<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/style/rss/rss_feed.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Clipmarks | AtlLiberal's Comments</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/comments/</link><feedUrl>http://rss.clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/comments/</feedUrl><ttl>15</ttl><description>Clip, tag and save information that's important to you. Bookmarks save entire pages...Clipmarks save the specific content that matters to you!</description><language>en-us</language><item><title>Catholic Patriarchy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/515F6B15-A495-4074-94D2-47F10230676B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  If your reaction to this clip is a blase "who cares" then the odds predict that you have a penis. It's remarkable that after centuries this outmoded way of thinking still holds sway. And what's even more remarkable is that women are sometimes responsible in not more forcefully opposing this outdated dogma. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701" title="http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701"&gt;www.concordatwatch.eu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Women need secularism&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/AtlLiberal/512/B3AB61FF-B77D-4646-8BEB-D31862A84450.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;These &lt;A href="http://www.womensfund.sk/blade/s/120/fotogalerie.html?gal_id=9" target="_blank"&gt;proverbs&lt;/A&gt; from Slovakia show the &lt;I&gt;other&lt;/I&gt; side of "family values". This is the name of a whole system of control which can prevent a woman from leaving an abusive marriage and further cement her in place by burdening her with unplanned children. The control imposed by the Vatican disproportionately affects women. That's because the hierarchy of obedience which goes from the pope to the parish priest doesn't stop there: it continues on, from the head of the household down to his wife.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Women must be kept at home and bearing children for the Church. Ordaining them as priests would give them dangerous authority. On 29 May 2008 the Vatican issued a decree "&lt;A href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=12780" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;I&gt;Regarding the crime of attempting sacred ordination of a woman&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/A&gt;". This is such a grave offence that it incurs &lt;A href="http://www.reuters.com/article/email/idUSL2986418520080529" target="_blank"&gt;automatic excommunication&lt;/A&gt;, on a par with heresy, schism, and laying violent hands on the Pope. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dogma/" rel="tag"&gt;dogma&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/women/" rel="tag"&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:14:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Adopting Desert Nomad's Science</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/9B42C284-601A-4A9F-8443-41C1441375E9/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Christians who cling to the outdated belief that being gay is a sin are following the pre-scientific notions and social customs that were relevant 2000 years ago but are outdated and wrong today. Partly they adhere to these archaic beliefs because it gives them biblical authority to feel superior (if they are straight) and backs up their notion of persecution when others speak out against their homophobia. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.rrstar.com/opinions/columnists/x1822517617/Christians-should-speak-out-freely-against-homosexuality" title="http://www.rrstar.com/opinions/columnists/x1822517617/Christians-should-speak-out-freely-against-homosexuality"&gt;www.rrstar.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1 class="p5h"&gt;Christians should speak out freely against homosexuality&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;STRONG&gt;Speaking out&lt;/STRONG&gt; against same-sex unions can result in a variety of consequences for anyone who dares to do so in the workplace, consequences which can include being required to attend special re-education workshops on “diversity” that teach that people must put values or religious beliefs aside to observe a “higher” value of tolerance.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
So conservatives find themselves in a very precarious position regarding the issue of same-sex relationships. The issue is no longer just a political or a social issue; it’s a very personal one. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;STRONG&gt;How do&lt;/STRONG&gt; we tell them what we believe the Bible has to say about homosexuality? The same Bible that lumps homosexuality in with a variety of other sins is the same Bible that provides the answer to that question.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;As Christians, we have an obligation to others, and that is to be mirrors, mirrors that reflect Christ’s love and also his truth.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/christianity/" rel="tag"&gt;christianity&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/homosexuality/" rel="tag"&gt;homosexuality&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.rrstar.com/opinions/columnists/x1822517617/Christians-should-speak-out-freely-against-homosexuality</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:27:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Catholic Patriarchy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/515F6B15-A495-4074-94D2-47F10230676B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  If your reaction to this clip is a blase "who cares" then the odds predict that you have a penis. It's remarkable that after centuries this outmoded way of thinking still holds sway. And what's even more remarkable is that women are sometimes responsible in not more forcefully opposing this outdated dogma. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701" title="http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701"&gt;www.concordatwatch.eu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Women need secularism&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/AtlLiberal/512/B3AB61FF-B77D-4646-8BEB-D31862A84450.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;These &lt;A href="http://www.womensfund.sk/blade/s/120/fotogalerie.html?gal_id=9" target="_blank"&gt;proverbs&lt;/A&gt; from Slovakia show the &lt;I&gt;other&lt;/I&gt; side of "family values". This is the name of a whole system of control which can prevent a woman from leaving an abusive marriage and further cement her in place by burdening her with unplanned children. The control imposed by the Vatican disproportionately affects women. That's because the hierarchy of obedience which goes from the pope to the parish priest doesn't stop there: it continues on, from the head of the household down to his wife.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Women must be kept at home and bearing children for the Church. Ordaining them as priests would give them dangerous authority. On 29 May 2008 the Vatican issued a decree "&lt;A href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=12780" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;I&gt;Regarding the crime of attempting sacred ordination of a woman&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/A&gt;". This is such a grave offence that it incurs &lt;A href="http://www.reuters.com/article/email/idUSL2986418520080529" target="_blank"&gt;automatic excommunication&lt;/A&gt;, on a par with heresy, schism, and laying violent hands on the Pope. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dogma/" rel="tag"&gt;dogma&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/women/" rel="tag"&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:14:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Catholic Patriarchy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/515F6B15-A495-4074-94D2-47F10230676B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  If your reaction to this clip is a blase "who cares" then the odds predict that you have a penis. It's remarkable that after centuries this outmoded way of thinking still holds sway. And what's even more remarkable is that women are sometimes responsible in not more forcefully opposing this outdated dogma. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701" title="http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701"&gt;www.concordatwatch.eu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Women need secularism&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/AtlLiberal/512/B3AB61FF-B77D-4646-8BEB-D31862A84450.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;These &lt;A href="http://www.womensfund.sk/blade/s/120/fotogalerie.html?gal_id=9" target="_blank"&gt;proverbs&lt;/A&gt; from Slovakia show the &lt;I&gt;other&lt;/I&gt; side of "family values". This is the name of a whole system of control which can prevent a woman from leaving an abusive marriage and further cement her in place by burdening her with unplanned children. The control imposed by the Vatican disproportionately affects women. That's because the hierarchy of obedience which goes from the pope to the parish priest doesn't stop there: it continues on, from the head of the household down to his wife.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Women must be kept at home and bearing children for the Church. Ordaining them as priests would give them dangerous authority. On 29 May 2008 the Vatican issued a decree "&lt;A href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=12780" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;I&gt;Regarding the crime of attempting sacred ordination of a woman&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/A&gt;". This is such a grave offence that it incurs &lt;A href="http://www.reuters.com/article/email/idUSL2986418520080529" target="_blank"&gt;automatic excommunication&lt;/A&gt;, on a par with heresy, schism, and laying violent hands on the Pope. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dogma/" rel="tag"&gt;dogma&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/women/" rel="tag"&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:14:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Catholic Patriarchy</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/515F6B15-A495-4074-94D2-47F10230676B/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  If your reaction to this clip is a blase "who cares" then the odds predict that you have a penis. It's remarkable that after centuries this outmoded way of thinking still holds sway. And what's even more remarkable is that women are sometimes responsible in not more forcefully opposing this outdated dogma. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701" title="http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701"&gt;www.concordatwatch.eu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Women need secularism&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/AtlLiberal/512/B3AB61FF-B77D-4646-8BEB-D31862A84450.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;These &lt;A href="http://www.womensfund.sk/blade/s/120/fotogalerie.html?gal_id=9" target="_blank"&gt;proverbs&lt;/A&gt; from Slovakia show the &lt;I&gt;other&lt;/I&gt; side of "family values". This is the name of a whole system of control which can prevent a woman from leaving an abusive marriage and further cement her in place by burdening her with unplanned children. The control imposed by the Vatican disproportionately affects women. That's because the hierarchy of obedience which goes from the pope to the parish priest doesn't stop there: it continues on, from the head of the household down to his wife.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Women must be kept at home and bearing children for the Church. Ordaining them as priests would give them dangerous authority. On 29 May 2008 the Vatican issued a decree "&lt;A href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=12780" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;I&gt;Regarding the crime of attempting sacred ordination of a woman&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/A&gt;". This is such a grave offence that it incurs &lt;A href="http://www.reuters.com/article/email/idUSL2986418520080529" target="_blank"&gt;automatic excommunication&lt;/A&gt;, on a par with heresy, schism, and laying violent hands on the Pope. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/dogma/" rel="tag"&gt;dogma&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/women/" rel="tag"&gt;women&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.concordatwatch.eu/showsite.php?org_id=11701</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:14:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hypocrite in Charge</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DF47972D-EE45-4A94-BB62-8762B6E7CC4F/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I seriously suspect this man is insane. He lied about the Iraq mess, cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis plus our own service men and women, bankrupt his nation and stained American prestige at home and abroad. If anyone does not have the right to accuse anyone else of "bullying and intimidation" it's this man. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/15/bush-to-russia-stop-the-b_n_119116.html" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/15/bush-to-russia-stop-the-b_n_119116.html"&gt;www.huffingtonpost.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;&lt;A id="title_permalink" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/15/bush-to-russia-stop-the-b_n_119116.html"&gt;Bush To Russia: Stop The "Bullying And Intimidation"&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://clipmarks.com/image_cache/AtlLiberal/512/7B4C4A25-0514-4721-83CB-6FCC14990224.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;WASHINGTON — President Bush on Friday accused Russia of "bullying and intimidation" in its harsh military treatment of Georgia, saying the people in the former Soviet republic have chosen freedom and "we will not cast them aside."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Bush ratcheted up his rhetoric against Moscow as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pursued a diplomatic solution to the week-old crisis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Bullying and intimidation are not acceptable ways to conduct foreign policy in the 21st century," the president said. "Only Russia can decide whether it will now put itself back on the path of responsible nations or continue to pursue a policy that promises only confrontation and isolation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/bush/" rel="tag"&gt;bush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/hypocrite/" rel="tag"&gt;hypocrite&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/war/" rel="tag"&gt;war&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/russia/" rel="tag"&gt;russia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/15/bush-to-russia-stop-the-b_n_119116.html</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:25:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Boogey Man is Gonna Get Ya!</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/B8522EEA-E9B0-44DB-BD96-D1CE535655F7/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  According to the review of this new book it seems the author is rehashing the same old discounted arguments over what he dubs the "New Atheism". Using fear and misdirection it seems once again to be a weak attempt to defend the indefensible by a christian apologist. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.towersonline.net/story.php?grp=news&amp;id=543" title="http://www.towersonline.net/story.php?grp=news&amp;id=543"&gt;www.towersonline.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
	In “Atheism Remix: A Christian Confronts the New Atheism” (Crossway),  Mohler engages the central arguments of four contemporary atheists, whom he calls “The Four Horseman of the Atheist Apocalypse:” Oxford University scientist Richard Dawkins, Tufts University philosopher Daniel Dennett, author Sam Harris and  pundit Christopher Hitchens.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;
	Mohler, who serves as president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, chose Dawkins, Dennett, Harris and Hitchens because “they are four figures who have especially come to embody the New Atheist movement.” &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The new atheism is marked by:&lt;BR /&gt;
·	An unprecedented new boldness.&lt;BR /&gt;
·	A clear and specific rejection of the Christian God of the Bible.&lt;BR /&gt;
·	An explicit rejection of Jesus Christ.&lt;BR /&gt;
·	Arguments grounded in science.&lt;BR /&gt;
·	A refusal to tolerate even moderate and liberal forms of theism.&lt;BR /&gt;
·	An attack on the toleration of any form of religion.&lt;BR /&gt;
·	A questioning of the right of parents to instill religious beliefs in their children.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/christian/" rel="tag"&gt;christian&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/book/" rel="tag"&gt;book&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheist/" rel="tag"&gt;atheist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.towersonline.net/story.php?grp=news&amp;id=543</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:53:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Theistic Sanity</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2EF968C1-9F95-4BE6-9A2A-78219E9C1E99/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  It's not often that I agree with religious leaders but when I do it deserves to be pointed out. The point that Benedict makes of refuting the claim that evolution promotes atheism is of course correct. Although many, particularly in the States, believe otherwise. Unfortunately, the persons that fall into this category are also people that are the least informed on the subject. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://zanesvilletimesrecorder.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080808/OPINION03/808080338/1014/OPINION" title="http://zanesvilletimesrecorder.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080808/OPINION03/808080338/1014/OPINION"&gt;zanesvilletimesrecorder.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Subsidized atheism&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I marvel at writers who refer to "evolutionists and their precious little theory." After 150 years, the Theory of Evolution is one of the most broadly accepted theories in all of science. How can any so-called educated person characterize the teaching of biological evolution as taxpayer-subsidized atheism?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read below what an ultraconservative Christian spiritual leader has to say about this so-called controversy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Pope Benedict XVI, 24 July 2007&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;This antithesis is absurd because, on the one hand, there are so many scientific proofs in favour of evolution which appears to be a reality we can see and which enriches our knowledge of life and being as such. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now consider the lack of credibility of anyone who calls evolution atheistic. I doubt any sane person of whatever religious persuasion would call the pope an atheist. Does accepting the scientific theory (fact) that the earth travels around the sun and not the other way around make a person an atheist?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/creationism/" rel="tag"&gt;creationism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://zanesvilletimesrecorder.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080808/OPINION03/808080338/1014/OPINION</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:05:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Theistic Sanity</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/2EF968C1-9F95-4BE6-9A2A-78219E9C1E99/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  It's not often that I agree with religious leaders but when I do it deserves to be pointed out. The point that Benedict makes of refuting the claim that evolution promotes atheism is of course correct. Although many, particularly in the States, believe otherwise. Unfortunately, the persons that fall into this category are also people that are the least informed on the subject. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://zanesvilletimesrecorder.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080808/OPINION03/808080338/1014/OPINION" title="http://zanesvilletimesrecorder.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080808/OPINION03/808080338/1014/OPINION"&gt;zanesvilletimesrecorder.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Subsidized atheism&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I marvel at writers who refer to "evolutionists and their precious little theory." After 150 years, the Theory of Evolution is one of the most broadly accepted theories in all of science. How can any so-called educated person characterize the teaching of biological evolution as taxpayer-subsidized atheism?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read below what an ultraconservative Christian spiritual leader has to say about this so-called controversy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;Pope Benedict XVI, 24 July 2007&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;This antithesis is absurd because, on the one hand, there are so many scientific proofs in favour of evolution which appears to be a reality we can see and which enriches our knowledge of life and being as such. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now consider the lack of credibility of anyone who calls evolution atheistic. I doubt any sane person of whatever religious persuasion would call the pope an atheist. Does accepting the scientific theory (fact) that the earth travels around the sun and not the other way around make a person an atheist?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/creationism/" rel="tag"&gt;creationism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/evolution/" rel="tag"&gt;evolution&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheism/" rel="tag"&gt;atheism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://zanesvilletimesrecorder.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080808/OPINION03/808080338/1014/OPINION</clipSource><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:05:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Python Lovers Storm the Gates</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/3D25CCEA-121E-4EBC-AAF1-BE5B30E93C7C/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I'd have much more respect for the joker who wants to keep the ban on Python's film alive if he had actually seen it. Since that's not the case the wanker's simply bonkers. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/08/08/life-of-brian-still-banned.htm" title="http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/08/08/life-of-brian-still-banned.htm"&gt;atheism.about.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H1&gt;Life of Brian Still Banned&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faith-based censorship is an effective means of social control when a religion dominates a society, but in the West where religions have lost their political status it's just a waste of time. Apparently, though, it's a waste of time that makes at least some believers feel more important and respected because they won't stop. They still want to control the expression of ideas they disapprove of.

&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Case in point is the town of Aberystwyth where Monty Python's 1979 film &lt;I&gt;Life of Brian&lt;/I&gt; is still banned. They weren't the only place to ban the film in a fit of Christian censorship, but they may be the last one left — and the local vicar thinks that's just grand. He seems to believe strongly in censoring material he personally finds blasphemous and offensive.



&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;It's worth noting that Stuart Bell never actually gives an explanation for &lt;I&gt;why&lt;/I&gt; the film should be banned. He sort of explains why it offends him, though that explanation is weak since he hasn't seen it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/censorship/" rel="tag"&gt;censorship&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/python/" rel="tag"&gt;python&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/uk/" rel="tag"&gt;uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/08/08/life-of-brian-still-banned.htm</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:50:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Moving to the Right?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A1DA0394-2FFE-470D-B77E-50C794024793/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I understand this is arguably the most polarizing topic on peoples minds yet without productive conversation it will not be resolved.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/" title="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/"&gt;scienceblogs.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;A href="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2008/08/theocracy_in_action.php" id="a083446"&gt;Theocracy in action---HHS proposes to limit birth control&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I'm so angry I can barely type coherently.  I have very strong &lt;A href="http://whitecoatunderground.com/2007/08/20/i-am-pro-choice/"&gt;feelings about abortion&lt;/A&gt;, but I believe it is possible to respectfully disagree about the ethical issues involved.  I have an obstetrics colleague who does not perform abortions, but refers patients needing this service to others.  That's the ethical way for a doctor to oppose abortion---don't do it, don't  prosteletize, refer out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;All that being said, if you chose a profession that will, by its very nature create an insoluble ethical conundrum, you need to get a new job.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The Religious Right is trying to protect these types of "acts of conscience."  Traditional passive resistance in the model of Thoreau and King emphasized the breaking of unjust laws &lt;I&gt;and&lt;/I&gt; the acceptance of any punishment that goes with it.  The religious right in this country is not content with this model---they would prefer to allow for acts of conscience without consequences.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/abortion/" rel="tag"&gt;abortion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pharmacies/" rel="tag"&gt;pharmacies&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/legislation/" rel="tag"&gt;legislation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:20:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>PZ Myers vs Crackers</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DCCAC750-7125-4816-9112-8BE6EAA36B15/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The absurdity continues. After Myers threatened to desecrate a communal cracker the hit squad of the Catholic Church has been gearing up. Slide over to the main article for a humorous look at religious "logic". It truly is hilarious. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/" title="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/"&gt;scienceblogs.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;A href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/07/the_confraternity_of_catholic.php" id="a083266"&gt;The Confraternity of Catholic Clergy doesn't like me&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="lead"&gt;An organization of the &lt;A href="http://christiannewswire.com/news/517137313.html"&gt;Catholic leadership has now condemned my actions&lt;/A&gt;. This is sad news: it's clear that at least this tier of the Catholic hierarchy is as deranged as the wackaloons flooding my mailbox.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;We find the actions of University of Minnesota (Morris) Professor Paul Myers reprehensible, inexcusable, and unconstitutional. His flagrant display of irreverence by profaning a consecrated Host from a Catholic church goes beyond the limit of academic freedom and free speech. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmmm. Who is the Confraternity of Catholic Clergy to decide the limits of freedom? Flagrant irreverence towards a cracker ought to be fair game, I should think…and that's all this action was: irreverence. You cannot demand that all members of a pluralist society be reverent towards any random humdrum article that a guy in a dress declares holy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/catholic/" rel="tag"&gt;catholic&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheist/" rel="tag"&gt;atheist&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cracker/" rel="tag"&gt;cracker&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/myers/" rel="tag"&gt;myers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:47:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Fry on Not Needing Religion</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A6279360-2A15-41D8-B1F9-4E1D601F71EA/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  Succinct, intelligent comments about humanism. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q715ty5hLt4&amp;feature=related" title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q715ty5hLt4&amp;feature=related"&gt;www.youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Stephen Fry's beautiful comments on a world without God.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;[Video]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/philosophy/" rel="tag"&gt;philosophy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/humanism/" rel="tag"&gt;humanism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q715ty5hLt4&amp;feature=related</clipSource><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:07:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Moving to the Right?</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/A1DA0394-2FFE-470D-B77E-50C794024793/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  I understand this is arguably the most polarizing topic on peoples minds yet without productive conversation it will not be resolved.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/" title="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/"&gt;scienceblogs.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;A href="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2008/08/theocracy_in_action.php" id="a083446"&gt;Theocracy in action---HHS proposes to limit birth control&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;I'm so angry I can barely type coherently.  I have very strong &lt;A href="http://whitecoatunderground.com/2007/08/20/i-am-pro-choice/"&gt;feelings about abortion&lt;/A&gt;, but I believe it is possible to respectfully disagree about the ethical issues involved.  I have an obstetrics colleague who does not perform abortions, but refers patients needing this service to others.  That's the ethical way for a doctor to oppose abortion---don't do it, don't  prosteletize, refer out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;All that being said, if you chose a profession that will, by its very nature create an insoluble ethical conundrum, you need to get a new job.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;The Religious Right is trying to protect these types of "acts of conscience."  Traditional passive resistance in the model of Thoreau and King emphasized the breaking of unjust laws &lt;I&gt;and&lt;/I&gt; the acceptance of any punishment that goes with it.  The religious right in this country is not content with this model---they would prefer to allow for acts of conscience without consequences.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/abortion/" rel="tag"&gt;abortion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/pharmacies/" rel="tag"&gt;pharmacies&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/legislation/" rel="tag"&gt;legislation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:20:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>PZ Myers vs Crackers</title><link>http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DCCAC750-7125-4816-9112-8BE6EAA36B15/</link><description>&lt;b&gt;clipped by:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipper/AtlLiberal/"&gt;AtlLiberal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;clipper's remarks:&lt;/b&gt;  The absurdity continues. After Myers threatened to desecrate a communal cracker the hit squad of the Catholic Church has been gearing up. Slide over to the main article for a humorous look at religious "logic". It truly is hilarious. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div border="2" style="margin-top: 10px; border:#000000 1px solid;" width="90%"&gt;&lt;div style="background-color:"&gt;&lt;div align="center" width="100%" style="padding:4px;margin-bottom:4px;background-color:#666666;overflow:hidden;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;"&gt;Clip Source: &lt;a style="color:#FFFFFF;" href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/" title="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/"&gt;scienceblogs.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;A href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/07/the_confraternity_of_catholic.php" id="a083266"&gt;The Confraternity of Catholic Clergy doesn't like me&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P class="lead"&gt;An organization of the &lt;A href="http://christiannewswire.com/news/517137313.html"&gt;Catholic leadership has now condemned my actions&lt;/A&gt;. This is sad news: it's clear that at least this tier of the Catholic hierarchy is as deranged as the wackaloons flooding my mailbox.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;We find the actions of University of Minnesota (Morris) Professor Paul Myers reprehensible, inexcusable, and unconstitutional. His flagrant display of irreverence by profaning a consecrated Host from a Catholic church goes beyond the limit of academic freedom and free speech. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;hr size="2" color="#666666" /&gt;&lt;div style="padding: 10px;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align:left;"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmmm. Who is the Confraternity of Catholic Clergy to decide the limits of freedom? Flagrant irreverence towards a cracker ought to be fair game, I should think…and that's all this action was: irreverence. You cannot demand that all members of a pluralist society be reverent towards any random humdrum article that a guy in a dress declares holy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 40px;"&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/religion/" rel="tag"&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/catholic/" rel="tag"&gt;catholic&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/atheist/" rel="tag"&gt;atheist&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/cracker/" rel="tag"&gt;cracker&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://clipmarks.com/tags/myers/" rel="tag"&gt;myers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><clipSource>http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/</clipSource><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:47:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>