to secularize America, or to deny religious believers a voice in politics. None of this follows from a belief that people have a right to be free from religion.

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/constitution/" rel="tag"&gt;constitution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/government/" rel="tag"&gt;government&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://atheism.about.com/od/churchstate/a/FreedomFrom.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:49:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Palin's History Knowledgte</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/94B74E40-7EDE-47AE-8DDC-67995BB1AF2B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  For a subject that I'm sure she has a strong opinion about it's remarkable that she comes to that opinion without understanding the facts first. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yeah, she sure is ready to lead the country! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/palin-on-pledge-of-allegi_n_122965.html" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/palin-on-pledge-of-allegi_n_122965.html"&gt;www.huffingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
				    
	
	
	
		&lt;DIV class="light_box_modal" id="huff_modal_common"&gt;
			&lt;DIV class="light_box_modal_inner" id="huff_modal_common_inner"&gt;
				Please wait, your request is processed...
			&lt;/DIV&gt;
		&lt;/DIV&gt;
	





			&lt;DIV id="news_content" class="grid two_thirds flush_top"&gt;
				
				
				&lt;DIV id="news_entries"&gt;


				




					
					&lt;DIV id="entry_12345" class="entry"&gt;
						&lt;DIV class="col entry_right full"&gt;
							&lt;H1&gt;&lt;A id="title_permalink" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/palin-on-pledge-of-allegi_n_122965.html"&gt;Palin On Pledge Of Allegiance: "If It Was Good Enough For The Founding Fathers, It's Good Enough For Me"&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a 2006 &lt;A href="http://eagleforumalaska.blogspot.com/2006/07/2006-gubernatorial-candidate.html"&gt;questionnaire for Alaska's gubernatorial race&lt;/A&gt;, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin seemed to muddle her American history.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Are you offended by the phrase "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?
&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Palin&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The pledge, of course, was not written until 1892 and the words "under God" were not added until the 1950s. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/history/" rel="tag"&gt;history&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/prayer/" rel="tag"&gt;prayer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/palin-on-pledge-of-allegi_n_122965.html</clipSource><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:45:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>McCain's Desperate Move</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E1BEF484-6F2F-4583-A23D-160C89A7C93A/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  While it may be that all VP picks are politically motivated, the good choices usually are those that besides being politically advantageous are also beneficial to the nation. After the nation discovers who Sarah Palin is and what she believes I think that McCain will realize what a colossal blunder he has made. Or maybe not?? &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/08/30/palin/index.html" title="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/08/30/palin/index.html"&gt;www.salon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;McCain's Palin pick is the epitome of tokenism&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P id="deck"&gt;Suddenly all anyone needs to qualify as a potential commander in chief is to be a religious ideologue with female gender characteristics? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/AtlLiberal/512/F900F008-69CE-42ED-80AE-DD0BFE614B14.jpg" alt="Sen. John McCain and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aug. 30, 2008 |   It is hard to think of a more cynical and contemptuous political act this year than John McCain's selection of Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential running mate. Having served as governor of Alaska for less than two years -- and as mayor of a small town before that -- her qualifications for national office are minimal. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Palin is the epitome of tokenism, exactly what conservative Republicans have always claimed to scorn, until today, as the politics of quotas and political correctness.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;But if Palin's résumé is limited, to put it politely, she possesses the only two qualities that McCain now seems to consider essential: She is a right-wing religious ideologue with female gender characteristics.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/palin/" rel="tag"&gt;palin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/vp/" rel="tag"&gt;vp&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republican/" rel="tag"&gt;republican&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/08/30/palin/index.html</clipSource><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:12:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Are We Safer Now?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/302B6F18-A392-434B-A46A-5CBE204C3D0E/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I doubt if the public's safety was forefront in this misguided attempt to silence protest during the RNC. Partly because of hysterical paranoia of terrorists the powers that be have long used the pretense of protection to denigrate and undermine our most basic rights and freedoms. And do we stand up and raise our fists in anger over theses blatant stabs to our freedoms? Afraid not. It seems everyone just sits back in their easy chairs and watches as the powers that be wall off protesters to Orwellian "Protest Zones".&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, bad people want to do us harm. But a modicum of sanity should accompany our plans to provide a reasonable level of protection from these people. As it is now, this smacks more of politics than of legitimate protection. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/30arrests.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1220104985-Dcl+Tjoc3eipfJB8HL+HPQ&amp;oref=slogin" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/30arrests.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1220104985-Dcl+Tjoc3eipfJB8HL+HPQ&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;www.nytimes.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;NYT_HEADLINE type=" " version="1.0"&gt;
Dozens Detained Ahead of Convention
&lt;/NYT_HEADLINE&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;ST. PAUL, Minn. — On the weekend before the Republican National Convention, law enforcement agencies detained dozens of people and issued a series of search warrants aimed at groups believed to be organizing demonstrations while delegates and Republican officials are in town.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
On Friday night the Ramsey County sheriff's department, accompanied by the St. Paul police, detained people inside a building here that was being used as a headquarters to plan protests.
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
“They handcuffed all of us,” said Sonia Silbert, 28, from Washington. “They searched everyone.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Ms. Coffey said that the officers, citing fire violations as the reason for their visit, “detained over 50 people in an attempt to pre-empt planned protests.”
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;
The sheriff's department continued the sweeps on Saturday morning, executing warrants for three houses in Minneapolis and two in St. Paul, detaining more than 50 people and arresting 4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/convention/" rel="tag"&gt;convention&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/republican/" rel="tag"&gt;republican&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/30arrests.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1220104985-Dcl+Tjoc3eipfJB8HL+HPQ&amp;oref=slogin</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:42:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>We Just Don't Get It</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2FA799D9-3118-45C8-9BD3-B626D4E5CB5B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Yep! How could anyone escape the iron clad logic of presented here? Well, I'm sold. I've always said that if anyone could provide irrefutable evidence I'd convert in an instant. Hallelujah!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkhQLt1vbWU" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkhQLt1vbWU"&gt;www.youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The Atheist Delusion&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/parody/" rel="tag"&gt;parody&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/god/" rel="tag"&gt;god&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/humor/" rel="tag"&gt;humor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkhQLt1vbWU</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:17:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Pakistan Honor Killing</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A7C271C9-D896-465B-9EF3-F13C8B79F34F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Religion continues to wreck its havoc around the world. This time, under the guise of "tribal custom" the brutal murder of 5 women in Pakistan has come to the forefront. No longer can we accept the excuse that certain practices are custom or tradition. These acts of barbarity must be made public and soundly condemned. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/" title="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/"&gt;scienceblogs.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;A href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/08/our_tribal_custom.php" id="a086254"&gt;“Our tribal custom”&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Balochistan Senator Sardar Israrullah Zehri stunned the upper house on Friday when he defended the recent incident of burying alive three teenage girls and two women in his province, saying it was part of "&lt;B&gt;our tribal custom&lt;/B&gt;."

Senator Bibi Yasmin Shah of the PML-Q raised the issue citing a newspaper report that the girls, three of them aged between 16 and 18 years, had been buried alive a month ago for wishing to marry of their own will.

The barbaric incident took place in a remote village of Jafarabad district and a PPP minister and some other influential people were reported to have been involved. The report accused the provincial government of trying to hush up the issue.

Ms Shah said that the hapless girls and the women were first shot in the name of honour and then buried while they were alive. She also said that no criminal had been arrested so far.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/custom/" rel="tag"&gt;custom&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/tradition/" rel="tag"&gt;tradition&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/misogyny/" rel="tag"&gt;misogyny&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:01:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Too Far Right!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/BA55CB7D-3ED3-4BB1-858A-F333E7151CFF/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Your father raped you? Too bad. Global warming an issue? Poppycock. Teach creationism in science class? Sure, let the students decide.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Ultra right wing religious fanatics are salivating all over themselves over McSame's choice.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A Hillary replacement? Ha! Going to draw Hillary supporters away from Obama? In a pig's eye. Republicans must believe that women voters are all stupid idiots.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is McCain's judgment in action!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://airamerica.com/blog/2008/aug/29/sarah-palin-bad-women" title="http://airamerica.com/blog/2008/aug/29/sarah-palin-bad-women"&gt;airamerica.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2 class="title"&gt;
	    Sarah Palin is Bad for Women	  &lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;There can be no doubt that Palin’s selection is purely tactical — a decision based more on image and balance than on substance and qualifications. Palin’s youth, beauty, and distance from Washington were all chosen because they directly counter shortcomings of McCain. Her indisputable conservatism in areas where McCain has appeared moderate — abortion, the Second Amendment, drilling — as well as her “strength” in domestic issues, balances nicely with McCain’s flip-flopping war-focused campaign.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Quite frankly, conservatives have rewarded a woman politically for deciding to keep a baby and for sending her son to Iraq. For this reason, Palin’s selection is a great disservice to women — and further evidence of how truly destructive a Republican victory will be for American women.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://airamerica.com/blog/2008/aug/29/sarah-palin-bad-women</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:38:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hail Mary!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A0FC28EA-00F5-4561-8FC2-31BAA9D0FF15/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  By her social agenda alone she should scare the pants off any thinking voter. By her own words, an avowed Creationist, anti-science fundamentalist, and she denies global warming is man-made. I didn't know that GWB had a sister! &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/van-jones/palin-youre-no-hillary-cl_b_122479.html" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/van-jones/palin-youre-no-hillary-cl_b_122479.html"&gt;www.huffingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;&lt;A id="title_permalink" title="Permalink" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/van-jones/palin-youre-no-hillary-cl_b_122479.html"&gt;Palin: You're no Hillary Clinton&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;None of my pro-Hillary female friends are falling for this obvious GOP pander. To the contrary, McCain's selection of Sarah Palin as his VP is drawing hoots of derision.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once they learn that Sarah Palin opposes rape and incest exceptions for women seeking abortion, they completely write her off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;One female friend said: "Sarah Palin is to the movement for women's equality what Clarence Thomas is to civil rights. She's an extremist and an enemy to the cause that has been fought on her behalf.... Someone should stand up and say: 'I know Senator Clinton. Senator Clinton is a friend of mine. And Sarah Palin is no Hillary Rodham Clinton.'"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then she added, with a laugh, "The only thing he is going to let her do in the White House is teach him how to use the internet."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another said, "It just seems desperate and calculated."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politics/" rel="tag"&gt;politics&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/abortion/" rel="tag"&gt;abortion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/van-jones/palin-youre-no-hillary-cl_b_122479.html</clipSource><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:51:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Bit of Rationalism</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/22E30668-3BA4-4652-8315-0568EE6536D2/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  It's always positive to point out what is myth and what is reality. Often they are confused, especially by people who depend so much on myth. The attached clip offers a bit of sunshine to brighten up those dark corners of peoples brains. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://atheism.about.com/od/atheismasrebellion/a/AngryGod.htm" title="http://atheism.about.com/od/atheismasrebellion/a/AngryGod.htm"&gt;atheism.about.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Myth&lt;/B&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Atheists are angry at God because they think He should have done something for them in their pasts.&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;Response&lt;/B&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;
The idea that &lt;A href="http://atheism.about.com/od/atheismmyths/a/AtheistsAngry.htm"&gt;atheists are angry in general&lt;/A&gt; is itself already quite popular, but the myth that atheists are angry specifically at God for not having done what they want may be more popular. This combines the idea that atheists are angry, that they are prideful enough to think that they know better than God, and that they are rebelling against what God wants for the world. Atheists are thus attacked from a variety of convenient directions, except for the fact that the claim is all wrong.

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The most obvious reason why everyone should recognize that this myth is false is the simple fact that you can't be angry at God unless you believe that God exists. This means that anyone who is angry at God must be a theist, not an atheist — an atheist is a person who doesn't believe in any gods at all. Atheists therefore cannot be angry at any gods.

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/logic/" rel="tag"&gt;logic&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/rational/" rel="tag"&gt;rational&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://atheism.about.com/od/atheismasrebellion/a/AngryGod.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:37:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>God Did It</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4F80FAC4-43FE-46CB-8512-DE3AF9BDCF56/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Just as we often react negatively towards religious driven policy in the Muslim world we ignore the blatant religious pandering in the USA. It has become pro forma to invoke God's blessing on the US after all speeches. Little thought is given to the substantial segment of the population who doesn't subscribe to this viewpoint. A cynic might think all the public posturing is being done solely for votes. And they may not be too far off the mark. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/08/29/democrats-religious-pandering-doesnt-impress.htm" title="http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/08/29/democrats-religious-pandering-doesnt-impress.htm"&gt;atheism.about.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Democrats' Religious Pandering Doesn't Impress&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Recent efforts by Democrats to pander to religion and religious believers is offensive and immoral, but could it possibly be defended on the grounds that it at least works? In politics that which works tend to survive no matter how offensive or immoral it is, so this isn't an irrelevant question. Unfortunately for the apologists for pandering — and fortunately for the rest of us — all the efforts thus far appear to have been in vain.

&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Using religion as a surrogate for substantive political discussion is precisely what's going on when people start bringing religion into political debates&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;When a person says that God "wills" some policy, the only options left are to deny that it's what God really wills or to declare one's opposition to God.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I think this is often deliberate because invoking God is a handy way of avoiding the hard job of substantively defending a political agenda.

&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/politic/" rel="tag"&gt;politic&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hypocrisy/" rel="tag"&gt;hypocrisy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/christian/" rel="tag"&gt;christian&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/08/29/democrats-religious-pandering-doesnt-impress.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:25:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>